Racism, the way I understand it, is to hate someone purely because of their skin colour/ancestral lineage. Which, I don't think any of us actually do. Genetic differences in race display themselves as often as they occur (which is all the time), and we're able to recognize it.

The problem is, normies can't separate one from the other, even if they themselves are often subconsciously "racist" in the same way that we are. This leads to a cognitive dissonance that they aren't equipped to deal with.

All this to say (sorry it was so long lol) I agree completely. "Racism" as a concept needs to disappear and should likely be replaced by 2 or 3 distinct words, all meaning different things. This way, people can still have a "big bad evil" to blame, but race realism and the recognition of genetic differences can be spared from sharing such a label.

An African YouTube channel conducted an independent IQ test in Lagos, Nigeria.

The average was 73.4, and the median was 69.7.

For the normies: If blacks have a lower average IQ in Africa and in every Western country they reside in, then the reason for that can only be genetic — it’s race and nothing else. No amount of education and nutrition can change the genetics.

It’s not just gas prices that will be going up due to this war with Iran. We can expect food prices to go up too.

All this, so that the Jews can use the US military to attack Iran.

Telling a “race blind” normie that race is biologically real sometimes feels like telling a tranny that biological sex is real and the natural basis for gender identity.

The level of delusion in both cases is equal, and so too is the potential for a violent reaction.

I think it’s important to get back to basics within this movement. All the infighting and politics has caused a lot of people to stop talking about race and stop debating people that deny the reality of race. I’m guilty of this myself.

We have to get back to promoting that race is real. That alone underpins every single issue, from the negro problem to Zionism and everything in between. Even the Second Amendment depends on this — people aren’t going to realize that guns aren’t the problem until they start seeing race differences; then they’ll see how different races have different rates of violence and criminality per capita.

Everything depends on people waking up to race realism! Every single fucking issue.

There’s still a very large percentage of Whites in every Western country that don’t understand how critically real biological race differences are. This is the problem we should ALL be focused on fixing.

As a big pro-2A guy that wants you to own guns and gear, get organized and train for SHTF; but I’ll say that anyone wishing for a civil war or some sort of mad max WROL kinetic shit-show is seriously crazy. That’s like wishing for home invaders to target your house so you can blow their heads off with your home defense gun. You really want that?

I think there is great potential for civil war on the horizon, and we should all be as prepared for that as possible, but to wish for it is peak insanity. I hope we have a peaceful path to victory, but I still doubt it.

People laughed at me when I talked about prepping and owning guns in the mid to late 2010s, and then we had the Covid lockdowns and BLM riots. After that, they weren’t laughing. But somehow people have a very short memory. I think it’s astonishingly naive to assume that the future is going to be safe and peaceful, and that the people that hate us will just give into reasonable arguments and leave us alone. People think things are really bad now… they have no idea.

If things get worse economically, I think that can really exacerbate the political tensions and hostility that already exist — a lot of people are fanatics and antifa-aligned. And this would further reduce the government’s ability to maintain public safety and deter violence, which is already abysmally low. Being doxxed could become a much more life threatening situation.

Remember how I was talking about anti-racists being like crazy religious fanatics that burnt heretics at the stake? In a scenario of reduced rule-of-law, I think they would be more willing to hunt “nazis.”

The internet has given White Nationalists a false sense of security, because they’ve taken over the public forums like Twitter. They think they’ve mostly won over public opinion enough to openly call themselves a “racist.” They forget that online spaces and echo chambers don’t reflect reality at all. There are people that are seemingly normies that will curb stomp you if they can label you a “racist.” It’s not just the blue haired freaks that are officially Antifa.

Anti-racism is a blood thirsty religion, with fanatics in every city and many towns. They absolutely want to hurt you.

If it were safe to publicly advocate for White well being, active clubs as we know it wouldn’t need to exist. It’s not safe, that’s why they train for fights and go out in numbers — because there are many normies out there that will harm you for being a “racist.”

Learn to throw hands so if some dindu says “you have five seconds to apologize” you can just knock him out while he’s waiting for his apology. He wasn’t asking for an apology, he was making a threat. If someone threatens you, you hit them first, before they’re ready to hit you.

Just as you have to train in martial arts, you also have to train your mind to hit them first once they cross a line.

https://t.me/DailyJapaneseThread/6364

I often wonder: to what extent do negroes find anti-racist shitlibs to be annoying and condescending? When anti-racists insist that negroes are different from Whites because of disparities in education, what’s unwittingly implied is that White-western culture is superior (which is true) and that blacks just need to assimilate into the superior White-western culture instead of acting ghetto and stupid. I don’t think the anti-racists realize that they’re making this argument that White-western culture is superior, but I sense the negroes instinctively find this sentiment to be offensive, “snowniggas sayin’ we need to act more White?!?”

If I were to take these anti-racists to task, they would never admit that White culture is superior, despite implying it when they argue that race differences are merely the result of disparities in education. But when negroes hear that from anti-racist shitlibs, they just instinctively know it’s some whacky bullshit being imposing up their own black culture.

So this whole idea that blacks will behave better (like White people) with more education is unwittingly a White supremacist position, despite being part of an anti-racist sentiment.

They’re unwittingly saying “we need to civilize the savages.” But as “racists” we all understand that you can’t civilize the savage negroes, because their race dictates their behavior.

TL;DR: The anti-racists, once they acknowledge that black culture is destructive and problematic, don’t have any solutions that aren’t (unwittingly) white supremacist.

It’s important to understand all of this when you’re debating with an anti-racist. You have to point out how they’re actually advocating for White supremacy by suggesting we ought to civilize the savages.

They may accuse you of so called “racism,” but you can turn it around by showing them how they’re also “racist.”

Part of the fallaciousness of the whole concept of “racism” is that it’s actually impossible to not be “racist.” Saying that someone is “racist” is like saying someone is a sinner — remember that anti-racism is a religion — but it’s actually more absurd than that. We can at least hypothetically imagine someone living a life without sin, but can you imagine someone living a life that is absolutely free of “racism”? It’s not really possible, because “racism” is such a nebulous, ambiguous concept that it is more all encompassing than the idea of sinning; because sins are specific things, whereas anything can be “racist.”

Ethno-masochism doesn’t count here, because being anti-white or anti-your-own race is a form of “racism.”

As I was alluding to earlier, anti-racists are hypocrites for accusing and berating others for being “racist” when they are also evidently (but unwittingly) quite “racist” and supremacist themselves.

And if everyone is “racist” then what even is a “racist” after all? They can’t reasonably get mad at you for something they are also VERY guilty of — assuming they aren’t completely insane zealots of the anti-racist cult.

The bottom line is that it is impossible for anyone to not be a “racist.”

The thing that I keep thinking about, that everyone should be thinking about everyday: anti-racism (aka racial equality) is a faith based religion. Everything about it, and the way its followers behave, it has all the markers of a religion!

And this should open up our thinking as to how to address the problem of this vile, criminally-insane religion.

This is from the rape festival in Nigeria.

"Outrage as several ladies suffer sexu@l molestation from men during what is being described as a “r@p!ng festival” in Ozoro,Delta state
Several ladies were sexu@lly molested by men who attacked them during what some have described as a ‘’r@ping festival’ in Ozoro, Delta state on Thursday, March 19.
According to reports, the community holds a festival in March every year in which ladies are barred from being seen in public and any lady who fails to remain indoors is molested by the men holding the festival. Videos shared online showed several young men running towards any lady they see on the road, ripping their clothes off and molesting them. It is alleged that some of the ladies were r@ped by the rampaging men.
Confirming the incident to LIB, spokesperson of the state police command, SP Bright Edafe, said the police has begun arresting some of the defaulting men. He mentioned that the command will soon release a statement on the incident."

Source: https://www.facebook.com/lindaikejiblogofficial/videos/outrage-as-several-ladies-suffer-sexul-molestation-from-men-during-what-is-being/967090699162222/