✅ | The core and covert talks related between Trump and Netanyahu represent another kind of oppression against Iran. The use of military and diplomacy at the same time seems like an attempt to pressure Iran to accept something, 20 bombs here, then another 20 bombs there. This is what they are discussing and coordinating with their officials.
Iran, in return, first and foremost as part of its Islamic duties, is performing a sensible role in the current scenario. It does not want the talks to be sabotaged and will not be changed under pressure or involvement of Israeli infiltration, neither in Muscat nor in Doha. Iran wants bold and genuine guarantors and partners to carry out the talks in the coming weeks if America truly wants to pursue negotiations.
Iran knows that a major outbreak of this war would directly affect Oman and Qatar, and that is not what Iran wants. For Iran, the stability of all its neighboring countries is a priority, as any fall will also bring threats near its borders. Their stability is needed on both material and moral grounds.
Gulf states are somehow recognizing the real threat posed by Trump’s recklessness, and any trigger against Iran would impact their stability and directly affect their economies. That is why they prefer to engage with the Iranian chair, Dr. Ali Larijani, who is not only the Secretary of the Security Council but also a close associate and advisor to Imam Khamenei directly.
Overall, if the American and Israeli “hammer per signature” approach is implemented, it is all they want to carry out the major issue, which they are not discussing in any of its corners. They do not calculate what would happen in retaliation. Somehow, it feels that it is not Iran but America that is stuck here.
The Jewish pressure over America wants Trump to bomb Iran, but American planners calculate that the cost is not only heavier, it may trigger a major domino effect. If it happens, the response from Iran, which has set strict limits, will turn any pre-fabricated or limited aggression into a war-like response, which has somehow trapped America and Israel. Because they are securing one-sided scenarios based on what they could do, they are failing to understand that the retaliation will not be less than the impact of a nuclear response.
Anyways, half or more of the ongoing issues are unknown to the public and even to secondary level-officials. Even if it go wrong in the future, it can be speculated: what if America accepts Iran returning to the 2015 commitments on nuclear files in exchange for relief from economic sanctions, which is somehow connected to Dr. Larijani’s talks with the Sultan of Oman and the Emir of Qatar? For opening trade zone etc.?Maybe yes, maybe no. Time will tell.
Anyway, trusting Americans and Israelis is a major sign of mental weakness and genetic mutation, which is why if they want to talk under a “signature under hammer” approach, then you also have to keep a trigger ready while dealing with them.
🔹@enemywatch
Iran, in return, first and foremost as part of its Islamic duties, is performing a sensible role in the current scenario. It does not want the talks to be sabotaged and will not be changed under pressure or involvement of Israeli infiltration, neither in Muscat nor in Doha. Iran wants bold and genuine guarantors and partners to carry out the talks in the coming weeks if America truly wants to pursue negotiations.
Iran knows that a major outbreak of this war would directly affect Oman and Qatar, and that is not what Iran wants. For Iran, the stability of all its neighboring countries is a priority, as any fall will also bring threats near its borders. Their stability is needed on both material and moral grounds.
Gulf states are somehow recognizing the real threat posed by Trump’s recklessness, and any trigger against Iran would impact their stability and directly affect their economies. That is why they prefer to engage with the Iranian chair, Dr. Ali Larijani, who is not only the Secretary of the Security Council but also a close associate and advisor to Imam Khamenei directly.
Overall, if the American and Israeli “hammer per signature” approach is implemented, it is all they want to carry out the major issue, which they are not discussing in any of its corners. They do not calculate what would happen in retaliation. Somehow, it feels that it is not Iran but America that is stuck here.
The Jewish pressure over America wants Trump to bomb Iran, but American planners calculate that the cost is not only heavier, it may trigger a major domino effect. If it happens, the response from Iran, which has set strict limits, will turn any pre-fabricated or limited aggression into a war-like response, which has somehow trapped America and Israel. Because they are securing one-sided scenarios based on what they could do, they are failing to understand that the retaliation will not be less than the impact of a nuclear response.
Anyways, half or more of the ongoing issues are unknown to the public and even to secondary level-officials. Even if it go wrong in the future, it can be speculated: what if America accepts Iran returning to the 2015 commitments on nuclear files in exchange for relief from economic sanctions, which is somehow connected to Dr. Larijani’s talks with the Sultan of Oman and the Emir of Qatar? For opening trade zone etc.?Maybe yes, maybe no. Time will tell.
Anyway, trusting Americans and Israelis is a major sign of mental weakness and genetic mutation, which is why if they want to talk under a “signature under hammer” approach, then you also have to keep a trigger ready while dealing with them.
🔹@enemywatch
💯24😱7❤3😨2🔥1
🇮🇷 Breaking — Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Dr. Ali Larijani concludes his historical and highly sensitive trip to Muscat and Doha and returns to Tehran.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤60👍10🔥7
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷 | Iranian media have released a video threatening to strike Muwaffaq al-Salti Air Base in Jordan in the event of a war.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤74🔥16👏10💔2
Forwarded from Vanessa Beeley
This is a dumb personal argument used to detract from the reality that the considered alternative to US imperialism did nothing concrete to end the genocide in Gaza, couldn't even raise an economic boycott of a genocidal squatter cult, in fact it contributes to keeping Israel afloat, as does Russia. I have no issue with China being China. What I have an issue with is people projecting their own ideological identity onto a country that will never meet such lofty expectations. China will talk the good talk, but, ultimately, China will let Cuba be blockaded, energy-starved and ground down by US Imperialism and Zionist expansionism. If you can't handle opposing views from someone who actually lives in a region that is being systematically destroyed with zero prevention measures being imposed or enforced by the nations who claim to uphold international law blah blah, without making it personal, I have to ask what hope is there for any "revolution" you claim to lead? Come here and ask people if they feel any solidarity from China while their children are ground to dust every day by Zionist drone strikes. It's depressing that your priority is to defend the powerful not doing enough rather than demand that those with power use it to defend the weakest and most deeply exploited and betrayed in the world today.
https://x.com/i/status/2021714705983975897
https://x.com/i/status/2021714705983975897
X (formerly Twitter)
Vanessa Beeley (@VanessaBeeley) on X
@Rango1917 @CPGBML @SocialRightsIRL This is a dumb personal argument used to detract from the reality that the considered alternative to US imperialism did nothing concrete to end the genocide in Gaza, couldn't even raise an economic boycott of a genocidal…
💯31👍1🤯1
🇮🇷: 🇳🇬 | Islamic Awakening in Nigeria: The Movement of Sayyid Shaykh Ibrahim Zakzaky (H):
With the wave of the Islamic Revolution of Iran–1979, one of the most prominent movements to emerge in Africa was the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) under the leadership of Sayyid Shaykh Ibrahim Zakzaky. Sayyid Zakzaky, who had been active in student Islamic activism since the 1970s at Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, was deeply influenced by the success of Imam Khomeini’s revolution in Iran and sought to promote similar ideals of Islamic governance, social justice, and resistance to oppression within Nigeria.
The Islamic Movement in Nigeria gradually developed into a mass grassroots organization, establishing schools, seminaries, health initiatives, and social welfare networks across northern Nigeria. The movement emphasized education, moral discipline, peaceful processions, and religious awareness, particularly among marginalized communities. Over the decades, it became one of the largest Islamic movements in sub-Saharan Africa.
The focus was not to copy Iran but on awakening people against foreign interference and the destruction of the Nigerian nation, and to expose the enemy’s influence exploiting various weaknesses in society. Nigerians themselves have called for unity and resistance against Western interference to protect their sovereignty and national dignity.
However, the movement faced repeated confrontations with Mossad-CIA backed-Nigerian authorities. Tensions escalated over the years, culminating in the December 2015 Zaria incident, when clashes between IMN members and the Nigerian Army led to a large-scale military crackdown. More than one thousand of IMN members were killed during the operation. Shaykh Zakzaky and his wife were arrested in December 2015 and remained in detention for several years despite court rulings calling for their release. They were eventually acquitted and released in July 2021.
Despite repression, arrests, and bans on activities in certain regions, the Islamic Movement in Nigeria has continued to organize religious gatherings, Ashura commemorations, and social programs. The movement remains active, sustained by its followers and shaped by the legacy of those who were killed during periods of unrest.
The Islamic awakening movement in Nigeria stands as one of the most visible examples of the transnational influence of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, adapting its themes of resistance, social justice, and religious revival to the Nigeria.
#IR47
🔹@enemywatch
With the wave of the Islamic Revolution of Iran–1979, one of the most prominent movements to emerge in Africa was the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) under the leadership of Sayyid Shaykh Ibrahim Zakzaky. Sayyid Zakzaky, who had been active in student Islamic activism since the 1970s at Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria, was deeply influenced by the success of Imam Khomeini’s revolution in Iran and sought to promote similar ideals of Islamic governance, social justice, and resistance to oppression within Nigeria.
The Islamic Movement in Nigeria gradually developed into a mass grassroots organization, establishing schools, seminaries, health initiatives, and social welfare networks across northern Nigeria. The movement emphasized education, moral discipline, peaceful processions, and religious awareness, particularly among marginalized communities. Over the decades, it became one of the largest Islamic movements in sub-Saharan Africa.
The focus was not to copy Iran but on awakening people against foreign interference and the destruction of the Nigerian nation, and to expose the enemy’s influence exploiting various weaknesses in society. Nigerians themselves have called for unity and resistance against Western interference to protect their sovereignty and national dignity.
However, the movement faced repeated confrontations with Mossad-CIA backed-Nigerian authorities. Tensions escalated over the years, culminating in the December 2015 Zaria incident, when clashes between IMN members and the Nigerian Army led to a large-scale military crackdown. More than one thousand of IMN members were killed during the operation. Shaykh Zakzaky and his wife were arrested in December 2015 and remained in detention for several years despite court rulings calling for their release. They were eventually acquitted and released in July 2021.
Despite repression, arrests, and bans on activities in certain regions, the Islamic Movement in Nigeria has continued to organize religious gatherings, Ashura commemorations, and social programs. The movement remains active, sustained by its followers and shaped by the legacy of those who were killed during periods of unrest.
The Islamic awakening movement in Nigeria stands as one of the most visible examples of the transnational influence of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, adapting its themes of resistance, social justice, and religious revival to the Nigeria.
#IR47
🔹@enemywatch
❤63😨1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇾🇪 | The representative of Ansar Allah Yemen:
The enthusiastic presence of people in Iran during the 22 Bahman march is a pressure card against Israel and shows that the people of Iran stand with their leader. We also held a magnificent march in Yemen today to show our solidarity with Iran.
🔹@enemywatch
The enthusiastic presence of people in Iran during the 22 Bahman march is a pressure card against Israel and shows that the people of Iran stand with their leader. We also held a magnificent march in Yemen today to show our solidarity with Iran.
🔹@enemywatch
❤53🫡5
🇵🇰 | Karachi (Pakistan) rally expresses support for Iran’s Islamic Revolution:
A public rally was held in Karachi, Pakistan, in support of Iran and the Islamic Revolution, where participants renewed allegiance to the ideals of Imam Khomeini and Imam Ali Khamenei.
🔹@enemywatch
A public rally was held in Karachi, Pakistan, in support of Iran and the Islamic Revolution, where participants renewed allegiance to the ideals of Imam Khomeini and Imam Ali Khamenei.
🔹@enemywatch
❤48