Week 10 of "Weekly Essay Challenge"

Essay Topic of the day:

"Each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand mediocre minds appointed to guard the past."

Do give it a try !!

You can get a detailed solution and feedback on your Essay Write up. For this, you have to be an active participant in the "Weekly Essay Challenge"

Register here to join !!👇👇

https://forms.gle/rWrjJNvmt7PqmwNc9

Hint For Introduction !!

Historical Examples of Progressive Spirits and Resistance

➡️Galileo Galilei: His advocacy for heliocentrism faced opposition from the Catholic Church.
➡️Charles Darwin: The backlash against his theory of evolution and the enduring resistance from creationists.
➡️Abolition of Slavery: The fierce opposition faced by abolitionists like Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman.
➡️Women's Suffrage: The resistance suffragettes like Susan B. Anthony and Emmeline Pankhurst encountered.
➡️Industrial Revolution: Luddites' opposition to mechanized industry.

You can also bring examples of Raja Ram Mohan Roy (Fight against Sati), Savitri Bai Phule (Women Education), Dr Ambedkar (Hindu Code Bill), Dr Manmohan Singh (Economic Reforms) etc..who faced opposition for their progressive Ideas. But try to ensure the diversity of examples to enrich your content.

These examples you can use to support/justify the proposition !!

Detailed Framework for Brainstorming: Think over these lines to cover each and every dimension of Essay

Essay Topic: "Each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand mediocre minds appointed to guard the past".

1. What does the statement "Each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand mediocre minds appointed to guard the past" mean?

2. How do societal structures and institutions contribute to the resistance faced by progressive thinkers?

3. What psychological factors drive individuals to resist progressive changes?

4. How has opposition from traditionalist forces historically affected major social and scientific advancements?

5. What strategies have successful progressive movements used to overcome resistance from conservative forces?

Counter-Arguments:

6. Can the resistance posed by "mediocre minds" serve a beneficial purpose in slowing down potentially reckless changes?

7. Some experts argue for a balance between traditional morality and progressive ideas for stable societal development?

Alternative Perspectives:

8. How do different cultures and societies vary in their acceptance and resistance to progressive ideas?

9. Can opposition from traditionalist forces sometimes lead to more robust and well-thought-out progressive movements?

10. What are some criticisms of labeling opposition to progress as "mediocre minds"?

Way Forward:

11. How can progressive thinkers and movements can effectively communicate their ideas to reduce resistance and gain broader support?

12. What role do education and critical thinking play in reducing resistance to progressive ideas?

13. How can technology and social media be leveraged to support progressive ideas and counter traditionalist resistance?

14. How can leaders and influencers bridge the gap between progressive spirits and resistant minds to foster a more inclusive dialogue?

You need to understand one thing - Brainstorming is a Science whereas Articulation is an Art. You need both to write an exceptional Essay...

Think over these lines...and try to articulate your ideas/arguments in a way so it can create long - lasting impression on someone who is reading your essay. This is only way out to score 140 + Marks in Essay Paper..

For more such tips & tricks....Join @essayprepcareer ..

Key Takeaways from "How Democracies Die" by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt

➡️ Democracy's Vulnerability: Democracies often die not through sudden and violent coups but gradually as elected leaders systematically undermine democratic institutions and norms to consolidate power. The authors emphasize that "democratic backsliding today begins at the ballot box" and not with military takeovers.

➡️ "Death by a Thousand Cuts": The authors highlight examples from countries like Hungary, Turkey, Venezuela etc. to show how democratically elected leaders can subvert the system from within, eroding checks and balances, and ultimately leading to authoritarian regimes.

➡️ "Soft Guardrails of Democracy": Levitsky and Ziblatt emphasize the importance of Mutual toleration & Institutional forbearance. Mutual toleration means accepting political rivals as legitimate, while Institutional forbearance involves restraining from using legal powers in ways that could undermine democracy.

➡️ Linz's litmus test: Using Juan José Linz's litmus test, the authors identify four indicators of authoritarian behaviour:
☑️ Rejecting democratic rules,
☑️ Denying the legitimacy of opponents,
☑️Tolerating or encouraging violence
☑️A readiness to curtail civil liberties.

Politicians displaying these behaviours pose a significant threat to democracy.

➡️ "Political gatekeeping is democracy’s first line of Defense". Political parties are crucial in preventing extremists from gaining power. Effective gatekeeping involves isolating and defeating extremist forces, avoiding alliances with anti-democratic parties, and uniting mainstream parties against authoritarian threats.

➡️ "Slow strangulation of Democracy": Authoritarian leaders often erode democratic institutions slowly, making changes that seem minor or legal at first but collectively weaken the system. This can involve undermining the judiciary, restricting press freedom, and changing electoral rules to entrench power.

➡️ Democratic Norms Over Institutions: Levitsky and Ziblatt argue that democratic institutions alone cannot safeguard democracy; the unwritten norms of mutual respect and restraint are equally important. Without these norms, institutions can be manipulated to serve authoritarian ends.

➡️ Solutions to Democratic Decline: To protect democracy, the authors suggest restoring and extending democratic norms, building coalitions among diverse groups, reforming political parties to reduce the influence of extremists, and addressing underlying issues like economic inequality and racial and religious tensions that fuel polarization.

➡️ Citizens' Role in Democracy: Levitsky and Ziblatt argue that no single politician or party can save democracy alone; it requires a collective effort from the populace to uphold democratic values and norms.

When you are Writing Essay on the theme of "Democracy & Governance"....You can't afford to miss these crucial Points. Use these ideas to make your Essay Write up Outstanding....

Don't miss to leave your reactions if you love our content..

For more such Insightful Content join @essayprepcareer....

You can read this here !!

Cracks in India's Steel Frame: High-Stakes Drama of IAS Officer Pooja Khedkar

Pooja Khedkar, a 32-year-old trainee IAS officer from the Maharashtra cadre, finds herself at the epicenter of a national scandal. Khedkar is accused of egregious misconduct, including high-handed behaviour, unauthorized use of official facilities, and leveraging her father's influence to intimidate officials. Allegations also question her eligibility under the OBC non-creamy layer and PwBD categories, suggesting fraudulent claims and significant wealth discrepancies.

360 Degree Overview of Pooja Khedkar Controversy

Ethical Issues

➡️ Integrity and Accountability: Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy underscores the importance of a merit-based and rule-bound administration. Khedkar's blatant misuse of official insignia and facilities signifies a severe breach of integrity and accountability.

➡️ Duty Ethics: Immanuel Kant's duty ethics emphasize that actions should be guided by a sense of duty and adherence to moral laws. Khedkar's conduct reflects a lack of duty and respect for the ethical standards required of public servants.

➡️ Transparency: The falsification of eligibility under reservation categories grossly undermines transparency which is crucial for fostering public trust and ensuring ethical governance.

➡️ Conflict of Interest: Public choice theory, as articulated by James M. Buchanan, warns that individuals in public service might prioritize self-interest over the public good. Khedkar's alleged partnerships with private entities while holding a public office epitomize a glaring conflict of interest.

Legal Issues

➡️ Spoils System at Play: This case brings to light the detrimental effects of a spoils system, where appointments and privileges appear to be driven by personal connections rather than merit.

➡️ Misrepresentation and Fraud: Alleged falsification of her disability status and OBC non-creamy layer certificate could result in serious fraud charges, violating the legal frameworks governing civil service exams.

➡️ Non-compliance: Her repeated failures to attend mandated medical examinations contravene legal requirements for civil service candidates, undermining the principles of legal compliance and equal opportunity.

➡️ Civil Service Conduct Rules: According to the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, and the Indian Administrative Service (Probation) Rules, 1954, officers must maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and avoid any actions unbecoming of their position. Khedkar's actions violate these fundamental rules that calls for strict disciplinary measures. (Part 1/3)......Continued ........

Be Prepared, UPSC can ask you the case study on this issue in the Upcoming Mains by changing the course of events...No matter whatever be the case, on the same lines you can to write Ethical and Legal Issues...

Stay Tuned @essayprepcareer for more...

Upcoming Post !!

Give it a ❤️ if you are excited..

Key Insights from "Why Nations Fail" by Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson

➡️ Inclusive Institutions vs. Extractive Institutions: Nations flourish with inclusive institutions that secure property rights, uphold the rule of law, and allow broad participation in economic and political activities. Conversely, extractive institutions, which concentrate power and wealth among a few, stifle innovation and economic progress, leading to stagnation and inequality.

For example, The stark difference between North and South Korea highlights how North Korea's extractive institutions caused massive poverty, while South Korea's inclusive institutions have driven prosperity despite similar cultural and geographic conditions.

➡️ Critical Junctures and Institutional Drift: Critical junctures are significant events that disrupt existing political and economic balances, leading to divergent paths. For example, The Black Death reduced labour supply which empowered workers in Western Europe to demand better conditions, as a result, fostered more inclusive institutions. In contrast, Eastern Europe reinforced serfdom, leading to more extractive institutions.

➡️ Political Centralization: Effective political centralization is essential for inclusive institutions. Without a central authority to enforce laws and protect property rights, societies can descend into chaos, as seen in Somalia.

➡️ Creative Destruction: Inclusive institutions facilitate creative destruction, a process where outdated systems and technologies are replaced by new, more efficient ones. This is essential for long-term economic growth.

➡️ Sustainable Economic Growth: While extractive institutions can generate short-term economic growth, as seen in historical Russia and contemporary China, this growth is unsustainable without transitioning to inclusive institutions. Long-term prosperity requires political and economic reforms that foster inclusiveness.

If you are still struggling with Essay Paper then join Essay Enrichment Program by Prepcareer IAS.... where Ideas/Insights from such famous books and well-known Authors are discussed in depth.

For enquiries related to Essay Enrichment Program, here is the link to register 👇👇👇

https://forms.gle/rWrjJNvmt7PqmwNc9

For more such content join @essayprepcareer

"The less there is to justify a traditional custom, the harder it is to get rid of it."

#ThoughtoftheDay
#Essay

“I wish this to be recorded in this house that during the last two or three years if most of the members of the services had not been serving the country efficiently, practically the Union would have collapsed.”

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel's emphatic proclamation in the Constituent Assembly underscored the indispensable role of a dedicated and efficient civil service in maintaining the India’s stability and unity. However, the contemporary state of India's bureaucracy presents a stark contrast to Patel's idealistic vision, now plagued by systemic corruption and institutional decay. One can only imagine the profound disturbance Patel would feel witnessing the current state of affairs. Recent scandals highlight glaring deficiencies: the Pooja Khedkar case, where she allegedly fabricated documents to claim disability benefits; Asif K Yusuf, who purportedly used forged OBC certificates; and Navneet Kumar (alias Rajesh Kumar Sharma), who deceitfully altered his identity to circumvent age restrictions.

These actions flagrantly betray Patel’s vision and tarnish the bureaucracy's reputation. Increasing public disillusionment and vociferous outcry on social media further highlight the perception of the bureaucracy as manipulable through subterfuge and chicanery, with incidents of bureaucrats exploiting their positions for personal gain exacerbating this perception. Modern Indian bureaucracy is afflicted with grievous structural imbalances, notably the unholy nexus between bureaucrats and politicians. Honest bureaucrats find themselves marginalized, while unscrupulous sycophants align with political factions.

Patel would be profoundly disturbed by the current state of the civil services he helped shape. His vision of an incorruptible and efficient bureaucracy seems a distant dream in today's environment of malfeasance and nepotism. The stark contrast between his ideals and the present reality calls for deep introspection and a return to the principles he espoused. Reflecting upon Patel’s adamantine and uncompromising stance on probity and efficiency, it is plausible to infer the measures he might champion in our contemporary milieu: instituting more rigorous verification processes for documents and certificates to thwart fraudulent claims; ensuring that only the most meritorious candidates ascend to positions of public trust; championing enhanced transparency within the UPSC and the civil services; and advocating swift and severe punitive measures against malefactors, reinforcing the principle that integrity is sacrosanct within the civil services.

Revisiting Patel's principles and adopting stringent measures can enable the Indian civil services to aspire once more to be the robust backbone of the nation envisioned by Sardar Patel. The time is ripe for a proactive, imaginative, responsive, and technologically adept bureaucracy that can address contemporary challenges while staying true to the spirit of service envisaged by Sardar Patel. As the ancient Sanskrit saying goes, "Sheelam Param Bhushanam" (Character is the highest virtue). We need individuals with personal and national character of the highest order to occupy positions of power to truly honour the legacy of their most ardent advocate.

This would be the greatest tribute to our beloved "The Sardar." !!

If you love this then give it a ❤️.....

Join @essayprepcareer for more !!