New data from Denmark shows that boostered people have the highest risk to end up in the hospital.

The Danish dashboard (see link below) also shows detailed information concerning the age groups. I can only keep re-emphasising that I consider vaccinating children and healthy adults against this common cold virus is a severe crime, because...

👉🏼 the vaxx neither prevents transmission nor severe courses of the disease
👉🏼 the list of side effects is huge
👉🏼 there is a high rate of underreporting of adverse effects
👉🏼 long-term damages are still unknown

Link to the Danish dashboard: https://bit.ly/3IV6hHJ

Cheers,
Dr. Simon

Have a good day. 🙃

2020: DeAdLy pAnDeMiC!
2021: tHe vAcCiNe iS gOiNg tO sAfE uS aLL.

Oh wait...

Cheers,
@Goddek

P.S.
Follow @usmortality.

Bad luck. 😞

It doesn't seem to matter how many videos, articles and even books that refute the existence of "viruses", I still get questioned with "but....what about [insert anything here]?"
I took up the challenge to make a one stop video, although I'm not holding my breath 😶‍🌫️
Make sure you watch till the end, where I have made a "Virology in 5 seconds" film 😉

https://drsambailey.com/videos/the-truth-about-viruses/

The co-author of this piece, Dean Jamison, was a paid consultant to Peter Daszak's Global Virome Project.

Long story short: Fauci funded GOF research. Peter Daszak covered it up. Then they lied about it. Then Daszak bribed others to downplay their lies.

Peter Daszak is simply a gift that keeps on giving, and yet hardly anyone ever talks about him.

My suggestion: Put him in prison. Throw away the key.

https://time.com/6150383/origins-covid-19/

@Goddek

P.S.
Daszak even emailed Dr Fauci in April 2020, praising him as "brave" for seeking to debunk the lab leak theory.

Trashing John Thrasher. ✅

@Goddek

Must have been climate change.

@jermwarfare

Is anyone aware of an unbiased search engine? I ran out of options. #followerpower

@Goddek

I am afraid the answer is 'YES'.

I am a scientist, and I have supervised many Bachelor's, Master's, and PhD students. I consequently know what I am talking about when assessing scientific essays and dissertations.

Prof. Dr. Karl Lauterbach is the German Minister of Health and got his PhD degree at the Harvard School of Public Health. Today, I took the time to read his dissertation, which has been taken offline but is still accessible via the Wayback Machine (link).

I have never read such an unscientific dissertation in my whole life. It is full of philosophical pearls of wisdom but does not contain any clear hypotheses, experiments, data analyses... nothing! His scientific work wouldn't even have passed as a Bachelor's student's term paper.

And yet, he received his doctoral degree and was made a full professor by the University of Cologne three years later without having done a post-doc and following the usual tenure track. This smells like corruption and raises many more questions.

Cheers,
Dr. Simon

Brave Search > SuckSuckGo

Concerning my post above, Brave Search is independent and safe to use: https://search.brave.com

Thanks Brendan, for getting back to me.

So, in case you are using #Twatter, please don't forget to follow the Co-founder and CEO of #Brave, Brendan Eich.

Cheers,
Simon

Ich fürchte, die Antwort lautet 'JA'.

Ich bin Wissenschaftler und habe viele Bachelor-, Master- und Doktoranden betreut. Ich weiß also, wovon ich spreche, wenn ich wissenschaftliche Arbeiten bewerte.

Prof. Dr. Karl Lauterbach ist Gesundheitsminister und hat an der Harvard School of Public Health promoviert. Heute habe ich mir die Zeit genommen seine Dissertation zu lesen, die zwar offline genommen wurde, aber hier weiterhin zugänglich ist.

Ich habe ehrlich gesagt noch nie eine so unwissenschaftliche Dissertation gelesen. Sie ist voller philosophischen Weisheiten, enthält jedoch keine klaren Hypothesen, Experimente, Datenanalysen... nichts! Sein wissenschaftlicher Essay wäre bei mir nicht einmal als Semesterarbeit durchgegangen.

Und dennoch wurde er promoviert und drei Jahre später von der Universität Köln zum Professor ernannt, ohne dass er eine Postdoc-Phase absolviert hätte und dem üblichen Tenure Track gefolgt wäre. Das riecht nach Korruption und wirft viele weitere Fragen auf.

Liebe Grüße,
Dr. Simon

Brilliant video by @katiehopkins_1 exposing Western propaganda.

@Goddek

I lol'd.

... and in the comment section of my channel, I temporarily allow calling for violence against Zuckerberg. #fuckzuck

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/exclusive-facebook-instagram-temporarily-allow-calls-violence-against-russians-2022-03-10/

@Goddek

German MEP Christine Anderson Speaks Out Against Identity Politics and Prejudice Towards Russians

"To punish Russian athletes and cultural workers because of their origin is racism in its purest form!"

@VigilantFox | Rumble

If you think Transhumanism isn’t their goal, you’re kidding yourself.

My friend #JPSears lightens up the mood with his brilliant humor, but the message is quite dark.

#WEF #KlausStooge #GotBeatUpALot

The same screenplay: again and again!

Let’s have a look at the features and outcomes of the "coronavirus scare" and what it shares in common with the “red" and the "Muslim" scare. The following list contains ten characteristics that these perceived threats share.

1. Fear-based and globally directed
2. Media saturation with a bias toward fear
3. Data manipulation
4. Censorship if opposing views
5. Preceded by exercises mimicking the threat
6. Series of claims made that are later proven wrong
7. Response threatens democracy
8. Significant increase in wealth and power for a few; increase in social inequality
9. Increased government control of the public and reduced individual freedoms
10. Response kills far more than the original threat


It will take us decades to treat the anxiety over the intangible and invisible enemy (just like terrorism or communism). Those who believe this psyop is most likely vulnerable to the following items on the agenda: cancel culture and climate change.


Cheers,
Dr. Simon