https://stitch.withgoogle.com/

#desain #ai #google #stitch

https://youtu.be/aSXZ4IImPlE?si=cjTzEurN98TOMsXM

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use: Google's FULLY FREE Browser Use AI Agent! Automate ANYTHING! (Ranked #1)

#gemini #ai #google #web #apps #browser #agent #debug

https://www.trae.ai/?utm_source=ads&utm_medium=gg_sem_dl_pur&utm_campaign=182415283163_22814727098_brand_simple_broadmatch_p21/p22_id/br/vn/mx_en_&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22814727098

#trae #ai #murmer #murah #meriah #ide

Here’s a breakdown of TRAE / Trae AI (sometimes called “Trae IDE” or “Trae Agent”) — its strengths, weaknesses, and how it compares with other AI-assisted coding tools. If you want a side-by-side comparison with a specific tool (e.g. GitHub Copilot, Cursor, etc.), I can do that too.

---

## What is TRAE / Trae AI / Trae Agent?

* TRAE (or Trae AI / Trae IDE) is an AI-powered development environment / coding assistant built (or backed) by ByteDance. ([trae.ai][1])
* It offers features such as:

* Builder / Agent mode: where you describe tasks or goals and the system plans and executes code changes. ([DataCamp][2])
* Chat / code assistance: inline suggestions, code completions, debugging help, etc. ([DataCamp][2])
* Model support: it gives access to strong LLMs like Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, etc. ([DataCamp][2])
* Multimodal / additional tools: image-to-code (uploading designs and converting to code), preview windows, built-in terminal, context indexing, etc. ([YouTube][3])
* Open agent / open source component: Trae Agent (the autonomous agent side) is open source. ([arXiv][4])
* The academic paper “Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling” describes a modular agent architecture and shows strong benchmark performance. ([arXiv][4])

Because it’s relatively new, some features are still evolving, and access to certain “premium” capabilities or modes might be limited or gated. ([DataCamp][2])

---

## Pros (Strengths) of TRAE

Here are the key advantages that users and reviewers often point out:

| Strength | Explanation / Evidence |
| ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Free or very generous access (for now) | TRAE is currently offered at no cost (all features available) in many reports. ([Builder.io][5]) |
| Access to powerful models | Even in its free tier, it gives access to Claude 3.5, GPT-4o, etc. ([futuretools.io][6]) |
| Builder / “think-before-doing” approach | The Builder mode first plans and breaks down tasks before making code changes, which can reduce errors or misinterpretations. ([Builder.io][5]) |
| Rich context & indexing | It supports indexing existing code, project context, URL/document context to guide suggestions in a more informed way. ([DataCamp][2]) |
| Multimodal features | The ability to upload images (e.g. mockups) and convert them to UI code is a distinctive feature. ([YouTube][3]) |
| Benchmark & research backing | According to the “Trae Agent” paper, it outperformed certain baselines for software issue resolution on a repository-level benchmark. ([arXiv][4]) |
| Open agent / transparency | The agent component (Trae Agent) is open source, which helps with transparency, trust, and potential customization. ([arXiv][4]) |

Some user feedback also notes that the UI/UX and speed of prototyping are attractive compared to alternatives. ([Medium][7])

---

## Cons (Weaknesses / Risks / Limitations)

However, TRAE is not perfect. Here are some drawbacks and cautions:

| Weakness / Risk | Explanation / Evidence |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Performance / queuing / lag under heavy use | Some users report that after substantial usage, requests get queued or delayed. ([Cubet][8]) |
| Limited customization / “rules” support | Compared to some competitors (e.g. Cursor), TRAE currently offers less in fine-grained AI behavior customization or project-level rules. ([Builder.io][5]) |
| Still maturing / features in beta | Some core features (e.g. fully autonomous “SOLO” mode) remain in beta or limited access. ([DataCamp][2]) |
| Dependency on internet / cloud | Since much of the AI work is done via cloud/remote calls, an unstable network or latency can affect usability. ([Cubet][8]) |
| Potential pricing / sustainability risk | Because TRAE is currently free (or very generous), there’s a risk that its pricing model might change in the future (as has happened with other AI tools). ([DataCamp][2]) |
| Less mature plugin / extension ecosystem | Compared to established IDEs (e.g. VS Code) or AI tooling with large ecosystems, TRAE’s ecosystem is still growing. ([Builder.io][5]) |
| Context / memory limitations | Some users mention context being “cut” or having to manage prompt sizes / context window limits. ([Reddit][9]) |
| Not full replacement (yet) for reviewing / QA / code review tools | Some desired features (e.g. AI-driven code review, deep static analysis) are reported as missing or weaker than in competitors. ([Builder.io][5]) |

In user forums, some comments also reflect that certain models (e.g. GPT-5 when used via TRAE) can be slow, and the tradeoff between “best model output” vs “response speed / responsiveness” is real. ([Reddit][9])

---

## Comparison: TRAE vs Other AI Coding / IDE Tools

To see where TRAE shines or falls short, let’s compare it briefly with some of the more established alternatives, especially Cursor and Copilot (and general AI IDE tools).

| Feature / Aspect | TRAE | Cursor (AI IDE) | GitHub Copilot / Traditional tools |
| ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Pricing / access | Currently free / generous for powerful models ([Builder.io][5]) | Has free tier but many advanced features require Pro / subscription ([DEV Community][10]) | Copilot is subscription-based; often integrated into VS Code / GitHub workflows |
| Model access / strength | Strong model access (Claude 3.5, GPT-4o, etc.) built in ([futuretools.io][6]) | Also supports strong models and context awareness; integration with multiple model backends ([DEV Community][10]) | Copilot’s strength is in line completions, context completions; behind the scenes uses models optimized for code |
| Project-level / agentic operation | TRAE’s Builder / Agent mode enables higher-level planning and executing multi-step workflows ([DataCamp][2]) | Cursor’s “Agent / Composer” modes try similar tasks, though tradeoffs in speed vs correctness exist ([Builder.io][5]) | Traditional tools focus more on assisting single lines / functions rather than full autonomy |
| Customization / rules / behavior control | Limited currently in fine-grained rules/custom AI behavior ([Builder.io][5]) | Stronger support for project-specific rules, behavior customization, etc. ([Builder.io][5]) | Customization is usually via configuration, plugins, but less “AI behavior tuning” |
| Ecosystem / extensions / plugins | Still developing; supports importing VS Code / Cursor settings to some extent ([DataCamp][2]) | Matureer ecosystem, many extensions, integrations | Copilot works within established dev tools (VS Code, etc.) so benefits from existing ecosystems |
| Stability / maturity | Newer, hence maybe more growing pains, occasional performance issues under load | More battle-tested, more stable under wide usage | Very stable in its domain (as a coding assistant) |
| Offline / local/sensitive environment support | Requires network, remote model inference, so less ideal for air-gapped / offline use | Some parts may work offline (local model support) depending on architecture | Similar challenge; often depends on cloud inference |
| Unique features | Image-to-code, “think-first” planning, multimodal context, open agent nature | Strong project-aware completions, deep integration, code review features, etc. | Strong code completions, developer familiarity, tight integration with dev tools |

In particular, analyses by Builder.io compare TRAE and Cursor tightly, noting where each is better (e.g. Cursor may be more mature, TRAE has some innovative approaches). ([Builder.io][5])

Also, the academic paper behind “Trae Agent” shows that for repository-level issue resolution (a harder task than line completions), TRAE’s approach yields measurable improvements over several baselines. ([arXiv][4])

---

## When TRAE Makes Sense (Use Cases) & When It Might Not

Good use cases for TRAE:

* Prototyping or building small-to-medium projects quickly, especially with AI-guided scaffolding.
* When you want to experiment with autonomous code generation / agentic workflows.
* For developers who want access to powerful models without needing to pay (or before pricing changes).
* When you want a tool that can understand context across files, manage dependencies, and integrate preview modes.
* For tasks where the image → UI conversion is valuable (e.g. turning mockups or designs into code).

When TRAE may fall short:

* Very large, complex codebases where latency, model limits, or context window constraints become problematic.
* Projects or environments requiring offline operation, or highly sensitive source code that cannot be sent to remote servers.
* Teams needing tight plugin / extension support, or deep custom tooling integrations (for now).
* Where you need mature, battle-tested stability and consistency under heavy load.
* If their “free model” usage gets limited or pricing changes, then cost may become a factor.

---

If you want, I can produce a side-by-side table comparing TRAE with (say) Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, etc., in your specific language(s) and stack (e.g. JavaScript, Python). Do you want me to do that for your use case?

[1]: https://www.trae.ai/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae AI"
[2]: https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/trae-ai?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae AI: A Guide With Practical Examples - DataCamp"
[3]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ytktxe7oXY&utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae AI a FREE AI Code Editor. Better than CURSOR ? - YouTube"
[4]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23370?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae Agent: An LLM-based Agent for Software Engineering with Test-time Scaling"
[5]: https://www.builder.io/blog/cursor-vs-trae?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae vs Cursor: AI IDE Comparison - Builder.io"
[6]: https://www.futuretools.io/tools/trae-ai?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae AI - Future Tools"
[7]: https://joodi.medium.com/comparing-cursor-and-trae-ai-ides-for-front-end-developers-9bd66d1314ab?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Comparing Cursor and Trae: AI IDEs for Front-End Developers - Joodi"
[8]: https://cubettech.com/resources/blog/trae-ai-vs-vscode-ai-vs-code-editors/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Trae.AI vs. VSCode: Can AI Outperform Traditional Editors? - Cubet"
[9]: https://www.reddit.com/r/Trae_ai/comments/1mtbk0o/which_trae_model_do_you_find_most_reliable_right/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Which Trae model do you find most reliable right now? : r/Trae_ai"
[10]: https://dev.to/joodi/comparing-cursor-and-trae-ai-ides-for-front-end-developers-1i0n?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Comparing Cursor and Trae: AI IDEs for Front-End Developers"


#trae #ai #murah #meriah #murmer

https://www.trae.ai/solo?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22814727098

#trae #ai #murah #meriah #murmer #solo

https://youtu.be/IaRC2BAU0Zw?si=t_DMt0JSkbrHU4


#ai #agent #agen #coding #koding #kilo #code #kilocode #tool #tools

دانلود Udemy - Crack System Design Interview 2025-4
https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://downloadly.ir/elearning/video-tutorials/crack-system-design-interview/&ct=ga&cd=CAIyHzdmNDAwZTBmZTM1Yjk3NWU6Y29tLmJyOnB0OlVTOkw&usg=AOvVaw2ISFzq7UtDhZiMmyFOk78I

دوره Crack System Design Interview. این دوره آموزشی با هدف آماده‌سازی فراگیران برای موفقیت در مصاحبه‌های طراحی سیستم، مبانی و اصول کلیدی...

#crack #master #desain #sistem #system #design

https://youtu.be/7FlF0ouozus?si=3uPFQE0ApgyRfQUR

#software #free #open #source #bisnis #profit #bangun #apps #lovable #chatgpt #gemini #desain

https://youtu.be/VEpQvHyAUa0?si=KOeM-3UOIhXu4D_6

https://youtu.be/lkJalleME-A

#gemini #builder #frontend #backend #agent #agen #jules #stitch #google #ai #fullstack #replicate #image

https://youtu.be/ZGHRTbvnPa8?si=SipJ-J3IphNexXNY

#qwen #ai #cli #code #free #open #source #agen #agent

https://youtu.be/iLxGvLTDv3s?si=odijzVxqvUc0Yuso

#keep #it #simple #apps #aplikasi #sederhana #kuat #kekuatan #fokus #satu

https://youtu.be/0dMXxlpcaLs?si=BBlJnowPtE0j8nPy

#gemini #desain #insane #web #ai #free #open #source #apps #fullstack

https://youtu.be/hj0nTLbhIEY?si=dDfo-59GHzlAAQEn

#gemini #apps #agen #ai #antigravity

https://chatgpt.com/share/6929732b-f700-8009-bd6f-15c95220cf65 » deploy 1st go-lang apps

#git #repo #github #push #pull #go #golang #setup #config #repository

#cloud #database #sql

On Local when any Change...
git add -> git commit -> git push origin main

On Server...
git pull origin main

The overall process

People often call this:

Git-based deployment

Deploy via git pull

Or simply: push to GitHub, pull on server

---
on local

# 1. Stage everything you changed
git add .

# 2. Commit with a message
git commit -m "Use MariaDB for TODO storage"

# 3. Push to GitHub
git push origin main

on server

login as owner of the site then
su - cloud # or ssh in as cloud
go version # should also show go1.22.0

cd ~/public_html
git pull
go build -o todo-app

login to root
su

sudo systemctl restart todo-app
sudo systemctl status todo-app

#git #command #common #github

You can totally do that 👍
Think of it like this:

1. Your backup folder = the code you want
2. Your Git repo = the thing connected to GitHub
3. You copy backup → repo, commit, then (maybe) force-push to make GitHub match.

I’ll assume:

* Your WSL project repo is: ~/projects/go/todo-api
* Your backup is somewhere like: ~/backup/todo-api-backup

---

## A. Make your local repo match the backup

1. Go to your repo:

   cd ~/projects/go/todo-api
   

2. (Optional, but safer) Clean out current files except .git:

   rm -rf *
   rm -rf .[^.]* 2>/dev/null   # removes dotfiles but keeps .git if it exists
   

> If rm -rf .[^.]* scares you, skip it and just overwrite files when copying.

3. Copy the backup contents into this repo:

   cp -r ~/backup/todo-api-backup/* .
   cp -r ~/backup/todo-api-backup/.* . 2>/dev/null || true
   

> If your backup also has a .git folder, this will overwrite your current .git.
> That’s fine as long as its origin is still set to https://github.com/kenzastore/todo-api.git.
> We’ll check that next.

4. Check git status and remote:

   git status
   git remote -v
   

You should see:

* lots of changes (or “untracked files”)
* origin https://github.com/kenzastore/todo-api.git

If there is no .git (i.e. git status says “not a git repository”), then:

   git init
   git branch -M main
   git remote add origin https://github.com/kenzastore/todo-api.git
   

---

## B. Commit the backup as the new version

git add .
git commit -m "Restore original Go app from backup"

Now your local main branch = backup code.

---

## C. Decide: overwrite GitHub or merge?

### 1️⃣ If you want GitHub to match the backup (overwrite)

This will throw away newer commits on GitHub and replace them with your backup.

git push -f origin main

* -f = force (required because history is different)
* After this, GitHub’s main will look exactly like your local code.

### 2️⃣ If you want to keep GitHub history and merge backup in

Then instead of forcing, you’d first pull and rebase:

git pull --rebase origin main
# resolve any conflicts
git push origin main

But from how you described it (“backup of the original go folder”), you probably want option 1: force-push so everything goes back to that state.

---

## D. Update the server from GitHub

Once GitHub has the backup version:

On the server as user cloud:

cd ~/public_html
git fetch origin
git reset --hard origin/main   # make server code exactly match GitHub
go build -o todo-app

Then as root:

systemctl restart todo-app
systemctl status todo-app

Now:

* WSL code = backup
* GitHub = backup
* Server = backup build, running on your domain

---
#git #command #common #github #backup #upload #change #file #wsl #server