From the sickness of Moosaa is his ability to tell a person exactly what tawbah is and how to implement it when deviance emerges, yet with himself the retweeting of a tweet suffices. Allah says:
أ تأمرون الناس بالبر و تنسون أنفسكم وأنتم تتلون الكتاب أفلا تعقلون
"Do you command the people with righteousness but forget about yourselves while you recite the book, do you not comprehend?!" Al-Baqara: 44
أ تأمرون الناس بالبر و تنسون أنفسكم وأنتم تتلون الكتاب أفلا تعقلون
"Do you command the people with righteousness but forget about yourselves while you recite the book, do you not comprehend?!" Al-Baqara: 44
The Sa'aafiqah, they warn against what they themselves do. The following is a list of scholars they are intentionally blocking the people in the west from. Some with blatant warnings, others are indirect, all are abandoned and their works and verdicts are not circulated by them.
Sheikh Wasiullah Abbas, Sheikh Muhammad Al Anjari, Sheikh Ahmad As-Subay'ee, Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi, Sheikh Muhammad ibn Rabee, Sheikh Usamah Al Utaybi, Sheikh Ahmad Bazmool, Sheikh Abdur Rahman Muhyiddin, Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous, Sheikh Azhar Sineeqra, Sheikh Abdul Majeed Jumu'ah, Sheikh Muzzamil Faqeeri, Sheikh Muhammad Adaab, Sheikh Abu Abdil A'alaa Khalid, Sheikh Khalid ibn Abdur Rahman, Sheikh Tal'at Zahran, Sheikh Adil Mansur, Sheikh Ali Al Haddadi, etc.
However now they have new mashaayikh they shamelessly direct you towards, like "Shaykh" Anwar Wright, as seen in this pitiful tweet. So who's really severing the ties between the people and the scholars?!
Sheikh Wasiullah Abbas, Sheikh Muhammad Al Anjari, Sheikh Ahmad As-Subay'ee, Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi, Sheikh Muhammad ibn Rabee, Sheikh Usamah Al Utaybi, Sheikh Ahmad Bazmool, Sheikh Abdur Rahman Muhyiddin, Sheikh Muhammad Ferkous, Sheikh Azhar Sineeqra, Sheikh Abdul Majeed Jumu'ah, Sheikh Muzzamil Faqeeri, Sheikh Muhammad Adaab, Sheikh Abu Abdil A'alaa Khalid, Sheikh Khalid ibn Abdur Rahman, Sheikh Tal'at Zahran, Sheikh Adil Mansur, Sheikh Ali Al Haddadi, etc.
However now they have new mashaayikh they shamelessly direct you towards, like "Shaykh" Anwar Wright, as seen in this pitiful tweet. So who's really severing the ties between the people and the scholars?!
The following advice is applicable to Moosaa Richardson, Abu Khadeejah, Hamza Abdur Razzaq and whoever else that roared like lions concerning the falsity that Sheikh Muhammad is one who accuses a Muslim of fornication/adultery falsely, but now whose voices are more insignificant than the squeaking of mice.
Sheikh Naasir Zakari said:
"From the bounties of the Lord of the existence, undoubtedly the Court of Appeals overturned the ruling that emanated as relates to Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi Al Madkhali. And I say all praise belongs to Allah He, by way of His blessings, righteousness is completed. Indeed I see this as an opportunity for all those who defied Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi with speech with regards to his honor is that he seek pardon from him, and request from him remittance. Indeed he acted hastily in assailing Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi and attacking him without proof and evidence.
Therefore my advice to whomever spoke about Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi Al Madkhali is that they seek remittance and pardon, and know that Sheikh Muhammad is from the scholars of criticism and praise. He does not speak about a person except with a surplus of knowledge (i.e. concerning that person's reality) and taqwa from Allah. Thus Sheikh Muhammad is excluded from speaking about a Muslim with what is not within him, we believe him to be like this and Allah is His reckoner.
I repeat, whoever acted hastily by speaking about Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi Al Madkhali in this affair, and specifically after the overturning of the ruling from the Court of Appeals, upon him first is to seek forgiveness from Allah, and thereafter to seek remittance and pardon from Sheikh Muhammad. In addition, he should know that he spoke based on ignorance with regards to an Islamic Legislative matter, or based on desires, or based on blind following a person ignorant to the matter, or based on blind following a person of desire.
So I repeat, all praise belongs to Allah He, by way of His blessings, righteousness is completed, and (repeat) a specific summons to the Sa'aafiqah:
Abandon being rebellious, arrogant, insolent, and being upon continuance in falsehood. A person being a tail upon truth is better than being a head upon falsehood"
Beautiful speech from Sheikh Naasir Zakari, I pray that Allah blesses Moosaa, Abu Khadeejah, Hamza, and others with success in repenting, and rectifying themselves in this regard, and that they do not continue to be a sword for falsehood and opposition to the truth.
Sheikh Naasir Zakari said:
"From the bounties of the Lord of the existence, undoubtedly the Court of Appeals overturned the ruling that emanated as relates to Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi Al Madkhali. And I say all praise belongs to Allah He, by way of His blessings, righteousness is completed. Indeed I see this as an opportunity for all those who defied Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi with speech with regards to his honor is that he seek pardon from him, and request from him remittance. Indeed he acted hastily in assailing Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi and attacking him without proof and evidence.
Therefore my advice to whomever spoke about Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi Al Madkhali is that they seek remittance and pardon, and know that Sheikh Muhammad is from the scholars of criticism and praise. He does not speak about a person except with a surplus of knowledge (i.e. concerning that person's reality) and taqwa from Allah. Thus Sheikh Muhammad is excluded from speaking about a Muslim with what is not within him, we believe him to be like this and Allah is His reckoner.
I repeat, whoever acted hastily by speaking about Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi Al Madkhali in this affair, and specifically after the overturning of the ruling from the Court of Appeals, upon him first is to seek forgiveness from Allah, and thereafter to seek remittance and pardon from Sheikh Muhammad. In addition, he should know that he spoke based on ignorance with regards to an Islamic Legislative matter, or based on desires, or based on blind following a person ignorant to the matter, or based on blind following a person of desire.
So I repeat, all praise belongs to Allah He, by way of His blessings, righteousness is completed, and (repeat) a specific summons to the Sa'aafiqah:
Abandon being rebellious, arrogant, insolent, and being upon continuance in falsehood. A person being a tail upon truth is better than being a head upon falsehood"
Beautiful speech from Sheikh Naasir Zakari, I pray that Allah blesses Moosaa, Abu Khadeejah, Hamza, and others with success in repenting, and rectifying themselves in this regard, and that they do not continue to be a sword for falsehood and opposition to the truth.
Shaykh Rabīʾ' b. Hādī al-Madkhalī has addressed the proponents of this call: “There are those who plant themselves among the people of Sunnah, yet they support the people of innovation and wage war against Ahl Sunnah. These individuals are the most dangerous people to the Salafis.”
Look at their Masjid’s and Centre’s and now they give honorific titles like “Shaikh”... They even tweet it amongst themselves,
Look at their Masjid’s and Centre’s and now they give honorific titles like “Shaikh”... They even tweet it amongst themselves,
The account of the user that created this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 27 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel will no longer have a creator.
It is not correct to differentiate between the Salafis and Ahl al-Sunnah.
Question:
What is your view of those who differentiate between the Salafis and Ahl al-Sunnah, and who regard the Salafis as a more specific group than Ahl al-Sunnah, and they that the principles of this group are based on the opinions of the group’s shaykhs?
Answer:
This is not correct, because the Ahl al-Sunnah are those who follow the Sahaabah and the path of the Salaf (the early generations of Islam). These are not two distinct groups, and the Salafis are not a more specific group!
According to the terminology that is well known, the Salaf are the Sahaabah and those who follow their path, and the Ahl al-Sunnah are those who follow the Sunnah of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They are the ones concerning whom the hadeeth was reported: “Whoever follows the same path as me and my Companions” (The hadeeth about the saved group).
Stirring up disputes and conflict on the grounds of names alone is not permissible. Allaah has commanded the believers to be united and has forbidden them to be divided and warned them against that.
The individual’s aim must be to seek the truth, and when he speaks he should say what is fair and just, and not hate individuals in such a way that his hatred makes him reject the truth that the person is saying, or look for faults in him. He should not come up with things that are ambiguous or far-fetched for that purpose. This is not the way of Ahl al-Sunnah, and the Muslim has to like for his brother what he likes for himself. He must be sincere towards him, and hold love and sincerity in his heart.
Source: Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah Al-Ghunaymaan
Question:
What is your view of those who differentiate between the Salafis and Ahl al-Sunnah, and who regard the Salafis as a more specific group than Ahl al-Sunnah, and they that the principles of this group are based on the opinions of the group’s shaykhs?
Answer:
This is not correct, because the Ahl al-Sunnah are those who follow the Sahaabah and the path of the Salaf (the early generations of Islam). These are not two distinct groups, and the Salafis are not a more specific group!
According to the terminology that is well known, the Salaf are the Sahaabah and those who follow their path, and the Ahl al-Sunnah are those who follow the Sunnah of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They are the ones concerning whom the hadeeth was reported: “Whoever follows the same path as me and my Companions” (The hadeeth about the saved group).
Stirring up disputes and conflict on the grounds of names alone is not permissible. Allaah has commanded the believers to be united and has forbidden them to be divided and warned them against that.
The individual’s aim must be to seek the truth, and when he speaks he should say what is fair and just, and not hate individuals in such a way that his hatred makes him reject the truth that the person is saying, or look for faults in him. He should not come up with things that are ambiguous or far-fetched for that purpose. This is not the way of Ahl al-Sunnah, and the Muslim has to like for his brother what he likes for himself. He must be sincere towards him, and hold love and sincerity in his heart.
Source: Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah Al-Ghunaymaan
The account of the user that created this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 18 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel will no longer have a creator.
Post from august 2018
Recently the shameless man known as Abu Khadeejah ignorantly uttered statements of criticism against Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi that oppose certain principles. He pitifully said:
"...by tearing up the ranks of Ahlus Sunnah in every country. In Algeria torn, in Libya torn, in Morocco torn, parts of America torn, parts of Canada torn, Holland torn, France torn apart, Indonesia torn apart, why? Because you decide to speak against a group of brothers without referring the affair to Ahlul-Ilm the Kibar. The Ulama that you learned from, that you studied with. They are in the position of your father, they are 40 years, 35 years, 30 years your senior, you were a boy and they were already scholars of this ummah. Why don't you refer to them? Why do you believe you need to go it alone, and you abandon, and you put the ulama to one side..."
Our brother Abu Yusuf Khaleefah responds with valid points that illustrate the ignorance and treachery found within this speech. Abu Yusuf said:
1. Abu Khadeejah's tone was very disrespectful towards Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi. Shaykh Muhammad is his elder and he is a Scholar from the Scholars of Ahlis-Sunnah who is to be respected and honored even when we differ with him and hold his view to be incorrect.
2. Salafis were split prior to this current situation. This is why the Scholars like Shaykh Rabee himself and others from the Mashaayikh of Ahlis-Sunnah were advising the Salafis around the world with stopping the differing and putting matters of differing behind us and start on a new page. Mashaayikh were addressing this issue of the splitting between the Salafis, however, Abu Khadeejah and company were putting on social media there is no differing amongst the Salafis and the Salafis are United etc... Yes, The Salafis are upon the same Aqīdah and Manhaj without a doubt, however, there was much differing around the world amongst the Salafis and the Mashaayikh were addressing it. Is this not a disregard for the words of the "Kibār"?!
3. Have Abu Khadeejah and his colleagues always consulted with the Kibār before they warned against anyone they have warned against from the Salafis?! Example: When Abu Muhammad Al-Maghribi warned against Abu Abdis-Salām at the Masjid Ar-Rahmah conference in Parsippany where was this speech of Abu Khadeejah, or was he silent due to him being in agreement?! Rather, it was said that Shaykh 'Ubayd was informed of what Abu Muhammad Al-Maghribi did. That's after the fact! Again, where was this speech about going to the Kibār first?!
4. How much separation was caused in different places due to their warnings against Salafis or is it considered to be clarifying the truth and purifying the ranks of the Salafis when they have issued warnings without first returning back to the Kibār?!
5. If returning back to the Kibār is the overall principle why do we find it being said on Social Media Accounts and Outlets the statement: Return back to the well known duat in the affairs of dawah? And as is well-known this includes warnings against other Salafis?! What are the guidelines of when do we return back to the Kibār Ulamā and when it is ok to return affairs back to the Kibār Duāt and Tullāb Al-'Ilm?
6. If Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi is a Scholar in his own right, a person who can make Ijtihad, is it upon him to go back to those elder than him when he sees an evil has taken place and he's warning the Muslims against it?!
7. When Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi spoke against Ibrahim Ar-Ruhaylī and they spread his speech, did they make sure that Shaykh Muhammad checked with the Kibār first before he spoke against Ibrahim Ar-Ruhaylī and then after that spread his speech?!
8. Did Arafat Muhammadi check with the Kibār before he warned/spoke against Shaykh Abdur-Razzāq?! Where is Abu Khadeejah's Khutbah/speech against Arafat?!
9.
Recently the shameless man known as Abu Khadeejah ignorantly uttered statements of criticism against Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi that oppose certain principles. He pitifully said:
"...by tearing up the ranks of Ahlus Sunnah in every country. In Algeria torn, in Libya torn, in Morocco torn, parts of America torn, parts of Canada torn, Holland torn, France torn apart, Indonesia torn apart, why? Because you decide to speak against a group of brothers without referring the affair to Ahlul-Ilm the Kibar. The Ulama that you learned from, that you studied with. They are in the position of your father, they are 40 years, 35 years, 30 years your senior, you were a boy and they were already scholars of this ummah. Why don't you refer to them? Why do you believe you need to go it alone, and you abandon, and you put the ulama to one side..."
Our brother Abu Yusuf Khaleefah responds with valid points that illustrate the ignorance and treachery found within this speech. Abu Yusuf said:
1. Abu Khadeejah's tone was very disrespectful towards Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi. Shaykh Muhammad is his elder and he is a Scholar from the Scholars of Ahlis-Sunnah who is to be respected and honored even when we differ with him and hold his view to be incorrect.
2. Salafis were split prior to this current situation. This is why the Scholars like Shaykh Rabee himself and others from the Mashaayikh of Ahlis-Sunnah were advising the Salafis around the world with stopping the differing and putting matters of differing behind us and start on a new page. Mashaayikh were addressing this issue of the splitting between the Salafis, however, Abu Khadeejah and company were putting on social media there is no differing amongst the Salafis and the Salafis are United etc... Yes, The Salafis are upon the same Aqīdah and Manhaj without a doubt, however, there was much differing around the world amongst the Salafis and the Mashaayikh were addressing it. Is this not a disregard for the words of the "Kibār"?!
3. Have Abu Khadeejah and his colleagues always consulted with the Kibār before they warned against anyone they have warned against from the Salafis?! Example: When Abu Muhammad Al-Maghribi warned against Abu Abdis-Salām at the Masjid Ar-Rahmah conference in Parsippany where was this speech of Abu Khadeejah, or was he silent due to him being in agreement?! Rather, it was said that Shaykh 'Ubayd was informed of what Abu Muhammad Al-Maghribi did. That's after the fact! Again, where was this speech about going to the Kibār first?!
4. How much separation was caused in different places due to their warnings against Salafis or is it considered to be clarifying the truth and purifying the ranks of the Salafis when they have issued warnings without first returning back to the Kibār?!
5. If returning back to the Kibār is the overall principle why do we find it being said on Social Media Accounts and Outlets the statement: Return back to the well known duat in the affairs of dawah? And as is well-known this includes warnings against other Salafis?! What are the guidelines of when do we return back to the Kibār Ulamā and when it is ok to return affairs back to the Kibār Duāt and Tullāb Al-'Ilm?
6. If Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi is a Scholar in his own right, a person who can make Ijtihad, is it upon him to go back to those elder than him when he sees an evil has taken place and he's warning the Muslims against it?!
7. When Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi spoke against Ibrahim Ar-Ruhaylī and they spread his speech, did they make sure that Shaykh Muhammad checked with the Kibār first before he spoke against Ibrahim Ar-Ruhaylī and then after that spread his speech?!
8. Did Arafat Muhammadi check with the Kibār before he warned/spoke against Shaykh Abdur-Razzāq?! Where is Abu Khadeejah's Khutbah/speech against Arafat?!
9.
Where do we find in the history of Jarh wa Ta'deel, a scholar warning against people he deems to be evil, and then others criticizing him for not referring back to specific scholars before he warned, be they older or younger?
10. Warning against evil people is from commanding the right and forbidding the wrong, where is it in the Book and Sunnah where it says that one has to return back to one who is senior before commanding the right and forbidding the wrong and if he doesn't he's blameworthy?! Rather, the Prophet (ﷺ) said,
“Whoever among you sees an evil action, let him change it with his hand; if he cannot, then with his tongue; and if he cannot, then with his heart, and that is the weakest of faith.” [Muslim]
11. Who from the Kibār did Amjad Rafiq return back to before using an unofficial court document that only the Hizbis have used to speak ill of Shaykh Muhammad?! None of the Kibār have used or even mentioned that document to show that Shaykh Muhammad doesn't refute with proofs and evidences, so again, who did Amjad refer to?!
12. When Abu Khadeejah and company took a stance against the Kuwaiti Mashaayikh, did they go to the most Senior of Scholars to them, -i.e. Shaykh Rabee’- before they took a stance?! And when they were advised by Shaykh Rabee to deal with the Mashaayikh of Kuwait did they act upon the advice?! If so, who from the Kuwaiti Mashaayikh were invited after the said advice? Who did they have a tele-link with? How was Shaykh Rabee's advice implemented, rather why wasn't it translated by them or those with then like the speech that's translated when Shaykh Rabee has mentioned Abu Khadeejah and company in a good light?!
13. When MPUBS continued to warn against Salafy Ink and company, even after Shaykh Rabee’ ordered that all warnings must stop and be taken offline, did they refer back to the Kibār to continue their warning or do they believe that Abu Khadeejah and Company were the Kibār; thus, MPUBS were taking the matter back to them, getting the green light to continue to speak and warn against Salafis?!
14. How is it that Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi was one of the Kibār with Abu Khadeejah and company who matters are referred back to, but now in this current situation he's referred to as boy when the other elders were Scholars?! What was he then and what is he now in comparison to Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi who was declared to be a Scholar decades ago by Major Scholars?!
15. Even though Shaykh Muhammad differs with Shaykh Rabee’ on this current issue, when have we seen Shaykh Muhammad speak about Shaykh Rabee’ in the manner that Abu Khadeejah, Amjad Rafiq and others have spoken and speak about Shaykh Muhammad?!
16. Lastly, who from the Kibār did Abu Khadeejah refer back to before he publicly spoke out against Shaykh Muhammad regarding this current matter and if he said he did speak to one of them, where is the proof? What was the question and answer given to him regarding how he was going to address the matter etc?... Or is it that he and company believe they have a green light to say what they want and how they want about and to Shaykh Muhammad due to the fact that Shaykh Rabee’ opposes Shaykh Muhammad in this current matter?! If that's the case, it is said to them, “You all are not Shaykh Rabee or anyone else from the Kibār;” Shaykh Muhammad is still a Scholar from the Scholars and don't forget what you all have been saying when you or those affiliated with you have been critiqued on issues: The mistake is refuted but the honor of the Salafi is preserved, especially that of the Scholar!
May Allāh accept this, Aameen!
Written by Abu Yusuf Khaleefah
Day of Arafah Dhul-Hijjah 1439Hijri
There are other observations against the speech of Abu Khadeejah to which clarity will be made inshaa'llah.
10. Warning against evil people is from commanding the right and forbidding the wrong, where is it in the Book and Sunnah where it says that one has to return back to one who is senior before commanding the right and forbidding the wrong and if he doesn't he's blameworthy?! Rather, the Prophet (ﷺ) said,
“Whoever among you sees an evil action, let him change it with his hand; if he cannot, then with his tongue; and if he cannot, then with his heart, and that is the weakest of faith.” [Muslim]
11. Who from the Kibār did Amjad Rafiq return back to before using an unofficial court document that only the Hizbis have used to speak ill of Shaykh Muhammad?! None of the Kibār have used or even mentioned that document to show that Shaykh Muhammad doesn't refute with proofs and evidences, so again, who did Amjad refer to?!
12. When Abu Khadeejah and company took a stance against the Kuwaiti Mashaayikh, did they go to the most Senior of Scholars to them, -i.e. Shaykh Rabee’- before they took a stance?! And when they were advised by Shaykh Rabee to deal with the Mashaayikh of Kuwait did they act upon the advice?! If so, who from the Kuwaiti Mashaayikh were invited after the said advice? Who did they have a tele-link with? How was Shaykh Rabee's advice implemented, rather why wasn't it translated by them or those with then like the speech that's translated when Shaykh Rabee has mentioned Abu Khadeejah and company in a good light?!
13. When MPUBS continued to warn against Salafy Ink and company, even after Shaykh Rabee’ ordered that all warnings must stop and be taken offline, did they refer back to the Kibār to continue their warning or do they believe that Abu Khadeejah and Company were the Kibār; thus, MPUBS were taking the matter back to them, getting the green light to continue to speak and warn against Salafis?!
14. How is it that Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi was one of the Kibār with Abu Khadeejah and company who matters are referred back to, but now in this current situation he's referred to as boy when the other elders were Scholars?! What was he then and what is he now in comparison to Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādi who was declared to be a Scholar decades ago by Major Scholars?!
15. Even though Shaykh Muhammad differs with Shaykh Rabee’ on this current issue, when have we seen Shaykh Muhammad speak about Shaykh Rabee’ in the manner that Abu Khadeejah, Amjad Rafiq and others have spoken and speak about Shaykh Muhammad?!
16. Lastly, who from the Kibār did Abu Khadeejah refer back to before he publicly spoke out against Shaykh Muhammad regarding this current matter and if he said he did speak to one of them, where is the proof? What was the question and answer given to him regarding how he was going to address the matter etc?... Or is it that he and company believe they have a green light to say what they want and how they want about and to Shaykh Muhammad due to the fact that Shaykh Rabee’ opposes Shaykh Muhammad in this current matter?! If that's the case, it is said to them, “You all are not Shaykh Rabee or anyone else from the Kibār;” Shaykh Muhammad is still a Scholar from the Scholars and don't forget what you all have been saying when you or those affiliated with you have been critiqued on issues: The mistake is refuted but the honor of the Salafi is preserved, especially that of the Scholar!
May Allāh accept this, Aameen!
Written by Abu Yusuf Khaleefah
Day of Arafah Dhul-Hijjah 1439Hijri
There are other observations against the speech of Abu Khadeejah to which clarity will be made inshaa'llah.
May Allah reward all those who stand firm in combating clear oppression, especially our scholars, and may Allah repel the tribulation that has befallen the ranks of Ahlus Sunnah as a result of the antics of the Sa'aafiqah.
Making excuses for the kuffaar who mock the prophet?
Shamsi Refuted, Is He A Munafiq for excusing the kuffaar?
https://youtu.be/k2iRa6t83eI
Shamsi Refuted, Is He A Munafiq for excusing the kuffaar?
https://youtu.be/k2iRa6t83eI