The most crucial understanding at this point is to grasp that the battle we witness within the Jewish state is not of a political nature but over the true essence of the Jewish state, Jewish existence within such a state and the meaning of Jewishness and Judaism in general.
While it is true that Labour Zionism and its vision of Israeliness dominated the Jewish national project until 1977, following the 1967 war Jewish religious nationalist have been constantly gaining power. Their current domination within Israeli politics is now complete to a point that the ‘Israelis’ are becoming a shrinking minority of an infinitesimal nature. The Israeli Labour party that practically transformed Zionism into a statehood and led the Jewish National project until 1977 has been struggling to make it into the Kenesst. Yet, the human-sacrifice orgy we all witness in Gaza is a direct outcome of the total hegemony of ‘The Kingdom of Judea’ within the Israeli military and politics. Jewish Religious Nationalist agitators openly, shamelessly and fearlessly speak about “mass expulsion,” “mass starvation,” “mass murder” “mass rape” and at least in their view they echo their religious teachings.
While in the 1990s the battle between these two competing identities was still seen as undecided, by the early 2000s it came to a closure with an Israeliness’ total defeat. Israel has learned to see itself as ‘The Jewish State’, a state of the Jewish people (as opposed to a state of the Israelis). But it didn’t take long before this state morphed once again, this time into a Judaic State. Israel is now defined by Judaic religious teaching and inspired by Judaic religious texts. The above transition manifests itself in every aspect of Israeli life and this includes Israeli politics in general and Israeli crimes against humanity in particular.
What we see in Gaza is a tragic amplification of the most extreme lethal interpretation of the Judaic precept. Shockingly enough this interpretation of the Judaic call is overwhelmingly popular in Israel but it is also overpoweringly spread amongst Western Jewish institutions.
I am yet to see the ADL, AIPAC, (the British) Labour Friends of Israel or the (French) CRIF calling Israel to stop the Gaza genocide. If anything, what these Jewish organizations, institutions, and lobbies do instead is going out of their way to penalize those who dare apply the word genocide to Israeli actions.
While the analysis I present above is common in Israel and accepted by most left and right commentators, The Palestinian solidarity movement, the Left and most of Western Palestinian activists pretend to be blind to the true meaning of this Essentiality Clash within the Israeli society. They keep focusing on the Israeli ‘territorial’ objective, pretending not to see that something way deeper and dark is at play in the ‘Kingdom of Judea.’ It is called theology.
In Part II, I will delve into the manner in which decades of Palestinian solidarity industry activity was wasted on a desperate attempt not to interfere with Jewish sensitivities by deliberately misdiagnosing the Jewish National Project. By doing so, instead of leading towards a resolution of any kind of the Palestinian plight, the movement as a whole became a continuation of the problem.
End of Part one.
-----
While it is true that Labour Zionism and its vision of Israeliness dominated the Jewish national project until 1977, following the 1967 war Jewish religious nationalist have been constantly gaining power. Their current domination within Israeli politics is now complete to a point that the ‘Israelis’ are becoming a shrinking minority of an infinitesimal nature. The Israeli Labour party that practically transformed Zionism into a statehood and led the Jewish National project until 1977 has been struggling to make it into the Kenesst. Yet, the human-sacrifice orgy we all witness in Gaza is a direct outcome of the total hegemony of ‘The Kingdom of Judea’ within the Israeli military and politics. Jewish Religious Nationalist agitators openly, shamelessly and fearlessly speak about “mass expulsion,” “mass starvation,” “mass murder” “mass rape” and at least in their view they echo their religious teachings.
While in the 1990s the battle between these two competing identities was still seen as undecided, by the early 2000s it came to a closure with an Israeliness’ total defeat. Israel has learned to see itself as ‘The Jewish State’, a state of the Jewish people (as opposed to a state of the Israelis). But it didn’t take long before this state morphed once again, this time into a Judaic State. Israel is now defined by Judaic religious teaching and inspired by Judaic religious texts. The above transition manifests itself in every aspect of Israeli life and this includes Israeli politics in general and Israeli crimes against humanity in particular.
What we see in Gaza is a tragic amplification of the most extreme lethal interpretation of the Judaic precept. Shockingly enough this interpretation of the Judaic call is overwhelmingly popular in Israel but it is also overpoweringly spread amongst Western Jewish institutions.
I am yet to see the ADL, AIPAC, (the British) Labour Friends of Israel or the (French) CRIF calling Israel to stop the Gaza genocide. If anything, what these Jewish organizations, institutions, and lobbies do instead is going out of their way to penalize those who dare apply the word genocide to Israeli actions.
While the analysis I present above is common in Israel and accepted by most left and right commentators, The Palestinian solidarity movement, the Left and most of Western Palestinian activists pretend to be blind to the true meaning of this Essentiality Clash within the Israeli society. They keep focusing on the Israeli ‘territorial’ objective, pretending not to see that something way deeper and dark is at play in the ‘Kingdom of Judea.’ It is called theology.
In Part II, I will delve into the manner in which decades of Palestinian solidarity industry activity was wasted on a desperate attempt not to interfere with Jewish sensitivities by deliberately misdiagnosing the Jewish National Project. By doing so, instead of leading towards a resolution of any kind of the Palestinian plight, the movement as a whole became a continuation of the problem.
End of Part one.
-----
👍24❤13🔥4
Part Two
Palestine Solidarity, Left vs. Right
Jewish ‘Anti’ Zionism for Dummies
After a long deliberation and consideration and tens of thousands of Palestinian children slaughtered in Gaza, the Jewish so-called ‘anti Zionists’ kindly allowed us to use the term ‘genocide’. They even gave us a green light to compare Israel to the 3rd Reich. Yet, they always make sure to set the boundaries of such equations just to insure that we do not look into the Judaic theology that guides Israel. We are allowed to make comparisons with other genocides as long as we 1. Sustain the primacy of Jewish suffering (the holocaust) 2. Make sure that we do not look into the Judaic elements that practically have been shaping the brutality of the conflict.
As far as I can tell, not one Jewish anti Zionist agitator or activist has recently contributed a single insight into the role of Judaism, Judaic texts or Judaic teaching in the context of the Gaza genocide. For the Jewish Left, and the so called Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists, the ‘Zionist’ state is still subject to the hegemony of the ‘Israelis.’ For the Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists the problem with ‘Zionism’ is the ‘occupation’, i.e. a ‘territorial matter’ (echoing the ‘Israelis’, see Part I, link in the 1st comment), ignoring the fact that in reality what we see is a Judaic theological crisis. The anti Zionist Jews will insist that we restrict our criticism to ‘colonialism’, ‘settler colonialism’, ‘apartheid’, basically every possible misleading historical model or term that would divert the attention from the J-word. When they allow themselves to refer to ‘Jewish supremacy’ (as some finally do these days) they will always frame it within the limited context of contemporary ‘Zionism’ or ‘settler colonialism’, as if Jewish supremacy is a recent invention, as if the Jewish problem was born with Zionism. In fact, the so-called ‘Jewish problem’ is as old as Judaism. Bizarrely enough, Zionism, in its early version, was a promise to resolve this problem.
But the Jewish anti Zionists are not alone. They have a battalion of Western Palestinian activists, agitators and academics who are lending their support to this misleading project. Why? Because it is convenient. It saves the trouble of being punished for being inconsiderate towards ‘Jewish sensitivities.’ As things stand, Palestinian activists can only operate successfully once they enjoy the support of the Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists. It is of course an absurd situation in which the solidarity discourse of the oppressed is shaped by the sensitivities of the oppressor.
Western Left isn’t helpful either. As much as it (genuinely) supports the Palestinians and is devastated by the ongoing extermination campaign in Palestine, Left doesn’t know how to deal with essentialism, religion and spirit. Left is a dialectical materialist apparatus, theology for the left is ‘the opium for the masses.’
Interestingly enough, from a metaphysical perspective, the Left discourse in its approach to history is structurally similar to the Judaic philosophy of the Old Testament. Rabbinical Jews do not need history because the meaning of their existence, temporality and historical direction is inspired by their Torah. Jewish history is basically a cycle of recycled inversions of ‘Remember Amalek”. The Left follows a similar paradigm. It recycles its very few materialist models (class war, colonialism, settler colonialism, imperialism, apartheid etc’). Whether they correspond with reality or not is irrelevant. However, doubting their fitness or explanatory power is considered an act of heresy within most if not all Left circles. I let you figure out why…
The American New Right and Gaza
This is exactly where the awakening of the American ideological Right is becoming a very interesting event, for me at least. Right wing are naturally less prone to party politics or any form of correctness.
It didn’t take MAGA prime agitators too long to turn against their leader once they realised that he didn’t actually have any plan to deliver.
Cont’
Palestine Solidarity, Left vs. Right
Jewish ‘Anti’ Zionism for Dummies
After a long deliberation and consideration and tens of thousands of Palestinian children slaughtered in Gaza, the Jewish so-called ‘anti Zionists’ kindly allowed us to use the term ‘genocide’. They even gave us a green light to compare Israel to the 3rd Reich. Yet, they always make sure to set the boundaries of such equations just to insure that we do not look into the Judaic theology that guides Israel. We are allowed to make comparisons with other genocides as long as we 1. Sustain the primacy of Jewish suffering (the holocaust) 2. Make sure that we do not look into the Judaic elements that practically have been shaping the brutality of the conflict.
As far as I can tell, not one Jewish anti Zionist agitator or activist has recently contributed a single insight into the role of Judaism, Judaic texts or Judaic teaching in the context of the Gaza genocide. For the Jewish Left, and the so called Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists, the ‘Zionist’ state is still subject to the hegemony of the ‘Israelis.’ For the Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists the problem with ‘Zionism’ is the ‘occupation’, i.e. a ‘territorial matter’ (echoing the ‘Israelis’, see Part I, link in the 1st comment), ignoring the fact that in reality what we see is a Judaic theological crisis. The anti Zionist Jews will insist that we restrict our criticism to ‘colonialism’, ‘settler colonialism’, ‘apartheid’, basically every possible misleading historical model or term that would divert the attention from the J-word. When they allow themselves to refer to ‘Jewish supremacy’ (as some finally do these days) they will always frame it within the limited context of contemporary ‘Zionism’ or ‘settler colonialism’, as if Jewish supremacy is a recent invention, as if the Jewish problem was born with Zionism. In fact, the so-called ‘Jewish problem’ is as old as Judaism. Bizarrely enough, Zionism, in its early version, was a promise to resolve this problem.
But the Jewish anti Zionists are not alone. They have a battalion of Western Palestinian activists, agitators and academics who are lending their support to this misleading project. Why? Because it is convenient. It saves the trouble of being punished for being inconsiderate towards ‘Jewish sensitivities.’ As things stand, Palestinian activists can only operate successfully once they enjoy the support of the Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists. It is of course an absurd situation in which the solidarity discourse of the oppressed is shaped by the sensitivities of the oppressor.
Western Left isn’t helpful either. As much as it (genuinely) supports the Palestinians and is devastated by the ongoing extermination campaign in Palestine, Left doesn’t know how to deal with essentialism, religion and spirit. Left is a dialectical materialist apparatus, theology for the left is ‘the opium for the masses.’
Interestingly enough, from a metaphysical perspective, the Left discourse in its approach to history is structurally similar to the Judaic philosophy of the Old Testament. Rabbinical Jews do not need history because the meaning of their existence, temporality and historical direction is inspired by their Torah. Jewish history is basically a cycle of recycled inversions of ‘Remember Amalek”. The Left follows a similar paradigm. It recycles its very few materialist models (class war, colonialism, settler colonialism, imperialism, apartheid etc’). Whether they correspond with reality or not is irrelevant. However, doubting their fitness or explanatory power is considered an act of heresy within most if not all Left circles. I let you figure out why…
The American New Right and Gaza
This is exactly where the awakening of the American ideological Right is becoming a very interesting event, for me at least. Right wing are naturally less prone to party politics or any form of correctness.
It didn’t take MAGA prime agitators too long to turn against their leader once they realised that he didn’t actually have any plan to deliver.
Cont’
❤15👏6🔥1
It didn’t take them too long to identify that the elephant in the room has been of a kosher nature and for more than a while. If ‘Jewish power’ is a taboo topic within left circles and western Palestinian solidarity groups (they will go as far as discussing ‘Zionist power’), in the American Right no one seems to be afraid of referring to the J word and the tribe’s dominance within American life.
The shift that we see in American Right currently may be way more significant than decades of Western left-leaning Palestinian solidarity for the obvious reason that the American Right and Christian Right have awakened to the true morbid nature of the Jewish State and the theology that made it into what it is. The Left couldn’t have gone through such an awakening as it doesn’t even possess the theoretical/ideological tools to engage with the meaning of Jewish theology or religion in general.
But there is another aspect here that may be very significant. Neither Hamas, nor Hezbollah, the Houthis or Iran could be considered Left-leaning by any form or shape. They are religiously driven and at least, from a Left perspective, are considered Right-wing by nature. It is only natural, therefore, that Right agitators will present a better understanding of the core ideology that inspires (ed) both Ben Gvir and Sinwar.
While I don’t see UK Tommy Robinson supporting Hamas any time soon, we already saw Tucker Carlson lending his platform to the voice of Iran while focusing on some core Jewish issues. Col. Douglas Macgregor is not shy of using the J-word while also presenting Iranian perspectives. Candace Owens is fearlessly putting her finger at the problem. Nick Fuentes is probably the most vocal about the topic. Needless to mention that many do insist that Charlie Kirk lost his life for awakening to the Palestinian cause and the shift to that extent within the American Right.
I am of course a post political person. I was a ‘lefty’ in my early days. I stayed more or less at the same place, I still uphold pretty much the same values, but the Left moved: it became ‘liberal’, progressive and ‘identitarian’. It grew compromised. Being a thinking adult I, long ago, lost interest in any kind of political affiliation with Left or Right but I am fascinated, instead, by the meaning of the political discourse, the questions that it raises and in the answers it fails to deliver.
It is very obvious to me that the Left and the organised Jewish anti-Zionists have betrayed Palestine all along, misidentifying the Jewish theological perspective at the heart of Israel. Was it a deliberate, calculated treacherous act or maybe a result of limited theoretical capacity? This is of course a very interesting question to ponder. However, now may be the last moment for the Left and for Jewish anti-Zionists to finally grasp what is it that drives the brutal eradication of the Palestinian people. It is not a ‘land-grab’ enthusiasm (the and grab is a symptom not the disease), it is not ‘colonialism’ that lacks a ‘mother nation.’ It is not ‘settler colonial’ ideas that fuel the settlers like Smortrich, Ben Gvir and Daniella Weiss. It is not a territorial expansionist zeal. It is the theology. We owe this most obvious acknowledgment to ourselves but more than anyone else to the Palestinians, as they are the current victims of that very theology.
The shift that we see in American Right currently may be way more significant than decades of Western left-leaning Palestinian solidarity for the obvious reason that the American Right and Christian Right have awakened to the true morbid nature of the Jewish State and the theology that made it into what it is. The Left couldn’t have gone through such an awakening as it doesn’t even possess the theoretical/ideological tools to engage with the meaning of Jewish theology or religion in general.
But there is another aspect here that may be very significant. Neither Hamas, nor Hezbollah, the Houthis or Iran could be considered Left-leaning by any form or shape. They are religiously driven and at least, from a Left perspective, are considered Right-wing by nature. It is only natural, therefore, that Right agitators will present a better understanding of the core ideology that inspires (ed) both Ben Gvir and Sinwar.
While I don’t see UK Tommy Robinson supporting Hamas any time soon, we already saw Tucker Carlson lending his platform to the voice of Iran while focusing on some core Jewish issues. Col. Douglas Macgregor is not shy of using the J-word while also presenting Iranian perspectives. Candace Owens is fearlessly putting her finger at the problem. Nick Fuentes is probably the most vocal about the topic. Needless to mention that many do insist that Charlie Kirk lost his life for awakening to the Palestinian cause and the shift to that extent within the American Right.
I am of course a post political person. I was a ‘lefty’ in my early days. I stayed more or less at the same place, I still uphold pretty much the same values, but the Left moved: it became ‘liberal’, progressive and ‘identitarian’. It grew compromised. Being a thinking adult I, long ago, lost interest in any kind of political affiliation with Left or Right but I am fascinated, instead, by the meaning of the political discourse, the questions that it raises and in the answers it fails to deliver.
It is very obvious to me that the Left and the organised Jewish anti-Zionists have betrayed Palestine all along, misidentifying the Jewish theological perspective at the heart of Israel. Was it a deliberate, calculated treacherous act or maybe a result of limited theoretical capacity? This is of course a very interesting question to ponder. However, now may be the last moment for the Left and for Jewish anti-Zionists to finally grasp what is it that drives the brutal eradication of the Palestinian people. It is not a ‘land-grab’ enthusiasm (the and grab is a symptom not the disease), it is not ‘colonialism’ that lacks a ‘mother nation.’ It is not ‘settler colonial’ ideas that fuel the settlers like Smortrich, Ben Gvir and Daniella Weiss. It is not a territorial expansionist zeal. It is the theology. We owe this most obvious acknowledgment to ourselves but more than anyone else to the Palestinians, as they are the current victims of that very theology.
❤43👍21🔥5💯1
What is behind the IDF top prosecutor saga?
The IDF's top prosecutor, General Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, is accused of leaking information and videos that expose a horrific story of IDF soldiers torturing and sodomizing Palestinian detainees. The Israeli right has tried to capitalize on the unfolding story, claiming that the general's recent arrest vindicates the soldiers and that the leaked videos were ‘fake.’ However, the trial of the soldiers is proceeding, and the videos have been confirmed as genuine. General Tomer-Yerushalmi is now essentially accused of ‘treason’ for the leak. This affair could have been a classic case of ‘killing the messenger,’ but it is far more complex.
It has become clear that the General was not operating alone. The Israeli police claim to possess WhatsApp group communications involving other high-ranking officers connected to the leaked information. The Israeli press has referenced eight top officers within the IDF prosecution command. The documents were physically leaked by a junior officer within the military prosecutor’s command, who also admitted to the act before the Israeli General Security Organisation (Shabak). It is unthinkable that General Tomer-Yerushalmi would have made the decision to expose the IDF's conduct, consulted other high-ranking officers, and mobilized junior officers without a green light from above. Who could give such a green light? Her direct commander, the Israeli chief of staff (Herzi Halevi), or even the defense minister (Yoav Gallant).
Why would Israel’s supreme military authorities give such an order? The goal would be to prove that Israel ‘has the legal means to prosecute its war criminals’—a message to The Hague that it should stay away. If this theory is correct, General Tomer-Yerushalmi and those who authorized her were driven by ‘patriotic sentiments.’ They believed their actions were ‘good for the Jews.’ Make no mistake, however: I am not arguing that an ethical drive was involved. On the contrary, it was an attempt to push away the world’s supreme court by presenting a false image of ethical accountability. In short, the image of ‘ethical behaviour’ replaces any genuine care for ethical conduct, something that is absent from the state that calls itself the Jewish State.
This is where the General's alleged fake suicide attempt becomes a fascinating development. The IDF's top prosecutor clearly understood what lay ahead. She knows about Israel’s judicial system; until a week ago, she was its head. She realized her case would likely be held behind closed doors under a gag order. The General, I believe, orchestrated the fake suicide attempt to point a finger at those who gave her the green light. She probably apologized to her loved ones for her decision to take her own life, but she must have also stated that she was following orders and operating within her military duties. How can we know this? The Israeli press mentioned that her ‘final note’ contained sensitive statements that cannot be disclosed.
If General Tomer-Yerushalmi were guilty of ‘treason’ as a top-ranking IDF officer, one would expect her to be tried by a military court and face severe punishment. This is clearly not the case. She was arrested by the Israeli police and brought before a civil court. This leads to an interesting question, shouldn’t the general be subject to military trial? First we may have to examine the distinction between civil and military law. In the liberal world, we tend to believe that people are ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ This is not the case in military law, where the organization’s interests supersede those of the individual. Often in the army, an officer will penalize an entire unit for a mistake made by one or two subordinates. Military justice is not inspired by the ‘pursuit of justice,’ let alone ethics, but by the survivability of the system itself.
The IDF's top prosecutor, General Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, is accused of leaking information and videos that expose a horrific story of IDF soldiers torturing and sodomizing Palestinian detainees. The Israeli right has tried to capitalize on the unfolding story, claiming that the general's recent arrest vindicates the soldiers and that the leaked videos were ‘fake.’ However, the trial of the soldiers is proceeding, and the videos have been confirmed as genuine. General Tomer-Yerushalmi is now essentially accused of ‘treason’ for the leak. This affair could have been a classic case of ‘killing the messenger,’ but it is far more complex.
It has become clear that the General was not operating alone. The Israeli police claim to possess WhatsApp group communications involving other high-ranking officers connected to the leaked information. The Israeli press has referenced eight top officers within the IDF prosecution command. The documents were physically leaked by a junior officer within the military prosecutor’s command, who also admitted to the act before the Israeli General Security Organisation (Shabak). It is unthinkable that General Tomer-Yerushalmi would have made the decision to expose the IDF's conduct, consulted other high-ranking officers, and mobilized junior officers without a green light from above. Who could give such a green light? Her direct commander, the Israeli chief of staff (Herzi Halevi), or even the defense minister (Yoav Gallant).
Why would Israel’s supreme military authorities give such an order? The goal would be to prove that Israel ‘has the legal means to prosecute its war criminals’—a message to The Hague that it should stay away. If this theory is correct, General Tomer-Yerushalmi and those who authorized her were driven by ‘patriotic sentiments.’ They believed their actions were ‘good for the Jews.’ Make no mistake, however: I am not arguing that an ethical drive was involved. On the contrary, it was an attempt to push away the world’s supreme court by presenting a false image of ethical accountability. In short, the image of ‘ethical behaviour’ replaces any genuine care for ethical conduct, something that is absent from the state that calls itself the Jewish State.
This is where the General's alleged fake suicide attempt becomes a fascinating development. The IDF's top prosecutor clearly understood what lay ahead. She knows about Israel’s judicial system; until a week ago, she was its head. She realized her case would likely be held behind closed doors under a gag order. The General, I believe, orchestrated the fake suicide attempt to point a finger at those who gave her the green light. She probably apologized to her loved ones for her decision to take her own life, but she must have also stated that she was following orders and operating within her military duties. How can we know this? The Israeli press mentioned that her ‘final note’ contained sensitive statements that cannot be disclosed.
If General Tomer-Yerushalmi were guilty of ‘treason’ as a top-ranking IDF officer, one would expect her to be tried by a military court and face severe punishment. This is clearly not the case. She was arrested by the Israeli police and brought before a civil court. This leads to an interesting question, shouldn’t the general be subject to military trial? First we may have to examine the distinction between civil and military law. In the liberal world, we tend to believe that people are ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ This is not the case in military law, where the organization’s interests supersede those of the individual. Often in the army, an officer will penalize an entire unit for a mistake made by one or two subordinates. Military justice is not inspired by the ‘pursuit of justice,’ let alone ethics, but by the survivability of the system itself.
❤12👍8🔥3🤔1
I would argue that General Tomer-Yerushalmi would likely have been vindicated by a military court, as she could have proven she followed orders and served the IDF's interest by presenting the pretence of an ‘active and healthy justice system.’ In a civil court, however, she faces accusations limited to leaking specific documents or lying in court. She will probably admit to this and face the consequences. The verdict would ultimately grant more power to Netanyahu against his weakened opposition.
However, the take-home message is overwhelmingly simple. If General Tomer-Yerushalmi’s actions were motivated by an attempt to push the ICC away by conveying a false image of a capable IDF justice system intolerant of war crimes, then her pursuit and arrest only prove to the world that the ICC must take the most severe measures against what the lawless, morbid entity and its wide range of war criminals.
However, the take-home message is overwhelmingly simple. If General Tomer-Yerushalmi’s actions were motivated by an attempt to push the ICC away by conveying a false image of a capable IDF justice system intolerant of war crimes, then her pursuit and arrest only prove to the world that the ICC must take the most severe measures against what the lawless, morbid entity and its wide range of war criminals.
👍27💯9❤4
Organology out soon https://youtu.be/aZY7DmmWfg4?si=QNjJ5ZYIaIQPWI3O
YouTube
Mack The Knife
Provided to YouTube by Virtual Label LLC
Mack The Knife · Organology
Mack The Knife
℗ AESTHETIKO
Released on: 2025-10-24
Alto Saxophone: Gilad Atzmon
Drums: Joel Barford
Mastering Engineer: Gilad Atzmon
Organ: Ross Stanley
Recording Engineer: James Welch…
Mack The Knife · Organology
Mack The Knife
℗ AESTHETIKO
Released on: 2025-10-24
Alto Saxophone: Gilad Atzmon
Drums: Joel Barford
Mastering Engineer: Gilad Atzmon
Organ: Ross Stanley
Recording Engineer: James Welch…
👍17❤11👏3
Purim, Passover and the war against Iran
Since Israel isn’t just a ‘Jewish State’ (the state of the Jewish people), but has gradually morphed into The Judaic State (a state driven by Judaic religion and spirit), it is crucial to examine the current Israeli-American war in Iran within the context of the Judaic religion.
The criminal war against Iran was launched one day before Purim, the most joyous Jewish holiday, which celebrates the biblical story of a Jewish genocide in ancient Persia. The celebration is inspired by the Book of Esther. It is worth mentioning that the story of Purim has zero historical support; it does not appear in any Persian historical account, yet Jewish people—both religious and secular—celebrate it.
Was the decision to launch the war on Iran a day before the Jewish celebration of a genocide in ancient Persia a coincidence? Was the decision to kill the Supreme Leader in the first air raid a tactical move, or was it inspired by religious sentiment? I will let you ponder these questions.
A month into this war, it is proving to be a catastrophe for its ‘architects’ and the West in general. It signals the long-awaited end of American global hegemony. It may well turn the prime aggressor- ISrael into WASrael.
Yet, from a Judaic point of view, we are just entering another Jewish holiday—or perhaps another ‘commemoration’ of a biblical, genocidal fantasy narrative.
Passover is, of course, a celebration of the Jewish God inflicting ten plagues on Egypt. These plagues should be described as nothing short of WMD and cosmic war crimes, entailing biological warfare of the worst kind. The Biblical plagues, in order, included turning the Nile to blood, frogs, lice/gnats, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts, darkness, and the death of the firstborn.
The Jewish Passover feast is a celebration of these divine collective punishments. Again, there is zero historical account of such an event ever occurring, but one thing cannot be denied: Jews, both religious and secular, celebrate this narrative of extended mass killing.
More worrying is the thought that they didn’t just invent this genocidal event and celebrate its alleged occurrence; they actually invented the God who inflicted this genocide and have adhered to Him throughout their history.
In light of this religious affinity for genocidal narratives, we shouldn’t be surprised that it was two Jewish scientists (Einstein and Szilard) who initiated the Manhattan Project and a third (Oppenheimer) who built it. The bomb was called at the time ‘The Jewish Bomb’ for a reason. It was also Fritz Haber who devised the idea of gas warfare during WWI. Haber died on his way to Palestine while making Aliyah.
The Jewish State was born in an act of mass ethnic cleansing—the 1948 Nakba—, it then locked the indigenous people of the land in open air prisons and it did not take long before it committed the most documented genocide in human history (Gaza 2023-2026).
The war against Iran, which was declared as a ‘fight against the regime,’ quickly evolved into a war of destruction against the Iranian people. By now, it is impossible not to attempt to understand the Jewish state and its actions in light of the Judaic religion, texts, and culture.
The Passover Haggadah tells the story of the Israelites' exodus from Egypt. In light of the destruction the Israelites have spread around them, it seems as if the Israelites’ exodus from Palestine is now only a matter of time.
Since Israel isn’t just a ‘Jewish State’ (the state of the Jewish people), but has gradually morphed into The Judaic State (a state driven by Judaic religion and spirit), it is crucial to examine the current Israeli-American war in Iran within the context of the Judaic religion.
The criminal war against Iran was launched one day before Purim, the most joyous Jewish holiday, which celebrates the biblical story of a Jewish genocide in ancient Persia. The celebration is inspired by the Book of Esther. It is worth mentioning that the story of Purim has zero historical support; it does not appear in any Persian historical account, yet Jewish people—both religious and secular—celebrate it.
Was the decision to launch the war on Iran a day before the Jewish celebration of a genocide in ancient Persia a coincidence? Was the decision to kill the Supreme Leader in the first air raid a tactical move, or was it inspired by religious sentiment? I will let you ponder these questions.
A month into this war, it is proving to be a catastrophe for its ‘architects’ and the West in general. It signals the long-awaited end of American global hegemony. It may well turn the prime aggressor- ISrael into WASrael.
Yet, from a Judaic point of view, we are just entering another Jewish holiday—or perhaps another ‘commemoration’ of a biblical, genocidal fantasy narrative.
Passover is, of course, a celebration of the Jewish God inflicting ten plagues on Egypt. These plagues should be described as nothing short of WMD and cosmic war crimes, entailing biological warfare of the worst kind. The Biblical plagues, in order, included turning the Nile to blood, frogs, lice/gnats, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts, darkness, and the death of the firstborn.
The Jewish Passover feast is a celebration of these divine collective punishments. Again, there is zero historical account of such an event ever occurring, but one thing cannot be denied: Jews, both religious and secular, celebrate this narrative of extended mass killing.
More worrying is the thought that they didn’t just invent this genocidal event and celebrate its alleged occurrence; they actually invented the God who inflicted this genocide and have adhered to Him throughout their history.
In light of this religious affinity for genocidal narratives, we shouldn’t be surprised that it was two Jewish scientists (Einstein and Szilard) who initiated the Manhattan Project and a third (Oppenheimer) who built it. The bomb was called at the time ‘The Jewish Bomb’ for a reason. It was also Fritz Haber who devised the idea of gas warfare during WWI. Haber died on his way to Palestine while making Aliyah.
The Jewish State was born in an act of mass ethnic cleansing—the 1948 Nakba—, it then locked the indigenous people of the land in open air prisons and it did not take long before it committed the most documented genocide in human history (Gaza 2023-2026).
The war against Iran, which was declared as a ‘fight against the regime,’ quickly evolved into a war of destruction against the Iranian people. By now, it is impossible not to attempt to understand the Jewish state and its actions in light of the Judaic religion, texts, and culture.
The Passover Haggadah tells the story of the Israelites' exodus from Egypt. In light of the destruction the Israelites have spread around them, it seems as if the Israelites’ exodus from Palestine is now only a matter of time.
👍46❤9🔥4✍2🙏2💯1
Jewish PRE Traumatic Stress Disorder on Display (PRE TSD)
The Sodomite’s media outlets are in a state of panic warning their Hebrew followers of a possible extensive Iranian ballistic attack during the Passover Dinner on 1st April.
Yet, at the same time, the IDF admits that there is no intelligence that indicates on such a development.
We are dealing with people who are traumatized by an imaginary event in the future. The clinical terms I myself attributed to this classic Jewish phenomenon is PRE TSD.
You wonder why the Hebrews are in panic. Simple, this is exactly what they themselves would do if they were Iranians. They themselves launched their current criminal war at the time of Ramadan. They love to hit their enemies at time of family gatherings, at the mosque, in classes, in theaters, in hospitals..
The Israelis are horrified by the fantasy of Iran ruining their Passover Dinner because they are attributing their own barbarian symptoms to the Iranians. The clinical term that describes this behavior is ‘projection’ (or projecStein in Yiddish).
I gathered many years ago that the more unethical one is, the more horrified one is of the possibility that the Other is equally unethical. This is the vicious cycle that pulls the tribe into endless disasters and preemptive violence.
I am not original here. I believe the Jesus Christ was the first to identify this tribal pattern. Turning the other cheek was his remedy. I guess you know what happened to him next…
The Sodomite’s media outlets are in a state of panic warning their Hebrew followers of a possible extensive Iranian ballistic attack during the Passover Dinner on 1st April.
Yet, at the same time, the IDF admits that there is no intelligence that indicates on such a development.
We are dealing with people who are traumatized by an imaginary event in the future. The clinical terms I myself attributed to this classic Jewish phenomenon is PRE TSD.
You wonder why the Hebrews are in panic. Simple, this is exactly what they themselves would do if they were Iranians. They themselves launched their current criminal war at the time of Ramadan. They love to hit their enemies at time of family gatherings, at the mosque, in classes, in theaters, in hospitals..
The Israelis are horrified by the fantasy of Iran ruining their Passover Dinner because they are attributing their own barbarian symptoms to the Iranians. The clinical term that describes this behavior is ‘projection’ (or projecStein in Yiddish).
I gathered many years ago that the more unethical one is, the more horrified one is of the possibility that the Other is equally unethical. This is the vicious cycle that pulls the tribe into endless disasters and preemptive violence.
I am not original here. I believe the Jesus Christ was the first to identify this tribal pattern. Turning the other cheek was his remedy. I guess you know what happened to him next…
👍42❤4🙏4💯3😱1😈1
Zionism vs. Judaism in just a few words!
Zionism was born to replace Judaism , to redefine the Jews as a ‘nation’ as opposed to a ‘religious group.’
The birth of Zionism evolved into a battle between the two. Consequently, Zionism was defeated. Judaism won by integrating the ‘homecoming’ and Ertz Yisrael into Judaism’s core belief (Rabbi Kook).
What we witness in Israel is not Zionism! It is far worse. Israel isn’t just a Jewish State, it is the Judaic State or more precisely, Judaism in practice and it is beyond scary…
Zionism was born to replace Judaism , to redefine the Jews as a ‘nation’ as opposed to a ‘religious group.’
The birth of Zionism evolved into a battle between the two. Consequently, Zionism was defeated. Judaism won by integrating the ‘homecoming’ and Ertz Yisrael into Judaism’s core belief (Rabbi Kook).
What we witness in Israel is not Zionism! It is far worse. Israel isn’t just a Jewish State, it is the Judaic State or more precisely, Judaism in practice and it is beyond scary…
👍35💯9
Jerusalemite Democracy vs. Iranian Meritocracy
If you ask yourself: How is it that Iran comes out on top? Why is China progressing while we are spiraling down? How is it possible that Russia is winning, while NATO which promised us an easy win in Ukraine, has been proven to be a comical military force?
Meritocracy vs. Democracy is my short answer.
Meritocracy is often defined as a system, organization, or society in which people are awarded power, positions, and rewards based on their abilities, talent, and effort , rather than based on their class, wealth, family connections, or other unrelated factors.
I tend to define meritocracy as a system in which the right people are doing the right jobs. This is what we see in Iran, China, and Russia.
This is the complete opposite of what we witness in Western democracy. The primary reason is obvious: "the masses" are not particularly known to be clever or gifted. Accordingly, letting the masses decide who may lead them is problematic.
But this is only the first obstacle. Lobbying, interest groups, think tanks, and wealth paralyze democracy and guarantee its failure. It turns democracy into a powerful tool in the hands of the privileged.
The international/global Israeli lobby groups exemplify the above. They make democracy impossible.
AIPAC, for instance, is funding both American parties, and even channeling support to both presidential candidates simultaneously. At the same time, Miriam Adelson puts her money on Trump. Haim Saban takes care of the Democratic Party's needs.
We see the same dynamic in Britain with Labour and Conservative Friends of Israel. You won't be surprised to find out that Reform Friends of Israel is already very active.
The catastrophic failure of Western democracy and The English speaking in particular is shining right now. We witness America being pushed into an Israeli war that goes against its national interests. We witness a low-life American president operating like an Israeli lapdog. We look at Britain and see the PM zigzagging desperately, trying to present a position that will serve the nation that voted him in—but he knows that upsetting the strongest lobby on the land will turn him into the next Corbyn.
Modern democracy was born as a fake project. It was there to make us believe that the mess we live-in is what we voluntarily inflicted upon ourselves. By now, every Western person can see who puppeteers this political farce…
If you ask yourself: How is it that Iran comes out on top? Why is China progressing while we are spiraling down? How is it possible that Russia is winning, while NATO which promised us an easy win in Ukraine, has been proven to be a comical military force?
Meritocracy vs. Democracy is my short answer.
Meritocracy is often defined as a system, organization, or society in which people are awarded power, positions, and rewards based on their abilities, talent, and effort , rather than based on their class, wealth, family connections, or other unrelated factors.
I tend to define meritocracy as a system in which the right people are doing the right jobs. This is what we see in Iran, China, and Russia.
This is the complete opposite of what we witness in Western democracy. The primary reason is obvious: "the masses" are not particularly known to be clever or gifted. Accordingly, letting the masses decide who may lead them is problematic.
But this is only the first obstacle. Lobbying, interest groups, think tanks, and wealth paralyze democracy and guarantee its failure. It turns democracy into a powerful tool in the hands of the privileged.
The international/global Israeli lobby groups exemplify the above. They make democracy impossible.
AIPAC, for instance, is funding both American parties, and even channeling support to both presidential candidates simultaneously. At the same time, Miriam Adelson puts her money on Trump. Haim Saban takes care of the Democratic Party's needs.
We see the same dynamic in Britain with Labour and Conservative Friends of Israel. You won't be surprised to find out that Reform Friends of Israel is already very active.
The catastrophic failure of Western democracy and The English speaking in particular is shining right now. We witness America being pushed into an Israeli war that goes against its national interests. We witness a low-life American president operating like an Israeli lapdog. We look at Britain and see the PM zigzagging desperately, trying to present a position that will serve the nation that voted him in—but he knows that upsetting the strongest lobby on the land will turn him into the next Corbyn.
Modern democracy was born as a fake project. It was there to make us believe that the mess we live-in is what we voluntarily inflicted upon ourselves. By now, every Western person can see who puppeteers this political farce…
👍33💯10❤1😭1
Can the World Survive Israel?
On the day Iran shot down one F-15E and one A-10, it also confirmed that it had turned more than 160 unmanned aircraft into a pile of wreckage on the ground.
This represents a complete and systematic failure of American/Israeli aerial doctrine. It means that Iran maintains air defense and manages to protect its skies wherever it matters—over cities, energy infrastructure, the petroleum industry, nuclear assets, and more.
Meanwhile, it is the U.S. military and Israel that have completely failed to protect the skies above their own heads. The entirety of American bases in the region have been wiped out by Iranian ballistic missiles. The Gulf's most strategic assets are now subject to Iranian mercy, and when it comes to the global arch monster: Israel- it is subject to a constant flow of Iranian ballistic fire. The Israelis have lost their ability to intercept anything. It looks as if Israel has given up on trying to protect its cities and assets, most likely because it is running very low on Arrow-3 missiles.
As things stand, America is desperate for a ceasefire and is endlessly searching for an exit strategy. The Iranians are not helping. Iran wants America out of the region. Furthermore, Iran's backers want to see America on its knees globally, and they are likely to succeed.
When it comes to the Jewish State, the situation is more complicated. Israel can see that this war may well be its last. It can see that it is being blamed for the current global energy catastrophe. It can see the prospect of the USA escaping the battle with its tail between its legs, leaving the Jewish state alone with Iran in a position of superiority.
If this war was initially about the survival of the Iranian regime, just a few weeks in, it is now the survival of the Jewish state that is hanging by a thread.
The only thing to bear in mind in this regard is that Israel is a nuclear superpower driven by a Judaically inspired genocidal and suicidal ethos.
The Israeli zealot messianic leadership is comforted by the thought of going down with the whole of humanity—also known as the Samson Option. If there was ever hope of dismantling this cancerous entity in a harmonious, peaceful manner, that hope is unlikely to materialize.
On the day Iran shot down one F-15E and one A-10, it also confirmed that it had turned more than 160 unmanned aircraft into a pile of wreckage on the ground.
This represents a complete and systematic failure of American/Israeli aerial doctrine. It means that Iran maintains air defense and manages to protect its skies wherever it matters—over cities, energy infrastructure, the petroleum industry, nuclear assets, and more.
Meanwhile, it is the U.S. military and Israel that have completely failed to protect the skies above their own heads. The entirety of American bases in the region have been wiped out by Iranian ballistic missiles. The Gulf's most strategic assets are now subject to Iranian mercy, and when it comes to the global arch monster: Israel- it is subject to a constant flow of Iranian ballistic fire. The Israelis have lost their ability to intercept anything. It looks as if Israel has given up on trying to protect its cities and assets, most likely because it is running very low on Arrow-3 missiles.
As things stand, America is desperate for a ceasefire and is endlessly searching for an exit strategy. The Iranians are not helping. Iran wants America out of the region. Furthermore, Iran's backers want to see America on its knees globally, and they are likely to succeed.
When it comes to the Jewish State, the situation is more complicated. Israel can see that this war may well be its last. It can see that it is being blamed for the current global energy catastrophe. It can see the prospect of the USA escaping the battle with its tail between its legs, leaving the Jewish state alone with Iran in a position of superiority.
If this war was initially about the survival of the Iranian regime, just a few weeks in, it is now the survival of the Jewish state that is hanging by a thread.
The only thing to bear in mind in this regard is that Israel is a nuclear superpower driven by a Judaically inspired genocidal and suicidal ethos.
The Israeli zealot messianic leadership is comforted by the thought of going down with the whole of humanity—also known as the Samson Option. If there was ever hope of dismantling this cancerous entity in a harmonious, peaceful manner, that hope is unlikely to materialize.
👍19❤7🔥2💯1
Why Iran holds back?
Don’t want to upset any of you, but it’s important for me to mention that, as of now, the damage to Israel’s infrastructure is minimal. They still have water in their taps and electric power running in their walls. Their bridges are intact, their leaders are alive. Cluster missiles have a significant morale effect, of course, but consider that the Hebrews are a manic-depressive collective, they will very quickly slip back into their usual hubris mode.
Why Iran refrains from hitting the Jewish State hard is an open question. Assuming that Iran possesses the capability to strike the Jewish State where it really hurts, and simply refrains from doing so, I can offer a few possible reasons:
1. For Iran, the destruction of Israel is a secondary objective. It sees American presence in the region as a core existential threat. Iran believes, therefore, that destroying America, its regional allies, its military presence in the region, and the petrodollar are Iran’s primary objectives. These objectives align with Iran’s backers. Once the U.S. is out of the way, Israel could be next.
2. The Jewish State has proven to be both genocidal and suicidal. This combination of characteristics makes the Jewish State a very dangerous element to deal with. If I am correct, Iran then chooses to slowly break the Israeli spirit. Earlier today I heard an Israeli on N12 news say, 'Once they open Ben Gurion Airport, everybody will leave. No one will stay to turn the lights off.' This is, obviously, an exaggeration; however, many will warily do whatever they can to leave this madhouse.
3. In an ideal world, Iran would prefer to give back Palestine to its true historic and indigenous owners intact—neither radioactively poisoned nor fully destroyed. They would love to return the land to its people with the power stations, refineries, and desalination plants.
4. The Iranians are. Obviously, the adults in the room. They see themselves as a showcase of an Islamic political system. Unlike the Jewish State, which does very little except give Jews, Judaism, and Jewishness a horrid reputation for centuries to come, the Islamic Republic of Iran performs a spectacle of restraint and harmonious sophistication in the face of the lowest of the low.
Don’t want to upset any of you, but it’s important for me to mention that, as of now, the damage to Israel’s infrastructure is minimal. They still have water in their taps and electric power running in their walls. Their bridges are intact, their leaders are alive. Cluster missiles have a significant morale effect, of course, but consider that the Hebrews are a manic-depressive collective, they will very quickly slip back into their usual hubris mode.
Why Iran refrains from hitting the Jewish State hard is an open question. Assuming that Iran possesses the capability to strike the Jewish State where it really hurts, and simply refrains from doing so, I can offer a few possible reasons:
1. For Iran, the destruction of Israel is a secondary objective. It sees American presence in the region as a core existential threat. Iran believes, therefore, that destroying America, its regional allies, its military presence in the region, and the petrodollar are Iran’s primary objectives. These objectives align with Iran’s backers. Once the U.S. is out of the way, Israel could be next.
2. The Jewish State has proven to be both genocidal and suicidal. This combination of characteristics makes the Jewish State a very dangerous element to deal with. If I am correct, Iran then chooses to slowly break the Israeli spirit. Earlier today I heard an Israeli on N12 news say, 'Once they open Ben Gurion Airport, everybody will leave. No one will stay to turn the lights off.' This is, obviously, an exaggeration; however, many will warily do whatever they can to leave this madhouse.
3. In an ideal world, Iran would prefer to give back Palestine to its true historic and indigenous owners intact—neither radioactively poisoned nor fully destroyed. They would love to return the land to its people with the power stations, refineries, and desalination plants.
4. The Iranians are. Obviously, the adults in the room. They see themselves as a showcase of an Islamic political system. Unlike the Jewish State, which does very little except give Jews, Judaism, and Jewishness a horrid reputation for centuries to come, the Islamic Republic of Iran performs a spectacle of restraint and harmonious sophistication in the face of the lowest of the low.
👍33💯10❤5
The American/Israeli defeat and the Jewish perspective
The Iranian victory is a historic landmark. It is something that will be taught in every military school until the end of time. This triumph is a product of a profound understanding of the enemy (both the Jewish State and its number one subservient proxy, the ‘not so united’ States of America). It is also a product of Iran understanding its own limitations, knowing its terrain, grasping its place in geopolitics, and recognizing its neighbors and their survival necessities.
The military philosopher Clausewitz taught us that "war is a continuation of politics by other means." America's war on Iran was not a continuation of any politics; it was a result of its president being blackmailed by the Jewish State. We learned yesterday that the entire administration, military elite, and intelligence opposed the war, yet the unhinged ginger guy at the top decided to launch a criminal war aimed at a set of unrealistic objectives.
Iran, for its part, knew its place. It knew its role within BRICS. It understood its position in the global economy. For Iran, the war that was inflicted upon it was the means, not a goal in itself. As I have written numerous times on this page, for Iran and its allies, the war had a prime objective: the destruction of America as a superpower. Trump was, of course, a golden opportunity that could not be missed. He has the natural characteristics that made him the perfect candidate for such a task. He has been blackmailed by the Jewish State and its lobby for a while. At the same time, he is a megalomaniac narcissist as well as insecure; consequently, he lacks the ability to conduct high-level group thinking. He was destined to make America Small like Never Before and he surely delivered.
The USA this morning is an isolated caricature. It has been defeated in a war it should never have started.
The Jewish State, of course, was the prime catalyst of this global disaster. It has proven to the world how dangerous and reckless it is. It has convinced America that it has a very serious Jewish problem: in the open, its lobby blackmails its political class into disastrous adventures.
While the founders of Israel were clever enough to grasp that, due to its dimensions and regional circumstances, Israel should always avoid war-and if pushed into them, better keep them short and decisive, the current Jewish State is in a constant state of war with pretty much everyone in the region. You ask why? The obvious answer is that its Prime Minister, Netanyahu, counts on war for his personal survival. But this is just the politically correct answer. The real answer is that Jewishness is defined by negation—by that which separates the Jew from the other (the goy or humanity if you like). Never ending conflict is tragically an inherent feature of a state that defines itself as "the Jewish State." The entire Jewish history is an endless tale of lethal conflicts, and the Jewish present is no different.
Contrary to Clausewitz’s observation, in the Jewish State, politics is a continuation of war by every possible means. As tragic as it may sound, as long as this state exists, world peace is in grave danger, and what we witnessed in the last five weeks is a disastrous spectacle of that very danger.
The Iranian victory is a historic landmark. It is something that will be taught in every military school until the end of time. This triumph is a product of a profound understanding of the enemy (both the Jewish State and its number one subservient proxy, the ‘not so united’ States of America). It is also a product of Iran understanding its own limitations, knowing its terrain, grasping its place in geopolitics, and recognizing its neighbors and their survival necessities.
The military philosopher Clausewitz taught us that "war is a continuation of politics by other means." America's war on Iran was not a continuation of any politics; it was a result of its president being blackmailed by the Jewish State. We learned yesterday that the entire administration, military elite, and intelligence opposed the war, yet the unhinged ginger guy at the top decided to launch a criminal war aimed at a set of unrealistic objectives.
Iran, for its part, knew its place. It knew its role within BRICS. It understood its position in the global economy. For Iran, the war that was inflicted upon it was the means, not a goal in itself. As I have written numerous times on this page, for Iran and its allies, the war had a prime objective: the destruction of America as a superpower. Trump was, of course, a golden opportunity that could not be missed. He has the natural characteristics that made him the perfect candidate for such a task. He has been blackmailed by the Jewish State and its lobby for a while. At the same time, he is a megalomaniac narcissist as well as insecure; consequently, he lacks the ability to conduct high-level group thinking. He was destined to make America Small like Never Before and he surely delivered.
The USA this morning is an isolated caricature. It has been defeated in a war it should never have started.
The Jewish State, of course, was the prime catalyst of this global disaster. It has proven to the world how dangerous and reckless it is. It has convinced America that it has a very serious Jewish problem: in the open, its lobby blackmails its political class into disastrous adventures.
While the founders of Israel were clever enough to grasp that, due to its dimensions and regional circumstances, Israel should always avoid war-and if pushed into them, better keep them short and decisive, the current Jewish State is in a constant state of war with pretty much everyone in the region. You ask why? The obvious answer is that its Prime Minister, Netanyahu, counts on war for his personal survival. But this is just the politically correct answer. The real answer is that Jewishness is defined by negation—by that which separates the Jew from the other (the goy or humanity if you like). Never ending conflict is tragically an inherent feature of a state that defines itself as "the Jewish State." The entire Jewish history is an endless tale of lethal conflicts, and the Jewish present is no different.
Contrary to Clausewitz’s observation, in the Jewish State, politics is a continuation of war by every possible means. As tragic as it may sound, as long as this state exists, world peace is in grave danger, and what we witnessed in the last five weeks is a disastrous spectacle of that very danger.
❤26👍19
I broke my silence, first interview after 5 years of media silence.
Friends , as you know I stopped giving interviews, I retired from being a public persona in 2020. I was asked so many time to comment but refused.
However this guy Syed M. Abbas intrigued me. I liked his posts and comments. I accepted his invitation.
Many clever people talk about geopolitics, others talk about military aspects. I may be the only one who is willing to dissect the J thing. I see the Jewishness of the Jewish State at the core of the mess we are all in..
I hope you enjoy it …
https://youtu.be/lrnildu2j4M?is=-fIxgmcPR8oF0Ro_
Friends , as you know I stopped giving interviews, I retired from being a public persona in 2020. I was asked so many time to comment but refused.
However this guy Syed M. Abbas intrigued me. I liked his posts and comments. I accepted his invitation.
Many clever people talk about geopolitics, others talk about military aspects. I may be the only one who is willing to dissect the J thing. I see the Jewishness of the Jewish State at the core of the mess we are all in..
I hope you enjoy it …
https://youtu.be/lrnildu2j4M?is=-fIxgmcPR8oF0Ro_
YouTube
Ex-IDF, Ex-Israeli: Gilad Atzmon on What's Really Driving Israel's Genocidal Logic
Gilad Atzmon served in the IDF. He left Israel at 30. He now identifies as neither Israeli nor Jewish. And he argues that what's driving the war on Iran isn't Zionism — it's something older, deeper, and far more dangerous.
In this episode, Atzmon — international…
In this episode, Atzmon — international…
👍38❤23🏆8🙏2
Were the Iranian willing to give away their enriched uranium?
I came across an interesting theory this morning. Iran’s 400 kg of enriched uranium weren’t intended as source material for ten or more potential “bombs.” They were a bargaining tool. The Iranians thought, “We give away the enriched uranium, and in return you Americans remove the sanctions completely.”
But it didn’t work out. You ask why? I can think of two possibilities:
1. American negotiation is dominated as well as driven by Israeli interests. Netanyahu defines the objectives; Witkoff and Kushner are the caretakers. The Jewish worldview, as we’ve discussed many times, is most often affected by Pre-TSD (pre-traumatic stress disorder).
As opposed to Post-TSD, which is defined as a behavioral pattern triggered by a traumatic event in the past, in the case of PRE-TSD, it is a imaginary fantasy event in the future that triggers the trauma in the present. Jews are often tormented by a future fantasy of destruction, and it is that ‘trauma’ that shapes their present behavior into a self-destructive path. Why Jews developed such a peculiar tendency is, in itself, an interesting question. Is it because the God whom they invented and worship is itself a genocidal character (the destruction of Sodom, the Ten Plagues of Egypt, Deuteronomy’s God calling for the destruction of the indigenous, etc.)? Is it because of their suicidal/genocidal biblical heroes such as Samson? It may have something to do with their recent cultural heroes who initiated/invented/devised WMDs and nuclear warfare (Haber, Einstein, Szilard, Oppenheimer, etc.). Is it their Jewish state that introduced nuclear weapons to the Middle East (Shimon Peres—Dimona)? The Jewish negotiating team couldn’t grasp, let alone consider the Iranians’ kind offer because they projected their own genocidal symptoms onto their Iranian counterparts.
2. There is also a counter-explanation possible. It suggests accepting that Kushner, Witkoff, and Netanyahu actually understood the Iranian offer very well. They grasped that Iran is not interested in possessing nukes. Israel, as such, wasn’t interested in removing the enriched uranium; it just wanted to destroy Iran as part of Israel’s plan for greater domination in the region.
I came across an interesting theory this morning. Iran’s 400 kg of enriched uranium weren’t intended as source material for ten or more potential “bombs.” They were a bargaining tool. The Iranians thought, “We give away the enriched uranium, and in return you Americans remove the sanctions completely.”
But it didn’t work out. You ask why? I can think of two possibilities:
1. American negotiation is dominated as well as driven by Israeli interests. Netanyahu defines the objectives; Witkoff and Kushner are the caretakers. The Jewish worldview, as we’ve discussed many times, is most often affected by Pre-TSD (pre-traumatic stress disorder).
As opposed to Post-TSD, which is defined as a behavioral pattern triggered by a traumatic event in the past, in the case of PRE-TSD, it is a imaginary fantasy event in the future that triggers the trauma in the present. Jews are often tormented by a future fantasy of destruction, and it is that ‘trauma’ that shapes their present behavior into a self-destructive path. Why Jews developed such a peculiar tendency is, in itself, an interesting question. Is it because the God whom they invented and worship is itself a genocidal character (the destruction of Sodom, the Ten Plagues of Egypt, Deuteronomy’s God calling for the destruction of the indigenous, etc.)? Is it because of their suicidal/genocidal biblical heroes such as Samson? It may have something to do with their recent cultural heroes who initiated/invented/devised WMDs and nuclear warfare (Haber, Einstein, Szilard, Oppenheimer, etc.). Is it their Jewish state that introduced nuclear weapons to the Middle East (Shimon Peres—Dimona)? The Jewish negotiating team couldn’t grasp, let alone consider the Iranians’ kind offer because they projected their own genocidal symptoms onto their Iranian counterparts.
2. There is also a counter-explanation possible. It suggests accepting that Kushner, Witkoff, and Netanyahu actually understood the Iranian offer very well. They grasped that Iran is not interested in possessing nukes. Israel, as such, wasn’t interested in removing the enriched uranium; it just wanted to destroy Iran as part of Israel’s plan for greater domination in the region.
👍18❤4🔥4💯2👀1
After three and a half years of wars, a genocide, pushing the world into a global conflict Netanyahu is still the most popular Israeli PM candidate according to Yesterday’s N12 poll (with 25 MKs out of 120). Following Netanyahu is Naftali Bennett, a clinical genocidal character with 20 predicted MKs.
In Israel there are only two left parties. They are both Arabs with 10 MKs together which mounts to less than 10% of the knesset.
10 MKs are centrist (Yair Golan) and the rest (100 out of 120) are right wing, hardcore right and religious fundamentalist.
The meaning of it is that Netanyahu is not the ‘disease’, he is the true face of the Jewish state. Netanyahu is merely a symptom.
In Israel there are only two left parties. They are both Arabs with 10 MKs together which mounts to less than 10% of the knesset.
10 MKs are centrist (Yair Golan) and the rest (100 out of 120) are right wing, hardcore right and religious fundamentalist.
The meaning of it is that Netanyahu is not the ‘disease’, he is the true face of the Jewish state. Netanyahu is merely a symptom.
👍30🔥6💯4🤬3
Can the USA survive Israel?
All indicators point to a growing world fatigue with the Jewish State: its politics, its aggression, its genocidal zeal , its lies, its dirty economy, its global lobby-pretty much everything about it.
Most significant, of course, is the well-documented American popular anti-Israel shift.
The madman at the helm notices it. He has gathered that, at least within his base, an act of rebellion against his Tel Aviv masters might buy him some time, it may even reinstate some of his lost credibility.
I have been telling you all along that Iran’s primary objective was not destroying Israel but weakening the USA first: dismantling its regional power, separating the American colony from its Jewish (mother) State. If I am reading the picture correctly, this is what we see before our eyes.
The Ginger Caligula grasps that for America to have a tomorrow, and for him to survive somehow, the USA must cut its losses. It will remove itself from the Middle East and rebel (or even just pretend to rebel) against Jerusalem.
The open question is whether the masters: both the ones in Zion and their caretakers in the USA, i.e., the lobby, the financiers, the media, the compromised political class-will let the Ginger Caligula off the hook. These people have a lot of leverage. They have used it effectively all along. They have no good reason to believe that Trump can so easily grow a spine.
On the face of it, the future of America depends on Trump’s ability to sustain the personal damage inflicted upon him by this collective. In light of the above, the unstable, constant zigzagging performed by the miserable man at the top should not necessarily be read as evidence of the man being unhinged or mentally unstable. The so called ‘leader of the world’s superpower’ is being blackmailed by the most powerful and sinister gang the world has ever known. History teaches us that not one empire in the past survived that specific type of attack on its corridors of power. Is there any reason to believe that the USA may prevail against all odds?
All indicators point to a growing world fatigue with the Jewish State: its politics, its aggression, its genocidal zeal , its lies, its dirty economy, its global lobby-pretty much everything about it.
Most significant, of course, is the well-documented American popular anti-Israel shift.
The madman at the helm notices it. He has gathered that, at least within his base, an act of rebellion against his Tel Aviv masters might buy him some time, it may even reinstate some of his lost credibility.
I have been telling you all along that Iran’s primary objective was not destroying Israel but weakening the USA first: dismantling its regional power, separating the American colony from its Jewish (mother) State. If I am reading the picture correctly, this is what we see before our eyes.
The Ginger Caligula grasps that for America to have a tomorrow, and for him to survive somehow, the USA must cut its losses. It will remove itself from the Middle East and rebel (or even just pretend to rebel) against Jerusalem.
The open question is whether the masters: both the ones in Zion and their caretakers in the USA, i.e., the lobby, the financiers, the media, the compromised political class-will let the Ginger Caligula off the hook. These people have a lot of leverage. They have used it effectively all along. They have no good reason to believe that Trump can so easily grow a spine.
On the face of it, the future of America depends on Trump’s ability to sustain the personal damage inflicted upon him by this collective. In light of the above, the unstable, constant zigzagging performed by the miserable man at the top should not necessarily be read as evidence of the man being unhinged or mentally unstable. The so called ‘leader of the world’s superpower’ is being blackmailed by the most powerful and sinister gang the world has ever known. History teaches us that not one empire in the past survived that specific type of attack on its corridors of power. Is there any reason to believe that the USA may prevail against all odds?
👍17❤9👏2🔥1🙏1🎃1
Netanyahu and the Myth of 'Jewish Values'
Netanyahu. a genocidal monster, a fugitive war criminal, and a man subject to an international arrest warrant for crimes against humanity — is talking to us this morning about "Jewish tolerance" and "Jewish values."
"As the Jewish state, Israel cherishes and upholds the Jewish values of tolerance and mutual respect between Jews and worshippers of all faiths," were the Prime Minister's exact words.
Let me first clarify Netanyahu's misleading terms. In Judaism, ethics is replaced by litigation, and values are replaced by mitzvoth (commandments). As such, the notion of "Jewish value" is either problematic, vague or misleading. If value involves a conscious and voluntary affirmation of an ethical proposition, then in Judaism the moral action is prescribed by law. There is, therefore, a valid argument that "Jewish value" is actually an empty signifier. It doesn't refer to any real substance; rather, it operates as a forceful, abstract notion that some Jews toss in the air, knowing that no one (except me ) would dare challenge them.
More specifically, when Netanyahu speaks of "Jewish tolerance," he is obviously and crudely falsifying. Judaism and tolerance are practically a contradiction in terms. Judaism adheres to the concept of Chosenness, and Chosenness is a form of organized intolerance.
One could challenge this and insist that for Orthodox Jews, the meaning of being chosen is the duty to exhibit morally exemplary behavior - a "light to the nations." But even if that were the case - even if Jews were indeed a light to the nations - one can argue that they follow a divine order rather than voluntarily adhering to a ‘value system.’
This morning, the man who sent his army to reduce Gaza and its people to dust and flatten every house of worship along the way is telling us that "all religions flourish in our land, and we view members of all faiths as equals in building our society and region."
Let me correct you, Mr. Netanyahu. This land is not yours, and it has never been yours. If there was at one stage a prospect of Jews living in Palestine in peace and harmony, you - more than anyone else in Jewish history - have made that an impossibility.
Netanyahu. a genocidal monster, a fugitive war criminal, and a man subject to an international arrest warrant for crimes against humanity — is talking to us this morning about "Jewish tolerance" and "Jewish values."
"As the Jewish state, Israel cherishes and upholds the Jewish values of tolerance and mutual respect between Jews and worshippers of all faiths," were the Prime Minister's exact words.
Let me first clarify Netanyahu's misleading terms. In Judaism, ethics is replaced by litigation, and values are replaced by mitzvoth (commandments). As such, the notion of "Jewish value" is either problematic, vague or misleading. If value involves a conscious and voluntary affirmation of an ethical proposition, then in Judaism the moral action is prescribed by law. There is, therefore, a valid argument that "Jewish value" is actually an empty signifier. It doesn't refer to any real substance; rather, it operates as a forceful, abstract notion that some Jews toss in the air, knowing that no one (except me ) would dare challenge them.
More specifically, when Netanyahu speaks of "Jewish tolerance," he is obviously and crudely falsifying. Judaism and tolerance are practically a contradiction in terms. Judaism adheres to the concept of Chosenness, and Chosenness is a form of organized intolerance.
One could challenge this and insist that for Orthodox Jews, the meaning of being chosen is the duty to exhibit morally exemplary behavior - a "light to the nations." But even if that were the case - even if Jews were indeed a light to the nations - one can argue that they follow a divine order rather than voluntarily adhering to a ‘value system.’
This morning, the man who sent his army to reduce Gaza and its people to dust and flatten every house of worship along the way is telling us that "all religions flourish in our land, and we view members of all faiths as equals in building our society and region."
Let me correct you, Mr. Netanyahu. This land is not yours, and it has never been yours. If there was at one stage a prospect of Jews living in Palestine in peace and harmony, you - more than anyone else in Jewish history - have made that an impossibility.
👏27👍8❤6
It wasn’t just one IDF soldier who smashed Jesus statue, his entire unit participated both actively and passively !
The IDF probe into the ‘killing Jesus all over again’ incident found out that in addition to the soldier who obliterated the statue and the soldier who photographed him, six other troops were “present at the scene and did not act to stop the incident or report it.” We are talking about the entire military unit.
The meaning of it is both simple and obvious, we are dealing with a deranged collective, an identity united by goy hatred and total dismissal of otherness. This is what Choseness means in practice…
The IDF’s inquiry determined that the soldiers’ conduct “completely deviated from IDF orders and values.”
They obviously lie and the fact that 8 soldiers participated as perpetrators and witnesses prove that the hatred of everything not Jewish is the spiritual bond that drives the so called “most moral army in the world”.
The IDF, an army credited with the worst documented genocide in world history, has only one issue with the ‘killing Jesus all over again’ incident- it is the fact that it was documented!
The IDF probe into the ‘killing Jesus all over again’ incident found out that in addition to the soldier who obliterated the statue and the soldier who photographed him, six other troops were “present at the scene and did not act to stop the incident or report it.” We are talking about the entire military unit.
The meaning of it is both simple and obvious, we are dealing with a deranged collective, an identity united by goy hatred and total dismissal of otherness. This is what Choseness means in practice…
The IDF’s inquiry determined that the soldiers’ conduct “completely deviated from IDF orders and values.”
They obviously lie and the fact that 8 soldiers participated as perpetrators and witnesses prove that the hatred of everything not Jewish is the spiritual bond that drives the so called “most moral army in the world”.
The IDF, an army credited with the worst documented genocide in world history, has only one issue with the ‘killing Jesus all over again’ incident- it is the fact that it was documented!
👍22💯3❤2😱1🤬1
Aletheia vs. Emet and the Jerusalemisation of the American Sphere
The fact that Trump is a pathological liar is well established. What is most fascinating about his pathology is that this abnormal human behaviour is a carbon copy of the Jerusalemite path in general and Dershowitz's pathology in particular.
As some of you may remember, Epstein's pal Chomsky referred to Dershowitz as a 'remarkable liar'. What is remarkable about Dershowitz is the shamelessness, the total lack of human dignity. Trump is contaminated with the exact same disease. It is that shamelessness while lying compulsively. What we see in Trump is total removal from the notion of truthfulness as we believe to know it.
Of course, there is a possible philosophical interpretation of this similarity between these two horrid beings. What we see in Trump is the corrosive impact of Jerusalem. It is practically the tragic Western departure from the Athenian ethos.
Let me brief you on the distinction between the Athenian and Jerusalemite in regards to the very specific perceptions of truth.
The Greek word for truth, Aletheia (ἀλήθεια), literally means "the state of not being hidden." Truth in Ancient Greek is the aim at unconcealment or disclosure. This contrasts with the Hebrew (Judaic) concept of truth (Emet), which implies acceptance, adherence, and faithfulness.
For the Greeks, truth was primarily about revealing what is. For the Jerusalemite, truth (Emet) means obedience. For the Greek, the act of searching for truth is defined by its seeking. In Jerusalem, truth is defined by Revelation: the act of obeying a given truth. Emet as such is defined by observance and practice (of the 613 Mitzvoth).
While everything precious about the West originates in Athens—the truth-seeking and the method of seeking this truth (philosophy, science , art, ethics etc.), everything disastrous about the West and the way it is spiralling down has a lot to do with Jerusalem and its notion of Emet. For Emet is not subject to verification or substantiation. Political correctness, for instance, is, of course, an exemplary case of Emet: it is that thing which you are demanded to observe blindly, it is politics that cannot be questioned. The Holocaust and the laws that protect it constitute another kind of ‘Emet.’ Emet is defined by blind observance. The fantasy stories about 7 October: the ‘400 beheaded babies’, and ‘Hamas rape’ are classic Emet; they demand obedience, they deny verification.
When Trump spreads astonishing lies that are literally counterfactual, he is practically following the Jerusalemite core tradition.
Trump is, in this respect, the first American Jewish President. And unless removed soon, he may as well be the last one.
The fact that Trump is a pathological liar is well established. What is most fascinating about his pathology is that this abnormal human behaviour is a carbon copy of the Jerusalemite path in general and Dershowitz's pathology in particular.
As some of you may remember, Epstein's pal Chomsky referred to Dershowitz as a 'remarkable liar'. What is remarkable about Dershowitz is the shamelessness, the total lack of human dignity. Trump is contaminated with the exact same disease. It is that shamelessness while lying compulsively. What we see in Trump is total removal from the notion of truthfulness as we believe to know it.
Of course, there is a possible philosophical interpretation of this similarity between these two horrid beings. What we see in Trump is the corrosive impact of Jerusalem. It is practically the tragic Western departure from the Athenian ethos.
Let me brief you on the distinction between the Athenian and Jerusalemite in regards to the very specific perceptions of truth.
The Greek word for truth, Aletheia (ἀλήθεια), literally means "the state of not being hidden." Truth in Ancient Greek is the aim at unconcealment or disclosure. This contrasts with the Hebrew (Judaic) concept of truth (Emet), which implies acceptance, adherence, and faithfulness.
For the Greeks, truth was primarily about revealing what is. For the Jerusalemite, truth (Emet) means obedience. For the Greek, the act of searching for truth is defined by its seeking. In Jerusalem, truth is defined by Revelation: the act of obeying a given truth. Emet as such is defined by observance and practice (of the 613 Mitzvoth).
While everything precious about the West originates in Athens—the truth-seeking and the method of seeking this truth (philosophy, science , art, ethics etc.), everything disastrous about the West and the way it is spiralling down has a lot to do with Jerusalem and its notion of Emet. For Emet is not subject to verification or substantiation. Political correctness, for instance, is, of course, an exemplary case of Emet: it is that thing which you are demanded to observe blindly, it is politics that cannot be questioned. The Holocaust and the laws that protect it constitute another kind of ‘Emet.’ Emet is defined by blind observance. The fantasy stories about 7 October: the ‘400 beheaded babies’, and ‘Hamas rape’ are classic Emet; they demand obedience, they deny verification.
When Trump spreads astonishing lies that are literally counterfactual, he is practically following the Jerusalemite core tradition.
Trump is, in this respect, the first American Jewish President. And unless removed soon, he may as well be the last one.
👍23💯7❤3🤡1
Trump according to Lacan
One of Jacques Lacan's most significant contributions to the field of psychoanalysis is the realisation that the "unconscious is the discourse of the Other." What Lacan points to is the fear that everyone around you doesn’t just see you for what you really are but also delve into it openly. The man who failed in bed yesterday is most likely fearful that all of humanity is mocking his performance behind his back. Whether this is actually the case is irrelevant; the fear of becoming the Other's discourse is real, and that is what the unconscious is, according to Lacan.
In previous writing, I argued that the Jewish fear of antisemitism is an exemplary case of the unconscious being the discourse of the Other. For the Jews, it isn't just the fear that the Goyim (humanity) see the Jews for what they are, but also that they discuss what they see amongst themselves. Early Zionism, as such, was an attempt to make Jews what they are not: a nation like all other nations, a people defined by morality, work ethic, a bond with the soil, etc. The success of early Zionism was not "making the desert bloom" but rather making the Goy appreciate the Hebraic ‘transformation’. Early Zionism was a ‘short lived’ remedy for Jewish unconscious.
The Jewish collective unconscious in light of the Gaza genocide (being credited with the most documented genocide in human history) is rather obvious. It isn't just the unbearable thought that all of humanity sees the Jewish State for "what it really is." It is the fact that the Goyim are not shy of discussing what Jewishness really means amongst themselves and beyond.
Trump is in the exact same place as his Jerusalemite puppeteers. He knows that he is blackmailed by Tel Aviv. He knows that everyone knows it. He knows that he treacherously took his country into an Israeli criminal war, pulling the entire West into a catastrophe. He knows that the whole world sees it all and is partially entertained, partially devastated but this mad show. He knows that all of humanity — including his close political, financial, and military circle is fully aware of his actions. But far worse, no one, including his former supporters, keeps their thoughts to themselves. Trump is the subject of the most unflattering universal discourse. His erratic behaviour is the most obvious outcome of the materialisation of his phobia.
Trump, a man who invested his entire life in pretending to be what he isn't, is now faced not just with the fear that he is the discourse of the Other, but rather with the acknowledgment that the whole of humanity is pointing at him to his face and discussing how low, hopeless and reckless sabbos goy he happens to be.
This is a very bad place to be in.
One of Jacques Lacan's most significant contributions to the field of psychoanalysis is the realisation that the "unconscious is the discourse of the Other." What Lacan points to is the fear that everyone around you doesn’t just see you for what you really are but also delve into it openly. The man who failed in bed yesterday is most likely fearful that all of humanity is mocking his performance behind his back. Whether this is actually the case is irrelevant; the fear of becoming the Other's discourse is real, and that is what the unconscious is, according to Lacan.
In previous writing, I argued that the Jewish fear of antisemitism is an exemplary case of the unconscious being the discourse of the Other. For the Jews, it isn't just the fear that the Goyim (humanity) see the Jews for what they are, but also that they discuss what they see amongst themselves. Early Zionism, as such, was an attempt to make Jews what they are not: a nation like all other nations, a people defined by morality, work ethic, a bond with the soil, etc. The success of early Zionism was not "making the desert bloom" but rather making the Goy appreciate the Hebraic ‘transformation’. Early Zionism was a ‘short lived’ remedy for Jewish unconscious.
The Jewish collective unconscious in light of the Gaza genocide (being credited with the most documented genocide in human history) is rather obvious. It isn't just the unbearable thought that all of humanity sees the Jewish State for "what it really is." It is the fact that the Goyim are not shy of discussing what Jewishness really means amongst themselves and beyond.
Trump is in the exact same place as his Jerusalemite puppeteers. He knows that he is blackmailed by Tel Aviv. He knows that everyone knows it. He knows that he treacherously took his country into an Israeli criminal war, pulling the entire West into a catastrophe. He knows that the whole world sees it all and is partially entertained, partially devastated but this mad show. He knows that all of humanity — including his close political, financial, and military circle is fully aware of his actions. But far worse, no one, including his former supporters, keeps their thoughts to themselves. Trump is the subject of the most unflattering universal discourse. His erratic behaviour is the most obvious outcome of the materialisation of his phobia.
Trump, a man who invested his entire life in pretending to be what he isn't, is now faced not just with the fear that he is the discourse of the Other, but rather with the acknowledgment that the whole of humanity is pointing at him to his face and discussing how low, hopeless and reckless sabbos goy he happens to be.
This is a very bad place to be in.
💯19❤6⚡2👍2🤯2