📌 | Trump only ruined Fujairah and returned!

Without any prior judgment, it is necessary to briefly and clearly review the developments of the past two to three days.

First, Trump suddenly announced an attempt to forcibly open the Strait of Hormuz without Iran’s consent.

On the following day, U.S. military announced its intention to escort vessels through the strait under military protection in order to undermine Iran’s strategic will.

With the initiation of this approach, U.S. destroyers entered the operational phase. However, the majority of commercial vessels, aware of the nature of American posturing, refrained from movement and refused to place themselves in a vulnerable position. At the same time, one or two vessels, due to miscalculation, attempted passage and were subsequently damaged or destroyed.

In parallel, the United Arab Emirates claimed that Fujairah had been targeted through missile and drone attacks. The precise origin of these alleged strikes remained unclear, but the port area of Fujairah was reported to be on fire.

As these developments unfolded, the vessels that attempted violation were disabled, Fujairah was engulfed in fire, and the U.S. destroyers became operationally stalled within the passage corridor. The situation reached a point where the deployed forces themselves appeared uncertain regarding the purpose and outcome of their presence.

Following this, Trump swiftly announced the failure of the operation. Despite this declaration, maritime assets had already suffered losses, Fujairah remained in a state of damage, and the destroyers were left without operational achievement in the field.

Subsequently, the decision was taken to withdraw the deployed destroyers. However, during the return phase, reports indicated that they were exposed to pressure from Iranian naval forces, further complicating their withdrawal.

The outcome of the sequence of events can be described as follows. The destroyers were deployed, became operationally ineffective, and ultimately withdrew. The Strait of Hormuz remained under Iranian strategic control. Only limited maritime assets suffered destruction, and Fujairah, according to Emirati reports, experienced significant damage.

At the strategic level, Washington is attempting to isolate Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz from broader regional negotiations. It seeks to condition any opening of the strait on the lifting of the naval pressure measures it has imposed. Accordingly, all maritime actions taken by the United States must be understood within this broader framework of coercive leverage.

From Tehran’s perspective, however, there will be no compromise over established strategic gains. Iran is not prepared to dismantle its achieved positions or accept arrangements that would prolong the crisis under managed escalation, as Washington attempts to do in other regional files. This includes rejecting any attempt to treat the Strait of Hormuz as a separable bargaining chip outside the broader security equation.

It is confirmed now that the Americans and their allies did not have proper framework to implement control in the case of the Hormuz chokepoint. Their only actions were reckless attempts, which came back and hit them like a boomerang.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷 | Documentation of the response of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps to the US violation of the ceasefire in the Strait of Hormuz.

🔻@enemywatch

0:02 - The Persian Gulf is your graveyard
0:03 - And He sent against them birds in flocks (Surah Al-Fil: 3)
0:05 - In memory of the martyred students of Minab
0:09 - In memory of the martyrs of the Dena destroyer
0:15 - Revenge for Martyr Mohammad Reza Tamaddonfar
0:18 - Revenge for Martyr Abdolrahman Zanganeh
0:25 - Revenge for the blood of Martyr Hamid Mohammadi