EvoNext
1.79K subscribers
272 photos
16 videos
266 files
484 links
Download Telegram
@Safaricom_Ethiopia_PLC What's happening? 😭😭😭😭
Front end: React or Next.js, Tailwind CSS
Back end: Node.js or Python (FastAPI/Django)
Database: PostgreSQL
AI/LLM: OpenAI API, RAG architecture, LangChain or similar
Authentication: OAuth/SSO
Cloud: AWS or GCP
API integrations: REST APIs connecting to enterprise data sources
Share this one with your friends, This is malicious link.
Don't open it.
My letter for generations coming after 2126,
2
Good morning 🌞

Good night 😴
😁2
😁🫣
# The Hidden Laziness of Perfectionism: Why Your High Standards Are Holding You Back

We often wear perfectionism like a badge of honor. In job interviews, we frame it as our "greatest weakness" while secretly hoping it signals that we are relentless, high-achieving, and detail-oriented. But according to author Mark Manson, perfectionism isn't a sign of high standards—it’s actually a sophisticated form of emotional laziness.

By clinging to impossible ideals, we avoid the messy, vulnerable work of actual progress. Here is a breakdown of why perfectionism is stalling your life and how to shift your mindset from "Maximizing" to "Satisficing."

---

### 1. The Penance Trap: Suffering is Not Progress
Manson opens with the historical example of Martin Luther, the 16th-century monk who famously obsessed over his own perceived sins. Luther would spend six hours a day in confession, fast for days, and even whip himself as penance.

This behavior illustrates the "Perfectionism Cycle":
1. The Fantasy: You start a project with an idealized vision of how it should look.
2. The Agony: You realize the work isn't living up to that vision.
3. The Abandonment: You quit because you can't bear the gap between reality and the ideal.
4. The Penance: You beat yourself up for weeks or months.

The trap is that self-punishment feels productive. We think that because we are suffering, we are taking our failures seriously. In reality, Manson argues that this "penance" is a way of paying for our failures with bad feelings so that we don’t have to do the harder work of actually changing our behavior.

### 2. The Power of Self-Forgiveness
It sounds counterintuitive, but being easier on yourself makes you more productive. Research from Carlton University found that students who forgave themselves for procrastinating on one exam were significantly less likely to procrastinate on the next one.

Those who beat themselves up, however, stayed stuck. When you stop paying for failure with self-flagellation, you are forced to pay with actual behavioral change. Lowering the bar isn’t about "settling"; it’s about making the task small enough that you can actually finish it.

### 3. "Other-Oriented" Perfectionism: The Cost of Control
Perfectionism doesn't just hurt the individual; it can become a form of "psychological warfare" against others. Manson points to director Stanley Kubrick, who was known for demanding hundreds of takes for a single scene—not because he had a clear vision, but because he didn't know what he wanted and expected others to suffer until he found it.

This "other-oriented perfectionism" is lazy because it’s an authoritarian approach. Instead of doing the difficult work of communicating, compromising, and understanding other people's perspectives, the perfectionist simply bulldozes them until their own impossible standards are met.

### 4. Maximizers vs. Satisficers
To understand how to move forward, we must look at two types of decision-makers:
* Maximizers: These people need to explore every possible option to ensure they get the "best" result. They spend hours reading reviews and agonizing over choices.
* Satisficers: These people look for a specific "good enough" threshold. Once a mattress (or a project) meets their criteria, they commit and move on.

Surprisingly, research shows that Maximizers often have worse outcomes and are less happy than Satisficers. Even when they choose the "better" option, they remain miserable because they can't stop wondering if another, better option existed.

### 5. The "70% Rule" for Success
How do we apply this? Manson suggests adopting the 70% Rule, a concept championed by Jeff Bezos.
* If you have less than 70% of the information/quality you need, you’re likely to fail.
* If you wait for more than 70%, you are wasting time and delaying the vital feedback that comes from shipping your work.
Shipping something at 70% is terrifying because it's vulnerable. It exposes you to the possibility that people will see your imperfections. But as Robert Watson-Watt (the inventor of radar) discovered, "imperfect radar" deployed in time helped win World War II, while "perfect radar" wouldn't have arrived for another decade.

---

### Conclusion: Escaping the Monastery
The solution to perfectionism is to redefine what "perfect" means. The flawless vision in your head isn't perfection—it’s a fantasy. Confusing that fantasy with reality is a lack of mental effort.

Real perfection is a process. It is the act of putting something imperfect into the world, receiving criticism, failing, and then improving it. To escape the trap of perfectionism, you must:
1. Define "good enough" before you start.
2. Commit to shipping when you hit that 70% mark.
3. Accept that suffering is not the same as progress.

By letting go of the need to be "worthy" through pain, you can finally start doing the work that actually matters.

***

*For more insights, watch the full video by Mark Manson:* [Why Perfectionism Is Actually Laziness](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OngYnjfKqd8)
👍1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
5 Million Ethiocoders or 5 Million Certificate Holders?

Can you really learn four tech programs in one day?

Two years ago, the Ethiopian government launched the 5 Million Coders Program. I saw people complete AI, Data Analytics, Programming, and Android Development in a single day all just for a certificate. It’s ironic.

No real learning. No experimentation. Just numbers to showcase success.
We celebrate certificates over skills, but this creates certificate holders, not innovators. If Ethiopia wants a real digital future, we must reward mastery, curiosity, and practical application, not political optics.

This is a similar pattern to the recent Ethiopia Artificial Intelligence Institute directive, which criminalizes real trainers, experimenters, and innovators, while rewarding certificate givers and holders.

We need a culture that values building real skills, not just chasing certificates.

Do you think the 5 Million Ethiopian Coders program failed, or has it served as good political instrument?
#Ethiocoders #EAII #AI #certificates #ethiopia #uae #ai #techprograms