🇮🇷 | Tasnim News Agency (Iran): Iran’s response to the U.S. was officially sent last night:

Iran’s response to the 15 proposed points by the United States was officially sent through mediators last night, and Iran is now awaiting a reply from the other side.

According to this informed source, Iran stated in its response that assassination attacks by the enemy must end, and that real conditions must be created to prevent the recurrence of war. It also demanded clear guarantees for compensation and damages, and that the end of the war must be implemented across all fronts and for all resistance groups involved in the conflict throughout the region.

The source added that Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz is a natural and legal right, which must be recognized as a guarantee for the implementation of the other side’s commitments. These conditions differ from those presented in the second round of negotiations in Geneva prior to the recent escalation.

The source also emphasized that Iran believes the U.S. claim of negotiation is merely a “third deception project”, aimed at several objectives:

• Presenting a peaceful image to the world while claiming to seek an end to the war

• Keeping global oil prices low

• Gaining time to prepare for a new military action, particularly a potential ground operation in southern Iran

It further stated that while Iran had doubts before the 12-day war about U.S. commitment to agreements, it now completely doubts the genuine intention of the United States to negotiate at any time. According to the source, the U.S. has initiated conflicts during negotiations in past instances, and is once again using negotiations as a cover to prepare for further escalation.

🔹@enemywatch

+

☑️ | Breaking — Initial reports of the martyrdom of IRGC Navy Commander Gen. Ali Reza Tangsiri (not from enemy announcements). Await official confirmation.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🇮🇷 | Spokesman for the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Brigadier General Abolfazl Shekarchi:

When a state launches an attack against us, we punish it.

All vital infrastructure of "israel" has been destroyed in this war.

To date, 17 American bases in the region have been destroyed.

We are pursuing the Americans in the region to exact retribution from them, and for the first time, they have been forced to flee their bases and take refuge in hotels.

F-35 fighter jets will no longer be safe.

We will target any American presence in the region.

We are relying on achieving the four conditions set by the Leader of the Revolution.

The Strait of Hormuz will not remain as it was.

The Americans and the "israelis" are fighting us, and we will respond to their attacks at their locations.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | "National Interest" – An Infamous Idea that Assists Americanism and Aids Greater Israel

The concept of “national interest” is often used as a cover to justify actions that serve foreign powers, particularly in Islamic-majority nations aligning with American and Israeli agendas. In Turkey, for example, significant segments of the population accept President Erdoğan’s close ties with Zionist-aligned trade and policy, claiming it is “in our national interest.”

Islam promotes a pan-Islamic and global approach to confronting oppression rather than restricting loyalty or action to borders imposed by colonial powers. The artificial boundaries drawn by colonialists do not define the Muslim ummah, which transcends national lines. Islam emphasizes the defense of the oppressed wherever they may be, insisting that allegiance to moral and religious principles outweighs adherence to state-imposed divisions created to serve foreign interests.

Modern nation-states exploit the concept of national interest to validate decisions that often contradict ethical, religious, or moral values. Boundaries, alliances, and trade agreements are presented as strategic necessities, but in reality, they facilitate division, dependency, and the advancement of external powers. For example, Western countries such as India or European states evaluate events primarily in terms of what benefits their national position, ignoring humanitarian, moral, or regional consequences. In Muslim-majority nations, religious scholars or state institutions are often co-opted to legitimize policies that ultimately serve the United States or Israel. Alliances with America, framed as essential for economic growth or security, are promoted even when they conflict with the broader interests of the Muslim world.

This misuse of national interest has had catastrophic consequences. Gaza and other oppressed communities have been left to suffer and die while governments defended their actions as “national interest.” Pakistan’s repeated involvement in U.S.-led conflicts, including interventions in Afghanistan and indirect alignment against Iran, has destabilized the region. Turkey’s economic and military cooperation with Israel and the United States has reinforced Western influence while alienating its own population. These examples show that national interest, when manipulated, serves imperialist agendas and Zionist objectives rather than the welfare of people.

From an Islamic perspective, the misuse of national interest is morally corrosive. Islam teaches that the welfare of the community and adherence to justice and moral law are paramount. Actions that compromise Islamic values, support oppression, or empower aggressors cannot be justified by material gains or political expediency.

🔹enemeywarch

✅ | Among the most significant miscalculations and acts of foolishness by the Israeli command was launching a ground attack against Lebanon without properly calculating the cost. Young, low-ranking soldiers chicks from the Golani Brigade were deployed, and large numbers of Merkava tanks were committed to the operation, resulting not only in battlefield failures but also in the loss of substantial personnel and equipment.

The destruction of 93 tanks alone amounts to more than half a billion dollars ($558 million). Even more devastating, Israel has lost approximately 23% of its total effective elite armored force 400 tanks—in less than a month. This is not mere attrition; entire battalions have effectively been wiped off the military map. The truce Israel is now desperately pursuing is not intended to impose the victor’s terms, but is rather a plea to salvage what remains of their collapsing army in the quagmire of the South.

In the end, the decision to launch a ground invasion of Lebanon will remain one of the greatest mistakes by the Israeli occupation forces, inflicting severe damage on their own infrastructure, eroding the effectiveness of the IOF, and leaving their military in ruins.

Death to the IOF!

🔻@enemywatch

+

From Khiam to Kharg, and from Naqoura to Abu Musa, whether Israel or America, the Party of Khomeini (r) will strike relentlessly, will rub their noses in defeat until they lose their very bones.

🔹@enemywatch

—Taking into account that the minor injuries reported by Israel are deaths, in reality, all the destroyed Merkava tanks represent massive casualties, which they conceal as if these tanks were unmanned or remotely controlled. If you are a powerful army fighting for your land, honor the dead as martyrs and acknowledge their sacrifice, rats!

🔻@enemywatch