This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Готові?)
😁561🤣232🎉35💊35👍16😐14🤮5🤝3💯2🔥1🤡1
Трошки оффтопна новина від підписника
Наразі готується до релізу 7 номерна частина компʼютерної гри Civilization, Реліз намічено на 15 лютого 2025 року. Це глобальна покрокова стратегія. Наразі розробники представляють нації (фракції) та їх умовних лідерів котрі будуть у грі на момент релізу. І російську імперію представляє така собі Катерина. Далі цікавіше абілки (унікальні вміння) цієї фракції будуть:
Prosveshchenie
Westernization
Obshchina
General Moroz
Також фракція має два унікальні юніти
Cossack
Katyusha Rocket Launcher
Далі лишаю цитату з презентації фракції на англійській мові
«Caught between the eternal question of Russia's role as part of Europe and the Russian dusha, or soul, the Romanov reign held at the center of its ideology a model of "enlightened absolutism.“»
Тут навіть Гугл переклад дозволяє відчути посил даного тексту.
І на останок Британська Імперія не буду представлена на релізі цієї гри.
Видео презентация от «товарищей» разработчиков
https://youtu.be/OXz9kj8SpJE?si=sMObOUDCwyI7WpGH
Мої 5 копійок або чому ця новина виклика зацікавлення та певні емоції.
Гра не 3 ешелону. Це культова серія з великою аудиторією та фан базою
Допустимо, що біс із додаванням русні в 2025 році в компʼютерну гру. Бо це просто фракція не більше того. Як мінімум цікавий крок
Вибір лідера та відносно цього лідера спеціального юніту виглядає, як знущання та паплюження історії.
Опис та вміння фракції це взагалі дикий «крінж».
Загалом кожний пункт можна розписати ширше, але не бачу в тому сенсу. І не має сенсу боротися за відміну фракції чи взагалі гри. Але просто для себе хто не в курсі чи хто планував собі придбати за 3000 тисячі гривень базова версія. Чи потрібно воно вам. Та звернути увагу взагалі на Take-Two Interactive. Дуже сумнівну гру вони ведуть, ой дуже сумнівну, намагаючись робити кульбіти і загравати не з таким вже і великим ринком «руськоговорящіх».
Дуже класно в руку всіляким карзо-яшоваровим підігріти тезу про «нєтакіх руськіх» та «загадочную руську душу».
P.S. Про шизанутого Ганді я знаю, але це не про те.
Наразі готується до релізу 7 номерна частина компʼютерної гри Civilization, Реліз намічено на 15 лютого 2025 року. Це глобальна покрокова стратегія. Наразі розробники представляють нації (фракції) та їх умовних лідерів котрі будуть у грі на момент релізу. І російську імперію представляє така собі Катерина. Далі цікавіше абілки (унікальні вміння) цієї фракції будуть:
Prosveshchenie
Westernization
Obshchina
General Moroz
Також фракція має два унікальні юніти
Cossack
Katyusha Rocket Launcher
Далі лишаю цитату з презентації фракції на англійській мові
«Caught between the eternal question of Russia's role as part of Europe and the Russian dusha, or soul, the Romanov reign held at the center of its ideology a model of "enlightened absolutism.“»
Тут навіть Гугл переклад дозволяє відчути посил даного тексту.
І на останок Британська Імперія не буду представлена на релізі цієї гри.
Видео презентация от «товарищей» разработчиков
https://youtu.be/OXz9kj8SpJE?si=sMObOUDCwyI7WpGH
Мої 5 копійок або чому ця новина виклика зацікавлення та певні емоції.
Гра не 3 ешелону. Це культова серія з великою аудиторією та фан базою
Допустимо, що біс із додаванням русні в 2025 році в компʼютерну гру. Бо це просто фракція не більше того. Як мінімум цікавий крок
Вибір лідера та відносно цього лідера спеціального юніту виглядає, як знущання та паплюження історії.
Опис та вміння фракції це взагалі дикий «крінж».
Загалом кожний пункт можна розписати ширше, але не бачу в тому сенсу. І не має сенсу боротися за відміну фракції чи взагалі гри. Але просто для себе хто не в курсі чи хто планував собі придбати за 3000 тисячі гривень базова версія. Чи потрібно воно вам. Та звернути увагу взагалі на Take-Two Interactive. Дуже сумнівну гру вони ведуть, ой дуже сумнівну, намагаючись робити кульбіти і загравати не з таким вже і великим ринком «руськоговорящіх».
Дуже класно в руку всіляким карзо-яшоваровим підігріти тезу про «нєтакіх руськіх» та «загадочную руську душу».
P.S. Про шизанутого Ганді я знаю, але це не про те.
YouTube
First Look: Catherine | Civilization VII
The Empress. Bow to 𝐂𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 in the latest Civ 7 First Look!
Sid Meier's Civilization VII launches worldwide on February 11, 2025 for PS5, PS4, Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, Nintendo Switch, and PC via Steam (which also supports Mac and Linux) and…
Sid Meier's Civilization VII launches worldwide on February 11, 2025 for PS5, PS4, Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, Nintendo Switch, and PC via Steam (which also supports Mac and Linux) and…
👍233💯118💩34🤬10🤮8❤1🤩1🤡1😐1
Forwarded from Petrenko AndryiⒸ (Kyiv Ukraine)
Goooo?...
🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️
ПІДТРИМАЙТЕ ПО 3 ГРН:
Важливий #ЗБІР пілотам дронів з 5 ОШБ на зброю!
- PayPal: petrenkoandryi@gmail.com
- Monobank: send.monobank.ua/jar/5UWtYEFB1V
- PrivatBank: privat24.ua/send/d0nml
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
За донат 500 грн — отримайте кружку від автора:
@PetrenkoAndryi
🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️🔺️
ПІДТРИМАЙТЕ ПО 3 ГРН:
Важливий #ЗБІР пілотам дронів з 5 ОШБ на зброю!
- PayPal: petrenkoandryi@gmail.com
- Monobank: send.monobank.ua/jar/5UWtYEFB1V
- PrivatBank: privat24.ua/send/d0nml
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
За донат 500 грн — отримайте кружку від автора:
@PetrenkoAndryi
🔥199💯165👍40🤣11🤨11🤯7😢4🙏3❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Це краще шо я бачив з ілоною)
😁858💊196🤣157🤡42🤮22🔥19🤯16😡10😢4👍2❤1
Доброго дня. Ось цей сука «бомонд» живе в місті Костянтинівка. Нехай всі побачать цих довбойобів! Може хтось впізнає і пізди їм дасть.
Від підписника
Від підписника
🤬908👍37🤔9
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Азарьонок настільки тупий шо зізнався публічно в тому шо є діючим працівником спецслужб Білорусі
Відеофакт
Відеофакт
💯679🤮226💩93👍77😁42🤯5💊4❤1
Forwarded from Добрый Шубин
Газовая гонка вооружений.
То, что раху ждут печальные перспективы на газовых рынках - уже видно невооруженным глазом. Но русня пытается встрять в проекты. которые могут замедлить падение. Что-то мне подсказывает, что ни один из крупных геополитических игроков не заинтересован в этом, поэтому, вангую, что будут нежданчики.
То, что раху ждут печальные перспективы на газовых рынках - уже видно невооруженным глазом. Но русня пытается встрять в проекты. которые могут замедлить падение. Что-то мне подсказывает, что ни один из крупных геополитических игроков не заинтересован в этом, поэтому, вангую, что будут нежданчики.
👍483🤔125💯105🔥12😁3🥱3❤2💩2🙊2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Смоленское быдло, почему тебе не нравится движуха???
Пацаны с ЗСУ старались, а ты ебалом воротишь…
Совсем страх потеряла, псина???
Пацаны с ЗСУ старались, а ты ебалом воротишь…
Совсем страх потеряла, псина???
4👍867🤣430🔥126👏48😁26💯12❤10🥰8🏆7🤷♂3🖕2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁554🤣298💯209👍41💩15🤮11😢10🤡8👌6❤2🖕1
"Putin's squads" in the “Washington Post”. Dedicated to "honest journalists"
Rusnya commissioned an article in the Washington Post about her "non-involvement" in the severing of cables in the Baltic Sea. The guys invested quite heavily - they even bought a Pulitzer Prize winner
I suggest you read this "article" in full to understand the scale of the fuck-up:
Headline.
"Accidents, not Russian sabotage, caused damage to undersea cables, officials say"
US and European security officials agree that accidents caused the damage to energy and communications lines on the Baltic Sea seabed.
The undersea cable breaks that have worried European security officials in recent months were most likely the result of maritime accidents rather than Russian sabotage, according to some US and European intelligence officials.
The determination reflects a consensus among U.S. and European security services, according to senior officials from the three countries involved in the investigation of a series of incidents on the seabed that severed critical power and communications lines.
The incidents have raised suspicions that Russia is targeting undersea infrastructure as part of a broader campaign of hybrid attacks across Europe and prompted increased security measures, including last week's announcement that NATO will launch new patrol and surveillance operations in the Baltic Sea.
But so far, officials say, investigations involving the US and half a dozen European security services have found no indication that commercial vessels suspected of dragging anchors through seabed systems have done so intentionally or at Moscow's behest.
Instead, U.S. and European officials have said that the evidence gathered to date - including intercepted communications and other classified intelligence - points to accidents caused by inexperienced crews serving aboard vessels in poor technical condition.
US officials cite the "clear explanations" that emerged in each case, pointing to the likelihood that the damage was accidental and the lack of evidence to point to Russian culpability. Representatives of two European intelligence services said they agreed with the US assessment.
Despite initial suspicions of Russian involvement, one European official said there was "counter-evidence" to the contrary. The US and European officials declined to elaborate and spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the ongoing investigations.
The study focuses on three incidents over the past 18 months in which ships travelling to or from Russian ports were suspected of breaking key links in the vast undersea pipeline network that supplies gas, electricity and internet traffic to millions of people across Northern Europe.
In the most recent case, Finland detained an oil tanker suspected of dragging its anchor through an undersea power line connecting Finland and Estonia. Finnish authorities said that the Eagle S is part of a "shadow fleet" of tankers that help Moscow sell oil on world markets in defiance of international sanctions.
Previous cases included the Hong Kong-registered container ship Newnew Polar Bear, which ruptured a gas pipeline in the Gulf of Finland in October 2023, and the Chinese vessel Yi Peng 3, which cut two data cables in Swedish waters last November.
Russia's denial of responsibility has been met with deep scepticism by European officials who are confronting a wider wave of hybrid attacks attributed to Moscow.
Last year, U.S. and European security services foiled an alleged Russian plot to smuggle incendiary devices on cargo planes, in what appeared to be a test run for future attacks targeting the United States and Canada. US intelligence officials also warned German authorities that Russia was planning to assassinate the head of one of Europe's largest arms manufacturers, a company that had announced plans to build an ammunition plant in Ukraine.
👇
Rusnya commissioned an article in the Washington Post about her "non-involvement" in the severing of cables in the Baltic Sea. The guys invested quite heavily - they even bought a Pulitzer Prize winner
I suggest you read this "article" in full to understand the scale of the fuck-up:
Headline.
"Accidents, not Russian sabotage, caused damage to undersea cables, officials say"
US and European security officials agree that accidents caused the damage to energy and communications lines on the Baltic Sea seabed.
The undersea cable breaks that have worried European security officials in recent months were most likely the result of maritime accidents rather than Russian sabotage, according to some US and European intelligence officials.
The determination reflects a consensus among U.S. and European security services, according to senior officials from the three countries involved in the investigation of a series of incidents on the seabed that severed critical power and communications lines.
The incidents have raised suspicions that Russia is targeting undersea infrastructure as part of a broader campaign of hybrid attacks across Europe and prompted increased security measures, including last week's announcement that NATO will launch new patrol and surveillance operations in the Baltic Sea.
But so far, officials say, investigations involving the US and half a dozen European security services have found no indication that commercial vessels suspected of dragging anchors through seabed systems have done so intentionally or at Moscow's behest.
Instead, U.S. and European officials have said that the evidence gathered to date - including intercepted communications and other classified intelligence - points to accidents caused by inexperienced crews serving aboard vessels in poor technical condition.
US officials cite the "clear explanations" that emerged in each case, pointing to the likelihood that the damage was accidental and the lack of evidence to point to Russian culpability. Representatives of two European intelligence services said they agreed with the US assessment.
Despite initial suspicions of Russian involvement, one European official said there was "counter-evidence" to the contrary. The US and European officials declined to elaborate and spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the ongoing investigations.
The study focuses on three incidents over the past 18 months in which ships travelling to or from Russian ports were suspected of breaking key links in the vast undersea pipeline network that supplies gas, electricity and internet traffic to millions of people across Northern Europe.
In the most recent case, Finland detained an oil tanker suspected of dragging its anchor through an undersea power line connecting Finland and Estonia. Finnish authorities said that the Eagle S is part of a "shadow fleet" of tankers that help Moscow sell oil on world markets in defiance of international sanctions.
Previous cases included the Hong Kong-registered container ship Newnew Polar Bear, which ruptured a gas pipeline in the Gulf of Finland in October 2023, and the Chinese vessel Yi Peng 3, which cut two data cables in Swedish waters last November.
Russia's denial of responsibility has been met with deep scepticism by European officials who are confronting a wider wave of hybrid attacks attributed to Moscow.
Last year, U.S. and European security services foiled an alleged Russian plot to smuggle incendiary devices on cargo planes, in what appeared to be a test run for future attacks targeting the United States and Canada. US intelligence officials also warned German authorities that Russia was planning to assassinate the head of one of Europe's largest arms manufacturers, a company that had announced plans to build an ammunition plant in Ukraine.
👇
👍123❤7🔥5🥱2
At the same time, European security officials have accused Russia of using proxies to carry out hundreds of arson attacks, railway bombings and smaller sabotage operations aimed at sowing discord in Europe and undermining support for Ukraine.
Against this backdrop, the damage to seabed systems has increased Europe's sense of being under siege. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius called the November anchor drag incident "sabotage" and said that "no one believes that these cables were accidentally severed". A few weeks later, Finnish President Alexander Stubb said that the Christmas incident was "definitely" linked to Russia.Experts also said that the incidents on the seabed fit into the scheme of Russian aggression.
The cable breaks "could very well be accidental accidents," said Eric Ciaramella, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who previously served as the deputy national intelligence officer for Russia. "But it's hard to rule out a coordinated Russian campaign, with Moscow's intelligence services trying to assassinate German business leaders, setting fire to factories across Europe and planting bombs on cargo planes," he said.
Some critics of Russia have rejected the view of Western spy agencies that the underwater damage was most likely caused by accidents rather than Russia. Pekka Tovere, who represents Finland in the European Parliament and previously served as the country's military intelligence chief, said the seabed incidents were part of a "typical hybrid operation" by Moscow.
"The most important thing in any hybrid operation is denial," Toveri said. According to him, the Russian intelligence services may have managed to leave "no evidence that could be used in court", but to claim that these were accidents "is complete nonsense".
Toviri and others cite anomalies in the vessels' behaviour, as well as evidence that Russia has devoted significant resources for decades - including a special military unit known as the General Staff's Main Directorate for Deep Sea Research - to mapping the western seabed infrastructure and identifying its vulnerabilities.
At least two of the ships suspected of causing the damage appear to have extended their anchors 100 miles or more across the seabed. According to Tovary, a ship that accidentally drops an anchor will immediately be so noticeably off course that the crew will struggle to stop the vessel and assess the damage.
Mike Plunkett, a maritime expert at safety research firm Janes, said that "as well as a very loud splash, there will also be a lot of noise from the anchor chain flying out the hatch." He described the likelihood of three anchor fall incidents in the Baltic region from 2023 as "vanishingly small", although not zero. But he said it was extremely difficult to prove deliberate sabotage.
Suspicions are heightened by the timing of the incidents. The most recent incidents, in November and December, damaged undersea power lines at a time when the Baltic states are stepping up efforts to decouple their power grids from Russia, a move that has taken on particular urgency following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
There are also reasons to question why russia would risk attacking underwater systems on waterways currently laid out by naTo member states. This could jeopardise the oil smuggling operations that Russia relies on to finance its war in Ukraine, and possibly provoke more aggressive efforts by Western governments to cut off Russia's access to the North Atlantic.
At the Baltic Summit in Helsinki on 14 January, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced plans for new patrols with frigates, aircraft, submarine satellites and a "small fleet of maritime drones" designed to detect underwater sabotage.
Despite advances in underwater surveillance capabilities, proving involvement in the attacks has proved difficult.
👇👇
Against this backdrop, the damage to seabed systems has increased Europe's sense of being under siege. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius called the November anchor drag incident "sabotage" and said that "no one believes that these cables were accidentally severed". A few weeks later, Finnish President Alexander Stubb said that the Christmas incident was "definitely" linked to Russia.Experts also said that the incidents on the seabed fit into the scheme of Russian aggression.
The cable breaks "could very well be accidental accidents," said Eric Ciaramella, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who previously served as the deputy national intelligence officer for Russia. "But it's hard to rule out a coordinated Russian campaign, with Moscow's intelligence services trying to assassinate German business leaders, setting fire to factories across Europe and planting bombs on cargo planes," he said.
Some critics of Russia have rejected the view of Western spy agencies that the underwater damage was most likely caused by accidents rather than Russia. Pekka Tovere, who represents Finland in the European Parliament and previously served as the country's military intelligence chief, said the seabed incidents were part of a "typical hybrid operation" by Moscow.
"The most important thing in any hybrid operation is denial," Toveri said. According to him, the Russian intelligence services may have managed to leave "no evidence that could be used in court", but to claim that these were accidents "is complete nonsense".
Toviri and others cite anomalies in the vessels' behaviour, as well as evidence that Russia has devoted significant resources for decades - including a special military unit known as the General Staff's Main Directorate for Deep Sea Research - to mapping the western seabed infrastructure and identifying its vulnerabilities.
At least two of the ships suspected of causing the damage appear to have extended their anchors 100 miles or more across the seabed. According to Tovary, a ship that accidentally drops an anchor will immediately be so noticeably off course that the crew will struggle to stop the vessel and assess the damage.
Mike Plunkett, a maritime expert at safety research firm Janes, said that "as well as a very loud splash, there will also be a lot of noise from the anchor chain flying out the hatch." He described the likelihood of three anchor fall incidents in the Baltic region from 2023 as "vanishingly small", although not zero. But he said it was extremely difficult to prove deliberate sabotage.
Suspicions are heightened by the timing of the incidents. The most recent incidents, in November and December, damaged undersea power lines at a time when the Baltic states are stepping up efforts to decouple their power grids from Russia, a move that has taken on particular urgency following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
There are also reasons to question why russia would risk attacking underwater systems on waterways currently laid out by naTo member states. This could jeopardise the oil smuggling operations that Russia relies on to finance its war in Ukraine, and possibly provoke more aggressive efforts by Western governments to cut off Russia's access to the North Atlantic.
At the Baltic Summit in Helsinki on 14 January, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced plans for new patrols with frigates, aircraft, submarine satellites and a "small fleet of maritime drones" designed to detect underwater sabotage.
Despite advances in underwater surveillance capabilities, proving involvement in the attacks has proved difficult.
👇👇
Patreon
Get more from Фашик Донецкий on Patreon
creating Развенчиваю фейки роспрапаганды из Донецка
👍134🔥8❤2🥱1