Imagine having this guy babysit your 1 year old child. 🤡

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62179

I get it, you think voting is gay. Yes, not everyone should get to vote. But here’s the thing: voting is supposed to be (as it was originally) a substitute for violence. If we live in civilizations in the future where there’s no voting, you won’t be happy if your leaders fail to do what you want. Civil wars would become more common and inevitable as people get angry, and maybe that’s a good thing.

A world without voting is a world with more wars, and maybe that’s a eugenic process.

Voting or no voting, the idea of being governed without consent is what I find to be repugnant and tyrannical; however that’s what we have now: we have this fake and perverted anti-democracy calling itself “democracy” and it’s so bad that now people hate democracy as a concept itself, and some even hate America too, as if the founding fathers had it completely wrong. I’m just not convinced they were entirely wrong, nor am I convinced that voting/democracy itself is where our people screwed up, there’s more nuance and small-hat factors to it all. We don’t have real democracy, we have foreigners voting and election fraud — voting isn’t the problem, the problem is that we don’t have a legitimate state that can be instantly held accountable and punished by our people exclusively.

Today in Jewish history

Ultimately I don’t think one should commit to some static one-size-fits all political -ism, you need an adaptive, dynamic system at different scales of focus.

It’s funnier when you see what happens immediately before this scene.

Untested vaccinations and now microchip implants, sounds like something you would only do to cattle.

Only nationalism and a strong, enduring, committed sense of nation that is intimately felt, can legitimize the concept and practice of things like democracy. It’s worthless without that. Only a well thought out, robust framework of nationalism can give voting any kind of value. And even then, the government should be as small as possible and broken down to local levels as much as possible.

Without nationalism, we can’t even have legitimate jury trials... another component of our Western system. The juries are composed of foreigners, those with no real blood or soil connection, no shared roots. For instance, Chauvin was put away by a jury of his enemies, not his peers.

Nationalism can have a small government or a large government, but I maintain that an effective and 1st-world-functional small government culture is only possible with nationalism.

Libertarianism itself needs nationalism. Not only nationalism, but White nationalism. Whites excel at self-government.

I read this post in a Telegram group and was impressed by how much insight is contained in so little text. Much food for thought.

"I guess such a person has value within a larger gene pool, they can specialize on a certain thing to a greater level. I even think the centre left gene would be selected for, such people may hate a patriarchal authority, may not be in anyway nationalistic, however their focus is on social issues within the tribe. I see some value for this, but such people are not meant to be running the show, if they somehow end up in charge, the tribes days are numbered. I see them as individuals who represent the little guy, while gaining status within the tribe, by being their representatives. Right wingers have evolved to listen to counter arguments with a open mind. The left have not, which tells me they have not evolved to be in charge, they are meant to negotiate from a position of weakness. The natural order is never allowing the left to gain much power. It must always be contained, and they will always push the boundaries. through trying to disarm you at first, with half truths, and violence later, as they have no off switch, because they are meant to be stopped."

They want you to eat bug burgers. Not a “conspiracy theory.”

Almost makes you wonder if blacks are attacking Asians so much because they know whites get blamed for it.

If this is the assessment of US intelligence agencies, you have to wonder what they're worth.

There is literally no data that could possibly be used to back this assessment up. At all. Zero.

As I have repeated ad nauseam over the last several weeks, in 2020 there were 16 deaths "related to" what the ADL characterizes as "domestic right wing extremists."

Some of those deaths were suicides, most of them were police shootings of apolitical criminals that had Nazi tattoos from being in prison. None of them were politically motivated murders or terror attacks.

As of 4 days ago there had been 147 mass shootings in the US in 2021. None of the shooters were motivated by a pro-White racial ideology.

One has to wonder then, why should agencies that put out an assessment like this not simply be abolished? They obviously don't serve any law enforcement or national security purpose.

https://news.sky.com/story/white-supremacist-groups-most-likely-to-carry-out-mass-casualty-attacks-in-us-12249310

They let it slip

They’re charging quite a lot for these compliance muzzles at the airport. What a racket.