🇦🇲: 🇮🇷 | Armenia acquires Iranian communication and air defense systems:

It appears that Armenia has also acquired Iranian Line-of-Sight communication systems to operate alongside Iranian radars and air defense systems. Recent images released from Armenia’s military parade drew major attention after several Iranian-made systems were identified, including the “Majid” air defense system, the “Kavosh” radar, a new radar likely connected to the Majid system, and other related military equipment. According to reports, the contracts for these systems were finalized as early as 2023, but little information regarding their delivery had surfaced until now. This indicates that military cooperation between Tehran and Yerevan has become deeper and more extensive in recent months than previously understood.

The importance of these purchases goes beyond the equipment itself. The entry of Iranian systems into Armenia’s defense structure signals a major shift in military relations between the two countries and reflects growing Armenian trust in Iran’s defense industries. Smaller states operating in difficult security environments often become heavily dependent on one or two major regional powers for military infrastructure and weapons procurement. Armenia’s move toward Iranian systems suggests an effort to diversify suppliers and reduce total dependence on traditional defense partners. At the same time, the appearance of Iranian military systems in active foreign service has had a propaganda and strategic impact internationally, bringing Iranian defense industries back into global military discussions and analysis networks.

In recent years, the battlefield performance of Iranian-made systems in regional wars has significantly changed perceptions about Iranian weapons. Systems such as the “Majid” air defense platform have demonstrated effectiveness against drones, low-altitude threats, and close aerial targets while remaining relatively cost-efficient. Iranian loitering and suicide drones have also attracted major attention among military analysts due to their low-cost, high-impact operational model. From this perspective, the Armenia deal is not simply an arms sale, but part of Iran’s broader effort to establish itself as a regional arms exporter and security actor. Arms exports create not only financial benefit but also political influence, strategic leverage, and long-term defense dependence. If these systems perform effectively in Armenian service, they could become a showcase for Iran’s military industry and potentially open the door for additional contracts with smaller nations seeking affordable but operational defense systems.

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Summary of Israeli aggression on Lebanese territory on 28/05/2026:

Israeli warplanes carried out massive aerial raids across southern Lebanon, the Beqaa region, and the southern suburbs of Beirut, targeting dozens of towns and areas including Kafra, Tyre, Dweir, Shokine, Hiboush, Deir Qanoun Ras El Ain, Bourj Qalawyeh, Ghandouriyeh, Kfardounine, Mifdoun, Touline, Ghassanieh, Haris, Chhour, Maarake, Ali Tahir, Deir Zahrani, Qatarni, Wadi Bourghoz, Yohmor El Shaqif, Kafar Jouze, Mansouri, Zibqine, Rmeidiyeh, Tebnine, Shakra, Qulayleh, Nabatieh, Jibchit, Kafar Tebnit, Deben, Tair Daba, Arnoun, Harouf, Sahmar in the Beqaa, and Shouwaifat in Beirut’s southern suburbs. Enemy drones also carried out raids on Jibchit, Adloun, Toul, Mifdoun, Haris, Deir Zahrani, Zebdine, Zefta, Hiboush, Abba, and surrounding roads and areas, while Israeli artillery shelling targeted Kafar Rouman, Al Mahmoodyeh, Al Reyhan, Deben, Sareefa, Nafakhiyeh, Blatt, Mansouri, Jdeidet Marjeyoun, Al Hanyeh, and Kafar Tebnit.

🔹@enemywatch

🏴 | Around the 10th, 11th, and 12th of Dhul Hijjah, Imam Husayn (A), whose journey from Makkah was destined to reach Kufa~(ended at Karbala), stopped at multiple stations and settlements for important reasons. Some of these stops are prominently recorded in history, while many others remain hidden and still demand deeper research and reflection. Among these stations was Tan’eem in Makkah, where Imam Husayn (A) met a number of people, explained his position, and openly exposed the reality of his stance and movement.

Imam Husayn’s caravan also stopped at a place called al-Abtah, where Yazid ibn Thabit al-Basri met Imam Husayn (A) and learned directly about the reasons behind the Imam’s migration. The caravan halted briefly at another station where Imam Husayn (A) purchased food and supplies from a Yemeni trade caravan. Although the caravan was moving with urgency and speed, Imam Husayn (A) deliberately did not avoid public gathering places, inhabited villages, or socially active routes. His intention was clear: to meet people, explain his position, establish proof, and expose the reality of the political and spiritual crisis consuming the Ummah and beyond.

These regions were not ordinary settlements. Many were inhabited by elite tribes, companions of Prophet Muhammad (S), their descendants, and socially influential figures whose words and loyalties carried weight across the Islamic world. Several of these areas also functioned as resting stations and sarays for Hajj travelers. This is why Imam Husayn (A), instead of taking isolated shortcuts toward the Iraqi mainland, continued moving through populated routes and visible public spaces.

According to the historian Ibn al-Athir, Abdullah ibn Ja’far (first cousin brother in-law of Imam Husayn, husband of Sayyidah Zaynab), himself, and according to other historians, the Governor of Makkah, Amr ibn Sa’eed, either personally or at the request of Abdullah ibn Ja’far, wrote a letter to Imam Husayn (A). The letter was delivered through Abdullah ibn Ja’far and Yahya ibn Sa’eed, the brother of the governor. Al-Tabari records the contents of the letter in which Amr ibn Sa’eed urged Imam Husayn (A) not to proceed toward Iraq, expressing fear that he would be killed. He offered Imam Husayn (A) protection, safety, kindness, and asylum if he agreed to return to Makkah under their guarantee, calling Allah as witness to his promise.

Imam Husayn (A) replied with words that exposed the spiritual depth and certainty behind his movement. He wrote: “You have offered me asylum and protection. In Allah is the best asylum and refuge. He does not grant refuge in the Hereafter to those who do not fear Him in this world. We pray that we may fear and obey Him in this world so that we may hope for His refuge on the Day of Judgment. May Allah reward you for your offer of kindness and goodness toward me.”

Realizing that Imam Husayn (A) had fully resolved to sacrifice himself for the truth and would not turn back from his mission, Abdullah ibn Ja’far eventually entrusted his own two teenage sons (probably of age group 17-19), Aun and Muhammad, to join Imam Husayn (A) as his representatives in the struggle against falsehood and tyranny. After this, Abdullah ibn Ja’far and Yahya ibn Sa’eed returned to Madinah, while the caravan of Imam Husayn (A) continued its destined journey toward Karbala.

Every stop was part of a living sermon, a political exposure, and a final completion of proof upon the Ummah. Along this path, Imam Husayn (A) met many lovers, but not many true followers. If time allows, this painful distinction itself deserves a separate discussion.

#HusaynSaidNo

🥀@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷 IRANIAN PARLIAMENT'S NATIONAL SECURITY COMMITTEE: WE DO NOT INTEND TO TRANSFER ENRICHED URANIUM TO A THIRD COUNTRY

⚪️ @Alsaa_plus_EN

🇱🇧 | Hezbollah’s video of targeting gatherings of IOF vehicles and soldiers in southern Lebanon with qualitative missiles on 27/05/2026.

🔻@enemywatch

🇮🇷 | Iran Updates:

1) Foreign Minister Mr. Abbas Araghchi stated that during a “..very constructive..” phone call with Omani Foreign Minister Mr. Badr Al Busaidi, he expressed Iran’s solidarity with Oman against any threats and discussed the future management of the Strait of Hormuz “..within the framework of sovereign responsibilities and international law..” He added that Iran welcomes consultations with all neighboring countries.

2) Mr. Abbas Araghchi reiterated that Iran stands with the Sultanate of Oman in confronting threats and emphasized that discussions with Muscat included regional maritime management, sovereign responsibilities, and legal frameworks governing the Strait of Hormuz.

3) IRIB News Agency sarcastically criticized Western appeals to international law regarding the Strait of Hormuz, stating: “..After failing to open the Strait of Hormuz, America is now talking about international laws. It is like an armed thief who, after failing to open the door, lectures about property rights and house rules..”

4) Speaker of Parliament and head of Iran’s negotiating team stated that “..we gain concessions not through talks, but with missiles, and negotiations only make them understand that..”

5) The Speaker of Parliament further stated that “..we do not trust guarantees and words, only actions are the criterion, and no action will be taken before the other side acts..”

6) Iranian parliamentary leadership also stated that “..the winner of any agreement is the one who is better prepared for war the day after..”

🔹@enemywatch