📝Drone Assembly Line📝
And the role of quality in the pursuit of quantity

What does the "drone revolution" look like in numbers? The answer comes from remarks by the director of the "Upyr" drone manufacturing plant: if previously producing 200 drones per month was a huge success, today three people make that many in a single day.

However, the overall increase in domestic drone production scale has another side to it. Huge numbers can intoxicate the customer and provoke the desire to report figures like "two million per year." This drives a pursuit of quantity (and low prices) with quality taking a back seat.

We mentioned this problem two years ago. Unfortunately, despite many clearly positive changes, it hasn't entirely disappeared, and troops continue receiving FPV drones assembled on the principle of "we'll just bury the enemy in sheer numbers!"

📌 No, we won't. Because a drone isn't an isolated thing—it's part of a system: if a crew receives a batch where 3/4 of the units need "finishing work" in a field workshop, that automatically means reduced combat readiness.

And when the critical moment comes, there will be nothing to shoot down a hovering "Baba Yaga" or strike a basement during an assault. This leads to loss of personnel, whom the enemy deliberately targets as the most vulnerable link. So what's the point of reports about "a million per year" if there's nothing behind the numbers?

❗️Maintaining a balance between quantity and quality plays a key role. It's achievable: the same "Upyrs" receive positive reviews in the field even with colossal increases in production volume. And if this becomes widespread for us, it will immediately become visible in changes on the battlefield and enemy complaints about increased casualties.

For objectivity's sake, the opponent also faces similar problems in chasing impressive production figures. But does that ease our problems in this area?
#UAV #Russia
✈ RU | ✈ EN | ✉ MAX

✉ VK | ✉ RuTube | ✉ OK | ✉ Zen

💸Support us Original msg