Jury Awards $687,000 to BlueCross BlueShield Scientist Fired for Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine | The Epoch Times
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/jury-awards-687000-to-bluecross-blueshield-scientist-fired-for-refusing-covid-19-vaccine-5678321
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/jury-awards-687000-to-bluecross-blueshield-scientist-fired-for-refusing-covid-19-vaccine-5678321
The Epoch Times
Jury Awards $687,000 to BlueCross BlueShield Scientist Fired for Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine
The award came after the scientist sued the company.
Danish doctor Jeanne A. Rungby notes that not a single Dane has been able to make decisions based on informed consent when offered to inject themselves with covid "vaccine". Based on the summary of product characteristics and the instructions given, the health authorities seem to have failed to inform the regions and thus pharmacists, doctors and nurses who vaccinate against COVID-19 of the following regarding the COVID-19 "vaccines":
1. that the vaccines have not prevented the spread of infection. This should be clearly stated in the instructions to the vaccinator, as the Danish Health Authority stated in its invitation letters that participation in the vaccination helped to protect others, which is not correct. For many people, this desire not to infect others was the main motivation for vaccination.
2. that the vaccinations cause long-term damage to the immune system - the more vaccinations given, the worse the damage becomes. Several scientific studies have documented that the immune system's ability to fight both COVID-19 and other infections weakens over time and with repeated injections. The first study on the adverse effects of the vaccine was published by the Serum Institute in Dec 2021, by which time alarm bells should have rung and vaccination should have been stopped, before the booster vaccine was offered.
3. that the risk of contracting covid increases with each injection given. A study from Cleveland was groundbreaking. This large and well-conducted study of 52,000 healthcare workers clearly showed that the risk of contracting COVID-19 increased with each injection given. The unvaccinated had the lowest risk.
4. the risk of permanent damage to the heart is so high that it is disproportionate to the severity of the disease
5. that there are other antivirals to treat covid.
6. that the risk of serious side effects - Alzheimer's, disability and fatal outcomes for children & adults - with the vaccine was greater than the risk of them becoming seriously ill from covid, which was already known to the authorities in Jan 2021, when the risk of death among people <70 years due to covid-19 was 0.05%, according to a study commissioned by the WHO.
7. that studies suggest that the incidence and severity of cancer increases with each injection
8. that the study on which the administration of these vaccines to pregnant and lactating women was based was carried out on 44 rats and did not include studies on the germ cells of the baby rats or studies on DNA integration. The rats were killed quickly, so long-term effects were not studied. The authors were employed by Pfizer. There are now statistics on pregnancy complications, abortions and stillbirths, which represent an unacceptable risk.
9. the very frequent occurrence of menstrual disorders after vaccination may indicate that the vaccination had a negative impact on fertility
10. that sperm quality deteriorated with each injection
11. that several population studies have shown significant (non-random) associations between these vaccines and excess mortality
12. that the manufacturers changed the production method after the conditional authorisation and that no randomised clinical trials were conducted based on this production process 2.
The above review shows that very important information is missing from both the summary of product characteristics and the staff instructions, preventing vaccinators from giving proper informed consent as required by law. In Denmark, vaccination against "seasonal" COVID and flu is planned for Sep & Oct. Will the vaccinators inform about all of the above?
The article contains 40 references to the 12 points.
https://www.wch-denmark.org/en/post/informed-consent-requires-correct-information
1. that the vaccines have not prevented the spread of infection. This should be clearly stated in the instructions to the vaccinator, as the Danish Health Authority stated in its invitation letters that participation in the vaccination helped to protect others, which is not correct. For many people, this desire not to infect others was the main motivation for vaccination.
2. that the vaccinations cause long-term damage to the immune system - the more vaccinations given, the worse the damage becomes. Several scientific studies have documented that the immune system's ability to fight both COVID-19 and other infections weakens over time and with repeated injections. The first study on the adverse effects of the vaccine was published by the Serum Institute in Dec 2021, by which time alarm bells should have rung and vaccination should have been stopped, before the booster vaccine was offered.
3. that the risk of contracting covid increases with each injection given. A study from Cleveland was groundbreaking. This large and well-conducted study of 52,000 healthcare workers clearly showed that the risk of contracting COVID-19 increased with each injection given. The unvaccinated had the lowest risk.
4. the risk of permanent damage to the heart is so high that it is disproportionate to the severity of the disease
5. that there are other antivirals to treat covid.
6. that the risk of serious side effects - Alzheimer's, disability and fatal outcomes for children & adults - with the vaccine was greater than the risk of them becoming seriously ill from covid, which was already known to the authorities in Jan 2021, when the risk of death among people <70 years due to covid-19 was 0.05%, according to a study commissioned by the WHO.
7. that studies suggest that the incidence and severity of cancer increases with each injection
8. that the study on which the administration of these vaccines to pregnant and lactating women was based was carried out on 44 rats and did not include studies on the germ cells of the baby rats or studies on DNA integration. The rats were killed quickly, so long-term effects were not studied. The authors were employed by Pfizer. There are now statistics on pregnancy complications, abortions and stillbirths, which represent an unacceptable risk.
9. the very frequent occurrence of menstrual disorders after vaccination may indicate that the vaccination had a negative impact on fertility
10. that sperm quality deteriorated with each injection
11. that several population studies have shown significant (non-random) associations between these vaccines and excess mortality
12. that the manufacturers changed the production method after the conditional authorisation and that no randomised clinical trials were conducted based on this production process 2.
The above review shows that very important information is missing from both the summary of product characteristics and the staff instructions, preventing vaccinators from giving proper informed consent as required by law. In Denmark, vaccination against "seasonal" COVID and flu is planned for Sep & Oct. Will the vaccinators inform about all of the above?
The article contains 40 references to the 12 points.
https://www.wch-denmark.org/en/post/informed-consent-requires-correct-information
WCH-Denmark
Informed consent requires correct information.
By Jeanne A. Rungby, MD.A new document review of the regions documents the guidance that health authorities have given to Danish regions regarding the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s (Comirnaty) Covid-19 mRNA “vaccines”. In particular, it was interesting…
I found this very insightful: https://thenobodywhoknowseverybody.substack.com/p/ask-chat-gpt-about-mrna?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=996115&post_id=147695745&utm_campaign=583200&isFreemail=true&r=b8pf1&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Covid19 Saving the Next Generation
Ask Chat GPT about mRNA
The questions your Doctor Should have Known the Answers to BEFORE offering their mRNA advice, Newspaper editorials and their Services.
Forwarded from SARS-CoV-STAT-DK
Kære Alle
Så er vi klar med et nyt studie. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/8/1343 Reports of Batch-Dependent Suspected Adverse Events of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: Comparison of Results from Denmark and Sweden.
Denne gang er det gået ud over de Svenske bivirkningstal, som vi har sammenlignet med de Danske bivirkningsdata. Studiet viser, ikke overraskende, tilsvarende mønstre i Sverige. Der er enkelte afvigelser, men overordnet ser vi samme bilede.
Det at vi kan finde sammenlignelige resultater i et andet land understøtter kraftigt, at de mønstre vi ser ikke er afhængige af tiltag i de enkelte lande, men at mønstret er generelt.
Studiet er open access, takket være donationer, og må deles så meget man vil😊. Vi sender også pressemeddelelse via Ritzau, så hvis I ser nogen artikler om det i pressen, så smid endelig et link i kommentarerne.😊
Læs, Gem og Del
Max Schmeling
Så er vi klar med et nyt studie. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/8/1343 Reports of Batch-Dependent Suspected Adverse Events of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: Comparison of Results from Denmark and Sweden.
Denne gang er det gået ud over de Svenske bivirkningstal, som vi har sammenlignet med de Danske bivirkningsdata. Studiet viser, ikke overraskende, tilsvarende mønstre i Sverige. Der er enkelte afvigelser, men overordnet ser vi samme bilede.
Det at vi kan finde sammenlignelige resultater i et andet land understøtter kraftigt, at de mønstre vi ser ikke er afhængige af tiltag i de enkelte lande, men at mønstret er generelt.
Studiet er open access, takket være donationer, og må deles så meget man vil😊. Vi sender også pressemeddelelse via Ritzau, så hvis I ser nogen artikler om det i pressen, så smid endelig et link i kommentarerne.😊
Læs, Gem og Del
Max Schmeling
MDPI
Reports of Batch-Dependent Suspected Adverse Events of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: Comparison of Results from Denmark and…
Background and Objective: An unexpected batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was recently identified in a nationwide study from Denmark, but the generalizability of this finding is unknown. Therefore, we compared batch-dependent…
Den gode Allan Randrup har opdaget at konspirationsteoretikerne havde ret..
http://sundhedspolitisktidsskrift.dk/nyheder/sundhedspolitik/9198
http://sundhedspolitisktidsskrift.dk/nyheder/sundhedspolitik/9198
sundhedspolitisktidsskrift.dk
Forskere kritiserer: Sundhedssystemet vender det blinde øje til mulige vaccineskader
Sundhedspolitisk Tidsskrift giver dig nyheder om sundhedspolitik, nye behandlinger, sundhedsøkonomi samt debat om sundhedsproblemer og -politik