✅ | Regarding the ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran, there are multiple layers that must be understood beyond surface-level media narratives. What is currently being promoted in the media is a deliberate military buildup around Iran aimed at coercion, not diplomacy. This buildup on land, airspace, and surrounding waters is designed to threaten Iran with a large-scale attack in order to force negotiations under pressure rather than mutual consent.

During this phase, the Iranian Foreign Minister traveled to Turkey to consult on the developing situation, meeting Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, followed by joint press conferences. Earlier speculation questioned whether Turkey itself or the United States initiated the negotiation push. It is now clear that the request originated from Washington, while regional states such as Oman, Qatar, and Turkey acted as facilitators urging Iran to engage in order to prevent escalation.

In this context, Qatar’s Foreign Minister made an overnight visit to Tehran and returned with a message from American officials addressed to Imam Khamenei. At the same time, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary, Dr. Ali Larijani, traveled to Moscow carrying a letter from Imam Khamenei to President Vladimir Putin. According to informed sources, the message conveyed that Iran is prepared to return to its 2015 nuclear commitments if its demands are met and guarantees are secured.

As a parallel signal, the US aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln withdrew beyond a 1,400 km operational radius, indicating a calculated de-escalation meant to preserve leverage rather than initiate immediate confrontation.

Turkey was initially proposed as a negotiation venue largely at American insistence. Iran, recognizing Turkey’s NATO alignment and limitations, requested a change of venue toward Oman or Qatar, states traditionally viewed by Tehran as more neutral intermediaries. This confirms that the United States relied on multiple intermediaries to reach Iran indirectly.

Reports indicate that Qatar offered financial incentives, including the release of frozen Iranian assets, demonstrating that the maximum-pressure strategy has failed to deliver results.

President Masoud Pezeshkian later confirmed that he instructed the Foreign Minister to proceed with negotiations. This confirms that the current government views talks as a tactical tool to reduce pressure, not a strategic dependency.

The key question remains the stance of Imam Khamenei. No official statement confirms that the Leader has authorized or endorsed these negotiations. Since the post–12 June war environment, he has repeatedly stated that negotiations under pressure weaken deterrence and invite further aggression. His silence during this phase is therefore significant and strategic.

What is clear, however, is that the Leader is actively overseeing military readiness and preparedness. Unlike earlier negotiation phases, vulnerabilities exploited during past Oman talks no longer exist. Iran’s armed forces and security institutions have prepared multiple counter-scenarios for any betrayal or surprise attack during negotiations.

It is firmly established that negotiations are restricted strictly to the nuclear file. Israeli demands for zero enrichment, missile reductions, and abandonment of regional allies are not on the table and have been categorically rejected.

The possibility of returning to the 2015 framework appears credible. Ali Shamkhani publicly referenced this in a recent Al-Mayadeen interview, reinforcing internal consistency in Iran’s messaging.

Some reports suggest that Imam Khamenei demanded a reduction of American military presence in the region in exchange for limiting, not eliminating, nuclear activity. This reflects Iran’s insistence on reciprocal security guarantees.

Most importantly, Iran is not dependent on the outcome of these negotiations.

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

Officials indicate a state of 200 percent preparedness, allowing Iran to deliver a decisive response in the first phase of any aggression.

Finally, it must be understood that much of the current discourse is part of an organized psychological and media campaign. Some reports are accurate, while others are exaggerated or speculative, designed to shape perceptions and influence negotiations. Time will determine the outcome, but it is already clear that portraying Iran as weakened, whether through diplomacy or war, contradicts the strategic posture set by the Leader.

So—

The current negotiation phase must also be viewed through the lens of past precedent and structural realities, particularly the 2018 US withdrawal from the JCPOA despite verified Iranian compliance, which explains Tehran’s insistence on guarantees and validates Imam Khamenei’s long-standing skepticism toward coercive diplomacy; legally, Iran continues to assert its rights under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the international system ignores Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal, exposing a persistent double standard that shapes Iranian threat perceptions; internally, decision-making in Iran follows a defined structure in which the elected government manages diplomatic engagement, the Supreme National Security Council coordinates security policy, and the Leader sets immutable red lines rather than day-to-day tactics, making his public silence analytically significant rather than ambiguous; militarily, Iran’s deterrence posture has evolved into a multi-domain framework encompassing land, sea, air, cyber, and asymmetric responses, designed not for first use but for immediate and overwhelming retaliation in the event of betrayal; regionally, Oman, Qatar, and Turkey are driven not only by mediation roles but by fears of escalation that could destabilize energy markets, shipping lanes, and internal security, which explains the urgency behind their involvement; simultaneously, an information-warfare environment surrounds the talks, where selective leaks, think-tank narratives, and anonymous briefings are used to shape perceptions and influence leverage, requiring careful separation of signal from noise; ultimately, the trajectory points toward three plausible outcomes, a limited nuclear understanding backed by guarantees, a negotiation collapse followed by controlled escalation, or a prolonged stalemate managed through indirect pressure, none of which imply Iranian strategic dependence on talks, but rather reinforce a posture where diplomacy operates alongside sustained deterrence rather than replacing it.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 | The Iranian "Nour News" website, which has close ties with Ali Shamkhani advisor to Imam Khamenei reports that special structural and administrative decisions have been adopted within the Iranian defense sector, and will be announced soon. This comes in response to recent threats.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | When you know, all know the solution is only battle. There is no escape in stretching the elastic and putting tables and chairs over it to talk this and that. We expect the ongoing talks are pre-war discussions instead of submission.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | Iran wants to talk only about nuclear files and may offer to return to previous commitments of the nuclear deal in return for the removal of sanctions, and then first reduce, then remove its military presence from the neighboring countries of Iran, with guarantees from Qatar, Oman, Turkey, and possibly Pakistan. However, this is only in the case when the two parties dispute these files. But America wants to destroy Iran. So all these things are just time-earning and time-wasting until or unless America understands that a battle with Iran will be very huge and even irreparable for it. Any military action against Iran would not be limited to conventional war. Any miscalculation could provoke responses far beyond what America anticipates, involving resistance axes' response and disruption of maritime trade routes in the Persian Gulf. Al-Mayadeen confirms that, according to informed sources, indirect talks between Tehran and Washington on the nuclear file will be held on Friday in Muscat, Oman. The report added that while Iran appreciates the efforts of regional mediators, it wishes to reduce the number of countries participating in the talks to facilitate a more focused and productive negotiation process.

🔹@enemywatch

❎ | Some foreign Pahlavi brainrots posted a picture of the martyr, defender of the holy shrine of Sayyidah Zaynab (S), Martyr Babak Nouri (r), claiming he was killed by Iranian security forces in recent riots. Yeah, poor things—they think all these mullah supporters look like medieval men… so they found his picture and posted it.

🔹@enemywatch

🇾🇪 | Yemeni Leader Abdulmalik Badreddin Al-Houthi offers condolences on the death of Mr. Abdul-Karim Nasrallah (r), the father of the martyr of Islam and humanity Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah (r):

The departure of Mr. Abdul-Karim came after a life filled with piety and righteousness, and after building a family that gave rise to the martyr of Islam and humanity, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, with what Allah achieved through his hands for Islam in terms of goodness, victories, and achievements. We extend our sincerest condolences and most heartfelt sympathy to the family of Sayyid Nasrallah, his dear relatives, to the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qassim, and to all members of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement.

🔹@enemywatch

—Why so—is there any preparation for prefabricated attacks and limited strikes going to release Jewish pressure over Trump?

🇮🇷 | Discovery of a 14-ton shipment of equipment usable in riots:

West Azerbaijan Province Information Department: With the efforts of the anonymous soldiers of Imam Zaman (AJ) in West Azerbaijan Province, a 14-ton shipment of various professional cold weapons and items usable in riots was discovered and seized while entering Iran.

The discovered shipment includes various high-voltage stun guns, telescopic batons, dangerous daggers, special knives for fighting and killing in one strike, and weapon accessories such as lasers (with terrorist applications for accurate shooting), in about 300 well packed packages.

Some of the discovered cold weapons had been skillfully made in the form of ordinary items and tools, such as flashlights, remote controls, and cosmetics. One of the detainees is a foreign national.

#MossadHunt

🔹@enemywatch

+

✅ | Iran is saying that in the talks, only the nuclear issue will be the subject of negotiation. America is saying that it wants to add and discuss ballistic missiles and reduce their range so they do not reach israel. At this moment, the main question is what is going to happen to the negotiations when the starting lines themselves are disputed, with other reasons and methods in conflict.

🔹@enemywatch

—The great custodian of the holy Kaaba and the Mosque of Medina cheering with the rapists of hundreds of children? Wow—what a moment for the Salafis and Madkhalis. Is it maslihah? Everything is maslihah? Come on, spit them out from your lives. Otherwise, your fate is to be a nail-chewer of “Baal.”

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 | Contrary to reports, the second Iranian UAV was not shot down by US aggressor forces. There has only been one confirmed Iranian drone shot down. The other Iranian UAV remained operational for several hours, appearing intermittently on radar, reaching the carrier’s location before returning to Iranian territory.

🔹@enemywatch

–Talks collapse [yet to confirm]. God is with Iran. God save Iran.

🔹@enemywatch