As if that’s a better trend

"اني اختلف عن باقي الولد"

If that makes you sleep at night then yeah you are 🫶🏻

لا والله شو مكضيها سهران

The civilization softens further as the Age of Affluence transitions into an Age of Intellect. Wealth is now available in such abundance that it far exceeds what is necessary “to supply the mere necessities, or even the luxuries of life,” so excess funds are poured into advanced education and the pursuit of knowledge. This produces “surprising advances in natural science” and also in many other fields. But, says Glubb, the shadow side of this flourishing intellectual climate is such a luxuriance of “discussion, debate, and argument” that “public affairs drift from bad to worse, amid an unceasing cacophony of argument” that vitiates “the power of action.”

In addition, except at the cutting edge, the quantitative increase in intellectual output tends to bring about a decline in quality. (As Gibbon famously remarked about Rome’s Age of Intellect, “A crowd of critics, of compilers, of commentators, darkened the face of learning, and the decline of genius was soon followed by the corruption of taste.”) The excessively rational approach to life characteristic of the Age of Intellect also fosters “the unconscious growth of the idea that the human brain can solve the problems of the world.”

- Immoderate Greatness, by William Ophuls

تصبحُ الحضارةُ أكثرَ لينًا وضعفًا بانتقالِها من عَصرِ الغِنى إلى عَصرِ العقل والفِكر. فالثروة تصيرُ وافرةً بشكلٍ يفوقُ الحاجة لما هو ضروري بل حتى لما هو تَرَفٌ وكمالي، ولهذا فإنّ الأموالَ الإضافية تُصَبُّ في صالح التعليم العالي والسعيِ نحو المعرفة، وهذا يَخلقُ تقدّمًا صادمًا في العلوم الطبيعية وبعضِ الحقولٍ الأُخرى. لكنَّ الجانِبَ المظلم مِن هذا الجوّ الثقافي المزدهر، وفقًا لغلوب، يشملُ أيضًا تكاثرًا مسرِفًا في "النقاشات والمناظرات والجدالات حيثُ يَنحرِفُ الشأنُ العام من سيءٍ إلى أسوأ وسط كل هذه الجدالات المتنافرة واللامتناهية التي تُضعِف الأرادةَ والرغبةَ بالتصرف."

بالإضافة إلى ذلك، وما عدا في قِمة الهرم، فإنّ الزيادة الكمية في الإنتاج المعرفي يَنتج عنها عادةً إنخفاضٌ في الجودة (مثلما صرّح Gibbon برأيِه المشهور عن عصرِ الفِكر والمعرفة في روما، "حَشدٌ مِن النقّاد وجامعي الكتب والمعلومات والمعلّقين سَوَّدوا وجهَ التعليم، ثُمّ لَحِقَ انحدارَ العبقرية سريعًا فسادُ الذوق.") هذا التوجُّه العقلانيُ المتطرف تجاهَ الحياة والذي يميّز عصرَ المعرفة "يُنمّي أيضًا بشكل لا-واعٍ بين ثناياه فكرةَ أنّ العقلَ البشري قادرٌ على حلّ مشاكلِ العالَم."

.

.

Also related, but not so much:

Intellectuals are usually stunted by their intellect. They over-think, over-plan, over-argue, and eventually they don't do anything.

We, men gifted with a flicker of intellect, believe that thinking is the one tool that can encompass the whole world and explain it. And only after explaining the world, we can find our way through it "safely" and "predictably." But we always forget that thinking, just like every other ability of ours, is limited, and that our minds, just like every other organ of ours, can only handle so much. Precisely because of our human limitedness and profound ignorance of the world and future, we have no other choice but to take risks and to have faith that "things will turn out good."

That does not mean that planning is useless. As all generals learn, war plans never survive first contact with the enemy, but planning is nonetheless an indispensable preparation for battle.

- Immoderate Greatness, by William Ophuls

"Planning is everything, plans are nothing"

- Dwight D. Eisenhower

.

Modern politics has reached the end of its tether. The modern political paradigm—that is, the body of political concepts and beliefs bequeathed to us by the philosophical movement known as the Enlightenment—is no longer intellectually tenable or practically viable. We are therefore in deep political crisis and confront the necessity for an abrupt and decisive change to a radically different type of politics.

- Requiem For Modern Politics, by William Ophuls