🇮🇷 |🔻: 🏴‍☠️ | A fourth round consisting of two subwaves involving five ballistic missiles has been reported, with alerts expected in the coming minutes across Haifa, the Galilee, and the Golan, including Wadi Ara, Menashe, Hamifratz, Carmel, Northern Golan, Central Galilee, Lower Galilee, Upper Galilee, Southern Golan, the Confrontation Line, Shfela, Yehuda, Lachish, Dan, Yarkon, the Coastal Plain, Sharon, Shomron, and Biq’at regions. Four missiles were reportedly directed toward the north and two toward Tel Aviv, with interceptions reported over Gush Dan. Yemen also reportedly launched a swarm of drones toward southern occupied areas.

Missile sirens were activated in Tel Aviv, Rishon LeZion, Al-Lydd, and Ariel, covering central occupied Palestine and the northern West Bank, while in the second subwave, sirens were reported across occupied areas stretching from the Lebanese border to Ashdod.

Explosions were reported in Tel Aviv and its periphery following impacts from the first subwave, including reports from Kiryat Ata in the Haifa District with repeated small explosions and possible use of cluster munitions, while air raid sirens continued across Tel Aviv and central occupied areas.

Additional reports indicate a direct hit in the Haifa Bay area following the latest volley, with large-scale sheltering underway affecting millions, and a sensitive target in Kiryat Ata has reportedly been struck, with emergency and rescue teams dispatched to the scene.

There are huge chances that Iran has struck a command room in Kiryat Ata, which may have resulted in mass casualties, but due to censorship the news may take time to be confirmed.

🔻@enemywatch

+

✅ | Israelis are now talking about level hundred building in Lebanon, in response to each Iranian missile impact, which is a dangerous scenario. Here comes another challenge for Iran. If this happens, how long will only Zionist military targets remain balanced? What would be better is to equate the same with warnings for children, elderly, pregnant, sick, and disabled to leave the regime as soon as possible, and then those who leave would have to deal with the consequences themselves.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷 | Statement by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps:

With the success granted by Allah, the Almighty, the aerospace force fighters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in response to the American-Zionist aggression that targeted one of the petrochemical facilities, struck similar facilities in Haifa with ballistic missiles a few minutes ago.

We warn that the Zionist enemy, by targeting civilian objectives and oil installations, has started a dangerous game whose scope will include all energy targets in the region. Its consequences for the global economy will fall upon the primary instigator of this arena, namely the United States.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🏴‍☠️ | The former Israeli officer, Tsvika Haimovich:

The Iranian response to the targeting of Beirut’s southern suburbs revealed three strategic indicators.

The Iranian response confirms that Tehran continues to consider Hezbollah an important regional player, beyond its organizational support.

Despite the strikes it has faced, Iran still possesses significant offensive capabilities and is “far from defeat.”

Through its response, Tehran seeks to exert pressure on the United States and improve its negotiating position.

The Iranian response established a new equation linking any Israeli attack on the southern suburbs with the launch of Iranian missiles towards Israel.

He added: “Beirut has now become equivalent to Haifa in the security equation.”

“Israel” now faces a dilemma regarding how and when to respond, and the coming days will determine the direction of the region.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷: 🎙️ | Press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson with the media, Tuesday, June 8, 2026.

Question:

After Israel’s attack on the Dahieh area, the President of the United States claimed that he was not aware of the execution of this attack. After the Islamic Republic of Iran’s response was put on the agenda, he also claimed that he asked the Zionists not to respond to these attacks; however, contrary to what was claimed, the Zionists targeted several points in our country. I wanted to know to what extent the Ministry of Foreign Affairs accepts the premise that the U.S. President is trying to convey, namely that the Zionists act independently and that Netanyahu no longer listens to the U.S. President?

Answer:

No one in our region believes that the Zionist regime would take any action without prior coordination and cooperation with the United States.

Second, let us not lose sight of the fact that the U.S. State Department has explicitly stated that the main reason for imposing this war against Iran was to support the Zionist regime. This has been the official position of the United States.

Third, even now, despite the claims of American officials, we know that CENTCOM is fully coordinated and cooperating with the Zionist regime in both defense and offense.

Interpreting that the Zionist regime no longer listens to the United States and commits crimes independently of U.S. demands, or with the aim of humiliating American officials, is a debate that can always be discussed. What is important to us is that the United States is responsible as a party to the ceasefire agreement of April 19.

Whatever happens in our region, whether the United States itself is the cause of the ceasefire violation through attacks on Iranian commercial ships, aggression against the southern regions of the country, or through the Zionist regime in Lebanon, or collusion with the United States in our own region, America’s responsibility, America’s direct responsibility, is obvious, and the consequences of the escalation of tension will also be the responsibility of America.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷: 🎙️ | Press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson with the media, Tuesday, June 8, 2026.

Question:

Considering all the events of last night and today, and the fact that the U.S. President has claimed that he does not want the agreement to be made with Iran to be affected by these events, please explain the status of the negotiations as a result of last night’s attack. What is Iran’s position regarding these negotiations after the recent events? Do you consider these attacks to be a hindrance to the process of exchanging talks and messages or not?

Answer:

These events definitely increase suspicions. We were already exchanging messages with the American side in a very intense atmosphere of mistrust. Undoubtedly, as I mentioned, the actions of the Zionist regime in the region cannot be separated from the policies of the United States.

The contradictions of the United States so far, the contradictory behaviors and statements that they themselves consider confusing, whether intentional or unintentional, have already caused enough disruption in the diplomatic process. What happened in the past 24 hours will only exacerbate this chaotic situation in the diplomatic process.

Question:

In recent days, we have witnessed clashes between Iran and the usurping Zionist regime. How far is Iran able and willing to go after this escalation of tension? Also, can it be said that the negotiations and their continuation have ended and concluded? Thank you.

Answer:

As far as necessary, as far as our national interests require, and as far as our national security deems necessary, we will definitely take action. Under no circumstances can we allow the Zionist regime or the United States to exploit the current situation to repeat their aggressions every day, expand their scope, and merely be content with a general statement that they remain committed to the ceasefire, while they continuously and repeatedly violate it.

Therefore, our armed forces, the diplomatic apparatus, and all pillars of the Iranian nation and the Islamic Republic of Iran are ready to confront any situation to protect the country’s security and national interests.

As I said, certainly and naturally, the diplomatic process that began to end an imposed war is affected by developments. What was the philosophy of the negotiations? From the beginning, the philosophy of the negotiations was to end the imposed war by the United States and the Zionist regime against Iran. It was explicitly stated from the start, and the Pakistani mediator repeatedly emphasized that ending the war in Lebanon is part of the ceasefire.

If the very purpose of these negotiations is distorted by the Zionist regime or any of the parties involved, namely the United States or Israel, naturally the diplomatic process will also be affected.

But ultimately, I want to emphasize once again that diplomacy and the battlefield are parallel and work together to secure Iran’s national interests and national security. Therefore, wherever necessary, our armed forces intervene, and wherever necessary, in full coordination, the diplomatic apparatus carries out its work.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷: 🎙️ | Press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson with the media, Tuesday, June 8, 2026.

Question:

We have the Board of Governors meeting ahead. A report from Mr. Grossi was also published, and claims were made against Iran’s peaceful nuclear program. There are also discussions that at this meeting, the American side intends to present a resolution against Iran’s peaceful nuclear program. If the resolution is approved, what will Iran’s response be? Overall, how do you view Grossi’s statements? If this resolution is approved at this meeting, what is Iran’s official response to it?

Answer:

We are certainly prepared for any eventuality and have the appropriate response in mind. The important point is that anyone who is a candidate for the position of Secretary-General of the United Nations must act responsibly in their behavior, in declaring their positions, and in performing their duties as the head of an important international organization, namely the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The Director General of the Agency continues to insist on a very inappropriate and unconstructive approach. He ignores the main reason and cause of the current situation and only pays attention to the consequences and signs of this situation. If the Agency is concerned about what it calls the continuity of knowledge regarding Iran’s nuclear issue, it should hold accountable those who have caused this situation.

The United States and the Zionist regime, due to their attack on Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities, are responsible for this situation. The Agency has not yet made a responsible statement on this matter and has not condemned this action; while in similar cases in our region, the Agency quickly visits that country and takes strong positions.

This double standard further reinforces the longstanding suspicion that, unfortunately, the Director General of the Agency pursues a completely biased, non-technical, and political approach to Iran’s nuclear issue. This situation will only further undermine the credibility of the Agency and the Director General regarding their commitments to nuclear non-proliferation.

Question:

Reports have been published stating that the Pentagon has assessed the level of Israeli counterintelligence threat as critical, and it has even been claimed that Israel has spied on Donald Trump’s representative in the negotiations with Iran. I wanted to ask, considering these reports, can this spying issue be considered one of the factors causing the deadlock in the negotiations? Also, on the other hand, American officials have repeatedly stated that they keep Israel informed about the negotiation process. What do you think this spying allegation fundamentally means?

Answer:

Nothing is unlikely from the Zionist regime. But it is noteworthy for everyone that from the Americans, who at the highest levels have admitted both before and after the negotiations that they have kept the Zionist regime officials informed of developments and have acted in full coordination with them, we hear that American officials have been subjected to intelligence and security actions by the Zionist regime.

This itself is another indication that the Zionist regime does not believe in any diplomatic process that could bring even a little calm to our region.

If you review the history of diplomatic processes related to Iran’s nuclear issue over the past twenty years, you will see that the Zionist regime has always openly acted as a destroyer and disruptor of any diplomatic process.

This is a dispute that must be resolved between the United States and the Zionist regime; however, the international community, regional countries, and public opinion will certainly learn the necessary lessons from this situation and these reports about which party and entity in our region actively strives to sabotage every diplomatic process.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷: 🎙️ | Press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson with the media, Tuesday, June 8, 2026.

Question:

Reports have been published indicating the deployment of Egyptian air defense and missile systems in the UAE. The President of Egypt has also recently been photographed alongside Egyptian fighter jets. At the same time, Cairo uses harsh rhetoric against our country. Some analyses say that these stances by Egypt are mainly aimed at gaining credibility in the Arab world and within the framework of Arab unity. What is your opinion on this matter and what is your position regarding these actions?

Answer:

I believe our Egyptian friends certainly know that gaining credibility comes through precise recognition of friend and foe, not by threatening an Islamic country that is confronting the Zionist regime.

Yes, we have seen these reports. We have no problem with Egypt; just as we have no problem with any of the Muslim and Arab countries in the region. We have repeatedly emphasized our determination to maintain the principle of good neighborliness and good relations with all countries and peoples of the region.

We are sorry that some countries in the region have allowed their territory, facilities, sovereignty, and dignity to be used for committing crimes, aggression, and illegal attacks by the Zionist regime and the United States against a Muslim country in the region.

Therefore, I recommend to all countries concerned about Islamic and Arab unity and credibility to be careful not to inadvertently or deliberately aid the enemy. Credibility can be earned in various ways.

The fact that for more than three years your brothers and sisters in Gaza have been mutilated, subjected to clear genocide, and unfortunately nothing has happened from their brothers and sisters on the other side of the border, I think is very significant.

Question:

If Israeli attacks on sensitive Iranian targets in the region continue, will Tehran still define its responses within the framework of limited deterrence, or will new options be put on the table?

Answer:

This question should be asked of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and I guess they will also demonstrate it in practice. They certainly will not talk about it, but in practice, they will show how they will defend the integrity of Iran and Iran’s national interests by any means they deem necessary.

Question:

There have been reports that the United States is seeking to seize part of Iran’s frozen assets for the benefit of regional countries. We wanted to know your opinion on this. Also, last night the US again claimed that it will not release Iran’s assets before any agreement.

Answer:

These claims are part of the media and propaganda war and pressure from opposing parties. Certainly, part of this cognitive and hybrid warfare originates from the Zionist regime.

It is a ridiculous claim; because we are strong creditors from all regional parties who have in any way participated in the aggression and crimes committed by the Zionist regime and the US against Iran, and we will definitely pursue this demand by any means and in any way possible.

The issue of Iran’s frozen assets is one of the components of any understanding currently under negotiation, and there will never be any leniency from Iran in this regard.

🔹@enemywatch

+