This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤72🫡21🥰1
🇱🇧 | Lebanon has entered a new phase of political uncertainty following the announcement of the Washington brokered Lebanon-Israel framework agreement. Presented by its supporters as a roadmap to end the conflict and stabilize southern Lebanon, the agreement calls for a phased Israeli withdrawal as security conditions are met, the deployment of the Lebanese Armed Forces across the country, the complete and verifiable disarmament of Hezbollah and all other non-state armed groups, the establishment of a US backed military coordination and verification mechanism, and the creation of joint working groups to negotiate a comprehensive peace and security agreement. It also places reconstruction, humanitarian assistance, and economic recovery under American coordination while preventing reconstruction funds from reaching Hezbollah or other armed groups. In addition, Lebanon reaffirms that only the state has the authority to maintain armed forces and commits to ending hostile political and legal actions while acknowledging the role of the United States in implementing the agreement.
Hezbollah has categorically rejected the framework, describing it as an agreement that strengthens rather than ends the occupation of southern Lebanon. Hassan Fadlallah, a member of Hezbollah’s Resistance Bloc in Parliament, said the Washington negotiations serve the interests of Israel at the expense of Lebanon’s sovereignty and reiterated Hezbollah’s firm opposition to any direct negotiations with the Israeli government. According to Fadlallah, instead of ending the occupation, the agreement creates conditions for the continued presence of Israeli forces in parts of southern Lebanon while weakening Lebanon’s sovereignty. He warned that direct negotiations would deepen internal divisions and urged Lebanese officials to abandon policies that contradict the interests of the Lebanese people. He further argued that the current political course represents an “unconditional slope” leading to Lebanon’s destruction and maintained that the developments in Washington are intended to dismantle the Resistance, without which no national project in Lebanon can succeed.
Public opposition followed almost immediately after details of the agreement emerged. Large crowds gathered in Beirut’s Riad Al Solh Square, Bishara El Khoury Square, and on the main road leading to Beirut Airport to protest the government’s acceptance of the framework. Lebanese media reported that security forces used tear gas to disperse demonstrators. The protests reflected growing concern among opponents who view the agreement not as a security arrangement but as a political normalization process that fundamentally alters Lebanon’s strategic position and compromises its sovereignty.
Political criticism has increasingly focused on President Joseph Aoun. Critics argue that for the past fifteen months he maintained a policy of inaction while the Resistance and large parts of the Shia community came under sustained military pressure, believing Hezbollah would eventually be forced either to surrender its weapons or defend itself in isolation. During this period, they allege, Aoun repeatedly sidelined Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri in key political decisions, while Berri continued to avoid direct confrontation with the presidency. With the government now formally embracing the Washington framework, attention has shifted to whether Berri will continue supporting the current administration or confront what critics describe as a project that weakens Lebanon’s sovereignty and the political position of the country’s Shia community.
Opponents have described the framework as a treacherous agreement, arguing that it compromises Lebanon’s sovereignty, advances Israeli strategic interests, and places key aspects of the country’s security and reconstruction under external influence. They contend that it establishes a security normalization framework under which Lebanon becomes strategically dependent on the United States and Israel.
🔹 @enemywatch
+
Hezbollah has categorically rejected the framework, describing it as an agreement that strengthens rather than ends the occupation of southern Lebanon. Hassan Fadlallah, a member of Hezbollah’s Resistance Bloc in Parliament, said the Washington negotiations serve the interests of Israel at the expense of Lebanon’s sovereignty and reiterated Hezbollah’s firm opposition to any direct negotiations with the Israeli government. According to Fadlallah, instead of ending the occupation, the agreement creates conditions for the continued presence of Israeli forces in parts of southern Lebanon while weakening Lebanon’s sovereignty. He warned that direct negotiations would deepen internal divisions and urged Lebanese officials to abandon policies that contradict the interests of the Lebanese people. He further argued that the current political course represents an “unconditional slope” leading to Lebanon’s destruction and maintained that the developments in Washington are intended to dismantle the Resistance, without which no national project in Lebanon can succeed.
Public opposition followed almost immediately after details of the agreement emerged. Large crowds gathered in Beirut’s Riad Al Solh Square, Bishara El Khoury Square, and on the main road leading to Beirut Airport to protest the government’s acceptance of the framework. Lebanese media reported that security forces used tear gas to disperse demonstrators. The protests reflected growing concern among opponents who view the agreement not as a security arrangement but as a political normalization process that fundamentally alters Lebanon’s strategic position and compromises its sovereignty.
Political criticism has increasingly focused on President Joseph Aoun. Critics argue that for the past fifteen months he maintained a policy of inaction while the Resistance and large parts of the Shia community came under sustained military pressure, believing Hezbollah would eventually be forced either to surrender its weapons or defend itself in isolation. During this period, they allege, Aoun repeatedly sidelined Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri in key political decisions, while Berri continued to avoid direct confrontation with the presidency. With the government now formally embracing the Washington framework, attention has shifted to whether Berri will continue supporting the current administration or confront what critics describe as a project that weakens Lebanon’s sovereignty and the political position of the country’s Shia community.
Opponents have described the framework as a treacherous agreement, arguing that it compromises Lebanon’s sovereignty, advances Israeli strategic interests, and places key aspects of the country’s security and reconstruction under external influence. They contend that it establishes a security normalization framework under which Lebanon becomes strategically dependent on the United States and Israel.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯41🤬6❤2
Particular criticism has focused on the establishment of a joint security committee, American oversight of reconstruction, verification mechanisms overseeing the Lebanese Armed Forces, and provisions that critics interpret as preventing Lebanon from pursuing legal or political action against Israel before international institutions. According to these opponents, the agreement grants unprecedented political and legal concessions that extend far beyond military coordination and fundamentally reshapes Lebanon’s future.
If implemented, the agreement is expected to trigger one of the most significant political confrontations in Lebanon since the end of the civil war. The demand for Hezbollah’s complete disarmament is widely regarded as the most contentious provision and is unlikely to be accepted voluntarily by the movement, which considers its military capabilities central to Lebanon’s defence against Israeli military action. Continued public protests, deepening political divisions, and prolonged disputes over implementation are therefore likely. Whether the agreement succeeds or remains largely symbolic will ultimately depend on the balance of power within Lebanon, the position adopted by Hezbollah and its allies, and the ability of external mediators to sustain the framework amid continuing regional tensions.
🔹 @enemywatch
If implemented, the agreement is expected to trigger one of the most significant political confrontations in Lebanon since the end of the civil war. The demand for Hezbollah’s complete disarmament is widely regarded as the most contentious provision and is unlikely to be accepted voluntarily by the movement, which considers its military capabilities central to Lebanon’s defence against Israeli military action. Continued public protests, deepening political divisions, and prolonged disputes over implementation are therefore likely. Whether the agreement succeeds or remains largely symbolic will ultimately depend on the balance of power within Lebanon, the position adopted by Hezbollah and its allies, and the ability of external mediators to sustain the framework amid continuing regional tensions.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯33🤬5❤1
Forwarded from By ibnalghobeiri
Fatal Silence & the Aoun Method
For those who do not know, Joseph Aoun's plan all along was as follows: He maintained inaction for 15 months as the Shi'a were being ethnically cleansed so that the Resistance and its community would be forced to either turn in their weapons and surrender or defend themselves on their own. Of course, he believed Hezb were finished after the 66-day war and the latter was highly unlikely, so his strategy was to sit back and watch, pressuring the Resistance into the former. During this period, Joseph Aoun stabbed Nabih Berri in the back at several political checkpoints, but Berri avoided even as much as a verbal political confrontation with Aoun. Berri said in March just a few weeks after the war began that as long as Aoun is President we can be at ease, and at the end of May, last month, that he opposes bringing down Nawaf Salam's government. But now, the government has made its most formal step in declaring its servitude to the Zionist entity, so what will Berri do? Will he finally face the so-called President and defend the country's sovereignty, let alone the Shi'a of Lebanon, from Aoun's project? Will he change his position on the government? Berri is one of the less predictable politicians in Lebanese politics, but one thing is for certain: maintaining his current silence will have drastic effects on his legacy, the Shi'a, and the future of Lebanon. This silence will be nothing short of fatal..
For those who do not know, Joseph Aoun's plan all along was as follows: He maintained inaction for 15 months as the Shi'a were being ethnically cleansed so that the Resistance and its community would be forced to either turn in their weapons and surrender or defend themselves on their own. Of course, he believed Hezb were finished after the 66-day war and the latter was highly unlikely, so his strategy was to sit back and watch, pressuring the Resistance into the former. During this period, Joseph Aoun stabbed Nabih Berri in the back at several political checkpoints, but Berri avoided even as much as a verbal political confrontation with Aoun. Berri said in March just a few weeks after the war began that as long as Aoun is President we can be at ease, and at the end of May, last month, that he opposes bringing down Nawaf Salam's government. But now, the government has made its most formal step in declaring its servitude to the Zionist entity, so what will Berri do? Will he finally face the so-called President and defend the country's sovereignty, let alone the Shi'a of Lebanon, from Aoun's project? Will he change his position on the government? Berri is one of the less predictable politicians in Lebanese politics, but one thing is for certain: maintaining his current silence will have drastic effects on his legacy, the Shi'a, and the future of Lebanon. This silence will be nothing short of fatal..
💯68❤2🤬1
Forwarded from Martyr Ayatollah Khamenei
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌷Newly published footage of a gathering of schoolgirls at the Imam Khomeini Hussainiyah, marking their Taklif celebration
💠 Contrary to Western civilization, where the powerful prey on the innocent, here was a man who lifted girls toward dignity, advising them to be among the prominent women of Iran — of whom there are many — and urging them to study, to strive, and to build the beloved Iran.
🔰 An excerpt from the documentary "the day I was with you," published at 09:40 a.m. Tehran time on Saturday — the hour of the martyrdom of Imam Sayyid Ali Khamenei (may God sanctify his noble soul).
📲 KHAMENEI.IR | 𝕏 (Official) | 𝕏 (Website)
✅ @Khamenei_en
💠 Contrary to Western civilization, where the powerful prey on the innocent, here was a man who lifted girls toward dignity, advising them to be among the prominent women of Iran — of whom there are many — and urging them to study, to strive, and to build the beloved Iran.
🔰 An excerpt from the documentary "the day I was with you," published at 09:40 a.m. Tehran time on Saturday — the hour of the martyrdom of Imam Sayyid Ali Khamenei (may God sanctify his noble soul).
📲 KHAMENEI.IR | 𝕏 (Official) | 𝕏 (Website)
✅ @Khamenei_en
💔57❤14
—Upcoming events are linked to the conflict involving some Arab satellite states and Iran, Ansar Allah’s battle with the Saudi regime, American aggression against Cuba and Colombia, and potential American tension with North Korea.
🔹 @enemywatch
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯50🙏9😱4🤬2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷 | The final prediction and recommendation made by the Leader of the Revolution to officials:
Dr. Seyed Mostafa Khoshcheshm
International Affairs Expert said:
A few weeks before his martyrdom, the Leader of the Revolution reportedly said Soon, a great fitna (trial) will arise. It will be the fitna of the officials, not of the people. If you remain steadfast, Allah will grant you victory, and the Revolution will then be secured forever.
🔹 @enemywatch
Dr. Seyed Mostafa Khoshcheshm
International Affairs Expert said:
A few weeks before his martyrdom, the Leader of the Revolution reportedly said Soon, a great fitna (trial) will arise. It will be the fitna of the officials, not of the people. If you remain steadfast, Allah will grant you victory, and the Revolution will then be secured forever.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤85🙏23😱7
Enemy Watch — Official
🇮🇷 | Statement by Sunni scholars in support of continued smart management and control of the Strait of Hormuz: Sunni scholars of Sistan and Baluchestan province, in a statement supporting the continued smart management and control of the Strait of Hormuz…
Sunni scholars of Sistan and Baluchestan province, in a statement supporting the continued smart management and control of the Strait of Hormuz, said that restricting access to the strait for hostile forces should be considered a form of preemptive defense and a factor in strengthening national security.
The statement reads that the Strait of Hormuz is not an international waterway granting unconditional access to any aggressive state, but is instead located within Iran’s territorial waters and linked to the strategic position of the islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb. It further emphasizes that, in principle, the owner of a house holds its key.
According to the religious and customary view expressed by these Sunni scholars, in a situation where the country is under attack from multiple directions, the principle of legitimate defense and the jurisprudential rule of “no harm and no harming” justify the right to manage maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz in order to strengthen security and prevent the entry of vessels linked to hostile states into the Persian Gulf.
The Sunni scholars of Sistan and Baluchestan also expressed readiness, alongside Sunni tribes along the Makran coast, to support the IRGC Navy and the Army if required.
They further described certain political authorities in some Persian Gulf littoral states as acting against regional security, stating that allowing foreign military use of their territory constitutes a breach of good neighborly conduct and a threat to collective regional stability.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤63🤝8
Enemy Watch — Official
🇧🇭: 🇸🇦 | Bahrain and the Saudi regime intensify their campaign against Shias: The Bahraini regime has intensified its campaign against the Shia community during Muharram by arresting Husseini reciter Hussein Al-Majed and preventing Husseini preacher Hassan…
🇧🇭 | Researcher Abbas Al-Murshed (Bahrain):
This year’s Ashura season has been the most successful, not because the authorities wanted it to be, but because society reclaimed it despite the siege imposed upon it.
For the first time, a Bahraini can scarcely find a place beneath any pulpit due to the overwhelming crowds, the immense turnout, and the scale of attendance.
It is also the first time that the Shia identity and the Bahraini identity have aligned so closely with Karbala: an identity of resistance, steadfastness, and defiance, not one that waits in fear for permission, nor one tamed by the cost of standing firm.
They sought to spread fear, but they only made the people more determined. They arrested scholars in an attempt to empty the arena of awareness and guidance, yet the scholars became even more deeply rooted in the conscience of the people. They sought to besiege the pulpit, but its influence only grew stronger. They tried to extinguish the rituals, yet they shone even brighter.
#BahrainShia
🔹 @enemywatch
+
This year’s Ashura season has been the most successful, not because the authorities wanted it to be, but because society reclaimed it despite the siege imposed upon it.
For the first time, a Bahraini can scarcely find a place beneath any pulpit due to the overwhelming crowds, the immense turnout, and the scale of attendance.
It is also the first time that the Shia identity and the Bahraini identity have aligned so closely with Karbala: an identity of resistance, steadfastness, and defiance, not one that waits in fear for permission, nor one tamed by the cost of standing firm.
They sought to spread fear, but they only made the people more determined. They arrested scholars in an attempt to empty the arena of awareness and guidance, yet the scholars became even more deeply rooted in the conscience of the people. They sought to besiege the pulpit, but its influence only grew stronger. They tried to extinguish the rituals, yet they shone even brighter.
#BahrainShia
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤53🙏9💯4🫡2
"It appears from the text of the statement issued by the so-called tripartite framework in Washington, which includes the United States, Israel, and Lebanon, that it relied on falsifying facts and concepts, particularly regarding the legitimate resistance and its right and national role, and regarding who actually represents the real and legal threat to Lebanese sovereignty. The statement deliberately reversed the facts and intentionally adopted and committed grave violations and immoral acts with prior intent and determination.
The statement also expressed the complete submission of the Lebanese authorities to the logic of American tutelage, and their collusion with the Zionist enemy against their own authentic people, who are committed to their land, reject Israeli occupation, and remain self-sacrificing, steadfast, and resistant to submission and surrender.
The position of the Lebanese authorities expressed in the statement goes beyond shame, disgrace, and baseness, to the point of relinquishing Lebanon’s sovereignty, the rights and interests of the Lebanese people, and their dignity and aspirations. It also reflects contempt for them, deception against them, and falsification of their free and honorable national will.
It remains to be said that the core and essence of this framework agreement lies in its malicious and sinister role, intended to cover the continuation of the Israeli occupation of Lebanon, and to provide an indirect way that the signatories to the statement believe would allow the United States to evade its explicit commitment with Iran regarding its responsibility to pressure Israel to fully withdraw from Lebanon and respect its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Thus, the preamble of this framework statement came to announce that Lebanon, under American sponsorship, has agreed to what Israel had conditioned for withdrawal, namely that both commit to disarming the resistance as a precondition for Israeli redeployment rather than a full withdrawal.
It is a disastrous and completely rejected statement, and it represents the hooting of an owl in Lebanon and the region. May Allah protect Lebanon and the Lebanese … and responsibility is entrusted to the honorable free people, the courageous patriots, and the sovereign defenders.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬28💯21❤2🙏2
1. Where is the integrity of the Lebanese authorities and their responsibility toward their people and the protection of Lebanon’s sovereignty? The American sponsor did not grant them a ceasefire, and when it came to them through the Pakistan talks between the United States and Iran in April 2026, they rejected it. This led the Israeli enemy to commit the crime of Black Wednesday, in which hundreds were killed and wounded, people were terrorized, and destruction was inflicted through one hundred airstrikes across Lebanon, beginning with the capital, Beirut.
2. We told the authorities that direct negotiations are nothing but free concessions to Israel, because they are meetings that impose submission to the demands of aggression and to Israeli-American dictates in their entirety. You are entering these negotiations while at odds with more than half of the Lebanese people, and in violation of the Constitution and the laws that consider the Israeli entity an enemy and prosecute anyone who deals with it in word or deed. You have no card of strength with which to confront them because you voluntarily abandoned the strength of the resistance and the people. You stabbed the resistance in the back by considering it outside the law in the midst of the war and from its very first moment, through the government’s ill-fated decision of March 2, thereby serving the Israeli aggressive project. Playing with words and interpreting them contrary to their meaning is of no use. The results are the true measure. This is a squandering of Lebanon’s sovereignty in the eyes of both friend and foe.
3. The Iranian-American Memorandum of Understanding placed the cessation of the war on Lebanon as its first clause. When the Israeli enemy refused to comply, Iran suspended the agreement and continued to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed until the United States exerted pressure and compelled the Israeli enemy to cease fire.
The first paragraph of the Memorandum of Understanding states:
“The United States, Iran, and their allies in the ongoing war, through the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, declare an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon, and undertake henceforth not to initiate any war or any military operation against one another, and to refrain from threatening or using force against one another, while guaranteeing the safety of Lebanon’s territory and its sovereignty.”
Negotiations and the conclusion of the final agreement are to take place within sixty days, according to the third clause of the memorandum.
The authorities rejected it once again until reasonable people and those involved in the Memorandum of Understanding made them understand that the firing would stop, something you had failed to achieve, and that this was in Lebanon’s interest. They also explained that negotiations over the Israeli withdrawal are in Lebanon’s hands and that no one negotiates on its behalf. This is the gift of honor, dignity, and strength from steadfast and proud Iran to Lebanon, its people, and its resistance.
The Memorandum of Understanding guarantees “the safety of Lebanon’s territory and its sovereignty,” and sovereignty is realized through the complete Israeli withdrawal, to be agreed upon within sixty days. This is a card of strength in Lebanon’s hands that it had never dreamed of possessing.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤42🫡11💯3
Enemy Watch — Official
+
(2/2)
Yet the authorities, in the “framework agreement,” abandoned the sources of strength contained in the Memorandum of Understanding, as well as the strength of the resistance, its steadfastness, and the sacrifices of the great Lebanese people, and handed Israel what it wanted free of charge.
4. What is this terrible blunder? What is this grave sin of surrendering sovereignty to the Israeli enemy? Netanyahu allows the Lebanese Army to establish itself in two experimental areas. The enemy monitors its deployment and the steps taken toward disarmament, while the tripartite committee follows up on the enemy’s demands. The experimental period in the two areas may last for months, and no transition to another phase will take place except with a certificate of good conduct from the Israeli enemy and the implementation of what Israel failed to achieve on the battlefield. As Netanyahu said:
“Israel will remain in the security belt until Hezbollah is disarmed in Lebanon, and the residents will not return to the occupied area.”
The authorities are legitimizing the continuation of the occupation for many years, and these lands may even end up being annexed to the Zionist entity. This is an agreement that deprives the Lebanese people of returning to their land. What does the Israeli enemy have to do with our internal affairs in Lebanon? Any agreement should be confined to the area south of the Litani River and should have no connection whatsoever to any internal Lebanese issue concerning weapons, security, or the country’s future.
Linking the Israeli withdrawal to the disarmament of the resistance throughout all of Lebanon is an extremely dangerous proposal that crosses every red line and turns Lebanon into a plaything in the hands of the Israeli enemy.
Under the pretext that Lebanon must fulfill its commitment to disarm in order for Israel to withdraw from Lebanon, every single weapon anywhere in Lebanon would be considered evidence that Lebanon has failed to comply. Yet the weapons will certainly not be surrendered, and no one has the right to deprive the Lebanese people of their right to defend themselves and their land against the occupier of our land and the killer of our people. The enemy must withdraw because it is an aggressor and an occupier, under an agreement that addresses the direct causes, as was done on 27 November 2024. Any step beyond this limit is a reward for Israel after the defeat of its project and a squandering of Lebanon’s sovereignty.
5. The framework agreement in Washington is humiliation, disgrace, and a surrender of sovereignty. This agreement is null and void, and the provisions of the Iranian-American Memorandum of Understanding must be implemented. We will pursue, through all necessary means and international and Arab pressure, to ensure that the Israeli enemy abides by the first clause of the Memorandum of Understanding and withdraws from Lebanon.
We say to the Lebanese authorities: It is time for you to retreat from your grave mistakes that are ruining Lebanon. Doing so would be a virtue that would be recorded in your favor after these sins. We are ready to cooperate and stand together for the sovereignty of Lebanon, the liberation of its land, the expulsion of the Israeli occupier, the return of the prisoners, the return of the residents, reconstruction, the building of the country, and agreement on a national security strategy.
The ceasefire would never have been achieved were it not for the great sacrifices of the resistance fighters, their families, and the Lebanese people. We will preserve the trust of the martyrs, the wounded, the prisoners, the sacrifices of the people of the land, the Lebanese Army, and the sacrifices of all the bodies and groups that offered martyrs and wounded. We will continue, as a resistance, on the battlefield until the occupation is defeated. We did not leave the battlefield under the most difficult circumstances, and we will not leave it now, for this is the path to goodness and salvation.
🇱🇧 @enemywatch
(2/2)
Yet the authorities, in the “framework agreement,” abandoned the sources of strength contained in the Memorandum of Understanding, as well as the strength of the resistance, its steadfastness, and the sacrifices of the great Lebanese people, and handed Israel what it wanted free of charge.
4. What is this terrible blunder? What is this grave sin of surrendering sovereignty to the Israeli enemy? Netanyahu allows the Lebanese Army to establish itself in two experimental areas. The enemy monitors its deployment and the steps taken toward disarmament, while the tripartite committee follows up on the enemy’s demands. The experimental period in the two areas may last for months, and no transition to another phase will take place except with a certificate of good conduct from the Israeli enemy and the implementation of what Israel failed to achieve on the battlefield. As Netanyahu said:
“Israel will remain in the security belt until Hezbollah is disarmed in Lebanon, and the residents will not return to the occupied area.”
The authorities are legitimizing the continuation of the occupation for many years, and these lands may even end up being annexed to the Zionist entity. This is an agreement that deprives the Lebanese people of returning to their land. What does the Israeli enemy have to do with our internal affairs in Lebanon? Any agreement should be confined to the area south of the Litani River and should have no connection whatsoever to any internal Lebanese issue concerning weapons, security, or the country’s future.
Linking the Israeli withdrawal to the disarmament of the resistance throughout all of Lebanon is an extremely dangerous proposal that crosses every red line and turns Lebanon into a plaything in the hands of the Israeli enemy.
Under the pretext that Lebanon must fulfill its commitment to disarm in order for Israel to withdraw from Lebanon, every single weapon anywhere in Lebanon would be considered evidence that Lebanon has failed to comply. Yet the weapons will certainly not be surrendered, and no one has the right to deprive the Lebanese people of their right to defend themselves and their land against the occupier of our land and the killer of our people. The enemy must withdraw because it is an aggressor and an occupier, under an agreement that addresses the direct causes, as was done on 27 November 2024. Any step beyond this limit is a reward for Israel after the defeat of its project and a squandering of Lebanon’s sovereignty.
5. The framework agreement in Washington is humiliation, disgrace, and a surrender of sovereignty. This agreement is null and void, and the provisions of the Iranian-American Memorandum of Understanding must be implemented. We will pursue, through all necessary means and international and Arab pressure, to ensure that the Israeli enemy abides by the first clause of the Memorandum of Understanding and withdraws from Lebanon.
We say to the Lebanese authorities: It is time for you to retreat from your grave mistakes that are ruining Lebanon. Doing so would be a virtue that would be recorded in your favor after these sins. We are ready to cooperate and stand together for the sovereignty of Lebanon, the liberation of its land, the expulsion of the Israeli occupier, the return of the prisoners, the return of the residents, reconstruction, the building of the country, and agreement on a national security strategy.
The ceasefire would never have been achieved were it not for the great sacrifices of the resistance fighters, their families, and the Lebanese people. We will preserve the trust of the martyrs, the wounded, the prisoners, the sacrifices of the people of the land, the Lebanese Army, and the sacrifices of all the bodies and groups that offered martyrs and wounded. We will continue, as a resistance, on the battlefield until the occupation is defeated. We did not leave the battlefield under the most difficult circumstances, and we will not leave it now, for this is the path to goodness and salvation.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤54💯18🫡8🙏3
🇱🇧 | Breaking — Five Israeli airstrikes against Nabatieh's al-Fawqa district, southern Lebanon.
🔹 @enemywatch
+
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬111💔6❤1
Around three hours ago, a series of American aggressions unfolded across southern Iran and the Persian Gulf. Multiple explosions struck the area of Tahroui village in Sirik after several projectiles hit a telecommunications tower. At the same time, several projectiles impacted the Mesen village area in Qeshm County. Explosions were also heard in Bandar Lengeh and Bandar Kangan in Hormozgan Province.
Air defense systems were activated across Bahrain as tensions rapidly escalated. An oil tanker escorted by the United States Navy reduced its speed from 14 to 12 knots while transiting the region, an unusual maneuver for that route. The slowdown came after Iranian forces reportedly fired a projectile toward the vessel shortly before the subsequent escalation.
In retaliation, Iran launched strikes against American military positions in the Persian Gulf. Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain was targeted with multiple Iranian drones and ballistic missiles, while Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait came under ballistic missile attack. Warning sirens sounded across Kuwait as the strikes unfolded, placing military installations throughout the region on high alert.
A second wave of missile strikes followed shortly afterward, targeting Bahrain once again. According to the latest information, one missile impacted Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain, one missile impacted Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait, and two Iranian drones precisely struck the Kuwaiti base.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤48🫡16🤬5
Enemy Watch — Official
Dear noble people of the Islamic Iran:
Your brave sons in the Naval and Aerospace Forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, during a joint missile and drone operation at 02:00-03:00 AM, targeted eight important U.S. targets, including Ali Al-Salem Airbase in Kuwait and the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet HQ in Bahrain.
The aggressor enemy, whose betrayal and violation of treaties are part of its nature, attacked early this morning five coastal sites in Iran under the pretext of confronting the IRGC Navy in response to seizing a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz.
According to the Islamabad MoU, regarding traffic arrangements in the Strait of Hormuz with the Islamic Republic, from now on, ships that violate Iran’s instructions will be confronted with a greater force than before.
Any potential new aggression by the enemy for any reason, even if it is similar to last night's attacks on unimportant targets, will have a devastating response.
The enemy must know that violating the ceasefire is contrary to Paragraph 1 of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding and will lead to a complete halt in negotiations.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤53🫡16
Enemy Watch — Official
The U.S. indiscriminate firing at Sirik does not solve the mystery of our control over the Strait. But our fire at violators reminds other vessels of the clear rules for safe passage. U.S. bases in the region are a separate matter. They will experience hell in these days.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🫡53❤22🥰2🤝1
Iran reportedly carried out an assassination operation that resulted in the elimination of Suran Mohammadzadeh, a terrorist field-leader of the Kurdish Democratic Party, this afternoon inside a hotel in Erbil, northern Iraq. According to initial reports, Mohammadzadeh was shot in the head at point-blank range and was killed instantly. The perpetrators reportedly left the hotel and safely returned to Iran after their movements were captured by surveillance cameras inside the hotel. No injuries or casualties among the assailants have been reported.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
2❤70👍13🔥5🤝4🥰3🤬2💔2
🇮🇶 | Breaking — Unconfirmed reports of mass arrests in Baghdad:
Unconfirmed reports indicate that a large number of Iraqi political figures have been arrested in Baghdad’s Green Zone and other parts of the capital. Rumours also claim that a former Prime Minister and several of his close aides are among those detained.
Some reports have alleged that the arrests followed the thwarting of an attempted coup. However, initial updates suggest that those detained were arrested on warrants issued by the Iraqi judiciary rather than in connection with a coup attempt.
Prime Minister Ali Zaidi is reportedly monitoring the situation closely. Further clarification is expected as the situation develops and more verified information becomes available.
🔹 @enemywatch
+
Unconfirmed reports indicate that a large number of Iraqi political figures have been arrested in Baghdad’s Green Zone and other parts of the capital. Rumours also claim that a former Prime Minister and several of his close aides are among those detained.
Some reports have alleged that the arrests followed the thwarting of an attempted coup. However, initial updates suggest that those detained were arrested on warrants issued by the Iraqi judiciary rather than in connection with a coup attempt.
Prime Minister Ali Zaidi is reportedly monitoring the situation closely. Further clarification is expected as the situation develops and more verified information becomes available.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬35🙏6🫡2🥰1
Enemy Watch — Official
Iran launched a large-scale wave of ballistic missile and drone strikes targeting American military positions across the Gulf over the past few hours. According to initial reports, eight major American bases were targeted as part of the operation.
Explosions were reported across Bahrain, with residents hearing multiple blasts followed by additional waves of explosions as air defenses were activated. Explosions were also reported in Kuwait during the course of the operation.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥57🥰15🫡12🙏1
In a critical letter to government officials, signed by 62 out of 86 members of the country’s highest clerical body, the Assembly calls upon the negotiators to respect the Leader’s red lines. The statement is as follows:
1. We urge that, considering the experiences of past damaging negotiations, the negotiators will be extremely careful of the tricks of the deceitful and evil enemy and pay attention to the fact that observing the Leader’s red lines is a religious obligation and violating them is not permissible under any circumstances.
2. We emphasize the need to pursue revenge for the martyrdom of our dear Leader, and that Trump and Netanyahu must face justice by any means necessary.
3. Any breach of the MoU must be responded to immediately. Therefore, considering the continuation of ceasefire breaches by the Zionist regime in Lebanon, and the failure to withdraw from the occupied territories, the opening of the Strait of Hormuz is contrary to the obligations of the officials and is considered a major strategic mistake, and will only embolden the enemy to continue its breach of the agreement.
4. We remind you again that according to the obligatory guidance of the Supreme Leader, the country's nuclear rights should not be discussed nor disputed, and should be completely excluded from the negotiations.
5. Establishing management over the Strait of Hormuz, receiving compensation for war damages, the release of frozen assets, lifting all sanctions, and the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the region are inviolable demands of the Supreme Leader and the people, and they must be pursued. Any negligence in this regard will be met with a fierce reaction of the nation.
6. Officials should avoid any statements that cause the enemy to become more arrogant and makes the country appear weak and helpless. Especially since the resistance of our self-sacrificing warriors has driven the arrogant America to despair, no statements should be made that suggests the country’s weakness or helplessness.
7. Everyone, especially the esteemed government officials, knows that in the system of Wilayat Al-Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist), the opinion and perspective of the Leader is the final word, and when informed of his definitive opinion, no official can or should act contrary to his opinion.
8. Based on all evidence, the enemy is merely seeking an opportunity to deploy additional forces and buy time for some matters, including the upcoming Midterm elections. After that, there will be a high probability of a new attack, and the issues raised in the MoU should be resolved within the stipulated 30-day and 60-day deadlines.
9. We ask the dear nation to continue their steadfast presence on the streets, and while preserving sacred unity and avoiding any action that disrupts this unity, they should not pay attention to the divisive words of some ignorant people who seek to limit this divine mission. The presence of the people is essential and decisive as long as the Supreme Leader deems it necessary.
10. The Asssembly of Experts, as humble servants and part of the people, will remain with the esteemed Leadership and the entire nation, while wishing success to the respected government officials, awaiting the fulfillment of the conditions and promises, and will fulfill their religious duty when necessary.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥56💯34🙏8👍5❤1🤬1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | In our experience of decades, we have never seen anything like this, where the Leader of the Revolution released an open letter to confirm that he did not share the same view as the negotiating team. This was followed by senior Shia scholar Ayatollah Seifi Mazandarani directly issuing a letter to the President, and now the Assembly of Experts, which holds the highest constitutional authority in the nation and the highest religious authority in this regard within the Shia system. The Assembly of Experts is the body that appoints the Leader of the Revolution and possesses the authority to remove him. This is an open warning to all those who are still worshipping the Araghchi nexus in the name of their foolish ideals and fantasies surrounding their political stunts.
The issuance of such a letter from the Assembly of Experts is a major blow to the entire Pezeshkian government and requires little further explanation as to the message it is conveying. We have never witnessed such a direct intervention before. Yet those who continue worshipping the negotiators will still oppose this. In doing so, you stand against the Leader, against the honourable Assembly, and against the very institutions you claim to defend. It was you, before anyone else, who disregarded the Leader’s commands and also played the principal role in the martyrdom of the Leader. That reality is now becoming increasingly clear.
We also supported the idea of negotiations and maintained respect for the negotiating team until the Leader’s position became clear. However, now that their conduct continues to contradict what they assured the nation, we stand completely against them. If they continue misleading the people and failing to fulfil what they promised, we will hold them accountable as well. No matter whether it is Araghchi, Qalibaf, Baqaei, Marandi, or the armchair cheerleaders sitting on Twitter, no one is above criticism.
And if you do not understand the weight and constitutional position of the Assembly of Experts, then you were never part of this discussion in the first place. Go somewhere else and cover Russia, Ukraine, or the garbage World Cup. We have seen some people accusing us in groups and elsewhere of working for the enemies. Keep believing that if you wish, but the reality is the opposite. It is you who are serving the enemies while pretending otherwise.
From today onwards, keep this in mind: there is nothing in the name of an agreement. It will collapse because there is nothing left. The Pezeshkian government is in contact with America, and they are betraying the nation at the highest level. The nation must rise before it is too late and the situation becomes even more disgraceful.
See how easily the “revenge of the Leader” has been removed from the government’s agenda. There is no mention of him anymore. Instead, only emotional narratives of the minab massacre are repeatedly promoted by the traitors to keep the public occupied and to make them continue believing in them.
keep this in mind: on the nuclear issue, they are acting against the Leader’s command, who had said there would be no discussion on this matter. Yet they met with Grossi and are opening such files as well. This is a clear violation of the line set by the Leader, and the nation must be aware of where these moves are leading.
See how easily the nuclear issue has been brought back onto the agenda by those who claim to serve the country. Instead of respecting the Leader’s position, they continue to pursue meetings and file openings that only deepen suspicion and confusion.
🔹 @enemywatch
+
The issuance of such a letter from the Assembly of Experts is a major blow to the entire Pezeshkian government and requires little further explanation as to the message it is conveying. We have never witnessed such a direct intervention before. Yet those who continue worshipping the negotiators will still oppose this. In doing so, you stand against the Leader, against the honourable Assembly, and against the very institutions you claim to defend. It was you, before anyone else, who disregarded the Leader’s commands and also played the principal role in the martyrdom of the Leader. That reality is now becoming increasingly clear.
We also supported the idea of negotiations and maintained respect for the negotiating team until the Leader’s position became clear. However, now that their conduct continues to contradict what they assured the nation, we stand completely against them. If they continue misleading the people and failing to fulfil what they promised, we will hold them accountable as well. No matter whether it is Araghchi, Qalibaf, Baqaei, Marandi, or the armchair cheerleaders sitting on Twitter, no one is above criticism.
And if you do not understand the weight and constitutional position of the Assembly of Experts, then you were never part of this discussion in the first place. Go somewhere else and cover Russia, Ukraine, or the garbage World Cup. We have seen some people accusing us in groups and elsewhere of working for the enemies. Keep believing that if you wish, but the reality is the opposite. It is you who are serving the enemies while pretending otherwise.
From today onwards, keep this in mind: there is nothing in the name of an agreement. It will collapse because there is nothing left. The Pezeshkian government is in contact with America, and they are betraying the nation at the highest level. The nation must rise before it is too late and the situation becomes even more disgraceful.
See how easily the “revenge of the Leader” has been removed from the government’s agenda. There is no mention of him anymore. Instead, only emotional narratives of the minab massacre are repeatedly promoted by the traitors to keep the public occupied and to make them continue believing in them.
keep this in mind: on the nuclear issue, they are acting against the Leader’s command, who had said there would be no discussion on this matter. Yet they met with Grossi and are opening such files as well. This is a clear violation of the line set by the Leader, and the nation must be aware of where these moves are leading.
See how easily the nuclear issue has been brought back onto the agenda by those who claim to serve the country. Instead of respecting the Leader’s position, they continue to pursue meetings and file openings that only deepen suspicion and confusion.
+
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯90🤬8👍4🤝1