Russian "nationalists" who support the war in Ukraine complain that they are being banned from participating in elections.

Three conservative candidates have been systematically removed from the elections in Russia. One of them was sued by the head of the Uzbek diaspora, Ravshanbek Kurbanov, who is also a candidate from the ruling United Russia party. Ultimately, the court sided with the Uzbek migrant, and he succeeded in disqualifying the Russian conservative from participating in the elections in Russia.

Meanwhile, in a small town in the Moscow region, a muslim migrant and head of the Tajik diaspora quietly wins the elections. Everything is fine, this is the Ruzzian world.

honestly, i called it long before anyone on Twitter did. WNs saw this and really thought he was an “ally” lmfao

🔗 dimples (@thracianlily)

They're totally speedrunning the meme.

https://t.me/AltSkull48/16016

@AltSkull48

On September 12, 1683, one of the greatest cavalry charges in history took place at Kahlenberg Hill, overlooking Vienna, where Jan III Sobieski and his winged hussars saved Europe from Islam.

" Right-wing" Christians often find themselves being apologists for non white Christians and use this as a cudgle for " Christian only" migrants. Even at a surface level, that is tremendously short sighted idea, an idea no different than when liberals say arbitrary things such as " Irish values" which is absolutely akin to " Belgian Values" or " American Values". It's nebulous, just as religious identity is. Non white Christians will always advocate for more non white migrants, over being Christian.

This is why race has to be put first. At all times

Anastasia writes about the quintessentially European aesthetic of Bermuda shorts.

“Bermuda shorts became very popular, especially by those trying to intimate the aesthetic of having spent time on a tropical island. They were associated with going on vacation, piloting or owning a yacht and as such were considered a sign of wealth.”

https://radicaldose.com/the-bermuda-shorts-aesthetic/

Radical Dose

There’s a modern label for that, it’s called a communist dictatorship.

🤖 Caution: Hazard Detected

The robot knows.

@AltSkull48

I am currently visiting NYC so you don’t have to. The official verdict is that it’s just as bad as you’d think it is, potentially worse.

NYC, due to its cultural enrichment, is the home of everything that encompasses new America. The smell of raw-sewage, and the view of pride flags and blm materials, as well as rampant crime and Jewish architecture make NYC a prime destination for any leftist.

Essentially, NYC makes up the very essence of what Heritage America opposes; a safe, prosperous, and most above all White community.

NYC is enemy occupied territory

White living space is TINY. We need more. When we decolonized after world war two, non whites didn't honor our sovereignty in exchange. They flooded into our countries and tried to take over what little land we had to ourselves in Europe, Australia and North America, so we shouldn't honor theirs.

The arc of chuddery is long, but it bends towards serfdom.

Radical Dose proudly publishes a transcript of Gabriele Adinolfi’s recent speech at the Nation Europa conference in Lviv, Ukraine.

https://radicaldose.com/for-a-new-european-elite-nation-europa-conference-speech/

Radical Dose

it's still insane how crp is now treated as a martyr

See what I mean. His king could be anything, or do anything, and he’d obey. That’s objectively political cuckoldry.

“Wha.. What? You don’t support my heckin’ based ideal of absolute monarchy/dictatorship where we become serfs and obey everything the supreme leader mandates, no matter what, even if it goes against our own morals?

Bro, you must support liberal democracy or something.”

Since reopening my chat, I’ve noticed a recurring argument from some individuals, blaming our current situation on the very rights we hold. Their claim is that “our rights have led us here,” and thus, we need an absolute monarch or dictator with the power to strip those rights away.

Essentially, they believe that we—ordinary citizens—are to blame for the destruction of our countries, the unending influx of migrants, and the replacement of our populations.

“Your rights caused this! We ought to have a ruler that can take them away from you!” is their rationale.

Are we the people at fault? I think not. I beg to differ.

Blaming the Constitution (specifically the original Bill of Rights of 1791) for our current predicament in America is like blaming the Magna Carta (1215) or the English Bill of Rights from 1689 for the current state of Britain. It just doesn’t make any sense, and it ultimately just redirects blame onto White people that, in their time, could mostly take living in a White dominated country for granted. The idea of mass non-White migration into White society wasn’t really conceivable enough until the 20th century for anything resembling racial nationalism as we know it to take form.

It isn’t tenable to claim that the founders of our countries made huge mistakes, given how different the world was at the time.

"I feel very strongly that it is consistent with the second amendment and your right to own a gun to say that we need an assault weapons ban." -Kamala Harris

1. In no way is forcibly (government is force) banning the guns tens of millions of Americans own consistent with the 2nd Amendment which reads "shall not be infringed." Forcibly banning a category of weapons is the very definition of infringement.

2. Kamala has a law degree. She knows what words mean. She knows this is utter nonsense and an outright lie but she also knows a large portion of Americans are either not smart enough to understand this or are just not interested enough to care.

3. Name one time in history where the head of state removes lawfully owned firearms from the population and they're "the good guy" ⬇️🤔

#kamala #KamalaHarris #CivilRights