As for the issues raised by Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov — regarding the level of our negotiators and the matter of a humanitarian pause (which we have discussed separately) — according to widely recognized international practice, this level is determined by the country the individuals represent. That level can be assessed from the outside only by those people, those experts, who possess undeniable authority and a high degree of competence.

What kind of authority can be claimed by the ringleaders of a regime that is utterly rotten and thoroughly corrupt? This is being talked about around the world. What kind of competence can those possibly be proud of who sent the Ukrainian armed forces to suffer senseless and massive losses in the Kursk Oblast — and who are now suffering one defeat after another on the battlefield?

It seems we are dealing with people who not only lack any meaningful competence whatsoever but also lack even the most basic political culture — judging by the kinds of statements and even direct insults they allow themselves to make toward those they claim to be ready to negotiate with.

As for yet another rejection of a two- or three-day ceasefire on humanitarian grounds — this is not the first time it has occurred. It does not surprise us but rather reinforces our conviction that the current regime in Kiev has no real interest in peace. For them, peace most likely means the loss of power. And for this regime, power appears to matter more than peace — or than the lives of people whom, judging by their actions, they do not even seem to regard as their own.

We will continue discussing all the nuances of this issue further with a number of colleagues. We will also consult with the Minister of Foreign Affairs and representatives of the power ministries at the upcoming meeting of the Security Council.

Russian: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/77099
English: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/77099

Valeriy Viktorovich Pyakin. Question-Answer Program of May 19, 2025

🎥 Watch the full episode: YouTube

⏳ Timestamps:
00:00:00 Introduction
00:00:22 The Istanbul Negotiations — A Real Victory for Russia, or Is the West Trying to Deceive Us?
01:16:37 Conclusion. VP USSR and FCT-Altai Books

📄 Read the transcript: English translation (PDF)

💡 Have a question? Ask here: Submit your question

📢 Explore more FCT channels:
Russian: Telegram, YouTube
German: Telegram, YouTube

✅ Join the FCT community – Subscribe now!

Dear subscribers,

The transcript of the Question-Answer Program from May 26, 2025 (in Russian) is now available on our website:

🔗 https://фкт-алтай.рф/qa/video/vopros-otvet-ot-26-maya-2025-g

Topics discussed include:
– Exchange of 1000 for 1000 — what's the nuance?
– Does the USSR still exist?

You can also find transcripts of previous programs in our archive:

🔗 https://фкт-алтай.рф/qa/video

If you have any questions after translating it into your own language, feel free to ask in the comments!

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!

Dear subscribers,

The transcript of the Question-Answer Program from June 2, 2025 (in Russian) is now available on our website:

🔗 https://фкт-алтай.рф/qa/video/vopros-otvet-ot-02-iyunya-2025-g

Topics discussed include:
– A sabotage and terrorist attack against Russia
– Is it appropriate to hold negotiations with Ukraine during such a massive attack?

You can also find transcripts of previous programs in our archive:

🔗 https://фкт-алтай.рф/qa/video

If you have any questions after translating it into your own language, feel free to ask in the comments!

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!

What is power?

Power is the practically implemented ability to govern.

In the exercise of power, the following specialized types are distinguished:

Conceptual power
- identifies the factors that influence society;
- sets goal vectors for each factor;
- develops governance concepts to achieve development goals.

Conceptual power is autocratic by nature and ignores the society’s "democratic" procedures, which neither see nor wish to acknowledge its autocracy.

Ideological power (political power) — gives the concept forms that are attractive to the people.

Legislative power — provides the concept with legal forms.

Executive power — implements the concept both structurally and non-structurally.

Judicial power — ensures the observance of "legality" in the life of society.

From State, the first volume of the three-volume series "War. State. Bolshevism."

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!

What is the Global Predictor, and how does it exercise power?

The Global Predictor (GP) is a conceptual subject with global-level responsibility in suprastate global governance that governs processes of planetary (global) significance (i.e., world governance) on the basis of conceptual power.

Conceptual power is the highest form of power in the distribution of the complete governance function among the specialized types of intra-societal power within the process of societal self-governance. It should be understood in two senses:

First, as a type of power (in relation to the system of differentiated specialized powers) that provides society with a concept of its life as an integrated whole across generations.

Second, as the power of the concept (the Idea) itself over society (that is, as the informational-algorithmic internal skeleton of culture and the foundation for society’s entire life and activity).

In the first sense, it is the power of specific individuals whose personal qualities enable them to perceive opportunities, select goals, discover and develop paths and means to achieve the goals they choose at their own discretion, and to implant all of this into the collective psyche of society — as well as into the formation of statehood. In other words, it is the introduction of a concept (an Idea) into society that guides the life activity of both individuals and society as a whole — which, in turn, constitutes power in the second sense.

All those who are conceptually powerless are hostages to conceptual power in both senses of the term. This is precisely why in a society of conceptually powerless individuals, neither democracy nor human rights are possible.

The Global Predictor is NOT structurally formalized and NOT personalized; it governs peoples, countries, and states through the control and formation of public/state ideologies and systems of education and science — all in accordance with the governance concept of the GP itself. Such suprastate/supranational structures — whether formal, like the United Nations, or informal, like world Freemasonry — are merely instruments through which the GP carries out the coordination of international relations and (supra)state governance. Therefore, identifying the governing subject and the process of GP governance through conventional structural conspiracy analysis is, a priori, impossible.

From State, the first volume of the three-volume series "War. State. Bolshevism."

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!

What is the complete governance function?

The complete governance function is a hierarchically ordered sequence of qualitatively distinct actions, which includes:

1. Identification of environmental factors (objective phenomena) encountered by the intellect, across the full diversity of processes in the Universe.

2. Formation of a stereotype (skill) for recognizing that factor in the future.

3. Formulation of a goal vector for governance in relation to the given factor, and integration of this goal vector into the overall goal vector of one’s behavior (self-governance), based on solving the problem of ensuring the stability of the governed object — in the sense of predictability of its behavior in an environment that includes this factor.

4. Development of a governance concept and specific governance objective functions that together form the concept — based on solving the problem of stability in terms of predictability of behavior in the environment (predictability to the degree required for governance at the specified quality level).

5. Organization and reorganization of purposeful governance structures that carry out the governance objective functions.

6. Control over (monitoring of) the activities of these structures during the governance process, and coordination of interactions among different structures.

7. Dismantling of structures that are no longer needed, or maintaining them in working condition for future use.

Steps 1 and 7 are always present. The intermediate steps can be grouped to varying degrees or broken down in more detail.

From State, the first volume of the three-volume series "War. State. Bolshevism."

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!

Forwarded from СВЕЖЕСТИ

Leading French media are discussing the new music video by Francis Lalanne — a singer popular in France — and Elena Maksimova, titled "My Russia."

This is how Le Parisien describes the video:

"The video, published on YouTube, shows the two artists walking with the wind in their hair across Red Square, dancing with their arms raised, surrounded by children on a football field, and performing this patriotic song in the language of Tolstoy."

Any system can develop, or at least survive, only if its resource capacity exceeds or at least equals the pressure exerted by the environment. A shortage of resources must be compensated for by improving the quality of governance. — A rule of the Sufficiently General Theory of Governance.

However, there is a limit to a system’s resource capacity. Accordingly, there is also a limit to how much the quality of governance can be improved in order to ensure the system’s development or even its survival.

In relation to the state, this means that there is a certain lower threshold of the people’s resource capacity (such as population size, science and education, industrial production, food security, armed forces) below which the state and its sovereignty become impossible.

From State, the first volume of the three-volume series "War. State. Bolshevism."

✅ Help grow the FCT community — share this post!

The American Spectator Magazine: Do we have a Nation?
...

These are not rioters fighting to stay in the adopted nation they now call home, but foreign invaders who have claimed our nation as their own.

...

"These riots pose a crucial and fundamental question for Americans: Do we have a nation? We ought to. We have a Constitution and thousands of legal documents and court rulings — not to mention hundreds of years of our ancestors’ blood, sweat, tears, and toils — that all say we have a nation. But whether or not we have a nation de jure, the response to L.A. will decide whether or not we have a nation de facto."

———

The New York Times: America Is No Longer a Stable Country
———

The two articles above are raising a long-standing issue. In reality, it would be correct to formulate it in the following way: "Is The U.S. actually a state?"

Find detailed research on this subject with regards to the US, as well as to many other countries of the world, in State - the first volume (soon to be available in English) of the 3-vol. series "War. State. Bolshevism."