من كتاب Technofeudalism:
ليسَ المالُ منفصلًا عن عالَمِنا الاجتماعي، وعمّا نفعله تجاهَ الآخرينَ ومعهم في العَمَلِ واللعب وفي كلّ صغيرةٍ وكبيرةٍ من حياتِنا الاجتماعية. صحيحٌ أنّه سِلعَةٌ مِثلَ كلّ السِلَع، لكنّه أيضًا شيءٌ أكبرُ بكثيرٍ. فهو في المقامِ الأول انعكاسٌ لعلاقَتِنا ببعضِنا البعض وبالتكنولوجيا (أَيْ الوسائل والطرق التي نستعينُ بها لنحوِّلَ المادة ونعيدَ تشكيلَها؛ رأس المال). أو كما قال كارل ماركس ببلاغة:

المالُ هو قدرةُ الإنسانِ المُغَيَّبة. فَكُلُّ فِعلٍ لا طاقَةَ لي به وحدي وإنْ استَعَنتُ بكلِّ قدراتي الفردية، أقدِرُ عليه بالمال. فالمالُ يُحيلُ كلَّ قُدرَةٍ فرديةٍ إلى نقيضِها.

فإنْ رُمتُ طعامًا ما أو السفرَ بالعربة لضعفي عن المَسير، فالمالُ يأتي لي بالطعامِ والعربة: فهو إذن يحوِّلُ رغباتي من عالمِ الخيالِ فيترجمُ المرغوبَ والمتأَمَّلَ والمُتخَيَّلَ إلى شيءٍ محسوسٍ وحقيقي. فيَصيرُ المالُ، عندئذٍ، القوةُ المُبدِعَةُ حقًا التي تُحيلُ الخيالَ إلى حياة.

Oedipus and the Sphinx
By François Emile Ehrmann

What could destroy us more quickly than working, thinking, and feeling without any inner necessity, without any deeply personal choice, without pleasure—as an automaton of “duty”? This is the very recipe for decadence, even for idiocy.

— The Antichrist, by Friedrich Nietzsche

Satan Presiding at the Infernal Council
By John Martin

Reminds me of this:

Cicero denounces Catiline
By Cesare Maccari

Almost every genius knows the “Catilinarian life” as one of the stages in his development, a feeling of hate, revenge and revolt against everything that exists, that has ceased to evolve.... Catiline—the early stage of every Caesar.

— Twilight of The Idols, by Friedrich Nietzsche

.

.

.

خُذِ الْعَفْوَ وَأْمُرْ بِالْعُرْفِ وَأَعْرِضْ عَنِ الْجَاهِلِينَ

[سورة الأعراف]

Peter Pan Jordan Peterson & The Lost Boys in Neverland
It's not a great insight, nor needs effort, to realize that the cult of young adults which Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate, and the likes of them have cultivated is partly due to those young people's need for an absent fatherly guidance.

This does not mean that someone like Peterson appealed to orphans per se, nor that the fathers of those young men were deadbeat or neglectful in any real sense.
Usually it's the age and cultural gap between fathers and sons that makes the latter consider the former to be neglectful, absent, or upfront repressive, so they found in Peterson what they couldn't find in their own fathers; someone with whom they can share their concerns about politics, their confusion about women and dating, and their doubts about religion. He was the non-judgemental father they wished to have. They were free to listen to him, argue with him in their minds, and disagree with him. But obviously, a non-judgemental father is by no means a real nor a good father, since parenthood requires judgement and correction, for better or worse.

In terms of intellectual achievements, Peterson was more of a commentator than an original thinker, and his books were practical, diluted, tips for everyday life, than actual philosophy. That being said, his "12 Rules for Life" and videos did a good service for society by offering some form of guidance for young men in need for it.

As for Andrew Tate, he probably served a similar psychological purpose in a different flavor. It seems that each young man these days gets to pick his own online dad on Youtube. Needless to say, this is probably an overgeneralized opinion.

فإذا كانَ شجاعًا، وَجَدَ الإنسانُ في المَوتِ البَهاء
وإذا كانَ جبانًا، وَجَدَ الإنسانُ في المَوتِ العَزاء

— ملحمة كلكامش، تميم البرغوثي