В єбанарії без змін
🤮871💩188💊103🤡34🤣15👍6🖕6🤯5🙉3🥰1🎃1
Forwarded from Добрый Шубин
Еще одна подляна от китайцев-братушечек
Это электро генератор на водороде Jupiter I . Его используют в часы пикового потребления. Устройство способно перерабатывать более 30 000 кубометров водорода в час, обеспечивая годовую выработку до 500 миллионов кВт·ч электроэнергии. Это делает турбину ключевым инструментом для реализации устойчивого энергетического будущего.
Шо там с верой в продаже нефти китайцам еще 40 лет?
Это электро генератор на водороде Jupiter I . Его используют в часы пикового потребления. Устройство способно перерабатывать более 30 000 кубометров водорода в час, обеспечивая годовую выработку до 500 миллионов кВт·ч электроэнергии. Это делает турбину ключевым инструментом для реализации устойчивого энергетического будущего.
Шо там с верой в продаже нефти китайцам еще 40 лет?
🔥735👍205😁50❤16🤔1🖕1
Forwarded from Чёрная Туфелька
На словах ты сверхдержава, а на деле ты возишь китайский хлам в Монголию, чтобы не арестовали президента рф
Вот оно - «величие», хи-хи-хи))
Вот оно - «величие», хи-хи-хи))
🤣759😁58👍21🥰21💩8🤮2
До речі, канал на Патреон можна підтримати тут https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
💯1.39K👍83❤8👏5🤔1🖕1
В липецке быдлу не нравится движуха
Вообще ахуели, мрази
Вообще ахуели, мрази
😁1.02K🔥120🤣64❤🔥37👍24🖕5🙊4🤡2
Drown them, dammit. New season preview
Oil tanker crew ready to cut more cables when caught - Finland
The crew of an oil tanker accused of sabotaging undersea power and communication cables in the Baltic Sea was ready to cut other cables and pipelines when Finnish authorities boarded the vessel last month, the head of a Finnish investigation said.
The Baltic Sea countries are on high alert after a series of power, telecommunications and gas pipeline disruptions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Leaders of NATO member states around the Baltic Sea are meeting in Helsinki on Tuesday to discuss the alliance's response to the threat.
On 26 December, Finnish authorities seized the Eagle S oil tanker carrying Russian oil. They said they suspected that the vessel had damaged the Estlink 2 Finnish-Estonian power line and four telecommunications cables by dragging its anchor across the seabed for more than 100 km (60 miles).
Investigating officer Risto Lohi of the National Bureau of Investigation told Reuters that at the time of the hijacking, the vessel was threatening to cut the second Estlink1 power cable and the BalticConnector gas pipe between Finland and Estonia.
"There would have been an almost immediate danger that other cables or pipes connected to our critical undersea infrastructure could have been damaged," he said.
Lohey said that a ninth crew member has been added to the list of suspects and is banned from travelling. Earlier this month, Finland announced that eight of the 24 crew members were banned from entering the country. The ship's captain is Georgian, and the crew are citizens of India and Georgia.
"We have heard and questioned the crew members, and at the moment we have nine crew members as suspects. They have been placed under a travel ban to support the investigation," said Lochie.
"Naturally, our priority is individuals whose tasks or responsibilities include ship navigation and anchor-related operations."
In another incident, Finland and other Baltic Sea countries suspect the Chinese bulk carrier Yi Peng 3 of overhauling its anchor in November and damaging two submarine fibre-optic communication cables.
Swedish Civil Defence Minister Carl-Oscar Bolin said on Sunday that authorities have determined that the Chinese vessel also threatened to cut a power cable connecting the Baltic and Nordic countries.
"Today we can report that it has been found that there are traces of an anchor, probably from the Yi Peng 3, also in connection with the NordBalt cable, that is, the connection between Sweden and Lithuania. This obviously illustrates the seriousness of the situation we are in," he told reporters.
It is interesting to see what NATO countries will do in response to deter Russia and prevent similar incidents from happening again.
They can be political, military, economic and technical.
I think there will definitely be an increase in military presence and control in the region, namely NATO naval forces to monitor underwater infrastructure + the use of modern threat detection systems such as drones and underwater sensors.
I would also not be surprised to see joint exercises aimed at protecting critical infrastructure, including sabotage response scenarios, deployment of new technologies to protect cables and pipelines (it's just an exercise and not a war, right)
There will definitely be an intensification of intelligence sharing between NATO countries on the movement of ships associated with Russia, including the use of satellites for constant surveillance of suspicious vessels, as well as investments in cyber intelligence to detect intentions to attack infrastructure (artificial intelligence will be trained on Russia.)
👇👇👇
Oil tanker crew ready to cut more cables when caught - Finland
The crew of an oil tanker accused of sabotaging undersea power and communication cables in the Baltic Sea was ready to cut other cables and pipelines when Finnish authorities boarded the vessel last month, the head of a Finnish investigation said.
The Baltic Sea countries are on high alert after a series of power, telecommunications and gas pipeline disruptions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Leaders of NATO member states around the Baltic Sea are meeting in Helsinki on Tuesday to discuss the alliance's response to the threat.
On 26 December, Finnish authorities seized the Eagle S oil tanker carrying Russian oil. They said they suspected that the vessel had damaged the Estlink 2 Finnish-Estonian power line and four telecommunications cables by dragging its anchor across the seabed for more than 100 km (60 miles).
Investigating officer Risto Lohi of the National Bureau of Investigation told Reuters that at the time of the hijacking, the vessel was threatening to cut the second Estlink1 power cable and the BalticConnector gas pipe between Finland and Estonia.
"There would have been an almost immediate danger that other cables or pipes connected to our critical undersea infrastructure could have been damaged," he said.
Lohey said that a ninth crew member has been added to the list of suspects and is banned from travelling. Earlier this month, Finland announced that eight of the 24 crew members were banned from entering the country. The ship's captain is Georgian, and the crew are citizens of India and Georgia.
"We have heard and questioned the crew members, and at the moment we have nine crew members as suspects. They have been placed under a travel ban to support the investigation," said Lochie.
"Naturally, our priority is individuals whose tasks or responsibilities include ship navigation and anchor-related operations."
In another incident, Finland and other Baltic Sea countries suspect the Chinese bulk carrier Yi Peng 3 of overhauling its anchor in November and damaging two submarine fibre-optic communication cables.
Swedish Civil Defence Minister Carl-Oscar Bolin said on Sunday that authorities have determined that the Chinese vessel also threatened to cut a power cable connecting the Baltic and Nordic countries.
"Today we can report that it has been found that there are traces of an anchor, probably from the Yi Peng 3, also in connection with the NordBalt cable, that is, the connection between Sweden and Lithuania. This obviously illustrates the seriousness of the situation we are in," he told reporters.
It is interesting to see what NATO countries will do in response to deter Russia and prevent similar incidents from happening again.
They can be political, military, economic and technical.
I think there will definitely be an increase in military presence and control in the region, namely NATO naval forces to monitor underwater infrastructure + the use of modern threat detection systems such as drones and underwater sensors.
I would also not be surprised to see joint exercises aimed at protecting critical infrastructure, including sabotage response scenarios, deployment of new technologies to protect cables and pipelines (it's just an exercise and not a war, right)
There will definitely be an intensification of intelligence sharing between NATO countries on the movement of ships associated with Russia, including the use of satellites for constant surveillance of suspicious vessels, as well as investments in cyber intelligence to detect intentions to attack infrastructure (artificial intelligence will be trained on Russia.)
👇👇👇
👍140❤6🥱1🖕1
And I'm not talking about sanctions against Russian vessels and companies that may be involved in sabotage (provided the threat is taken seriously). I don't think it will come to the expulsion of diplomats or restrictions on consular activities in NATO countries, but this option is also possible. I think that they will limit themselves to investigations in international organisations to publicly expose Russia.
Perhaps additional rules will be introduced for Russian vessels in NATO waters, such as mandatory escort or inspection, which is long overdue, instead of waiting and thinking that the snake will not bite.
Will the diversification of energy sources be completed to reduce dependence on Russian resources? I don't know. We'll see.
I think they will start by protecting cables and pipelines - relatively speaking, they will put underwater sensors, protective shells and duplicate communication systems in the sea, and possibly create backup energy and telecommunication routes for quick switching in case of attacks (one is a bad number, in case anyone forgot)
Will there be enough courage to issue a joint statement equating attacks on infrastructure with military action, which could trigger Article 5 of the NATO treaty?
I don't know. But anything else will be seen by Russia as a sign of weakness. Does NATO understand this? Personally, I'm not sure.
Of course, in the event of new incidents, NATO can respond with economic or military actions, such as blocking Russian vessels in international waters or symmetrical steps against their infrastructure. But...
But so far, I don't really believe it. No offence, but I'm not a sceptic, I'm a realist first and foremost
Epilogue or so many letters. the question is not about what can be done to respond to such incidents, not about the tools or the availability of leverage on Russia. The question is primarily about determination.
Russia is openly taking NATO for a ride. Does the alliance understand this?
We will soon find out.
But if the response to Russia's actions is not decisive, then such incidents will continue on a regular basis.
Russia understands only the language of force. Greetings to the Dostoevsky and Pushkin fans in NATO. Your move, ladies and gentlemen.
The end
P.s - if you want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda efforts: 4441111068433840
PayPal - fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com
Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
Btc -
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq
Perhaps additional rules will be introduced for Russian vessels in NATO waters, such as mandatory escort or inspection, which is long overdue, instead of waiting and thinking that the snake will not bite.
Will the diversification of energy sources be completed to reduce dependence on Russian resources? I don't know. We'll see.
I think they will start by protecting cables and pipelines - relatively speaking, they will put underwater sensors, protective shells and duplicate communication systems in the sea, and possibly create backup energy and telecommunication routes for quick switching in case of attacks (one is a bad number, in case anyone forgot)
Will there be enough courage to issue a joint statement equating attacks on infrastructure with military action, which could trigger Article 5 of the NATO treaty?
I don't know. But anything else will be seen by Russia as a sign of weakness. Does NATO understand this? Personally, I'm not sure.
Of course, in the event of new incidents, NATO can respond with economic or military actions, such as blocking Russian vessels in international waters or symmetrical steps against their infrastructure. But...
But so far, I don't really believe it. No offence, but I'm not a sceptic, I'm a realist first and foremost
Epilogue or so many letters. the question is not about what can be done to respond to such incidents, not about the tools or the availability of leverage on Russia. The question is primarily about determination.
Russia is openly taking NATO for a ride. Does the alliance understand this?
We will soon find out.
But if the response to Russia's actions is not decisive, then such incidents will continue on a regular basis.
Russia understands only the language of force. Greetings to the Dostoevsky and Pushkin fans in NATO. Your move, ladies and gentlemen.
The end
P.s - if you want to help Ukraine's counter-propaganda efforts: 4441111068433840
PayPal - fashdonetsk2022@gmail.com
Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/fashdonetsk
Btc -
bc1qdtrkvnqhur6zvftku73stq88y97ut4rg730kdq
Patreon
Get more from Фашик Донецкий on Patreon
creating Развенчиваю фейки роспрапаганды из Донецка
👍154❤8🥱1🖕1