Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
468 subscribers
65.8K photos
15 videos
157 files
132K links
Exploit
Pentesting
Hacking
Red Team
Blue Team
Kali Linux
Bug Bounty
Black Hat
Cyber security etc

@Hacking_Video
@Hacking_attack
Download Telegram
Dark Reading: Attacks/Breaches
Popular IoT Cameras Need Patching to Fend Off Catastrophic Attacks

Several models of EZVIZ cameras are open to total remote control by cyberattackers, and image exfiltration and decryption.
Dark Reading: Attacks/Breaches
5 Steps to Strengthening Cyber Resilience

Organizations are thinking about their cyber resilience. Here are five steps security teams should take.
All about: Open Redirects

Sites often use HTTP or URL parameters to redirect users to a specified URL without any user action. While this behavior can be useful, it…Continue reading on Medium »
Read more...
hacking: security in practice
is there any way to hack emails other than phishing?

until recently afaik you could hack Gmail accounts by brute forcing smtp ( I could be wrong I only read they fixed it in may 2022 ), and that got me wondering is there any way to hack emails other than phishing?

also ik that its illegal to hack even your own account so how can I legally try it out? ( if there is anything at all that can be done )

submitted by /u/Fuck_Life_421
[link] [comments]

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
hacking: security in practice
How do i get into hacking and programming?

Man, i'm 16 and i love tech and hacking shit, but i dunno how to hack or to program... I don't know where to read things about it, where to search, HOW to search, etc... Can you dudes help me?

submitted by /u/Chumaludo_Plays
[link] [comments]

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
hacking: security in practice
Hashcat: If one has the progress percent before a crash, can one restart at roughly that percent?

I was running hashcat on some digests and got to about 26%, saying Progress.........: 863477760/3313552704 (26.06%). Accidentally hit 'q' for quit right after hitting 's' for status.

Assuming hashcat runs through the same possibilities in the same order for a given command (no parallelism other than within the GPU), I should be able to skip to, say, 25% and continue, right? If so, how might one do this?

(I'm cracking legally acquired, publicly available hashes.)

submitted by /u/gnulynnux
[link] [comments]

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Looking for thoughts, advice, or known prior art of building an alternative to hooking: behavior baseline by predicting a limited subset of machine code's probable control flow in memory at runtime.
https://www.reddit.com/r/redteamsec/comments/xfeocn/looking_for_thoughts_advice_or_known_prior_art_of/

Hooking is pretty easy to beat. It's efficient, low overhead, but unreliable. It also results in very low resolution scrutiny of program behavior. I think I have an idea, not to replace hooking, but maybe add a more resilient redundant behavior analysis mechanism. Computational overhead is my primary concern, and also I'm unsure how often you can halt a process's normal execution flow to do this without noticeable performance impact. To be honest, I'm actually not even sure how, without implementing this in the kernel, you would, at some interval, redirect the instruction pointer to your analysis code (by force, not by hooking) and also protect it from attacker modification. But I think the idea itself is interesting enough to be discussion-worthy. I think the defender's best option to deal with higher end EDR evasion and obfuscation techniques is to analyze the control flow of the x86 machine code at run-time to build a baseline and detect when there's significant deviation. We know the control flow is unpredictable (https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/qopemf/i_attempted_to_diagram_everything_ive_learned/), but it should be fairly predictable outside of malicious activity and a few edge-cases (JIT compilation, like in a browser). So I propose this idea of, at a set interval, decode a limited number of instructions ahead of the current IP, disassemble them, and map that disassembly to a behavior baseline. Make sure the control flow matches the baseline - a baseline generated and extrapolated on and broadened by comparing analysis of the same process on hundreds or thousands of hosts in a network.. The next interval, test your last prediction; make sure the IP is within the predicted control flow range. If not, log an alert to a SIEM. Maybe it's a false positive, but the SIEM's logic or some SOAR solution can at least more carefully scrutinize the process / host, maybe treat any other alerts from that host with higher sensitivity. These baselines could also be used as signatures. An attacker might re-write the implementation of a PowerShell command to evade improving PS auditing apparatuses, for example. Or Python, or any other LOLBIN vector. Or they might just do some unhooking on the mechanisms that perform that auditing. This measure would potentially be resistant to those evasion vectors along with control flow obfuscation. You would either identify a baseline that matches some other known baseline (like a PowerShell command, or a Python interpreter) or worse, one that doesn't match any baseline. submitted by /u/Jonathan-Todd (https://www.reddit.com/user/Jonathan-Todd)
[link] (https://www.reddit.com/r/redteamsec/comments/xfeocn/looking_for_thoughts_advice_or_known_prior_art_of/) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/redteamsec/comments/xfeocn/looking_for_thoughts_advice_or_known_prior_art_of/)

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video