Hacking on Medium
National Safety Day — A Step Towards Safe Payments
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1920/1*3BBsZm-nWKZowo-x3hPA3w.png
Safety is the new keyword which is in the news these days. With revolution and development going hand in hand. The time has come when the…
Continue reading on Medium »
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
National Safety Day — A Step Towards Safe Payments
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1920/1*3BBsZm-nWKZowo-x3hPA3w.png
Safety is the new keyword which is in the news these days. With revolution and development going hand in hand. The time has come when the…
Continue reading on Medium »
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Medium
National Safety Day — A Step Towards Safe Payments
Safety is the new keyword which is in the news these days. With revolution and development going hand in hand. The time has come when the…
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
Photo
KitPloit - PenTest Tools!
Litefuzz - A Multi-Platform Fuzzer For Poking At Userland Binaries And Servers
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjy4PMTSmDGQkRvHUAKHJniNaTSQkwXGRcY0gXSh7HpHCTMKkuOiG3olP8_6fsSqe009iLaTcc_vIkF2YARc7c-EpnnpRSszEQJpfLnMT2godGIeFylIeGiBiuZSiB1BGpb_naqEnYoWQa5DE62p90_MBZ5dXstvU5kAhnRASsL9rEtxH2HBMp6Aapv=w586-h640 Litefuzz is meant to serve a purpose: fuzz and triage on all the major platforms, support both CLI/GUI apps, network clients and servers in order to find security-related bugs. It simplifies the process and makes it easy to discover security bugs in many different targets, across platforms, while just making a few honest trade-offs.
It isn't built for speed, scalability or meant to win any prizes in academia. It applies simple techniques at various angles to yield results. For console-based file fuzzing, you should probably just use AFL. It has superior performance, instrumention capabilities (and faster non-instrumented execs), scale and can make freakin' jpegs out of thin air. For networking fuzzing, the mutiny fuzzer also works well if you have PCAPs to replay and frizzer looks promising as well. But if you want to give this one a try, it can fuzz those kinds of targets across platforms with just a single tool.
./ and give your target... a lite fuzz.
completed (1000) iterations with (3) unique crashes and 127 dups >> check crashes/latex2rtf for more details">
This is a simple local target which AFL++ is perfectly capable of handling and just quickly given as an example. Litefuzz was designed to do much more in the way of network and GUI fuzzing which you'll see once you dive in. whyYes, another fuzzer and one that doesn't track all that well with the current trends and conventions. Trade-offs were made to address certain requirements. These requirements being a fuzzer that works by default on multiple platforms, fuzzes both local and network targets and is very easy to use. Not trying to convince anybody of anything, but let's provide some context. Some targets require a lot of effort to integrate fuzzers such as AFL into the build chain. This is not a problem as this fuzzer does not require instrumentation, sacraficing the precise coverage gained by instrumentation for ease and portability. AFL also doesn't support network fuzzing out of the box, and while there are projects based on it that do, they are far from straightforward to use and usually require more code modifications and harnesses to work (similar story with Libfuzzer). It doesn't do parallel fuzzing, nor support anything like the blazing speed improvments that persistent mode can provide, so it cannot scale anywhere close to what fuzzers with such capabilities. Again, this is not a state-of-the-art fuzzer. But it doesn't require source code, properly up a build or certain OS features. It can even fuzz some network client GUIs and interactive apps. It lives off the land in a lot of ways and many of the features such as mutators and minimization were just written from scratch.
It was designed to "just work" and effort has been put into automating the setup and installation for the few dependencies it needs. This fuzzer was written to serve a purpose, to provide value in a lot of different target scenarios and environm[...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Litefuzz - A Multi-Platform Fuzzer For Poking At Userland Binaries And Servers
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjy4PMTSmDGQkRvHUAKHJniNaTSQkwXGRcY0gXSh7HpHCTMKkuOiG3olP8_6fsSqe009iLaTcc_vIkF2YARc7c-EpnnpRSszEQJpfLnMT2godGIeFylIeGiBiuZSiB1BGpb_naqEnYoWQa5DE62p90_MBZ5dXstvU5kAhnRASsL9rEtxH2HBMp6Aapv=w586-h640 Litefuzz is meant to serve a purpose: fuzz and triage on all the major platforms, support both CLI/GUI apps, network clients and servers in order to find security-related bugs. It simplifies the process and makes it easy to discover security bugs in many different targets, across platforms, while just making a few honest trade-offs.
It isn't built for speed, scalability or meant to win any prizes in academia. It applies simple techniques at various angles to yield results. For console-based file fuzzing, you should probably just use AFL. It has superior performance, instrumention capabilities (and faster non-instrumented execs), scale and can make freakin' jpegs out of thin air. For networking fuzzing, the mutiny fuzzer also works well if you have PCAPs to replay and frizzer looks promising as well. But if you want to give this one a try, it can fuzz those kinds of targets across platforms with just a single tool.
./ and give your target... a lite fuzz.
completed (1000) iterations with (3) unique crashes and 127 dups >> check crashes/latex2rtf for more details">
$ sudo apt install latex2rtf
$ ./litefuzz.py -l -c "latex2rtf FUZZ" -i input/tex -o crashes/latex2rtf -n 1000 -z
--========================--
--======| litefuzz |======--
--========================--
[STATS]
run id: 3516
cmdline: latex2rtf FUZZ
crash dir: crashes/latex2rtf
input dir: input/tex
inputs: 1
iterations: 1000
mutator: random(mutators)
@ 1000/1000 (3 crashes, 127 duplicates, ~0:00:00 remaining)
[RESULTS]
> completed (1000) iterations with (3) unique crashes and 127 dups
>> check crashes/latex2rtf for more details This is a simple local target which AFL++ is perfectly capable of handling and just quickly given as an example. Litefuzz was designed to do much more in the way of network and GUI fuzzing which you'll see once you dive in. whyYes, another fuzzer and one that doesn't track all that well with the current trends and conventions. Trade-offs were made to address certain requirements. These requirements being a fuzzer that works by default on multiple platforms, fuzzes both local and network targets and is very easy to use. Not trying to convince anybody of anything, but let's provide some context. Some targets require a lot of effort to integrate fuzzers such as AFL into the build chain. This is not a problem as this fuzzer does not require instrumentation, sacraficing the precise coverage gained by instrumentation for ease and portability. AFL also doesn't support network fuzzing out of the box, and while there are projects based on it that do, they are far from straightforward to use and usually require more code modifications and harnesses to work (similar story with Libfuzzer). It doesn't do parallel fuzzing, nor support anything like the blazing speed improvments that persistent mode can provide, so it cannot scale anywhere close to what fuzzers with such capabilities. Again, this is not a state-of-the-art fuzzer. But it doesn't require source code, properly up a build or certain OS features. It can even fuzz some network client GUIs and interactive apps. It lives off the land in a lot of ways and many of the features such as mutators and minimization were just written from scratch.
It was designed to "just work" and effort has been put into automating the setup and installation for the few dependencies it needs. This fuzzer was written to serve a purpose, to provide value in a lot of different target scenarios and environm[...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
KitPloit - PenTest & Hacking Tools
Litefuzz - A Multi-Platform Fuzzer For Poking At Userland Binaries And Servers
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
KitPloit - PenTest Tools! Litefuzz - A Multi-Platform Fuzzer For Poking At Userland Binaries And Servers https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjy4PMTSmDGQkRvHUAKHJniNaTSQkwXGRcY0gXSh7HpHCTMKkuOiG3olP8_6fsSqe009iLaTcc_vIkF2YARc7c-EpnnpRSszEQJp…
ents and most importantly and for what all fuzzers should ultimately be judged on: the ability to find bugs. And it does find bugs. It doesn't presume there is target source code, so it can cover closed source software fairly well. It can run as part of automation with little modification, but is geared towards being fun to use for vulnerability researchers. It is however more helpful to think of it as a R&D project rather than a fully-fledged product. Also, there's no complicated setup w here it's slightly broken out of the box or needs more work to get it running on modern operating systems. It's been tested working on Ubuntu Linux 20.04, Mac OS 11 and Windows 10 and comes with fully functional scripts that do just about everything for you in order to setup a ready-to-fuzz environment.
Once the setup script completes, it only takes a few minutes to get started fuzzing a ton of different targets. how it worksLitefuzz supports three different modes: local, client and server. Local means targeting local binaries, which on Linux/Mac are launched via subprocess with automatic GDB and LLDB triage support respectively on crashes and via WinAppDbg on Windows. Crashes are written to a local crash directory and sorted by fault type, such as read/write AVs or SIGABRT/SIGSEGV along with the file hashes. All unique crashes are triaged as it fuzzes and this data along with target output (as available) is also captured and placed as artifacts in the same directory. It's also possible to replay crashes with
There are a few mutation functions written from scratch which mostly do random mutations with a random selection of inputs specified by the
It fuzzes as fast as the target can consume the data and exit, such as the case for most CLI applications or for as long as you've determined it needs before the local execution or network connection times out, which can be much slower. No fancy exec or kernel tricks here. But of course if you write a harness that parses input and exits quickly, covering a specific part of the target, that helps too. But at that point, if you can get that close to the target, you're probably better off using persistant mode or similar features that other fuzzers can offer.
In short... what it does* runs on linux, windows and mac and supports py2/py3
* fuzzes CLI/GUI binaries that read from files/stdin
* fuzzes network clients and servers, open source or proprietary, available to debug locally or remote
* diffs, mini[...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Once the setup script completes, it only takes a few minutes to get started fuzzing a ton of different targets. how it worksLitefuzz supports three different modes: local, client and server. Local means targeting local binaries, which on Linux/Mac are launched via subprocess with automatic GDB and LLDB triage support respectively on crashes and via WinAppDbg on Windows. Crashes are written to a local crash directory and sorted by fault type, such as read/write AVs or SIGABRT/SIGSEGV along with the file hashes. All unique crashes are triaged as it fuzzes and this data along with target output (as available) is also captured and placed as artifacts in the same directory. It's also possible to replay crashes with
--replayand providing the crashing file. In localclient mode, the input directory should contain a server greeting, response or otherwise data that a client would expect when connecting to a server. As of now only one "shot" is implementated for network fuz zing with no complex session support. The client is launched via command line and debugged the same as when file fuzzing. A listener is setup to support this scenario, yes its a slow and borderline manual labor but it works. If a crash is detected, it is replayed in gdb to get the triage details. In remoteclient mode, this works the same expect for no local debugging / crash triage. In local server mode, it's similar to local client mode and for remoteserver mode it just connects to a specified target and send mutated sample client data that the user specifies as inputs, but only a simple "can we still connect, if not then it probably crashed on the last one" triage is provided.There are a few mutation functions written from scratch which mostly do random mutations with a random selection of inputs specified by the
-iflag. For file fuzzing, just select local mode and pass it the target command line with FUZZ denoting where the app expects the filename to parse, eg. tcpdump -r FUZZalong with an input directory of "good files" to mutate. For network client fuzzing, it's similar to local fuzzing, but also provide connection specifics via -a. And if you want to fuzz servers, do server mode and provide a protocol://address:portjust like for clients.It fuzzes as fast as the target can consume the data and exit, such as the case for most CLI applications or for as long as you've determined it needs before the local execution or network connection times out, which can be much slower. No fancy exec or kernel tricks here. But of course if you write a harness that parses input and exits quickly, covering a specific part of the target, that helps too. But at that point, if you can get that close to the target, you're probably better off using persistant mode or similar features that other fuzzers can offer.
In short... what it does* runs on linux, windows and mac and supports py2/py3
* fuzzes CLI/GUI binaries that read from files/stdin
* fuzzes network clients and servers, open source or proprietary, available to debug locally or remote
* diffs, mini[...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
ents and most importantly and for what all fuzzers should ultimately be judged on: the ability to find bugs. And it does find bugs. It doesn't presume there is target source code, so it can cover closed source software fairly well. It can run as part of automation…
mization, replay, sorting and auto-triaging of crashes
* misc stuff like TLS support, golang binary fuzzing and some extras for Mac
* mutates input with various built-in mutators + pyradamsa (Linux) what it doesn't do* native instrumentation
* scale with concurrent jobs
* complex session fuzzing
* remote client and server monitoring (only basic checks eg. connect) supportPrimarily tested on Ubuntu Linux 20.04 (lightly tested on 21.04), Windows 10 and Mac OS 11. The fuzzer and setup scripts may work on slightly older or newer versions of these operating systems as well, but the majority of research, testing and development occurred in these environments. Python3 is supported and an effort was made to make the code compatiable with Python2 as well as it's necessary for fuzzing on Windows via WinAppDbg. Platform testing primarily occured on Intel-based hardware, but things seem to mostly work on Apple's M1 platform too (notable exceptions being on Linux the exploitable plugin for GDB probably isn't supported, nor is Pyradamsa). There are also setup scripts in setup/ to automate most or all of the tasks and depencency installation. It can generally fuzz native binaries on each platform, wh ich are often compiled in C/C++, but it also catch crashes for Golang binaries as well (experimental). python versionsPython3 is supported for Linux and Mac while Python2 is required for Windows.
Why Py3 for Linux and Mac? Pyautogui, Pyradamsa (Linux only), better socket support on Mac.
Why Py2 for Windows? Winappdbg requires Py2. linuxGDB for debugging and exploitable for crash triage. If it's OSS, you can build and instrument the target with sanitizers and such, otherwise there's some memory debuggers we can just load at runtime.
This installation along with the python dependencies and other helpful stuff has been automated with setup/linux.sh. Recommended OS is Ubuntu 20.04 as that is where the majority of testing occurred. macInstead of gdb, we use lldb for debugging on OS X as it's included with the XCode command line tools. Being an admin or in the developer group should let you use lldb, but this behavior may differ across environments and versions and you may need to run it with sudo privileges if all else fails.
The one thing you'll manually need to do is turn off SIP (in recovery, via cmd+R or use vmware fusion hacks). Otherwise, auto-triage will fail when fuzzing on Tim Apple's OS.
Almost all of the setup has been automated with the setup/mac.sh script, so you can just run it for a quick start. windowsWinAppDbg is used for debugging on Windows with the slight caveat that stdin fuzzing isn't supported.
Like the automated setups for the other operating systems, chocolatey helps to automate package installation on windows. Run setup/windows.bat in the litefuzz root directory as Administrator to automate the installations. It will install debugging tools and other dependencies to make things run smoothly. targetsThis is a list of the types of targets that have been tested and are generally supported.
*
Local CLI/GUI apps that parse file formats or stdin
* debug support
*
Local CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* debug support for CLIs
* limited debug support for GUIs
*
Local CLI network server that parses client requests
* debug support (caveat: must able to run as a standalone executable, otherwise can be treated as remote)
*
Local GUI network server that parses client requests
* theoretically supported, untested
*
Remote CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* no debug support
*
Remote CLI/GUI network server that parses client requests
* no debug support
* exception being on Mac and using
Again, the fuzzer can run on and support local apps, clients and servers on Linux, Mac and Windows and of course can fuzz remote stu[...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
* misc stuff like TLS support, golang binary fuzzing and some extras for Mac
* mutates input with various built-in mutators + pyradamsa (Linux) what it doesn't do* native instrumentation
* scale with concurrent jobs
* complex session fuzzing
* remote client and server monitoring (only basic checks eg. connect) supportPrimarily tested on Ubuntu Linux 20.04 (lightly tested on 21.04), Windows 10 and Mac OS 11. The fuzzer and setup scripts may work on slightly older or newer versions of these operating systems as well, but the majority of research, testing and development occurred in these environments. Python3 is supported and an effort was made to make the code compatiable with Python2 as well as it's necessary for fuzzing on Windows via WinAppDbg. Platform testing primarily occured on Intel-based hardware, but things seem to mostly work on Apple's M1 platform too (notable exceptions being on Linux the exploitable plugin for GDB probably isn't supported, nor is Pyradamsa). There are also setup scripts in setup/ to automate most or all of the tasks and depencency installation. It can generally fuzz native binaries on each platform, wh ich are often compiled in C/C++, but it also catch crashes for Golang binaries as well (experimental). python versionsPython3 is supported for Linux and Mac while Python2 is required for Windows.
Why Py3 for Linux and Mac? Pyautogui, Pyradamsa (Linux only), better socket support on Mac.
Why Py2 for Windows? Winappdbg requires Py2. linuxGDB for debugging and exploitable for crash triage. If it's OSS, you can build and instrument the target with sanitizers and such, otherwise there's some memory debuggers we can just load at runtime.
This installation along with the python dependencies and other helpful stuff has been automated with setup/linux.sh. Recommended OS is Ubuntu 20.04 as that is where the majority of testing occurred. macInstead of gdb, we use lldb for debugging on OS X as it's included with the XCode command line tools. Being an admin or in the developer group should let you use lldb, but this behavior may differ across environments and versions and you may need to run it with sudo privileges if all else fails.
The one thing you'll manually need to do is turn off SIP (in recovery, via cmd+R or use vmware fusion hacks). Otherwise, auto-triage will fail when fuzzing on Tim Apple's OS.
Almost all of the setup has been automated with the setup/mac.sh script, so you can just run it for a quick start. windowsWinAppDbg is used for debugging on Windows with the slight caveat that stdin fuzzing isn't supported.
Like the automated setups for the other operating systems, chocolatey helps to automate package installation on windows. Run setup/windows.bat in the litefuzz root directory as Administrator to automate the installations. It will install debugging tools and other dependencies to make things run smoothly. targetsThis is a list of the types of targets that have been tested and are generally supported.
*
Local CLI/GUI apps that parse file formats or stdin
* debug support
*
Local CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* debug support for CLIs
* limited debug support for GUIs
*
Local CLI network server that parses client requests
* debug support (caveat: must able to run as a standalone executable, otherwise can be treated as remote)
*
Local GUI network server that parses client requests
* theoretically supported, untested
*
Remote CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* no debug support
*
Remote CLI/GUI network server that parses client requests
* no debug support
* exception being on Mac and using
attachor reportcrashfeaturesAgain, the fuzzer can run on and support local apps, clients and servers on Linux, Mac and Windows and of course can fuzz remote stu[...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
mization, replay, sorting and auto-triaging of crashes * misc stuff like TLS support, golang binary fuzzing and some extras for Mac * mutates input with various built-in mutators + pyradamsa (Linux) what it doesn't do* native instrumentation * scale with concurrent…
ff independent of the target platform. triage*
Local CLI/GUI apps that parse file formats or stdin
* run app, catch signals, repro by running it again inside a debugger with the crasher
*
Local CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* run app, catch signals, repro by running it again inside a debugger with the crasher
*
Local GUI/CLI network server that parses client requests
* run app in debugger, catch signals, repro by running it again inside a debugger with the crasher
*
Remote CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* no visiblity, collect crashes from the remote side
* can manually write supporting scripts to aid in triage
*
Remote CLI/GUI network server that parses client requests
* no visiblity, collect crashes from the remote side
* can manually write supporting scripts to aid in triage
* exception on Mac are the
See INSTALL.md for details. testsunit testsThere are a few simple unit and functional tests to get some coverage for Litefuzz, but it is not meant to be complete.
* (a) null pointer dereference
* (b) divide-by-zero
* (c) heap overflow
* (d-gui) format string bug in a GUI
* (e) buffer overflow in client
* (f) buffer overflow in server
They are automatically built during setup and you can run them on the command line, in a debugger or use them to test as fuzzing targets. If running on Windows command line, check
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Local CLI/GUI apps that parse file formats or stdin
* run app, catch signals, repro by running it again inside a debugger with the crasher
*
Local CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* run app, catch signals, repro by running it again inside a debugger with the crasher
*
Local GUI/CLI network server that parses client requests
* run app in debugger, catch signals, repro by running it again inside a debugger with the crasher
*
Remote CLI/GUI network client that parses server responses
* no visiblity, collect crashes from the remote side
* can manually write supporting scripts to aid in triage
*
Remote CLI/GUI network server that parses client requests
* no visiblity, collect crashes from the remote side
* can manually write supporting scripts to aid in triage
* exception on Mac are the
attachand reportcrashoptions, which can be used to enable some triage capabilities getting startedMost of the setup across platforms has been automated with the scripts in the setup directory. Simply run those from the litefuzz root and it should save you a lot of time and help enable some of what's needed for automated deployments. It's useful to use a VM to setup a clean OS and fuzzing environment as among other things its snapshot capabilities come in handy.See INSTALL.md for details. testsunit testsThere are a few simple unit and functional tests to get some coverage for Litefuzz, but it is not meant to be complete.
py2> pytest
py3> python3 -m pytest This will run pytest for test_litefuzz.pyin the main directory and provide PASS/FAIL results once the test run is finished. crashing app testsA few examples of buggy apps for testing crash and triage capabilities on the different platforms can be found in the testfolder.* (a) null pointer dereference
* (b) divide-by-zero
* (c) heap overflow
* (d-gui) format string bug in a GUI
* (e) buffer overflow in client
* (f) buffer overflow in server
They are automatically built during setup and you can run them on the command line, in a debugger or use them to test as fuzzing targets. If running on Windows command line, check
Event Viewer -> Windows Logs -> Applicationto see crashes. optionsThere are a ton of different options and features to take advantage of various target scenarios. The following is a brief explanation and some examples to help understand how to use them. crash directory-olets you specify a crash directory other than the default, which is the crashes/ in the local path. One can use this to manage crash folders for several concurrent fuzzing runs for different apps at the same time. insulate mode-uinsulates the target application from the normal fuzzing process, eg. execs or sending packets over and over and checking for crashes. Instead, this mode was made for interactive client applications, eg. Postman where you can script inside the application to repeat connections for client fuzzing. The target is ran inside of a debugger, the fuzzer is paused to get the user time to click a few buttons or sets the target's config to make it run automatically, user resumes and now you are fuzzing interactive network clients. litefuzz -lk -c "/snap/postman/140/usr/share/Postman/_Postman" -i input/http_responses -a tcp://localhost:8080 -u -n 100000 -zInsulate mode + refresh can be used for interactive clients, eg. run FileZilla in a debugger, but keep hitting F5 to make it reconnect to the server for each new iteration. Also, fuzzing local CLI/GUI servers are only started and ran once inside a debugger to make the process a little more efficient. --keyalso allows you to send keys while fuzzing interactive targets, such as fuzzing FileZilla's parsing of FTP server responses by sending "refre[...]___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
hacking: security in practice
How does UDP Flood on webservers work?
I am very likely to have misunderstood something here, since I don't know much about web in general. But shouldn't a UDP flood only work if the victim ports, which receive the UDP traffic aren't blocking all udp data. Doesn't that mean UDP flood only works, when there's a port/service on that webservers, which allows UDP data like a videochat or sth. In conclusion: when there's a webserver that doesn't use UDP at all, isn't it immune to UDP flood attacks?
Probably a lot wrong here, so please go soft on me >~
submitted by /u/LarryTheSnobster
[link] [comments]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
How does UDP Flood on webservers work?
I am very likely to have misunderstood something here, since I don't know much about web in general. But shouldn't a UDP flood only work if the victim ports, which receive the UDP traffic aren't blocking all udp data. Doesn't that mean UDP flood only works, when there's a port/service on that webservers, which allows UDP data like a videochat or sth. In conclusion: when there's a webserver that doesn't use UDP at all, isn't it immune to UDP flood attacks?
Probably a lot wrong here, so please go soft on me >~
submitted by /u/LarryTheSnobster
[link] [comments]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
reddit
How does UDP Flood on webservers work?
I am very likely to have misunderstood something here, since I don't know much about web in general. But shouldn't a UDP flood only work if the...
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
Photo
Kali Linux Tutorials
Wifi-Framework : For Creating Proof-Of-Concepts, Automated Experiments, Test Suites, Fuzzers, And More…
Wifi-Framework is a framework to more easily perform Wi-Fi experiments. It can be used to create fuzzers, implement new attacks, create proof-of-concepts to test for vulnerabilities, automate experiments, implement test suites, and so on.
The main advantage of the framework is that it allows you to reuse Wi-Fi functionality of Linux to more easily implement attacks and/or tests. For instance, the framework can connect to (protected) Wi-Fi networks for you and can broadcast beacons for you when testing clients. In general, any Wi-Fi functionality of Linux can be reused to more quickly implement attacks/tests. The framework accomplishes this by executing test cases on top of the hostap user space daemon.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi27NzKEWwoQn_Wm7MQ2kEms5PkICD7q5ajoQtftXY4WudUUBqbIvkToXH9TUSLTEJDVa2ZNemv6bZYm6_OEzqw45lCfIZ3Bpt1qpyQDzzAvzRL-j0O9RSJlJTUuaUFuran8f5TQptPNUI5E2lyM_x3MV4dJTP73PYKkeRopUeYVQmMkPsJCPI-uLpF=s1000
If you are new to performing Wi-Fi experiments on Linux it is highly recommended to first read the libwifi Linux Tutorial. When you are implementing basic Wi-Fi attacks without the need to reuse Linux functionality, then the framework provides limited advantages and you can instead consider directly implementing attacks in Scapy and optionally use the libwifi library. Usage
To use the framework:
* Install it by running
* Read the usage tutorial. Example
Say you want to test whether a client ever encrypts frames using an all-zero key. This can happen during a key reinstallation attack. By using the framework you do not need to reimplement all functionality of an access point, but only need to write the following test case:
class ExampleKrackZerokey(Test):
name = “example-krack-zero-key”
kind = Test.Authenticator
def init(self):
super().init([
# Replay 4-Way Handshake Message 3/4.
Action( trigger=Trigger.Connected, action=Action.Function ),
# Receive all frames and search for one encrypted with an all-zero key.
Action( trigger=Trigger.NoTrigger, action=Action.Receive ),
# When we receive such a frame, we can terminate the test.
Action( trigger=Trigger.Received, action=Action.Terminate )
])
def resend(self, station):
# Resend 4-Way Handshake Message 3/4.
station.wpaspy_command(“RESEND_M3 ” + station.clientmac )
def receive(self, station, frame):
if frame[Dot11].addr2 != station.clientmac or not frame.haslayer(Dot11CCMP):
return False
# Check if CCMP-encrypted frame can be decrypted using an all-zero key
plaintext = decrypt_ccmp(frame.getlayer(Dot11), tk=b”\x00″*16)
if plaintext is None: return False
# We received a valid plaintext frame!
log(STATUS,’Client encrypted a frame with an all-zero key!’, color=”green”)
return True
The above test case will create an access point that clients can connect to. After the client connects, a new 3rd message in the 4-way handshake will be sent to the client. A vulnerable client will then start using an all-zero encryption key, which the test case automatically detects.
You can run the above test case using simulated Wi-Fi radios as follows:
./setup/setup-hwsim.sh 4
source setup/venv/bin/activate
./run.py wlan1 example-krack-zero-key
You can connect to the created access point to test it (network
./hostap.py wlan2
By changing the network configuration this AP can easily be configured to use WPA2 or WPA3 and/or can be configured to use enterprise authentication, without making any changes to the test case that we wrote! Additional benefits of using the framework in this example are:
* No need to manually broadcast beacons
* The authentication and association stage [...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Wifi-Framework : For Creating Proof-Of-Concepts, Automated Experiments, Test Suites, Fuzzers, And More…
Wifi-Framework is a framework to more easily perform Wi-Fi experiments. It can be used to create fuzzers, implement new attacks, create proof-of-concepts to test for vulnerabilities, automate experiments, implement test suites, and so on.
The main advantage of the framework is that it allows you to reuse Wi-Fi functionality of Linux to more easily implement attacks and/or tests. For instance, the framework can connect to (protected) Wi-Fi networks for you and can broadcast beacons for you when testing clients. In general, any Wi-Fi functionality of Linux can be reused to more quickly implement attacks/tests. The framework accomplishes this by executing test cases on top of the hostap user space daemon.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi27NzKEWwoQn_Wm7MQ2kEms5PkICD7q5ajoQtftXY4WudUUBqbIvkToXH9TUSLTEJDVa2ZNemv6bZYm6_OEzqw45lCfIZ3Bpt1qpyQDzzAvzRL-j0O9RSJlJTUuaUFuran8f5TQptPNUI5E2lyM_x3MV4dJTP73PYKkeRopUeYVQmMkPsJCPI-uLpF=s1000
If you are new to performing Wi-Fi experiments on Linux it is highly recommended to first read the libwifi Linux Tutorial. When you are implementing basic Wi-Fi attacks without the need to reuse Linux functionality, then the framework provides limited advantages and you can instead consider directly implementing attacks in Scapy and optionally use the libwifi library. Usage
To use the framework:
* Install it by running
./setup.sh. See setup to know what this script does.* Read the usage tutorial. Example
Say you want to test whether a client ever encrypts frames using an all-zero key. This can happen during a key reinstallation attack. By using the framework you do not need to reimplement all functionality of an access point, but only need to write the following test case:
class ExampleKrackZerokey(Test):
name = “example-krack-zero-key”
kind = Test.Authenticator
def init(self):
super().init([
# Replay 4-Way Handshake Message 3/4.
Action( trigger=Trigger.Connected, action=Action.Function ),
# Receive all frames and search for one encrypted with an all-zero key.
Action( trigger=Trigger.NoTrigger, action=Action.Receive ),
# When we receive such a frame, we can terminate the test.
Action( trigger=Trigger.Received, action=Action.Terminate )
])
def resend(self, station):
# Resend 4-Way Handshake Message 3/4.
station.wpaspy_command(“RESEND_M3 ” + station.clientmac )
def receive(self, station, frame):
if frame[Dot11].addr2 != station.clientmac or not frame.haslayer(Dot11CCMP):
return False
# Check if CCMP-encrypted frame can be decrypted using an all-zero key
plaintext = decrypt_ccmp(frame.getlayer(Dot11), tk=b”\x00″*16)
if plaintext is None: return False
# We received a valid plaintext frame!
log(STATUS,’Client encrypted a frame with an all-zero key!’, color=”green”)
return True
The above test case will create an access point that clients can connect to. After the client connects, a new 3rd message in the 4-way handshake will be sent to the client. A vulnerable client will then start using an all-zero encryption key, which the test case automatically detects.
You can run the above test case using simulated Wi-Fi radios as follows:
./setup/setup-hwsim.sh 4
source setup/venv/bin/activate
./run.py wlan1 example-krack-zero-key
You can connect to the created access point to test it (network
testnetworkwith password passphrase):./hostap.py wlan2
By changing the network configuration this AP can easily be configured to use WPA2 or WPA3 and/or can be configured to use enterprise authentication, without making any changes to the test case that we wrote! Additional benefits of using the framework in this example are:
* No need to manually broadcast beacons
* The authentication and association stage [...]
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Kali Linux Tutorials
Wifi-Framework : For Creating Proof-Of-Concepts, Automated Experiments
Wifi-Framework is a framework to more easily perform Wi-Fi experiments. It can be used to create fuzzers, implement new attacks.
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
Kali Linux Tutorials Wifi-Framework : For Creating Proof-Of-Concepts, Automated Experiments, Test Suites, Fuzzers, And More… Wifi-Framework is a framework to more easily perform Wi-Fi experiments. It can be used to create fuzzers, implement new attacks, create…
is handled by the framework
* The WPA2 and/or WPA3 handshake is handled by the framework
* Injected packets will be automatically retransmitted by the Linux kernel
* Packets sent towards the AP will be acknowledged
* Sleep mode of the client is automatically handled by the kernel
* … Download
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
* The WPA2 and/or WPA3 handshake is handled by the framework
* Injected packets will be automatically retransmitted by the Linux kernel
* Packets sent towards the AP will be acknowledged
* Sleep mode of the client is automatically handled by the kernel
* … Download
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Weakly Typed SQL Injection
Programming languages come in two categories: Hard/Strong Typed Soft/Weak TypedContinue reading on Medium »
Read more...
Programming languages come in two categories: Hard/Strong Typed Soft/Weak TypedContinue reading on Medium »
Read more...
Programming languages come in two categories:
Hard/Strong Typed
Soft/Weak TypedContinue reading on Medium » (https://hogarth45.medium.com/weakly-typed-sql-injection-f43a158a7daa?source=rss------bug_bounty-5)
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Hard/Strong Typed
Soft/Weak TypedContinue reading on Medium » (https://hogarth45.medium.com/weakly-typed-sql-injection-f43a158a7daa?source=rss------bug_bounty-5)
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Medium
Weakly Typed SQL Injection
Programming languages come in two categories: Hard/Strong Typed Soft/Weak Typed
Weakly Typed SQL Injection
Programming languages come in two categories: Hard/Strong Typed Soft/Weak TypedContinue reading on Medium »
Read more...
Programming languages come in two categories: Hard/Strong Typed Soft/Weak TypedContinue reading on Medium »
Read more...
Exploit Collector
Polkit pkexec Local Privilege Escalation
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Polkit pkexec Local Privilege Escalation
___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Kitploit
Polkit pkexec Local Privilege Escalation
Exploit Collector is the ultimate collection of public exploits and exploitable vulnerabilities. Remote/Local Exploits, Shellcode and 0days.