27 июня (пятница) в 22:00 состоится семинар «Chá das 5» (Университет Кампинас).
Тема доклада: «Why is Frege not a Gricean?».
Докладчик: Рамазан Аюпов (стажер-исследователь МЛ ЛогЛинФФ)
Аннотация: In the year 2025, it marks the centenary of the demise of the classicist and founder of analytical philosophy, Gottlob Frege. One of the most pertinent themes for researchers of Frege is the question of the presence of pragmatic elements in his philosophy of language. This issue, on one hand, arose from the critique of Michael Dummett’s interpretation of Gottlob Frege [12]; on the other hand, it revolves around the neo-Gricean dispute between Lawrence Horn and Christopher Potts concerning the nature of conventional implicatures and presuppositions in linguistics.
Lawrence R. Horn, in his articles ([4], [5], [6]), analyses how Frege anticipated Grice’s understanding of conventional implicatures. Frege engaged in the analysis of meanings that do not affect the truth or falsity of a statement, which was later developed into Grice’s conception of implicatures. Horn discusses Frege’s views on the differences in meaning introduced by words such as although, but, and still, which add layers of meaning without altering the truth value of the sentence. Furthermore, Frege adhered to a strict interpretation of the term presupposition (Voraussetzung), limiting its application to proper names. Frege’s principal idea was that presuppositions are associated with potential truth-value gaps that arise when proper names fail to refer. This creates situations where a statement cannot be true or false...
C полной аннотацией можно ознакомиться в анонсе: https://llfp.hse.ru/announcements/1061106739.html
Ссылка для подключения: meet.google.com/otb-fmnu-dch
Тема доклада: «Why is Frege not a Gricean?».
Докладчик: Рамазан Аюпов (стажер-исследователь МЛ ЛогЛинФФ)
Аннотация: In the year 2025, it marks the centenary of the demise of the classicist and founder of analytical philosophy, Gottlob Frege. One of the most pertinent themes for researchers of Frege is the question of the presence of pragmatic elements in his philosophy of language. This issue, on one hand, arose from the critique of Michael Dummett’s interpretation of Gottlob Frege [12]; on the other hand, it revolves around the neo-Gricean dispute between Lawrence Horn and Christopher Potts concerning the nature of conventional implicatures and presuppositions in linguistics.
Lawrence R. Horn, in his articles ([4], [5], [6]), analyses how Frege anticipated Grice’s understanding of conventional implicatures. Frege engaged in the analysis of meanings that do not affect the truth or falsity of a statement, which was later developed into Grice’s conception of implicatures. Horn discusses Frege’s views on the differences in meaning introduced by words such as although, but, and still, which add layers of meaning without altering the truth value of the sentence. Furthermore, Frege adhered to a strict interpretation of the term presupposition (Voraussetzung), limiting its application to proper names. Frege’s principal idea was that presuppositions are associated with potential truth-value gaps that arise when proper names fail to refer. This creates situations where a statement cannot be true or false...
C полной аннотацией можно ознакомиться в анонсе: https://llfp.hse.ru/announcements/1061106739.html
Ссылка для подключения: meet.google.com/otb-fmnu-dch
llfp.hse.ru
Доклад Рамазана Аюпова «Why is Frege not a Gricean?» на семинаре «Chá das 5» Университета Кампинаса
В 22:00 состоится семинар «Chá das 5» Университета Кампинаса, на котором стажер-исследователь МЛ ЛогЛинФФ Рамазан Аюпов выступит с докладом «Why is Frege not a Gricean?»
❤4👍1
Показываем как прошел первый день летней школы «Логика, лингвистика и формальная философия 2025» 🍪
❤4👍2🔥1🎉1