One would call them morbid beauty, because death/destruction and beauty are intertwined in these images. Many of them do not even contain a speck of "good." Yet they are still beautiful.
People confuse beauty with goodness, forgetting that even death, killing, destruction, and evil can be beautiful.
Hannibal would be a great artistic example as to why beautiful is not equivalent to good.
Another example, one from the real life, is to watch any predator (a carnivore animal) during a hunt. They are absolutely beautiful and (not but) morbid.
Hannibal would be a great artistic example as to why beautiful is not equivalent to good.
Another example, one from the real life, is to watch any predator (a carnivore animal) during a hunt. They are absolutely beautiful and (not but) morbid.
0/0
People confuse beauty with goodness, forgetting that even death, killing, destruction, and evil can be beautiful. Hannibal would be a great artistic example as to why beautiful is not equivalent to good. Another example, one from the real life, is to watch…
ولقد ذكرْتُكِ والرِّماحُ نواهل
وبيْضُ الهِنْدِ تقْطرُ منْ دمي
فوددتُ تقبيل السيوفِ لأنها
لمعتْ كبارق ثغركِ المتبسِّم
وبيْضُ الهِنْدِ تقْطرُ منْ دمي
فوددتُ تقبيل السيوفِ لأنها
لمعتْ كبارق ثغركِ المتبسِّم
0/0
People confuse beauty with goodness, forgetting that even death, killing, destruction, and evil can be beautiful. Hannibal would be a great artistic example as to why beautiful is not equivalent to good. Another example, one from the real life, is to watch…
لا تَغْتَرِرْ بنحُولِ خَصرٍ أهيَفِ
فالموتُ في حَدِّ الحُسامِ المُرهَفِ
فالموتُ في حَدِّ الحُسامِ المُرهَفِ
0/0
People confuse beauty with goodness, forgetting that even death, killing, destruction, and evil can be beautiful. Hannibal would be a great artistic example as to why beautiful is not equivalent to good. Another example, one from the real life, is to watch…
Leonardo da Vinci understood this. He was a gentle soul for most of his life, but he also knew intuitively that beauty is not just a mysterious smile and a wild flower. He found it too in blood and guts while dissecting dead bodies, and designing military weapons. He discovered beauty in death and war too.
زين هو الـ DSM-5 أحدث نسخة،
تجي تعتمد على الـ 4 بالتشخيص ليش... وهو أصلًا قديم من سنة 2000
تجي تعتمد على الـ 4 بالتشخيص ليش... وهو أصلًا قديم من سنة 2000
0/0
زين هو الـ DSM-5 أحدث نسخة، تجي تعتمد على الـ 4 بالتشخيص ليش... وهو أصلًا قديم من سنة 2000
Schizophrenia subtypes in DSM-4 were all discarded in favor of a severity-based classification.
But I still have to memorize the old subtypes cuz they might come up in the exam
But I still have to memorize the old subtypes cuz they might come up in the exam
From a modern perspective, the problem of cholera was an epidemiological and pathological puzzle, to be solved with shoe leather, statistics, and flashes of insight. But it was also the problem of free trade and living in industrial cities; of maintaining imperial control and global military and naval strength; of the origin and nature of poverty; of the proper role of medicine in government and public life. It is ironic, and revealing, that many of these problems were solved not by physicians wielding microscopes and germ theories, but by lawyers, administrators and engineers who believed that cholera blew on the wind.
— The Sick Rose
— The Sick Rose