❎ | The amount of people bragging, ranting, bluffing, and insisting that Iran should do this or that is not only funny but also saddening. It highlights how many are reacting for quick dopamine hits rather than real insight into complex ground realities. Iran doesn’t need your unsolicited advice, thanks, or suggestions, what matters is deep understanding and thoughtful reflection, not empty loud opinions.

The mobilization of noble Iranians knows what to do when they see some officials going off track.

🔹@enemywatch

❎ | People are questioning why Iran doesn’t mention Palestine separately, as if it was Qatar or some other country had sacrificed its top leaders and thousands for the cause of Gaza. What’s truly shocking is how quickly some seem to forget that Iran has officially supported the Palestinian people and their struggle for decades, both politically and materially. The people themselves, the same community, react in extreme ways: they get shocked, jump with excitement, change sides or colors, celebrate every military success, and then quickly forget the very friends and allies who stood by the cause all along. Weird state!

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | As per reports: Americans have utilized the covert indications of the Zarif-Rouhani nexus to create this situation and carried out a major massacre in Lebanon to divide the mobilization on the ground. They wanted a percentage of people on the streets who are influenced more by a nationalist approach rather than purely an Islamic-resistance stance (though both are acceptable in such scenarios; topic of discussion, so leave it for now) to stand against those who want revenge for Lebanon.

This attempt is linked to a broader objective: the enemies want one group to chant “No Gaza, no Lebanon, only Iran,” an idea that was repeated many times by Zarif in the past and Hassan Rouhani’s Iran-only narrative hidden behind his official statements, which are now actively being posted from his office. As we see now, his office is tweeting, not him, which allows him to distance himself later.

At the same time, another group is pushing the natural demand of joining the Lebanese front and fighting for them at any cost. This division is what they are trying to create, but thanks to the public and officials who understand this deception.

Abbas Araghchi tweeted that last night’s attack had been decided but was halted to allow room for diplomacy in Islamabad, only if Israel showed restraint (another sign of miscalculation by reformists who connect Israel and restraint with each other), followed by the deletion of the tweet by the Iranian ambassador in Islamabad. This shows that many things are clashing internally. This can be recalled from what the martyred leader said before his martyrdom, that the main test is of the officials. This is indeed a high-level seditious attempt, similar to what those aware of the Battle of Siffin would understand.

At present, it appears that reformist element wanting to push negotiation tactics and have asked for some hours or days for their part. Still, as the SNSC stated, the trigger remains in hand. If the Leader and the forces allow any movement, it will have a minimum deadline, and the next phase will be decided by action, not by paper. The only agenda allowed for them is to officially declare that if Lebanon is included in the ceasefire, there will be a ceasefire, which means everything will collapse with the start of Operation TP5. One round will take place, and then it will collapse. This will likely end the game of table and bomb—bomb and table.

Anyways, As of now, there is no clarity on what will happen, who will lead the delegation, or how progress will occur. There are a number of ambiguities, so the assessment of such matters is not possible at this stage and requires time.

Thanks to thousands of active and aware elites on media who are doing their best to expose any such plans. Be confident that the next phase belongs to the revolution, the noble nation of Iran, and the resistance axis.

🔹@enemywatch

+

✅ | Something disastrous enough for the masses to act upon. We repeat: Pakistan, it is not your business—stay away and do not choose eternal disgrace. Another problematic issue is that the venue has been chosen by the Americans, not the Iranians, so top officials are going to an American venue. God forbid, what they may do has no other explanation than disgrace, which only feeds the (shameless) reformists.

🔹@enemywatch

+

✅ | When you look at how Shehbaz Sharif and Asim Munir have behaved toward Trump since his administration took office, it becomes clear they have left no stone unturned. They have bent over backwards to win his approval, constantly praising him at every forum, whether for supposedly brokering peace with India or claiming to end the Gaza genocide while facilitating it. It is a classic case of singing from the same hymn sheet.

Shehbaz Sharif has been one of the most vocal supporters of Trump’s so-called Gaza Peace Plan, effectively giving legitimacy to an American takeover of the Strip and encouraging others to fall in line. In doing so, he has nailed his colors to the mast, openly backing a position few others dared to endorse so strongly. His repeated calls for Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize show how far he has gone to stay in his good books.

The Pakistani establishment has also played its cards carefully, courting figures close to Trump, especially Steve Witkoff. Knowing the influence of business networks and financial interests, they tried to grease the wheels through crypto connections and elite partnerships. This was not random. It was a calculated move to kill two birds with one stone, gain access and rebuild influence in Washington.

After years of strained ties with the US, Pakistan has been eager to get back in the driver’s seat. The loss of aid, the cooling of relations after the Afghanistan war, and mistrust in Washington left Pakistan out in the cold. With Imran Khan attempting to pivot away from the US, the current leadership reversed course quickly. Since then, Sharif’s government has worked relentlessly to mend fences and align with American interests.

Recent developments add weight to this pattern. High-level meetings such as the rare Oval Office interaction with Asim Munir did not happen in a vacuum. Reports of offering mineral contracts, alternative port access, and expanded cooperation signal that Pakistan is putting all its eggs in one basket again. These are not isolated gestures. They point toward a strategic repositioning.

Within this context, Pakistan’s role in mediating between Iran and the US should be viewed with caution. It is not simply acting as a neutral party. Rather, it is trying to have its cake and eat it too, maintaining ties with China and Russia while simultaneously chasing Washington’s approval. The public diplomacy, however, clearly leans in one direction.

At the same time, Pakistan’s internal and regional pressures cannot be ignored. Tensions with Afghanistan, instability at home, and the ever-present risk with India mean it is walking a tightrope. Its dependence on external support and energy routes forces it to make choices that may not appear balanced.

All of this suggests that Pakistan is not just mediating. It is playing a deeper game. Its actions indicate a desire to re-establish itself as a key American ally in the region, even if it means compromising neutrality. In such a situation, trusting it as an unbiased actor for Iran would be taking it at face value, which may not reflect the full picture.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah:

Netanyahu agreed to direct negotiations with Lebanon, but set a precondition: the disarmament of Hezbollah. This has been his consistent position, including after the appointment of Simon Karam as a civilian negotiator in the mechanism committee, when he explicitly stated that Hezbollah’s disarmament is the entry point for any negotiations. He is seeking to achieve this through Lebanese actors, possibly offering assistance as he has in the past.

Netanyahu’s acceptance of direct talks with Lebanon, along with Trump’s call for him to reduce strikes, is described as a tactical maneuver. The aim is seen as containing the fallout from ceasefire violations in Lebanon and the recent wave of strikes that killed hundreds of civilians, including in Beirut.

Another objective is said to be weakening Iran’s strategy of “linked fronts” or “unity of fronts”, by suggesting that Lebanon can negotiate independently and does not need to be included in talks mediated through Pakistan.

Iran responded quickly through its foreign ministry, stating that ending the war depends on a U.S. commitment to a ceasefire across all fronts, especially Lebanon—indicating that Tehran has not accepted Trump’s approach.

🔹@enemywatch

+