المخطوطة بيها هواي ملاحظات وأفكار جان ليوناردو يفكر بيها... وحدة منها هي: ليش اكو أحافير لأسماك وكائنات بحرية بأماكن جبلية؟
ليوناردو توقع بالمخطوطة انه بعض الجبال جانت سابقاً أراضي بحرية seabed وصعدت شوية شوية وصارت جبال (وهلشي أثبته علم الجيولوجيا ورة ليوناردو)
وهواي ملاحظات ثانية...
ليوناردو توقع بالمخطوطة انه بعض الجبال جانت سابقاً أراضي بحرية seabed وصعدت شوية شوية وصارت جبال (وهلشي أثبته علم الجيولوجيا ورة ليوناردو)
وهواي ملاحظات ثانية...
Forwarded from use telegram apk (Khalid)
Nietzsche claimed, the oppression felt by the Jews and early Christians grew to the point at which a new value system—the JudeoChristian value system—came into being, as a kind of religious and ethical response to Roman domination. Though a single unified system, it carried different emphases for the two groups. For Jews the focus was on selfpity, ethnic cohesion, a thirst for revenge, an obsession with freedom, a hatred of the strong and powerful, and a desire to recover lost wealth. The Christians—through the figure of Jesus—preferred to emphasize the value of the downtrodden (“blessed are the meek”), faith in God to bring justice (“the meek shall inherit the earth”), salvation in the afterlife, and a fixation on love as a means for ameliorating suffering. Arising as it did out of the quasislavery imposed by the Romans, Nietzsche deemed this collective JudeoChristian response a ‘slave’ or ‘priestly’ morality.
When the Western Empire, based in Rome, collapsed in the 5th century a.d., the master morality collapsed with it. As the only real competitor, slave morality rose to take its place as the dominant ethical system of the West. And there it has remained for nearly
two thousand years. In this sense, Nietzsche says, the slave has defeated the master, and become the new master.
But the actual outcome has been far from positive. Quite the contrary: it has been an absolute disaster for humanity. When combined with booming populations and advancing technology, there now exists a distinctly modern form of the priestly mindset, one based on subservience, conformity, equality, pity, guilt, suffering, revenge, and selfhatred: the herd morality. One could scarcely devise a lower conception of man.
Which brings us to the question of the Jews. Nietzsche’s position on the Jews is complex and decidedly mixed. On the one hand, they are the embodiment and product of the despised slave morality. Jews owe their very success to the promotion and exploitation of this way of thinking. On the other hand, they did succeed: they ‘defeated’ (or rather, outlived) Rome, and thus were able to successfully pull off that inversion of values in which the slave eclipsed the master. Partly for this very reason they have been able to sustain themselves as a distinct ethnicity through the millennia. They are hardened survivors; they are (relatively) pure; they know how to succeed. We see this ambivalent attitude in an early work, Human, All Too Human (1878). In a brief discussion of “the problem of the Jews,” Nietzsche shows evident sympathy with their suffering: “I would like to know how much one must excuse in the overall accounting of a people which, not without guilt on all our parts, has had the most sorrowful history of all peoples” (sec. 475). In a brief moment of praise—and in noted contrast to later writings—he hails the contributions of the Jews; they are the ones “to whom we owe the noblest human being (Christ), the purest philosopher (Spinoza), the mightiest book, and the most effective moral code in the world.” This would be virtually his last unconditional praise for Jesus and the Bible.
When the Western Empire, based in Rome, collapsed in the 5th century a.d., the master morality collapsed with it. As the only real competitor, slave morality rose to take its place as the dominant ethical system of the West. And there it has remained for nearly
two thousand years. In this sense, Nietzsche says, the slave has defeated the master, and become the new master.
But the actual outcome has been far from positive. Quite the contrary: it has been an absolute disaster for humanity. When combined with booming populations and advancing technology, there now exists a distinctly modern form of the priestly mindset, one based on subservience, conformity, equality, pity, guilt, suffering, revenge, and selfhatred: the herd morality. One could scarcely devise a lower conception of man.
Which brings us to the question of the Jews. Nietzsche’s position on the Jews is complex and decidedly mixed. On the one hand, they are the embodiment and product of the despised slave morality. Jews owe their very success to the promotion and exploitation of this way of thinking. On the other hand, they did succeed: they ‘defeated’ (or rather, outlived) Rome, and thus were able to successfully pull off that inversion of values in which the slave eclipsed the master. Partly for this very reason they have been able to sustain themselves as a distinct ethnicity through the millennia. They are hardened survivors; they are (relatively) pure; they know how to succeed. We see this ambivalent attitude in an early work, Human, All Too Human (1878). In a brief discussion of “the problem of the Jews,” Nietzsche shows evident sympathy with their suffering: “I would like to know how much one must excuse in the overall accounting of a people which, not without guilt on all our parts, has had the most sorrowful history of all peoples” (sec. 475). In a brief moment of praise—and in noted contrast to later writings—he hails the contributions of the Jews; they are the ones “to whom we owe the noblest human being (Christ), the purest philosopher (Spinoza), the mightiest book, and the most effective moral code in the world.” This would be virtually his last unconditional praise for Jesus and the Bible.
0/0
What is in this world that is worth saving, Sartaj? Can u think of one reason? - Sacred games
المسلسل الهندي الوحيد اللي تابعته لأن انتاج نتفلكس ومبني على رواية 😂🌚🍻
0/0
المسلسل الهندي الوحيد اللي تابعته لأن انتاج نتفلكس ومبني على رواية 😂🌚🍻
ستل حلو كلش + مبيه اغاني وركص 🌚🍻
آلـــهـة
Photo
"If ur dreams don't have a high probability of failure, they are not worth ur time"
Forwarded from ميمز و هيج
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
لما تكتشف انه الكافيين يساعد بنمو الشعر
ميمز و هيج
لما تكتشف انه الكافيين يساعد بنمو الشعر
الكافيين بإعتباره vasodilator يساهم بزيادة تدفق الدم لبصيلات الشعر وبالتالي المواد الغذائية، وبالتالي نمو الشعر
*قبل متغسل وجهك بالجاي، البحوث على هذا الشي مو هواي وقابلة للنقاش*
*قبل متغسل وجهك بالجاي، البحوث على هذا الشي مو هواي وقابلة للنقاش*
Never saw anyone describe education systems as accurate as Howard Gardner as he says, “teacher-centered ‘lets stuff it into the kid’s mind’ type of education.”
Forwarded from WAXES 🖤 (WANES ELAGORY)
When your boyfriend or girlfriend asks if you are okay..
Don't lie to them. If y'all are in love, tell them what's bothering you. They care. It's okay to be vulnerable with them. Don't tell them "yes, I'm okay" and you're not, because then you'll be mad at them for not understanding your hurt when YOU HAVEN'T EVEN EXPLAINED IT to them. People can't read minds. Give them the chance to listen, give them the chance to understand. Let them love you, communication is key.
Don't lie to them. If y'all are in love, tell them what's bothering you. They care. It's okay to be vulnerable with them. Don't tell them "yes, I'm okay" and you're not, because then you'll be mad at them for not understanding your hurt when YOU HAVEN'T EVEN EXPLAINED IT to them. People can't read minds. Give them the chance to listen, give them the chance to understand. Let them love you, communication is key.