It's kind of odd, unless you already know all the same people who oversaw Oklahoma City Bombing, Waco, and Ruby Ridge are the exact same people running your government today.

It's just how they operate because the masses are stupid sheep.
@TheWesternChauvinist7

Well that didn’t take long.

https://thepostmillennial.com/hawaii-governor-says-state-is-looking-to-acquire-land-that-was-destroyed-in-fires

From firearms to wood burning stoves, they want it all. If you give an inch, the system will always take a mile.

Well, Trudeau is an Authoritarian. I assume most of his support comes from the French speaking parts of Canada, but I don’t really know.

https://t.me/thuletide/5635

When it comes to debates over what rights we should have, and ultimately our right to exist, it never ceases to amaze me how many gullible and naive people there are on the political right when it comes to giving an inch just because the other side made a “good point” that seems to appeal to the truth or “common sense.” The establishment-left understands that every single argument and idea has implications, like ripples in water, the door opens for other conclusions to be accepted as true; if you accept a “good point” from your enemy, it adds another nail in your coffin. The establishment understands the power of rhetorical victories and that it’s all a zero-sum game, and we must all get wise to this game. Lawyers also seem to understand this intuitively, and that’s why I think the nature of lawfare should be part of a standard education for our people.

I reposted this to try to make the context a bit clearer.

https://t.me/hapaperspective/10963

Just some friendly disagreement here, since I’m pretty sure Thuletide is responding to me.

Thuletide, what you’re saying sounds good in theory, but there are no “human rights” to be gotten rid of or ignored in the first place; It’s like saying we need sound fiat currency. As long as Whites don’t have “human rights,” there’s no “human rights” to begin with, it’s just something the establishment pretends is real to protect non-Whites. That’s why I think it’s more important to point out that it doesn’t even exist. I’m not saying we should advocate for real human rights, because it is often a zero-sum affair between races, but I think attacking “human rights” is a poljak (chudjak) frame that unwittingly gives the very concept of “human rights” more life and reality than it actually has. Remember, “human rights” do not exist.

Secondly, who can we trust to “clear them out”? Elon Musk and Trump? Authoritarianism clearly isn’t an option for us, unless we like being hoodwinked over and over again by the good-cop faction of the ruling class, which is the most likely outcome of “right wing authoritarianism” given what we’ve seen historically. I don’t trust the ruling class enough for any authoritarianism for the next 100 years.

I’m optimistic for the future in the long term, but in the short term i don’t believe we’re getting our guys into any positions of world power anytime soon.

https://t.me/thuletide/5636

Real human rights: making Whites a super majority in every single country they founded. That’s what I call human rights. Since that’s not what’s on the ruling class agenda, we don’t have human rights.

See how I’m framing this?

“Human rights must be ignored” is the same sort of frame as “billions must die.” If you’re gonna say the former, you might as well just say latter instead. There’s really no difference.

Or you could play to win by having a better frame, one that people can accept.

You think gun rights are stupid? You think having a good set of guns and the ability to train with them doesn’t matter? Are you training?

I’m seeing stories like these more often. Coming to a town near you: no police.

https://youtu.be/mqLk2F9QSvY

Who are the WEF, UN etc. fooling with these climate measures? Asia's surpassed all of the West 2 decades ago, and it's like everyone has forgotten that. They're not getting on board with scaling down in the name of "the planet", so we can stop pretending that climate quotas mean something (regardless of opinions on anthropogenic climate change).

https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/olugbenga.felix.ajiga/viz/CO2productionbyregionDashboards/Sheet2

Accurate. This has been a common complaint of the Anglos that the French Canadiens have been such a major detriments to Canada's political landscape. They have been consistently left leaning since the 1960s when the so-called Quiet Revolution transformed what had been a very conservative French cohort into a very liberal-left one. This is on top of the fact each have their on in-group preference (but, as is typical throughout the Anglosphere, the Anglos are far more accommodating; to their further detriment). If Quebec had actually separated, as it threatened to do (having two referendums on the matter in 1980 and 1995 respectively), Canada would be a much more right leaning nation than it is today.
As Justin Trudeau once said in an interview before he became prime minister, the government of Canada must be controlled by Quebecers; meaning the liberal French, and not the Anglos, especially not the more generally right wing Westerners. It would have been for the best if they separated, but also complicated (most of Quebec was only assigned to it by Ottawa well after Canada became a nation and the predominately "First Nation" tribes have no interest in staying with an independent Quebec nation). https://t.me/hapaperspective/10964

What it's like posting three words from the bible on Elon's free speech platform

Elon's TOS censors quotes from the bible as hate speech.

It looks like Argentina is going to become a much more based country. I don't know much about Javier Milei, but so far he looks like an interesting, promising leader for Argentina. Argentina is a country we should keep an eye on.

"Controversial Libertarian Deputy Javier Milei pledged to sell off all of the State's assets, legalize the free carrying of weapons, privatize the health system, impose cuts in pension expenses, eliminate the compulsory nature of sex education in schools, and restrict the entry of foreigners, among other ideas if he is elected President of Argentina."

https://en.mercopress.com/2023/05/18/javier-milei-s-presidential-platform-privatization-gun-rights-and-immigration-restrictions

I've had a few IRL friends from Argentina over the years, and they would all tell me that their country has had a history of economic turmoil, rolling black outs, and other third world nonsense, despite it being one of the Whitest countries in South America. Even if Javier Milei has some connections to Jewish power or the WEF (allegedly), I can't imagine that their country could get much worse from what I know about it. It makes sense that they would vote for someone with a radically different approach to government, and I doubt any of the other people running weren't also connected to Jewish power and the WEF.

It’s hard for people that weren’t around in the 70s and 80s to understand just how much Whiter places like California once were. America overall was so White, it was totally taken for granted, that’s why boomers didn’t give shit about race.

https://t.me/AmericanaAesthetics/1008

This is what they took from us.

"So, what does the Ukraine war have to do with us?"

Well, how do I put this... Western governments propped up the Russian empire against Napoleon and later against Germany. Jewish businessmen financed the USSR and built up its industry, with the Roosevelt administration later joining them. British intelligence subverted every German attempt to normalise relations with Poland, leading up to the unfortunate conflict between those two nations. They later pulled a similar stunt in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The US government saved the USSR from defeat in 1941 with its Lend-Lease programme. Churchill and Roosevelt later betrayed all of Eastern Europe at Yalta and just gave it to Stalin. The US government later incited the Hungarians to revolt against the Soviets, but stood by when the Soviet crushed the Hungarian resistance. The West likewise did nothing to support the Prague spring and Czechoslovakia's attempt to break out of the Warsaw Pact. Finally, the US and UK, along with Russia, made Ukraine give up its nuclear weapons in the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in return for security guarantees and respect for its sovereignty. That's even without getting into the Bush crime family's flirtations with Russia in the 2000s.

In summary, in the past two centuries, the West has built up a monster in Moscow, undermined Eastern Europe's ability to fight this monster, financed the monster, provided it with money, food, weapons and industry, allowed it market access, allowed it to absorb and subjugate Eastern Europe and now finally the monster has slipped its leash. I see this as less of a case of "please defend us" and more "come clean up your fucking mess."