Well alright

Marxism inherently asks for the destruction of beauty, because objective beauty can be observed and comprehended, even if you don't like an artwork, a song or even a physical woman, you can always agree that certain beauty is objective (subjectivity within objectivity).

When the marxist destroys beauty in favour of ugliness it evens the playing field, it forces you to lie to yourself in favour of pretentiousness, a baroque well curated and worked painting being as valuable as a contemporary piece of disgusing human waste.

Once it becomes mainstream, you forget what beauty really is like, and it's very easy to establish a new standard of beauty according to whatever entity is in power.

Inequality is the worst sin for the socialist and it will never accept that beauty can be quantified, unless, of course, it benefits >her< argument. (Hence, woman posting).

Yum!!!

Diogenes:
*barging into Plato's academy*
BEHOLD! A WOMAN!

I actually made three stars from this post

Accountant positions open