✅ | Those who challenge us are those who do not understand us. Our protests against internal issues in Iran and Lebanon, including foreign policy and the reformist class, will continue, but with respect and without assisting the enemies. We will repeat our stance and remain firm on it. This stance has been with us since the first day, and people know this, and that is enough for us. We are not journalists, nor part of any cult. Our culture is resistance, and our leader is Mujtaba Khamenei. We will remain firm on this stance. Those who want to stay with us are welcome; those who do not may leave and join any copy-paste media.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | The reports claiming that Pakistan is working to bring Iran and America back to the table are, in reality, suggesting that the Americans have asked Pakistan to facilitate this, as they are planning to impose heavy pressure through a so-called naval blockade.

America must understand that this is, in fact, one of the worst methods of applying pressure, as it is likely to backfire. It may also trigger reactions from those countries they once assumed were aligned with them or under their influence.

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

✅ | As we have been informed, indications of what was going to happen have been confirmed by Professor Marandi to Al-Mayadeen. He stated:

“We received direct threats and serious information indicating that the Iranian delegation’s plane to Islamabad could be attacked. The Iranian delegation returned from Islamabad in a different way after receiving this information. The plane changed its route, landed in Mashhad, and the delegation then traveled by train and cars to Tehran.”

During these threats, our seniors and sources in Iran wanted us to highlight the issue in a way that did not appear as a leak. A friendly country in the region had informed Iran in a timely manner about what was going to happen, and it has now become clearer that Israeli elements were planning to target the aircraft.

Once again, as a responsible and reasonable voice, we raise this issue as a form of protest to the officials, urging them to carefully consider such decisions. If such risks are taken without full awareness, then those responsible must reflect seriously. Those armchair critics who consider constructive criticism as being against Iran or serving its enemies fail to understand the role of a martyred leader and the importance of maintaining a sensible presence in such arenas. Acting only on emotional or reactive thinking is not acceptable.

The loss of such a high-level delegation would have led to a very serious crisis for Iran and beyond. There is also a need to stop romanticizing and fetishizing martyrdom and turning it into mere slogans; “one gone, another will go.” Yes, it has happened, but how and under what circumstances—if some of you knew, you would surrender to such thinking in these situations..

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

✅ | Once again, news of Iran returning to the negotiation table has surfaced. The talks may be scheduled in Islamabad, Oman, or elsewhere, although CIA-linked media is emphasizing Islamabad. It seems that Turkey, Saudi Arabia, or Oman may have attempted mediation after the Americans requested Islamabad to push for concessions.

The challenge here for the Iranian delegation is that mass mobilization will not accept another round of failure and humiliation attached to ceasefire talks. As per American propaganda media:

“During talks in Islamabad, the U.S. proposed a 20-year halt to Iran’s uranium enrichment, while Iran responded with a willingness to accept up to five years, an offer President Trump rejected. Washington also pushed for Iran to remove its highly enriched uranium, but Tehran insisted it remain in the country, offering instead to dilute it so it could not be used for weapons.”

If this news is taken as correct, even though it may involve fabrication, it still presents a problematic issue. Abandoning enrichment even for five years remains a major concern.

Currently, discussions about another round of in-person talks are ongoing, though no plans have been finalized. We may expect a sharp-edged statement from Imam Mujtaba Khamenei soon in this regard.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇺🇸 | The American carrier strike group centered around USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) was operating east of Cyprus (approx. 33.75°N, 29.18°E). It had already been present in the same area two days earlier, confirming that it is not in transit and is expected to remain stationed there until further operational orders are issued.

Satellite imagery shows the carrier being refueled by a supply vessel, escorted by at least two Arleigh Burke-class destroyers (escort radius typically 5–20 km, equipped with Aegis missile defense systems). The delayed release of imagery by the European Space Agency, approximately 24 hours, indicates sensitivity around naval deployments in the eastern Mediterranean.

The USS Gerald R. Ford is the most advanced aircraft carrier in the American fleet, a 100,000-ton nuclear-powered supercarrier, carrying over 75 aircraft and a crew of approximately 4,500–5,000 personnel . Its air wing typically includes:

• F/A-18E/F Super Hornets (strike fighters)

• EA-18G Growlers (electronic warfare)

• E-2D Hawkeye (airborne early warning)

• F-35C Lightning II (stealth strike capability, if deployed)

It uses advanced systems such as the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and multi-band radar, allowing higher sortie rates and faster operational cycles.

From its current position in the eastern Mediterranean, the carrier remains outside immediate coastal threat zones but still within extended strike range of Iranian capabilities. If it moves further east toward operational hotspots, it may enter deeper into contested missile engagement zones.

Iran possesses a wide range of missile systems, including:

• Short-range ballistic missiles (300–700 km)

• Medium-range ballistic missiles such as Ghadr and Shahab variants (1,300–2,000 km)

• Cruise missiles and anti-ship systems designed for maritime targeting

This places large parts of the eastern Mediterranean, Arabian Sea, and Gulf within layered Iranian strike reach.

A notable development has been the absence of American warships from the confined waters of the Persian Gulf. In anticipation of escalation around February 28, U.S. naval units repositioned left the Gulf to reduce vulnerability to close-range missile and drone attacks.

The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) has been operating in the Arabian Sea (approx. 18°N, 65°E) at a distance of roughly 320 km or more from the Iranian coastline, sometimes even further.

Iran’s strategy is not based on direct naval confrontation but on asymmetric warfare, including:

• Saturation missile attacks (large volumes to overwhelm defenses)

• Drone swarms targeting ships and infrastructure

• Anti-ship ballistic missiles targeting high-value assets

• Proxy-based regional attacks on bases and logistics

The absence of warships in the Gulf, combined with carrier positioning in the Mediterranean and Arabian Sea, indicates a shift from proximity-based dominance to distance-based deterrence.

At the same time, Iran’s expanding missile reach and asymmetric capabilities mean that even distant deployments are not entirely outside its operational envelope.

🔹@enemywatch

+