Marxism inherently asks for the destruction of beauty, because objective beauty can be observed and comprehended, even if you don't like an artwork, a song or even a physical woman, you can always agree that certain beauty is objective (subjectivity within objectivity).

When the marxist destroys beauty in favour of ugliness it evens the playing field, it forces you to lie to yourself in favour of pretentiousness, a baroque well curated and worked painting being as valuable as a contemporary piece of disgusing human waste.

Once it becomes mainstream, you forget what beauty really is like, and it's very easy to establish a new standard of beauty according to whatever entity is in power.

Inequality is the worst sin for the socialist and it will never accept that beauty can be quantified, unless, of course, it benefits >her< argument. (Hence, woman posting).

Yum!!!

Diogenes:
*barging into Plato's academy*
BEHOLD! A WOMAN!

I actually made three stars from this post

Accountant positions open

I'm 100% letting this get to my head btw.

Disney took this from you....

supposedly heterosexual niggas on their way to post another meme with some homoerotic fantasy involving a dog and a lion

It's just obvious the difference between those who relate with the lion vs those who relate to the raped dog isnt it

The bostero doesn't concern itself with the penis size of the lion when it is raped

Visibly lowering the pin everytime I talk with the lady at HR and acting like nothing is happening atm

GM reminder to inspect your rats, today is rat Friday, so don't forget.