Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
Something that I’ve been thinking about lately: MAGA foreign policy has become Kissinger/Brzezinski foreign policy. Both Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinsky were “realists”, believing the USSR was too strong to be directly challenged, preferring instead to contain communism and favouring detente with the Communists (and achieving it in China). They fundamentally believed that the US and its Western allies were too weak to successfully stop the Soviets. They also to a certain degree wanted to perpetuate the diplomatic impasse that had existed in the world.
Ronald Reagan on the other hand detested this approach as cowardly and un-American and indeed, neither Kissinger (German Jew) nor Brzezinski (Pole raised in Canada) were Americans. Reagan hated strategies that relied on lose-lose scenarios, such as MAD and supported SDI in order to force a “we win, they lose” option. This made the Soviets fear him as a fanatic, but made him equally hated by the Western foreign policy establishments. Here was this plastic cowboy openly calling the evil Soviet empire an Evil Empire. Such things were simply not done! He would anger the Soviets. But then the Soviets turned out to be laughably weak and collapsed in the face of the Reagan era arms buildup and the Soviet Afghan War.
Now, of course, I’m not going to start worshipping Reagan any time soon, but if you were to poll MAGApedes on whom they identify with more, Reagan or Kissinger, I have a sneaking suspicion that most of them would answer Reagan. Yet the man’s policies were what they’d call “escalatory” or “warmongering” and the policies they propose align more with Kissinger’s or Brzezinski’s views. However, both Kissinger and Brzezinski would rightly be dismissed and rejected by MAGA as “globalists”.
Ronald Reagan on the other hand detested this approach as cowardly and un-American and indeed, neither Kissinger (German Jew) nor Brzezinski (Pole raised in Canada) were Americans. Reagan hated strategies that relied on lose-lose scenarios, such as MAD and supported SDI in order to force a “we win, they lose” option. This made the Soviets fear him as a fanatic, but made him equally hated by the Western foreign policy establishments. Here was this plastic cowboy openly calling the evil Soviet empire an Evil Empire. Such things were simply not done! He would anger the Soviets. But then the Soviets turned out to be laughably weak and collapsed in the face of the Reagan era arms buildup and the Soviet Afghan War.
Now, of course, I’m not going to start worshipping Reagan any time soon, but if you were to poll MAGApedes on whom they identify with more, Reagan or Kissinger, I have a sneaking suspicion that most of them would answer Reagan. Yet the man’s policies were what they’d call “escalatory” or “warmongering” and the policies they propose align more with Kissinger’s or Brzezinski’s views. However, both Kissinger and Brzezinski would rightly be dismissed and rejected by MAGA as “globalists”.
👍14👏3
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸 Gaige Grosskreutz, the man who was shot in the bicep after attacking Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was hit by a car in a hit-and-run incident.
Grosskreutz, who has since changed his name to "Paul Prediger" explains how he was dragged under the SUV.
"I went on top of the hood and then was dragged under and stuck underneath the vehicle for a good 20 feet," he said.
Grosskreutz suffered a lacerated liver and broke multiple bones according to a report.
📎 Collin Rugg
Grosskreutz, who has since changed his name to "Paul Prediger" explains how he was dragged under the SUV.
"I went on top of the hood and then was dragged under and stuck underneath the vehicle for a good 20 feet," he said.
Grosskreutz suffered a lacerated liver and broke multiple bones according to a report.
📎 Collin Rugg
😁21🆒4🤔1
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
🇺🇸 📝 Ultimately, Gaige was run over by the same demographic that he was supporting during the BLM riots of 2020.
Milwaukee police say 📸 Marvin Thomas admitted to being behind the wheel
https://www.wisn.com/article/police-make-arrest-in-brady-street-hit-and-run-milwaukee/45233830#
Milwaukee police say 📸 Marvin Thomas admitted to being behind the wheel
https://www.wisn.com/article/police-make-arrest-in-brady-street-hit-and-run-milwaukee/45233830#
😁14
It’s as if Gaige Grosskreutz is the real bad luck Brian.
Exhibit A: https://t.me/hapaperspective/11256
Exhibit B: https://t.me/hapaperspective/11257
Exhibit A: https://t.me/hapaperspective/11256
Exhibit B: https://t.me/hapaperspective/11257
😁10
Forwarded from Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
When reading the words of kings and conquerers throughout history, on the subject of leadership it’s typical to find advice on personal composure and conduct.
In politics, never retreat, never retract, never admit a mistake.
–Napoleon Bonaparte
The more you read and the more sources you read from, the more a general theme comes into view. Strength is what people admire and follow, not tentativeness or sobbing or apologising.
Australian parliament is the only institution in known history which consists of men claiming to be leaders, but who possess none of the standard leadership qualities. Actually, half the time they represent the opposite of what you would look for in a leader, they are petty, provisional and fragile.
But I suppose they’re only doing and saying exactly what their sponsors tell them to.
In politics, never retreat, never retract, never admit a mistake.
–Napoleon Bonaparte
The more you read and the more sources you read from, the more a general theme comes into view. Strength is what people admire and follow, not tentativeness or sobbing or apologising.
Australian parliament is the only institution in known history which consists of men claiming to be leaders, but who possess none of the standard leadership qualities. Actually, half the time they represent the opposite of what you would look for in a leader, they are petty, provisional and fragile.
But I suppose they’re only doing and saying exactly what their sponsors tell them to.
👍14
Forwarded from The Course of Empire (Uncensored)
They’re not really even hiding it anymore. https://t.me/disclosetv/12006
🤬1
I was really looking forward to trying Payday 3, but I’m glad I didn’t buy it right away, it has mostly negative reviews on Steam.
👍9
Forwarded from The Course of Empire (Uncensored)
And, unlike many of the recent winners in white majority nations, I’d say she likely deserved it. https://t.me/TraditionalBritainGroup/11493
Telegram
Traditional Britain Group
Africans explode at the idea of a White origin woman winning a beauty title in one of 'their' countries. Isn't this a win for diversity?
https://www.essence.com/news/white-woman-wins-miss-universe-zimbabwe/
https://www.essence.com/news/white-woman-wins-miss-universe-zimbabwe/
👍16
Forwarded from Et In Arcadia Ego (Alt Skull️)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
No passport, no boarding pass, facial scan biometrics now being used to travel on an airplane.
All the shit we said was coming because of covid is being implemented now.
@AltSkull48
@TheParanormiesPresent
All the shit we said was coming because of covid is being implemented now.
@AltSkull48
@TheParanormiesPresent
👍10🤬2
Gun control is one of those things that doesn’t work when you have diversity (the Sheriff of Philadelphia is a black woman) because the non-White population is less law abiding and non-White officials are often too incompetent or corrupt to even enforce the extra laws that a non-White society necessitates.
Gun control only “works” when you have a solid White majority with minimal diversity, but in White majority areas such laws are not needed at all, and in fact they’re quite detrimental.
It’s kind of like laws in general: they only work when a vast majority of the population is law abiding enough to abide by them and competent enough to enforce them (White people), but a law abiding population doesn’t need so many laws because individuals are more morally inclined to regulate their own behavior like good, responsible citizens; therefore they don’t need to live under an overbearing, authoritarian government that would be interested in something like gun control in the first place.
Gun control only “works” when you have a solid White majority with minimal diversity, but in White majority areas such laws are not needed at all, and in fact they’re quite detrimental.
It’s kind of like laws in general: they only work when a vast majority of the population is law abiding enough to abide by them and competent enough to enforce them (White people), but a law abiding population doesn’t need so many laws because individuals are more morally inclined to regulate their own behavior like good, responsible citizens; therefore they don’t need to live under an overbearing, authoritarian government that would be interested in something like gun control in the first place.
👏14👍3
Forwarded from The Course of Empire (Uncensored)
This explains why Canada has lower gun related crime than the US. It’s not because it’s a better country or has more effective gun control laws, it’s because it has few blacks. It’s mostly blacks, more so than even saying non-whites, blacks are far and away the worst offenders; Canada’s Chinese aren’t shooting people every day like American blacks are and that’s why gun crime is higher in the US. This has been pointed out by others, too. You take away the black impact on crime and suddenly gun crime is about the same as Canada’s crime rate. https://t.me/hapaperspective/11266
Telegram
HapaPerspective
Gun control is one of those things that doesn’t work when you have diversity (the Sheriff of Philadelphia is a black woman) because the non-White population is less law abiding and non-White officials are often too incompetent or corrupt to even enforce the…
👏13
Nix is streaming games again around 4pm EST, do me a favor and subscribe to his gaming channel.
https://t.me/nixjeelvy/5332
https://t.me/nixjeelvy/5332
Telegram
Nicholas R. Jeelvy
Tonight’s Writer’s Block has been derailed by pestilence and plague descending upon our esteemed guest, so we’ll be having another Gamer’s Block instead, once again exploring Grounded Commonwealth, American Krogan's mod for Fallout 4 which returns the game's…
👍5
I hope Ukraine wins the war, but average Americans are paying for this, we should get something in return.
https://t.me/AltSkull48/10842
https://t.me/AltSkull48/10842
Telegram
Alt Skull's Charnel House
Some would say US taxpayer money should be used to help US taxpayers…
@AltSkull48
@AltSkull48
🌚6👍3🤬1🍓1
Forwarded from Nicholas R. Jeelvy
“Kevin MacDonald is an interesting one because his books are very tame and academic yet he is treated like James Mason by even people who schizopost about TND.”
He lays down a scientific and non-schizo foundation for expelling Jews from western countries, insofar as we value our freedom and survival. That’s a lot more dangerous to the system than some retards or bad actors posting murder fantasies online.
Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique doesn’t merely document what the Jews have done, like the national socialists. He doesn’t come up with unfalsifiable claims of Jewish guilt from Christian sources like E. Michael Jones or the Churches. He doesn’t even focus on the Jews. The CoC series is merely the contrast used to illuminate his fundamental insights about white people in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. And that is a lot more dangerous than Siege or posting TND (no disrespect to James Mason intended).
He lays down a scientific and non-schizo foundation for expelling Jews from western countries, insofar as we value our freedom and survival. That’s a lot more dangerous to the system than some retards or bad actors posting murder fantasies online.
Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique doesn’t merely document what the Jews have done, like the national socialists. He doesn’t come up with unfalsifiable claims of Jewish guilt from Christian sources like E. Michael Jones or the Churches. He doesn’t even focus on the Jews. The CoC series is merely the contrast used to illuminate his fundamental insights about white people in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. And that is a lot more dangerous than Siege or posting TND (no disrespect to James Mason intended).
👏14