By the way, I even have a diploma from Larissa, Lars.
So I asked the artificial intelligence what the red rectangle means. And this is what it told me, don't switch:
If the discipline "Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Humanity" is related to the direction of training 41.04.05 "International Relations", this may indicate its interdisciplinary nature. In the context of international relations, it probably considers the role of science, rationalism and critical thinking in global politics, diplomacy and international communication.
Possible course content within the strand:
1. Science as an instrument of international influence:
- The use of scientific evidence in diplomacy and global negotiations.
- "Science diplomacy" as part of international relations.
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes.
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics:
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise policy decisions.
- The role of pseudoscience in propaganda and information warfare.
- The problem of "fake science" (e.g. climate scepticism).
3. ethics in international science communication:
- Issues related to bioethics, artificial intelligence and the technology race.
- Global challenges: dealing with climate change, pandemics and the energy crisis.
4. historical examples:
- The application of science during the Cold War (e.g., the space race or the arms race).
- World initiatives to control the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
5. Contemporary challenges and issues:
- How scientific evidence influences the policies of countries in the UN, WHO, WTO and other international organisations.
- The role of international agreements in the use of scientific findings.
Discipline Objectives:
- To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific evidence used in international policy.
- To understand how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and a tool of manipulation in the international environment.
- To explore how world powers use science to set their political agenda.
Relationship to the GEC:
Topics for final qualifying theses may include:
- The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
- Analysing the manipulation of scientific evidence in international propaganda.
- The use of science in international conflicts (e.g. climate change as a factor of political pressure).
And what follows is even more interesting. Here's what the iron (artificial intelligence) says:
👇👇👇
So I asked the artificial intelligence what the red rectangle means. And this is what it told me, don't switch:
If the discipline "Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Humanity" is related to the direction of training 41.04.05 "International Relations", this may indicate its interdisciplinary nature. In the context of international relations, it probably considers the role of science, rationalism and critical thinking in global politics, diplomacy and international communication.
Possible course content within the strand:
1. Science as an instrument of international influence:
- The use of scientific evidence in diplomacy and global negotiations.
- "Science diplomacy" as part of international relations.
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes.
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics:
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise policy decisions.
- The role of pseudoscience in propaganda and information warfare.
- The problem of "fake science" (e.g. climate scepticism).
3. ethics in international science communication:
- Issues related to bioethics, artificial intelligence and the technology race.
- Global challenges: dealing with climate change, pandemics and the energy crisis.
4. historical examples:
- The application of science during the Cold War (e.g., the space race or the arms race).
- World initiatives to control the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
5. Contemporary challenges and issues:
- How scientific evidence influences the policies of countries in the UN, WHO, WTO and other international organisations.
- The role of international agreements in the use of scientific findings.
Discipline Objectives:
- To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific evidence used in international policy.
- To understand how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and a tool of manipulation in the international environment.
- To explore how world powers use science to set their political agenda.
Relationship to the GEC:
Topics for final qualifying theses may include:
- The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
- Analysing the manipulation of scientific evidence in international propaganda.
- The use of science in international conflicts (e.g. climate change as a factor of political pressure).
And what follows is even more interesting. Here's what the iron (artificial intelligence) says:
👇👇👇
👍103💯21❤1🥱1
Curriculum of the discipline:
"Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Mankind"
Field of study: 41.04.05 "International Relations".
Level: Master's degree
Aims of the discipline
1. To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific data used in international politics.
2. to explain how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and manipulation in the international environment.
3. Explore the role of science in global diplomacy and international conflict.
4. To prepare students to work effectively in the context of information wars and data manipulation.
Objectives of the discipline
1. To provide students with a theoretical understanding of the scientific method and rationalism.
2. To show with examples how science can be used for political and diplomatic purposes.
3. To develop skills in identifying and analysing pseudoscientific information.
4. To consider ethical aspects of using scientific developments in international relations.
Main sections of the discipline
1. Science as a tool of international influence
- The use of scientific evidence in global diplomacy (e.g. Paris Climate Agreement).
- The concept of 'science diplomacy' and its examples (e.g. cooperative space exploration).
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes (example: COVID-19 and international allegations).
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise political decisions.
- The problem of pseudoscience and "fake science" (analysis of examples of climate scepticism, vaccination).
- The role of science in information wars (e.g. cybersecurity and artificial intelligence). 3.
3 Ethics in international scientific communication
- Bioethics in the context of international treaties.
- Global challenges: climate crisis, pandemics, technological races.
- Problems of responsibility of countries in the use of scientific developments.
4. historical examples
- Science during the Cold War: arms race, space, nuclear policy.
- International initiatives to limit weapons of mass destruction (e.g., Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
5. Contemporary challenges
- The role of science in the politics of international organisations: UN, WHO, WTO.
- Use of technology in international conflicts (e.g. satellite reconnaissance).
- The impact of scientific evidence on international agreements.
Practical exercises
1. case analyses:
- Example: The Paris climate agreement and its scientific basis.
- How WHO data is used in international policy.
2. Recognising manipulation:
- Working with examples of pseudoscientific publications.
- Analysing fake news in the field of science.
3. Modelling international negotiations:
- Topics: climate, technology, bioethics.
Topics for final qualification works (FQWs)
1. The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
2. Analysis of scientific data manipulation in international propaganda. 2.
3. The use of science in international conflicts: climate change as a factor of political pressure. 3.
4. The ethics of artificial intelligence in international relations.
5. Scientific research as a tool of diplomacy in the 21st century (e.g. CERN, ITER projects).
Graduate competences
After mastering the discipline, students will be able to:
- Critically evaluate scientific data and its interpretation.
- Recognise manipulation and misinformation in scientific publications.
- Use science diplomacy in professional activities.
- Develop strategies for integrating science into international negotiations.
👇👇👇👇
"Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Mankind"
Field of study: 41.04.05 "International Relations".
Level: Master's degree
Aims of the discipline
1. To develop students' ability to critically analyse scientific data used in international politics.
2. to explain how rationalism and science can be both an instrument of progress and manipulation in the international environment.
3. Explore the role of science in global diplomacy and international conflict.
4. To prepare students to work effectively in the context of information wars and data manipulation.
Objectives of the discipline
1. To provide students with a theoretical understanding of the scientific method and rationalism.
2. To show with examples how science can be used for political and diplomatic purposes.
3. To develop skills in identifying and analysing pseudoscientific information.
4. To consider ethical aspects of using scientific developments in international relations.
Main sections of the discipline
1. Science as a tool of international influence
- The use of scientific evidence in global diplomacy (e.g. Paris Climate Agreement).
- The concept of 'science diplomacy' and its examples (e.g. cooperative space exploration).
- Manipulation of scientific information for political purposes (example: COVID-19 and international allegations).
2. Rationalism and misinformation in international politics
- How scientific arguments are used to legitimise political decisions.
- The problem of pseudoscience and "fake science" (analysis of examples of climate scepticism, vaccination).
- The role of science in information wars (e.g. cybersecurity and artificial intelligence). 3.
3 Ethics in international scientific communication
- Bioethics in the context of international treaties.
- Global challenges: climate crisis, pandemics, technological races.
- Problems of responsibility of countries in the use of scientific developments.
4. historical examples
- Science during the Cold War: arms race, space, nuclear policy.
- International initiatives to limit weapons of mass destruction (e.g., Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
5. Contemporary challenges
- The role of science in the politics of international organisations: UN, WHO, WTO.
- Use of technology in international conflicts (e.g. satellite reconnaissance).
- The impact of scientific evidence on international agreements.
Practical exercises
1. case analyses:
- Example: The Paris climate agreement and its scientific basis.
- How WHO data is used in international policy.
2. Recognising manipulation:
- Working with examples of pseudoscientific publications.
- Analysing fake news in the field of science.
3. Modelling international negotiations:
- Topics: climate, technology, bioethics.
Topics for final qualification works (FQWs)
1. The role of science in strengthening the "soft power" of the state.
2. Analysis of scientific data manipulation in international propaganda. 2.
3. The use of science in international conflicts: climate change as a factor of political pressure. 3.
4. The ethics of artificial intelligence in international relations.
5. Scientific research as a tool of diplomacy in the 21st century (e.g. CERN, ITER projects).
Graduate competences
After mastering the discipline, students will be able to:
- Critically evaluate scientific data and its interpretation.
- Recognise manipulation and misinformation in scientific publications.
- Use science diplomacy in professional activities.
- Develop strategies for integrating science into international negotiations.
👇👇👇👇
👍93💯18❤3🥱1
Now ask yourself the question of why would anyone want to teach all this to a foreigner?
Exactly. Because the answer is really simple:
Graduates of such programmes become cultural and political "ambassadors" for the country, promoting its interests and views in their home states.
International students who study international politics often hold important positions in their home countries. If they have been educated in a particular country, this provides a basis for future co-operation.
Students also learn the "correct" interpretation of history, politics and contemporary challenges, which lays the foundation for strategic partnerships (and you and I wonder where such a young sovkodrocher in Europe came from).
And espionage, of course (who knows what Lars did when he was studying in St. Petersburg, the Russian security services have dirt on him).
And now about how Larisa, Lars that is, studied in a school for Russian Chekists in full view of everyone. And now I will prove it
If you re-read carefully what students in St. Petersburg study in the discipline "Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Mankind", you can draw the following conclusions:
Critical analysis of information, recognising manipulation and understanding pseudoscientific concepts have applications for developing strategies of information influence and counteraction - this is what a foreigner is taught "just for fun". And I certainly believe it, for
Professionals who study this discipline can learn to identify weaknesses in the perception of scientific data by society or specific groups. This knowledge they can later use to misinform or manipulate public opinion through false scientific arguments.
Also, at the prompting of the Chekists, they can use the knowledge to disseminate pseudoscientific data to undermine the credibility of governments or international organisations (conspiracy theories, flat earth, reptiloids, etc.). Well, or simply you can create for rubles "alternative" versions of scientific facts that support the interests of the Russian Federation
But that's not all, because having studied in St. Petersburg, the knowledge gained during the study of the discipline can easily be used to analyse the actions of a potential enemy: exposing manipulative scientific reports used to justify political or military decisions.
And if anyone thinks that this is a joke or a laughing matter, I have to disappoint you - it is much more serious. Because then all these Lars and others can safely put their knowledge into practice:
spread misinformation, as was the case with the covida vaccination - it was the Katsaps who were accused of creating and promoting pseudo-scientific theories about Western vaccines, which undermined trust in international medical organisations
to lobby the interests of those countries dependent on hydrocarbon exports - in case anyone has forgotten, in the 2010s oil and gas corporations funded pseudoscientific research to question the impact of human activity on climate change.
And graduates of universities like St Petersburg can track scientific research and its use for political influence - the same data on nuclear research or technological developments can be used to assess the enemy's military potential.
Plus they can use scientific conferences and projects as a cover for collecting data on potential rivals.
Well, knowledge of scientific data manipulation can help them better hide their true objectives.
And all of this was taught to Larissa by the Russians for free. Mm-hmm.
Hello to the intelligence services of Europe and NATO.
The end.
P.s - Want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda? - 4441111068433840
PayPal- fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com
Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
VTS
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq
Exactly. Because the answer is really simple:
Graduates of such programmes become cultural and political "ambassadors" for the country, promoting its interests and views in their home states.
International students who study international politics often hold important positions in their home countries. If they have been educated in a particular country, this provides a basis for future co-operation.
Students also learn the "correct" interpretation of history, politics and contemporary challenges, which lays the foundation for strategic partnerships (and you and I wonder where such a young sovkodrocher in Europe came from).
And espionage, of course (who knows what Lars did when he was studying in St. Petersburg, the Russian security services have dirt on him).
And now about how Larisa, Lars that is, studied in a school for Russian Chekists in full view of everyone. And now I will prove it
If you re-read carefully what students in St. Petersburg study in the discipline "Science and Rationalism: How Modern Science Misleads Mankind", you can draw the following conclusions:
Critical analysis of information, recognising manipulation and understanding pseudoscientific concepts have applications for developing strategies of information influence and counteraction - this is what a foreigner is taught "just for fun". And I certainly believe it, for
Professionals who study this discipline can learn to identify weaknesses in the perception of scientific data by society or specific groups. This knowledge they can later use to misinform or manipulate public opinion through false scientific arguments.
Also, at the prompting of the Chekists, they can use the knowledge to disseminate pseudoscientific data to undermine the credibility of governments or international organisations (conspiracy theories, flat earth, reptiloids, etc.). Well, or simply you can create for rubles "alternative" versions of scientific facts that support the interests of the Russian Federation
But that's not all, because having studied in St. Petersburg, the knowledge gained during the study of the discipline can easily be used to analyse the actions of a potential enemy: exposing manipulative scientific reports used to justify political or military decisions.
And if anyone thinks that this is a joke or a laughing matter, I have to disappoint you - it is much more serious. Because then all these Lars and others can safely put their knowledge into practice:
spread misinformation, as was the case with the covida vaccination - it was the Katsaps who were accused of creating and promoting pseudo-scientific theories about Western vaccines, which undermined trust in international medical organisations
to lobby the interests of those countries dependent on hydrocarbon exports - in case anyone has forgotten, in the 2010s oil and gas corporations funded pseudoscientific research to question the impact of human activity on climate change.
And graduates of universities like St Petersburg can track scientific research and its use for political influence - the same data on nuclear research or technological developments can be used to assess the enemy's military potential.
Plus they can use scientific conferences and projects as a cover for collecting data on potential rivals.
Well, knowledge of scientific data manipulation can help them better hide their true objectives.
And all of this was taught to Larissa by the Russians for free. Mm-hmm.
Hello to the intelligence services of Europe and NATO.
The end.
P.s - Want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda? - 4441111068433840
PayPal- fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com
Patreon- https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
VTS
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq
Patreon
Get more from Фашик Донецкий on Patreon
creating Развенчиваю фейки роспрапаганды из Донецка
👍134❤3🥱1🖕1
Агент лариса. Пту (гру) рф посвящается
Преамбула. Обожаю, когда спецслужбы рф пытаются прятать агентов влияния. Ибо делаю они это по старой схеме, которой давно уже пора на пенсию
Поэтому предлагаю познакомиться с агентом ларисой, он же Ларс Краузе, который ни разу не спалился и топит за рф «за идею».
Честно, не принципиально то, как его завербовали (идея, деньги, шантаж), но похоже на то, шо лариса неслабо так налажала в жизни, когда подрабатывала инфоцыганом и пыталась продать «знания» о «пассивном доходе».
Как бы не звучало цинично, но я никогда не поверю обещаниям научить заработать миллион, пройдя условных три курса от «успешного спикера» по 50 долларов, у которого куча фоточек возле крутых авто, но нет ни одной фирмы. С другой стороны, это ваша жизнь и вам решать - кто я такой шоб кому-то что-то советовать?
👇
Преамбула. Обожаю, когда спецслужбы рф пытаются прятать агентов влияния. Ибо делаю они это по старой схеме, которой давно уже пора на пенсию
Поэтому предлагаю познакомиться с агентом ларисой, он же Ларс Краузе, который ни разу не спалился и топит за рф «за идею».
Честно, не принципиально то, как его завербовали (идея, деньги, шантаж), но похоже на то, шо лариса неслабо так налажала в жизни, когда подрабатывала инфоцыганом и пыталась продать «знания» о «пассивном доходе».
Как бы не звучало цинично, но я никогда не поверю обещаниям научить заработать миллион, пройдя условных три курса от «успешного спикера» по 50 долларов, у которого куча фоточек возле крутых авто, но нет ни одной фирмы. С другой стороны, это ваша жизнь и вам решать - кто я такой шоб кому-то что-то советовать?
👇
👍225💯60🔥8❤5
Но вернемся к Ларисе, который учился в петербурге, а после продавал формулу успешного успеха, пассивного дохода, богатства за 6 недель, но…
Но когда не пошло, вспомнил про «друзей» на россии и понял шо настоящий успех - это хвалить русских нацистов за деньги и не носить тяжелого. Безусловно, жаль было расставаться ему со своей аудиторией (788 подписчиков, йопт). Он наверное плакал навзрыд, ибо нашел почти 800 дебилов, верящих в то, шо некий вася по ссылке (и главное недорого!) ща быстро расскажет как заработать два вагона денег…
Только хуй с ним, с пассивным доходом за 6 недель - есть те, кто платят больше здесь и сейчас, блядь. Просто пизди себе про «победу», «величие», англосаксов, НАТО и прочую хуйню в нужном контексте и не будешь никогда носить тяжелого. Тем более шо платят тебе больше, чем местным ватанам - у тебя ж гражданство Германии, йопт
Ну, а дальше будет самое интересное. Не переключайтесь
👇👇
Но когда не пошло, вспомнил про «друзей» на россии и понял шо настоящий успех - это хвалить русских нацистов за деньги и не носить тяжелого. Безусловно, жаль было расставаться ему со своей аудиторией (788 подписчиков, йопт). Он наверное плакал навзрыд, ибо нашел почти 800 дебилов, верящих в то, шо некий вася по ссылке (и главное недорого!) ща быстро расскажет как заработать два вагона денег…
Только хуй с ним, с пассивным доходом за 6 недель - есть те, кто платят больше здесь и сейчас, блядь. Просто пизди себе про «победу», «величие», англосаксов, НАТО и прочую хуйню в нужном контексте и не будешь никогда носить тяжелого. Тем более шо платят тебе больше, чем местным ватанам - у тебя ж гражданство Германии, йопт
Ну, а дальше будет самое интересное. Не переключайтесь
👇👇
👍215💯50❤5👀5