Нетакий кацап завжди насправді такий

Памʼятайте про це

Ахуйвертительные истории продолжение

Похоже, уже даже роспропагандоны поняли, как уёбищно выглядит их собственный "продукт", раз они его порезали на кусочки и публикуют фраментами уже несколько дней среди ночи. Чтобы эту дичь меньше кто видел.

#дичь #в_мире_животных

About Messages from Trump and Beyond

Preamble: I am utterly baffled by people and the fact that they don’t read past the headline.

I propose turning on our brains (that thing located in your head) and searching for the message.

Let’s read the article fully, and don’t skimp on one euro:

Europe is already thinking about how to protect Ukraine the day after the war started by Russia ends. There are still no negotiations to end the conflict, which has lasted over a thousand days, but Donald Trump’s arrival in the White House might stimulate them. However, it could result in a bad deal for Ukraine and the European Union. Kyiv demands security guarantees from Europe and the United States to achieve a “lasting peace.” The most effective shield would be Ukraine’s accession to NATO — Article 5 states that an attack on one ally is considered an attack on all. However, there is significant opposition from those against Ukraine’s membership.

Meanwhile, in some European energy hubs, other options for deploying a security umbrella are being considered: a combination of sending European peacekeeping troops to Ukraine with a flow of Western weapons and a defensive shield from the US.

“The war will end at the negotiating table, possibly sooner than expected. Europe must prepare for this and claim a seat at that table,” says a senior European source. Few doubt that, in the current situation, such an agreement would mean Ukraine losing territory or, at the very least, freezing the status of occupied territories for a number of years.

But the major debate that will define the coming months revolves around the “security guarantees” that can be offered to Ukraine “not only to accept this agreement,” says the senior European source, but, above all, to ensure its survival as an independent and sovereign country and to deter Putin’s insatiable imperial appetite — an autocrat who does not honor agreements he himself has signed.

These are not new debates or disputes. Last year, Kyiv already called for a NATO shield but only managed to convince a group of countries, including Spain, to sign security commitments that essentially guarantee long-term military and economic support.

“The fundamental question is whether these security guarantees are backed by the United States,” says Luis Simón, director of the Brussels office of the Royal Elcano Institute. Among European allies, there is no consensus, but several formulas are being considered in some capitals, diplomatic circles, and think tanks.

It would be desirable for Ukraine to have NATO membership illuminated and for American and European troops to be stationed in western Ukraine, says Simón. Or only European troops, but under a US umbrella. Or an agreement excluding NATO membership but guaranteed by Washington and other relevant European powers.

“NATO membership should be Europe’s primary goal. Although there are different variables that are less reliable but politically more viable,” says Simón. In October, just days after stepping down as NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg argued that providing Ukraine with Article 5 protection would be possible “if there is a dividing line that is not necessarily an internationally recognized border.”

Trump has promised to keep Americans out of the war and seems uninterested in admitting Kyiv into the Atlantic Alliance.

👇