Saying that democracy or liberalism (the original kind) was a mistake is tantamount to saying that high trust societies are a mistake.

None of these things are a mistake, they’re actually great. Democracy is for us by us.

The problem is all the diversity preventing us from being able to have any kind of system that works for us. The non-White presence drags us all down on a societal level, down to the political needs of the bone headed black and brown population: brutal, tyrannical authoritarianism.

When you give non-Whites individual rights and freedoms, you make a mockery of individual rights and freedoms. It’s for Whites people only, they invented the very idea of individual rights.

Even the idea of a high trust society, as a possible thing to strive for, seems absurd to people that have only ever known diversity or life within non-White society.

I can imagine some race-blind individuals thinking, retrospectively, that the high trust societies of the past were a complete mistake, because “Why wouldn’t you lock your doors or have a cash register behind bullet proof glass?”

“Shaking my damn head, White people society be way too ‘lax [with its rights and freedoms]” the negro says, and the brown person nods. They only see race when they feel ostracized or need to play the victim card. Subconsciously, the very idea of God given freedom and rights is an affront to their racial-ego, because “it just can’t be true that Whites are better, more responsible, more thoughtful and thus more deserving than us.”

In honour of St. George!

https://radicaldose.com/saint-george-thracian-demigod-become-christian-martyr/

Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. - Ben Franklin.

No matter what the orange toddler says or does.

https://youtu.be/sXKezDfoR3E

>Dodges the draft in South Africa
>Illegally immigrates to the US
>Uses climate change to grift unlimited subsidies for his failing businesses
>Relies on pajeet and other immigrant labor
>Impregnates as many women as possible without spending any time with his kids
>Does drugs
>Wants a microchip in your brain

Yup, he's lived right wing, traditional values his whole life.

BAP accounts used British colonial imagery to make JD Vance’s brown wife less jarring during the presidential campaign, and now they’re doing the same to downplay Trump’s appointment of a pajeet to a high-level government office.

Kash Patel is not an Indian servant boy who will be cutting your toenails and fetching you another cigar. He will be in charge of the FBI.

https://x.com/meingottniles/status/1857515752879710686

At 7

36 trillion dollars in debt and this is what it's being spent on

India and Pakistan is starting a love conflict. How can we help?

This is why I was saying that the right to keep and bear arms should be seen as a human right, but only for people within their own homeland obviously — people can’t expect to have any rights outside of their homeland.

https://t.me/hapaperspective/16619?comment=21475

“But, I don’t care about the right to keep and bear arms.”

Okay, then you cannot reasonably argue that these male military age third world migrants should go home and fight — because what would they fight with?

They have their argument for flooding your country, and it’s objectively stronger than your argument for them to “go back and fight.”

https://t.me/hapaperspective/16622

Again, I’m not arguing that migrants have any argument or right to enter our homelands; I’m simply saying it’s irrelevant to point out that most of them are military-age males “who should go back and fight” if we don’t believe that the right to keep and bear arms is a human right.

That’s my point: it’s nothing more than that.

Even if all of the male migrants were White males, large numbers of White male migrants would eventually be a problem, because a surplus of males creates a gender imbalance.

My point here is that the problem with mass migration isn’t just that it’s non-White, but also that it’s typically all military age males. If they show up in your homelands, they will fuck your women and take your jobs at the expense of you and your countrymen. It’s just a matter of numbers.

This goes back to seeing the right to keep and bear arms as a human right: you can’t credibly argue that the military-age-male aspect of mass migration is a problem unless you philosophically (and genuinely) support the idea that the right to keep and bear arms is a human right, and that all men have a human right to the means of resistance against a tyrannical government within their homeland.

It’s really just a matter of making sense and having philosophical credibility/consistency in your arguments against mass migration.