Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
471 subscribers
65.9K photos
15 videos
157 files
132K links
Exploit
Pentesting
Hacking
Red Team
Blue Team
Kali Linux
Bug Bounty
Black Hat
Cyber security etc

@Hacking_Video
@Hacking_attack
Download Telegram
hacking: security in practice
Using operators in js to exec code

Can somebody give me a good explanation (searched for it online but couldn’t find an exaustive answer) of why you can use let’s say the “-“ operand to execute code? (“-alert()-“). Is it possible to use it everywhere?

submitted by /u/Bongioo
[link] [comments]

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Dark Reading: Attacks/Breaches
GitHub Opens Security Database to Community Contributions

The Microsoft company will allow community members to add information and code samples to security advisories using the standard pull request to change the document.
HSTS false positive findings in Burp Pro?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Pentesting/comments/sz6wq9/hsts_false_positive_findings_in_burp_pro/

I notice that Burp keep showing low finding "Strict transport security not enforced" when "strict-transport-security" not found in the HTTP header which is the right thing to do. https://portswigger.net/kb/issues/01000300_strict-transport-security-not-enforced Example of good HSTS configuration $ curl -sI https://owasp.org HTTP/2 200 content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains However, Burp also show similar finding when the site is redirecting (302) to different page and there is no HSTS in the landing page e.g. $ curl -sI https://127.0.0.1 HTTP/1.1 302 Found Cache-Control: private Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Location: https://127.0.0.1/otherPage.php But then when checked the redirected page, HSTS is there $ curl -sI https://127.0.0.1/otherPage.php HTTP/1.1 302 Found Cache-Control: private Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 ... Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains Is this considered as false positive? submitted by /u/w0lfcat (https://www.reddit.com/user/w0lfcat)
[link] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Pentesting/comments/sz6wq9/hsts_false_positive_findings_in_burp_pro/) [comments] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Pentesting/comments/sz6wq9/hsts_false_positive_findings_in_burp_pro/)

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video
Hacking Articles Tips Tricks Videos Tutorials
Photo
hacking: security in practice
HSTS false positive findings in Burp Pro?

I notice that Burp keep showing low finding "Strict transport security not enforced" when "strict-transport-security" not found in the HTTP header which is the right thing to do.

https://portswigger.net/kb/issues/01000300_strict-transport-security-not-enforced

Example of good HSTS configuration
$ curl -sI https://owasp.org HTTP/2 200 content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
However, Burp also show similar finding when the site is redirecting (302) to different page and there is no HSTS in the landing page

e.g. (no HSTS here)
$ curl -sI https://127.0.0.1 HTTP/1.1 302 Found Cache-Control: private Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Location: https://127.0.0.1/otherPage.php
But then when checked the redirected page, HSTS is there
$ curl -sI https://127.0.0.1/otherPage.php HTTP/1.1 302 Found Cache-Control: private Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 ... Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
My questions:

1. Is this considered as false positive?
2. Is HSTS flag required in every single HTTP response?

submitted by /u/w0lfcat
[link] [comments]

___________________________
@hacking_Attack
@Hacking_Video