Ibn al-Qayyim رحمه الله:
“Constantly remember Allāh in every situation, with the tongue, the heart, and the actions. The person will attain Allāh’s love in accordance with his remembrance of Allāh.”
[Book: One Hundred Pieces of Advice by Ibn al-Qayyim | Pg. 9]
“Constantly remember Allāh in every situation, with the tongue, the heart, and the actions. The person will attain Allāh’s love in accordance with his remembrance of Allāh.”
[Book: One Hundred Pieces of Advice by Ibn al-Qayyim | Pg. 9]
Shaikh Sālih al-Fawzān was asked:
“Is it binding upon us to mention the good points of the one we are warning against?” So the Shaikh responded:
“No. Do not mention their good points. Mention only the error that they have fallen into.
It has not been entrusted to you to give them tazkiyah (commendation).
That which is entrusted to you is to explain the error they are upon so that they may repent from it, and so that others may take caution against it.”
Kitābul-Ajwibah al-Mufīdah Fī As’ilatil-Manāhij al-Jadīdah (p.13-14).
كتاب-الأجوبة المفيدة في أصيلة-مناهج الجديدة (ص١٣-١٤).
“Is it binding upon us to mention the good points of the one we are warning against?” So the Shaikh responded:
“No. Do not mention their good points. Mention only the error that they have fallen into.
It has not been entrusted to you to give them tazkiyah (commendation).
That which is entrusted to you is to explain the error they are upon so that they may repent from it, and so that others may take caution against it.”
Kitābul-Ajwibah al-Mufīdah Fī As’ilatil-Manāhij al-Jadīdah (p.13-14).
كتاب-الأجوبة المفيدة في أصيلة-مناهج الجديدة (ص١٣-١٤).
Allah refuted the unbelievers, criminals and hypocrites―and He (the Most High) did not mention any of their good deeds.
Likewise, the scholars of the Salaf refuted the Jahmiyyah, Muʿtazilah and the people of misguidance yet they did not mention their good deeds because their good deeds were overtaken by their misguidance, unbelief, heresy, or hypocrisy.
So, it is not correct that when you refute a person who is misguided, an innovator, and a deviant that you mention his good deeds by saying: ‘He is a good person, he has good deeds, etc., but was mistaken.’
We say to you: Your praise of him is worse than his misguidance because the people trust your praise of him―and when your praise of this astray innovator circulates, you are responsible for deceiving the people. And this will open the door for the acceptance of the ideas of the misguided.
If, however, the one being refuted is from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah, then the refutation should be with good manners.
He is shown his mistakes that are related to fiqh issues, issues that are open to juristic deduction, extrapolation and ijtihād.
So, we would say, ‘So-and-so erred in this matter, and what is correct is such-and-such, and here is the proof, so may Allah forgive him.’
This is the way, just as the rebuttals that would take place between the jurists of the Four Madh-habs, and other scholars.
So, such a person is not defamed in his station of knowledge if he is from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah―and Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah are not infallible―they can err. The proof can pass them by, or they can miss the mark in deduction.
So, we do not remain silent concerning the mistake―rather, we clarify it, alongside making excuses for him due to the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him):
“When a judge passes a judgement and makes ijtihād―and he is correct, he receives two rewards. And if he passes a judgement, and is wrong, then he receives a single reward.”
(Bukhāri, no. 6919, Muslim, no. 1716) This is in matters of fiqh.
Ajwibah al-Mufīdah pp. 29-38.
أجوبة المفيدة ص ٢٩/٣٨
Likewise, the scholars of the Salaf refuted the Jahmiyyah, Muʿtazilah and the people of misguidance yet they did not mention their good deeds because their good deeds were overtaken by their misguidance, unbelief, heresy, or hypocrisy.
So, it is not correct that when you refute a person who is misguided, an innovator, and a deviant that you mention his good deeds by saying: ‘He is a good person, he has good deeds, etc., but was mistaken.’
We say to you: Your praise of him is worse than his misguidance because the people trust your praise of him―and when your praise of this astray innovator circulates, you are responsible for deceiving the people. And this will open the door for the acceptance of the ideas of the misguided.
If, however, the one being refuted is from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah, then the refutation should be with good manners.
He is shown his mistakes that are related to fiqh issues, issues that are open to juristic deduction, extrapolation and ijtihād.
So, we would say, ‘So-and-so erred in this matter, and what is correct is such-and-such, and here is the proof, so may Allah forgive him.’
This is the way, just as the rebuttals that would take place between the jurists of the Four Madh-habs, and other scholars.
So, such a person is not defamed in his station of knowledge if he is from Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah―and Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah are not infallible―they can err. The proof can pass them by, or they can miss the mark in deduction.
So, we do not remain silent concerning the mistake―rather, we clarify it, alongside making excuses for him due to the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him):
“When a judge passes a judgement and makes ijtihād―and he is correct, he receives two rewards. And if he passes a judgement, and is wrong, then he receives a single reward.”
(Bukhāri, no. 6919, Muslim, no. 1716) This is in matters of fiqh.
Ajwibah al-Mufīdah pp. 29-38.
أجوبة المفيدة ص ٢٩/٣٨
Al-Imām Ibn Bāz (رحمه الله ) commented on these words of Fudayl bin ‘Iyād (رحمه الله ) said:
“Making the deed correct (according to the Sunnah) is more important than quantity―and the servant must give importance to performing the deed sincerely for Allah and purifying it from riyā (i.e. showing off to impress the people) and other than that from the categories of Shirk. So a person is to give importance to making sure the deed complies with the Sharī’ah and that is free from innovation―that is more important that quantity.”
“Making the deed correct (according to the Sunnah) is more important than quantity―and the servant must give importance to performing the deed sincerely for Allah and purifying it from riyā (i.e. showing off to impress the people) and other than that from the categories of Shirk. So a person is to give importance to making sure the deed complies with the Sharī’ah and that is free from innovation―that is more important that quantity.”
❤1
Ibn Abbas رضي الله عنه said,
"Allah made four months (Dhul Qa'dah, Dhul Hijah, Muharram, and Rajab) especially sacred, and their sanctity is great, and every sin done within them is more severe, and every righteous deed done within them is greatly rewarded.”
[Lataif Al Ma'arif pg. 206]
"Allah made four months (Dhul Qa'dah, Dhul Hijah, Muharram, and Rajab) especially sacred, and their sanctity is great, and every sin done within them is more severe, and every righteous deed done within them is greatly rewarded.”
[Lataif Al Ma'arif pg. 206]
Ma’rūf Al-Karkhī said:
“We seek refuge in Allāh from extensive hopes, for verily it prevents [one] from [doing] righteous deeds!”
[Jāmi’ Bayān: 503]
“We seek refuge in Allāh from extensive hopes, for verily it prevents [one] from [doing] righteous deeds!”
[Jāmi’ Bayān: 503]
Ahmad ibn Hanbal said:
“Forgive your brother! And what do you [truly] benefit if Allāh punishes your Muslim brother because of you?!”
[Siyar A'lam al-Nubala: 11/262]
“Forgive your brother! And what do you [truly] benefit if Allāh punishes your Muslim brother because of you?!”
[Siyar A'lam al-Nubala: 11/262]
Al-Fuḍayl ibn ʻIyāḍ رحمه الله said:
“Whoever seeks a brother with no faults will remain without a brother!”
[Shu’ab Al-Īmān: 10/574]
“Whoever seeks a brother with no faults will remain without a brother!”
[Shu’ab Al-Īmān: 10/574]
[ماذا تصنع إذا ضاع شيء أو أضعت شيئا؟]
What should you do if something is missing or you lost something?
سُئِلَ ابن عمر رضي الله عنهما عنِ الضَّالَّة؟
Ibn ‘Umar رضي الله عنه was asked about a missing object?
فقال يتوضّأ ويصلِّي ركعتين ثمَّ يتشهَّدُ ثمَّ يقولُ:
So he said that a person should make wudū and pray two raka’at, say the tashahhud and say:
اللَّهمَّ رادَّ الضَّالَّةِ هاديَ الضَّلالَةِ تَهدي من الضَّلالةِ ردَّ عليَّ ضالَّتي بعزَّتِك وسلطانِك فإنَّها من فضلك وعطائِك.
“O Allāh! The One Who returns lost objects, the One Who guides the mislead! You guide from error, return to me my lost item by Your Might and Your Sovereignty; indeed, that is from Your Grace and Generosity.”
(إسناده حسن)
Its chain is hasan.
مصنف ابن أبي شيبة ۳۱۷۰۲
Musannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah 31702
انظر: الآثار أخرى في(موسوعة آثار الصحب الكرآم/ المجلد السابع)
See the other traditions in Mawsū’atu Āthār-is-Sahab-il-Kirām, vol 7.
قلت محمد ناظر الأثري:-عسى أن يرد الله عز وجل له ما أضاع.
Muhammad Nādhir al-Atharī (the author of this post and the book mentioned above) said: “Perhaps Allāh ﷻ will return his lost item to him.”
What should you do if something is missing or you lost something?
سُئِلَ ابن عمر رضي الله عنهما عنِ الضَّالَّة؟
Ibn ‘Umar رضي الله عنه was asked about a missing object?
فقال يتوضّأ ويصلِّي ركعتين ثمَّ يتشهَّدُ ثمَّ يقولُ:
So he said that a person should make wudū and pray two raka’at, say the tashahhud and say:
اللَّهمَّ رادَّ الضَّالَّةِ هاديَ الضَّلالَةِ تَهدي من الضَّلالةِ ردَّ عليَّ ضالَّتي بعزَّتِك وسلطانِك فإنَّها من فضلك وعطائِك.
“O Allāh! The One Who returns lost objects, the One Who guides the mislead! You guide from error, return to me my lost item by Your Might and Your Sovereignty; indeed, that is from Your Grace and Generosity.”
(إسناده حسن)
Its chain is hasan.
مصنف ابن أبي شيبة ۳۱۷۰۲
Musannaf Ibn Abī Shaybah 31702
انظر: الآثار أخرى في(موسوعة آثار الصحب الكرآم/ المجلد السابع)
See the other traditions in Mawsū’atu Āthār-is-Sahab-il-Kirām, vol 7.
قلت محمد ناظر الأثري:-عسى أن يرد الله عز وجل له ما أضاع.
Muhammad Nādhir al-Atharī (the author of this post and the book mentioned above) said: “Perhaps Allāh ﷻ will return his lost item to him.”
Yahya bin Mu’ādh رحمه الله said:
“The hearts are like cooking pots. They boil with that which they contain and their tongues are their ladles. Therefore, look at a man when he speaks.
His tongue will scoop up for you that which is contained in his heart, whether it is sweet, bitter, fresh, salty and/or other than that. The flavour of his heart will become apparent to you from that which his tongue scoops up.”
Hilyat-ul-Awliyā’a, 10/63
“The hearts are like cooking pots. They boil with that which they contain and their tongues are their ladles. Therefore, look at a man when he speaks.
His tongue will scoop up for you that which is contained in his heart, whether it is sweet, bitter, fresh, salty and/or other than that. The flavour of his heart will become apparent to you from that which his tongue scoops up.”
Hilyat-ul-Awliyā’a, 10/63
Fuḍayl ibn ʿIyāḍ رحمه الله:
"Neglecting to do a good deed in order to please people is hypocrisy, whereas doing a good deed to please people is polytheism.
Sincerity is that Allah protects you from both of those acts."
[Baghawī, Maʿālim al-tanzīl: i. 157]
"Neglecting to do a good deed in order to please people is hypocrisy, whereas doing a good deed to please people is polytheism.
Sincerity is that Allah protects you from both of those acts."
[Baghawī, Maʿālim al-tanzīl: i. 157]
"Kill Yusuf or cast him out to some other land, so that the favor of your father may be given to you alone, and after that you can become a righteous people." [12:9]
In his commentary on this ayah, Imam al-Baghawi wrote:
Muhammad ibn Ishaaq said, “What they did involved many sins including the cutting of blood ties, poor treatment of parents, lack of compassion towards a child who had done nothing wrong, making false promises to achieve their own aims, breaking their promises, and lying to their parents. But Allāh pardoned them for all of that so that no one could lose hope of Allāh’s mercy.”
[Tafsir al-Baghawi 4/219]
In his commentary on this ayah, Imam al-Baghawi wrote:
Muhammad ibn Ishaaq said, “What they did involved many sins including the cutting of blood ties, poor treatment of parents, lack of compassion towards a child who had done nothing wrong, making false promises to achieve their own aims, breaking their promises, and lying to their parents. But Allāh pardoned them for all of that so that no one could lose hope of Allāh’s mercy.”
[Tafsir al-Baghawi 4/219]
Ahmad ibn Hanbal رحمه الله used to say:
Displaying your inkpot is from showing-off (riyaa’)
[Virtues of Imām Ahmad (Manaqib Imām Ahmad - rahimahullah), chapter 30: words on sincerity, hypocrisy and hiding worship, page 267, Narrated by Ibn as-Sammak (rahimahullah) from Imam Ahmad (rahimahullah), Ibn al-Jawzi (rahimahullah)]
Displaying your inkpot is from showing-off (riyaa’)
[Virtues of Imām Ahmad (Manaqib Imām Ahmad - rahimahullah), chapter 30: words on sincerity, hypocrisy and hiding worship, page 267, Narrated by Ibn as-Sammak (rahimahullah) from Imam Ahmad (rahimahullah), Ibn al-Jawzi (rahimahullah)]
❤4
Umar ibn Al-Khattāb رضي الله عنه said:
“Abstinence in the worldly life is a comfort for the heart and body!”
[Az-Zuhd Li Ibn Mubārak: 1/210]
“Abstinence in the worldly life is a comfort for the heart and body!”
[Az-Zuhd Li Ibn Mubārak: 1/210]
❤5
Al-Awzā’ī said:
“It is upon Allāh to send the revelation, it is upon His Messenger to convey it, and it is upon us to submit!”
[At-Tamhīd: 6/14]
“It is upon Allāh to send the revelation, it is upon His Messenger to convey it, and it is upon us to submit!”
[At-Tamhīd: 6/14]
❤5