🇮🇷 | 🎶 | A special musical piece dedicated to the farewell of the “martyred leader of the Revolution,” composed by Habib Khazaeifar, has been produced and will be released soon. Habib Khazaeifar, who previously earned recognition for composing music for prominent works centered on the Sacred Defense and the Resistance Front, has once again sought to musically portray the grandeur of resistance in this piece.

It is worth noting that the Owj Arts and Media Organization had earlier produced and released the musical piece “Sayyid al-Ummah,” composed by Karen Homayounfar, for the funeral ceremony of martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 | Breaking — Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi warned that the presence of French and British warships in the Strait of Hormuz, particularly if accompanying what Tehran described as unlawful American actions, would face an “immediate and decisive response.”

He stated that any deployment or stationing of destroyers around the Strait of Hormuz under the pretext of protecting maritime navigation represented a further escalation of the crisis rather than a solution to it. According to Iranian officials, maritime security cannot be established through military power demonstrations, naval blockades, or continuous threats against coastal states.

The warning came as the United Kingdom reportedly prepared to deploy HMS Dragon, a Type 45 destroyer, to West Asia as part of a potential international mission aimed at protecting shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz. The vessel was repositioned from the eastern Mediterranean, where it had been guarding British bases in Cyprus, allowing it to remain ready for immediate deployment if such a mission is formally launched.

While the UK Ministry of Defence described the operation as “strictly defensive and independent,” Iranian officials viewed the growing Western naval presence in the region as part of a wider military escalation surrounding the Strait of Hormuz and warned that any direct involvement alongside American operations would provoke a rapid Iranian response.

🔹@enemywatch

+

Beware of these bloody grifters, liars, and frauds from South Asia.

🔹@enemywatch

+

10. Ten strategic points regarding the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz were outlined by the Leader of the Revolution:

• The presence of American military forces and bases in the Persian Gulf region was described as the primary source of insecurity.

• American bases were described as incapable of guaranteeing even their own security.

• A future Persian Gulf free from American influence and serving regional prosperity was envisioned.

• Iran stressed the shared destiny linking Gulf states through the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman.

• Foreign military forces were rejected from the Persian Gulf region.

• Iran’s actions in the Persian Gulf were described as part of the emergence of a new regional and global order.

• Iran highlighted its management role over the Strait of Hormuz as essential for regional security.

• Preventing hostile exploitation of the Strait of Hormuz was presented as a strategic necessity.

• Iran argued that regional prosperity and stability could be achieved through new legal frameworks and management mechanisms regarding Hormuz.

• Economic benefits resulting from the new management structure of the Strait of Hormuz were also highlighted for the Iranian nation.

11. Former Iranian ambassador to Venezuela Soltani stated that approximately 700,000 Iranians living abroad returned to the country during the war despite heavy American and Israeli bombardment. He contrasted this with migration patterns seen in Syria and Iraq during wartime, claiming that Iran instead experienced reverse migration. Soltani also claimed that the Mossad chief had assured Donald Trump that internal unrest would overthrow the Iranian government, but described this as a failed and false assessment that ultimately damaged Israeli calculations. He added that the Iranian people traditionally unite in the face of foreign threats and credited this cohesion for preserving Iran over thousands of years.

12. Former Qatari Prime Minister Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani stated that Iran emerged politically stronger after the American and Israeli attacks. He argued that attempts to overthrow Iran through military power had always been an illusion. He also stated that Iran would likely use the war to further develop its military and technological capabilities and added that Gulf states should similarly strengthen their own capacities.

13. Brigadier General Zolghadr stated that enemy powers failed to achieve their objectives despite employing numerous tools and individuals. He argued that the states claiming to guarantee regional security now face major internal and operational challenges and increasingly depend on outside assistance to deploy their forces. Zolghadr also stated that recent developments exposed the fragility of great power narratives and argued that the era in which American naval deployments alone could determine the collapse of countries had passed, as such movements no longer produce their intended strategic outcomes.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah writes:

1. Following the Iranian response, and according to what has been leaked regarding its contents, Trump and Netanyahu held a phone call. There are two possibilities: either Trump is informing his wartime partner about a potential agreement, or they are discussing the possibility of some form of military action which both sides believe could push Tehran toward greater flexibility, meaning substantial concessions.

It is clear that the issue of enriched uranium represents a difficult obstacle, as does the matter of the fronts, particularly Lebanon.

2. Iran’s peaceful nuclear program is a sovereign right guaranteed by international law. Tehran has no intention of accepting its dismantlement. The American demands in this regard are excessive, and insisting on dismantling the nuclear program means moving once again toward confrontation.

Washington’s problem is that it behaves as though it emerged victorious and capable of imposing harsh conditions. The results of the war do not allow Washington to impose any of these terms.

Tehran, which endured two consecutive wars, did not retreat from its nuclear rights. This confirms that any third war will not force it to back down, but rather will deepen its commitment to its rights.

3. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam says that 68 villages are now under “Israeli” control. Regardless of his refusal to use the term “under occupation,” this number is inaccurate.

They will say it is “control by fire.” Fine, but there is a major difference between control by fire and actual control and occupation.

The number of villages where the occupation is present, either fully or partially, is fewer than 23 villages.

More importantly, despite the destruction and bulldozing that began after the 2024 war, the Israeli occupation army is not stable in those villages. Resistance fighters continue to pursue them, and the evidence is visible in the field.

Mr. Prime Minister, searching for justifications for direct negotiations is futile. A peace agreement will not pass, nor will it happen. The decision is larger than a government and larger than impulsive decisions.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | Iran sent a proposal to America via Pakistan stating that it will not hand over Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile to the U.S. or any other country. The proposal also called for an immediate end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, guarantees of no further aggression, the immediate lifting of the U.S. naval blockade, and the gradual lifting of all U.S. sanctions against Iran. Specifically, sanctions on Iran’s oil exports were demanded to be lifted within 30 days of signing an MoU. The proposal also included the release of frozen Iranian funds within the same 30-day period after signing the MoU, along with recognition of Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz.

These Iranian proposals confirm that this is the third time Iran has explored and sharply laid its cards on the table for negotiations. However, Trump responded with an outright rejection and indicated that he did not like the proposal at all. Parallel to the confirmation of the Iranian proposal, both Trump and Netanyahu gave interviews repeating the same narrative they used before the first aggression against Iran. Both rejected the Iranian proposals, repeated the same allegations regarding highly enriched uranium, and Netanyahu once again raised the issue of ballistic missiles. Shortly afterward, the two also held a phone call.

It increasingly appears that the proposal-forwarding process will ultimately end unsuccessfully because it is following the same pattern that previously preceded military attacks against Iran. In the past hours, the USS Alaska (SSBN-732), an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine, was spotted surfacing and briefly visiting the Strait of Gibraltar. The submarine carries 20 Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles, each capable of carrying a scaled nuclear payload of up to 475 kilotons of TNT. Alongside this, there has also been a noticeable military re-establishment across the region.

Iran has also involved Qatar at certain levels, and there are different talks taking place. But somehow, it does not give the impression that the meeting of Witkoff and Rubio in Qatar will yield any real results. Rather, it resembles the same pattern seen before previous attacks on Iran.

Imam Mujtaba Khamenei has reportedly set goals regarding the Hormuz issue, the nuclear issue, and strategic matters related to Lebanon. It is clear that the issue of enriched uranium represents a difficult obstacle, as does the matter of the fronts, particularly Lebanon. Iran will not retreat from its nuclear rights.

But it must also be clear to Iran at this moment that Iran hopefully has to evolve its diplomatic theater and negotiation structure with America. While many people correctly believe that Americans often use negotiation gaps as tools to regroup and later attack again, there is still an urgent need to find a solution to this cycle in which attacks are followed by ceasefires, and ceasefires are followed once again by attacks.

Whatever it may require, whether a pre-emptive approach, a change in diplomatic structure, or an entirely different strategic framework, there is a need to rethink the patterns under which negotiations usually operate. Because despite Iran presenting what many would consider viable, positive, and logical proposals, they are still being presented to someone who can hardly even be considered serious in negotiations. It is like presenting a proposal to a rock.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷 | Mr. Kabadi, Deputy Head of the Iranian Red Crescent:

“I swam the 1,050-kilometer length of the Persian Gulf in 85 days. My record was registered in Guinness as the first human to swim more than 1,000 kilometers.”

🔹@enemywatch

VISA and MASTERCARD return to Syria after 15-year hiatus

RT: “VISA and MASTERCARD return to Syria after 15-year hiatus

Now Ahmed al-Sharaa can order coffee without cash!”

🤦‍♀️

Visa and Mastercard return along with the murdering of Alawites, Christians, Shias, rape, torturing of civilians and other ethnic groups, and the selling off of land to Zionists.

But hey it’s cool because a head-chopping psycho can smile & swipe using US-based payments. 🤡

Don’t know who’s in charge of writing these shit headlines and copy but do better.

https://x.com/fiorellaisabelm/status/2053705470230122823?s=46

@FiorellaInMoscow

🇮🇷 | In the midst of war, when the battle between humans and subhumans continues, nature is seen healing as time heals many things. The “bird of hope,” the Rosy Starling, has returned to the Qopi Baba Ali wetland after decades. According to the Mahabad Environmental Protection Department, after several decades, the Rosy Starling was observed again in the Qopi Baba Ali International Wetland in Mahabad, Iran.

🔹@enemywatch