ChudTheBuilder may have started a movement to allow Whites to say n1gg3R with a Hard R in public with the approval of enlightened, freedom-respecting negroes. This goes far beyond simple free speech advocacy, it is something else... That was his cause, but that cannot be our cause. If Whites are given the N-word card, it’s negroes that ultimately win.

Remember, the ultimate goal of the negro race is to gain and maintain access to White people (and White DNA), which is a goal that is actually more important to them than any amount of “black pride ✊🏿” that they pretend to have. In truth, negroes privately hate being negro, and they hate most other negroes. While they won’t fully admit it to themselves, they typically only hate Whites out of envy. If a genie gave most of them one wish, secretly, it would be to become a White person.

Without a doubt, the smarter blacks will champion the idea of giving all Whites a permanent n-word pass if that is what it takes to maintain and increase access to Whites. They would give up their monopoly on the N word faster than you could say it.

That’s why I think negroes should keep the N word and not allow Whites to say it. It’s the ultimate (and a very necessary) reminder to Whites that negroes do not identify with them! Whites, as all other races, should fear crossing racial boundaries. Just like separation and segregation, racial boundaries are good, period.

Unfortunately, too many Whites still fantasize about black and brown people assimilating, blending into and mixing into White society, into a single people; no matter how brown, grotesque, miscegenated and dysfunctional the result. It strokes their pathological altruism and cultural-assimilationist dreams with warm fuzzy feelings; it feeds their utopianism.

But here, we know that savages cannot ever become civilized: they cannot be anything like us. No amount of N-word passes will ever change that. It will only serve the beguile the White masses into believe that they can be one with the N1gg3Rs.

The N-word pass is like that proverbial invitation to the BBQ in the hood. If you accept it, it’s more than the meat on your plate that’s getting seasoned—it’s potentially your entire gene pool.

If we’re all in agreement that the overwhelming majority of negroes are uncivilized, low IQ savages, why would you be frustrated that they react like animals to certain things, like a certain word? It’s like getting frustrated that certain breeds of dogs are more prone to unprovoked acts of violence. That’s how they are. You don’t bark at wild animals.

I used to get frustrated that Whites couldn’t say n1gg3R in public without being attacked and ostracized, and it bothered me to no end that the n-word taboo was part of this systematic double standard of “racial equality” that was imposed mainly on Whites. Whites are still expected to treat everyone equally regardless of race, despite all other races (especially blacks and Jews) maintaining racial boundaries (like the n-word) and enjoying racial in-group privileges (e.g. racial nepotism, ethnostates like Israel, etc…). What bothered me most about this was that it simply wasn’t fair. It objectively isn’t fair that other races get to be racist, have racial boundaries and exclusive associations, whereas Whites aren’t allowed to have any official racial boundaries whatsoever.

What I’ve come to realize was that this frustration ultimately comes from a position of a sort of “reluctant racism.” I think it’s a phase of the race pill, an early phase of White Nationalism. You see examples of this with the black fatigue meme. Many Whites are becoming racially aware simply out of frustration that other races have utterly failed to assimilate for far too long. They grew up believing and wishing that other races would one day fully assimilate to our culture and identifying with us as in some post-racial version of Western society.

But as your thinking advances, you come to realize that it’s a huge blessing that other races failed to assimilate, that they are physically and culturally repulsive, rude, aggressive, criminally inclined and so on — because it provides the initial shock that awakens Whites to the biological reality of race and racial identity, whereas they might otherwise be too content to notice or care.

I now see the N-word taboo as something the actually helps us quite a lot. “Of course we can’t use that word when blacks are around, because they don’t identify with us! Let that sink if you think race doesn’t matter.”

Good Morning Folks!!!

Thomas Sewell makes a final address responding to the government listing the White Australia Party as a "prohibited hate group".

He reveals ASIO advised the ban on the same day he registered the party with the Australian Electoral Commission - Anzac Day - and that he filed paperwork for a High Court challenge to the "hate groups" laws today.

"If our High Court injunction fails, then the fate of liberal democracy dies with the fate of White Australia"

Follow: @NoticerNews

We need to excise the words "I just want to be left alone" from the vocabulary of every white of the west who cares about the world their white children will grow up in.

Some people still don’t understand what I’m saying here.

What I’ve come to realize is that many White people aren’t naturally ethnocentric enough (at least not consciously) to understand that they need to play on team White. And they won’t understand that until other races make them understand that. Some Whites won’t see racial differences and embrace White Nationalism until they experience being excluded by other races or worse…

You either understand what I’m saying or you don’t.

To go back to the sports analogy, some White people just won’t understand that they need to play for team White until team negro steals their ball a couple times. If that doesn’t happen, they won’t open their eyes.

There’s little doubt in my mind that many of ChudTheBuilders biggest fans are blacks that want to give White people the N-word pass, in order to make White people feel more comfortable being around blacks.

Never underestimate the extreme lengths non-Whites are willing to go to gain access to White people and extract White DNA.

Toronto used to be cool. It used to be a vibe

““wHy aRe tHerE iNdiaNs In pOrTuGaL?!”

Because they are good slaves, you are not.

I hate essay-posting but allow me a rare indulgence:

To understand what is happening now, you need understand that this isn’t the first time it’s happened.

Why are there Indians in Kenya? Suriname? Fiji? Burma?

Because Indians have always been the preferred servile class of elites. The evidence for this goes back hundreds of years.

I’ve spoken about British colonial Burma before, and it is a great example of what this looks like.

Even after extensive efforts to bring them to heel, the majority of the Burmese ethnic groups were far too resistant to submit to the British empire to be reliable labor. They refused to abandon their culture and ways of life to be slave drones for British pocketbooks. So the Brits started importing Indians to be their colonial administrators, preferring them as labor because they were easier to control and satisfy.

By the 1940s, Indians made up almost 20% of the population of the entire country.

Another great historical example of this is Suriname - a small country in South America that had been under Dutch colonial rule for 300 years.

The Dutch abolished slavery in 1863, forcing colonial plantation owners to have to hire labor to do the work they had previously been using slaves for. But… they didn’t want to pay former slaves or Indigenous locals a living wage for the work.

So what did the Dutch elites do instead? Import Indians.

Today, Indians still make up 27% of the population. 27%. Of a tiny, obscure South American country.

We could basically go through the list of every country with a non-negligible Indian population and the theme would be consistent: They were brought there by elites who needed a submissive, easily exploitable labor pool when local labor asked for better living conditions or wages.

Why? Because Indians never did. They are a population that seems fully content with subjugation (even Marx noticed this).

So it’s easy to see why they were such an ideal population for the intensive global expansion era of colonial empires. And it’s even easier to see why they are perfect subjects for late capitalism now.

They are the culturally, psychologically, and physically ideal organism for the dominant system.

There’s 1.4 billion of them. They are deeply socially stratified and so expect and even enjoy inequality. Their cuisine is cheap, meat-free slop. They live amongst trash and filth with no qualms. They don’t care about the environment. Their reaction to death and abuse is blank-eyed indifference. They are physically and spiritually malleable. They not only adopt and internalize the demands of the dominant system as personal ambition, they believe this servitude makes them better than everyone else who hasn’t.

Absolutely IDEAL subjects.

You, on the other hand, are not the ideal subject.

You want to live in a high-trust society. You would shed tears if someone tried to cut down the apple tree you climbed as a child to build a data center. You want to see and experience beauty. You want your own space. You have an expectation that your living conditions will improve over time. You would not be content to live in a room with 10 other people, work 16 hours per day for pennies, and eat cheap slop.

You are a liability. Just like the Burmese and Surinamese slaves were.

And as we continue to crawl deeper into this late capitalist hellscape, you and your silly little needs will come into increasing conflict with those of the system.

Thus, you WILL be replaced by people far easier to control and far less concerned about their own welfare or the welfare of everyone and everything around them.

… Unless you do something about it. But the system has already locked-in that you won’t, and that you’ll just sort of fade into nothingness, distracted by meaningless comforts and terrified of the uncertainty of change.

So “why are Indians in [wherever]?”

Because you are about to not be.”

https://x.com/slatzism/status/2053955955508019269

👆This is why I think it’s futile (and even suicidal) for us to focus our efforts on trying appeal to the elites to try to win them over to our cause. The ruling class don’t want White people, they want Indians to replace them. They want absolutely obedient, mindless slaves.

It is only when the elites genuinely fear a racially aware host population that can take action against them, with lethal consequences, that they (the elites) will fall in line with Nationalism.

This ties into why some of the elites (Peter Thiel, Elon) are trying to influence and co-opt right wing politics, in order to insert and pervert certain ideas (authoritarianism, hierarchy, monarchy, anti-freedom) that facilitate a society where they become a ruling hereditary aristocracy that remove your rights, turn you into a subject, and exercise complete control over you. And we all know where that can lead: being replaced by Indians.

These ideas on the right promote the restoration of medieval institutions associated with feudalism, they have nothing to offer the White race, it’s just a one way road to techno-feudalism, and more Indians.

All these ideas are just a blank check for the elites to steam roll your rights and your race.

🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️- Ed Gallrein has defeated Representative Thomas Massie in the Kentucky 4th Congressional District primary in a major win for Israel and Trump.

This was the most expensive House primary in American history totaling close to $33 million in campaign spending alongside normal payments to zionist and pro Trump influencers.

All our enemies have is money, but they have a lot of it.

The next time we do a republic, we need an updated constitution that makes it illegal to mix money with politics.

With diversity, no form of government works except the worst, most brutal, abject totalitarianism — the kind where your society is an open air prison. Is that solution we want? Absolutely not. So the problem with our republic is not that it is a republic. The problem is the presence of non-White populations fucking it all up. The answer isn’t to do away with a republic, but to reestablish the White republic that the founding fathers established.

Getting rid of our republic because it doesn’t work when we have diversity is like getting rid of cities because our cities aren’t safe anymore, because of diversity.

The problem isn’t the system or form of government, it’s the non-Whites that are the problem.

The more you read about people in the past, especially Americans around the years leading up to the War for Independence, the more you'll realize that they actually weren't dramatically different from the heritage Americans alive today — they were just dealing with greater physical brutality. They didn't just revolt over a 2% tax (a popular lie); they were galvanized by the pigheaded brutality of the British Empire's heavy-handed policies and tactics. The oppressive establishment/elites we are dealing with today are much better at being subtle, cloak-and-dagger, and are less openly violent toward the population than the British Empire was.

That's why it seems like modern heritage Americans are more docile than their 18th-century ancestors, but that is a popular misunderstanding. It’s fake news.