🏴☠️ | Former emir of Idlib appointed internal security chief in Hasakah:
Julani's media announced the appointment of Marwan al-Ali as commander of the so-called “Internal Security” in Hasakah Governorate, which is under the control of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Terrorist Marwan al-Ali, also known as “Abu Muhjin al-Hasakawi,” previously served as the security emir of Idlib and worked as an interrogator at the notorious al-Uqap (العقاب) prison, where he is accused of committing numerous crimes and atrocities, including brutal acts of torture.
🔹@enemywatch
Julani's media announced the appointment of Marwan al-Ali as commander of the so-called “Internal Security” in Hasakah Governorate, which is under the control of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Terrorist Marwan al-Ali, also known as “Abu Muhjin al-Hasakawi,” previously served as the security emir of Idlib and worked as an interrogator at the notorious al-Uqap (العقاب) prison, where he is accused of committing numerous crimes and atrocities, including brutal acts of torture.
🔹@enemywatch
🤬23❤2✍2🤯1
🏴☠️ | Four Kurdish women killed in areas under the control of the Julani's regime:
The killing of women and children has increasingly become a deliberate pattern under HTS terrorist rule. In Afrin, on January 29, two gunmen riding a motorcycle opened fire on a vehicle carrying three Kurdish women on the Aleppo–Afrin road near the Bayanoun junction, killing all of them. The victims were identified as Rania Haji Hassan, Izza Firas Haji Hassan, and Fatima Batayhi. In a separate incident, the body of another Kurdish woman was found in agricultural land near the village of Kafardela (Keferdelê) in the Afrin countryside. She had been shot in the head.
🔹@enemywatch
The killing of women and children has increasingly become a deliberate pattern under HTS terrorist rule. In Afrin, on January 29, two gunmen riding a motorcycle opened fire on a vehicle carrying three Kurdish women on the Aleppo–Afrin road near the Bayanoun junction, killing all of them. The victims were identified as Rania Haji Hassan, Izza Firas Haji Hassan, and Fatima Batayhi. In a separate incident, the body of another Kurdish woman was found in agricultural land near the village of Kafardela (Keferdelê) in the Afrin countryside. She had been shot in the head.
🔹@enemywatch
😭26🤬8🤯1
🏴☠️ | A widely circulated video shows HTS terrorists assaulting and abusing an Alawite man at an unidentified location. In the footage, the victim can be heard saying, “I swear to God I didn’t do anything,” speaking in an Alawite coastal Syrian accent. The person filming speaks with a Sunni Homs accent, while one of the attackers, wearing military-style trousers, speaks with an Idlib accent. The assailants demand that the man unlock his phone, mock him sarcastically by saying, “You want to work in factories,” and insult him by calling his sect “pigs,” using the term in the plural to target his sectarian identity. They also state that his neck is “meant to be slapped,” while continuing the abuse.
It is noteworthy that numerous cases have been reported of Alawites being kidnapped while traveling to factory jobs in Aleppo, particularly after many lost their employment following directives by Julani to dismiss thousands of Alawites from public-sector positions. Most of these abductions have occurred along the international highway near Homs. A previous video also showed a group of Alawites being held by kidnappers in Homs after being abducted while traveling from Damascus to Aleppo for factory work.
🔹@enemywatch
It is noteworthy that numerous cases have been reported of Alawites being kidnapped while traveling to factory jobs in Aleppo, particularly after many lost their employment following directives by Julani to dismiss thousands of Alawites from public-sector positions. Most of these abductions have occurred along the international highway near Homs. A previous video also showed a group of Alawites being held by kidnappers in Homs after being abducted while traveling from Damascus to Aleppo for factory work.
🔹@enemywatch
🤬27😭4❤1🤯1
🏴 | Four Alawite civilians were killed and a fifth was wounded in a sectarian terrorist attack carried out by HTS terrorists, who targeted a taxi near the entrance of Al-Kindi Hospital in the Al-Ghouta area of Homs. Those killed were Dhul-Fiqar Zahir, a physician; Lial Faisal Salloum, an engineer; Alaa Mohammad Wnous, a nurse; and Mazen Al-Asmar, a nurse. The injured victim, Osama Diab, an administrative accountant, was wounded and is currently receiving treatment. Evidence indicates the attack was premeditated and deliberate, not a random act. The hospital is located in a predominantly Sunni area, and most of its staff are Sunni; the victims, all Alawites, were the only Alawite employees and used the same taxi daily to return home. Reports indicate that HTS terrorists lay in wait at the hospital entrance, and that the sole motive for the attack was the victims’ Alawite identity.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬25😭6❤1🤯1😡1
✅ | Regarding the ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran, there are multiple layers that must be understood beyond surface-level media narratives. What is currently being promoted in the media is a deliberate military buildup around Iran aimed at coercion, not diplomacy. This buildup on land, airspace, and surrounding waters is designed to threaten Iran with a large-scale attack in order to force negotiations under pressure rather than mutual consent.
During this phase, the Iranian Foreign Minister traveled to Turkey to consult on the developing situation, meeting Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, followed by joint press conferences. Earlier speculation questioned whether Turkey itself or the United States initiated the negotiation push. It is now clear that the request originated from Washington, while regional states such as Oman, Qatar, and Turkey acted as facilitators urging Iran to engage in order to prevent escalation.
In this context, Qatar’s Foreign Minister made an overnight visit to Tehran and returned with a message from American officials addressed to Imam Khamenei. At the same time, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary, Dr. Ali Larijani, traveled to Moscow carrying a letter from Imam Khamenei to President Vladimir Putin. According to informed sources, the message conveyed that Iran is prepared to return to its 2015 nuclear commitments if its demands are met and guarantees are secured.
As a parallel signal, the US aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln withdrew beyond a 1,400 km operational radius, indicating a calculated de-escalation meant to preserve leverage rather than initiate immediate confrontation.
Turkey was initially proposed as a negotiation venue largely at American insistence. Iran, recognizing Turkey’s NATO alignment and limitations, requested a change of venue toward Oman or Qatar, states traditionally viewed by Tehran as more neutral intermediaries. This confirms that the United States relied on multiple intermediaries to reach Iran indirectly.
Reports indicate that Qatar offered financial incentives, including the release of frozen Iranian assets, demonstrating that the maximum-pressure strategy has failed to deliver results.
President Masoud Pezeshkian later confirmed that he instructed the Foreign Minister to proceed with negotiations. This confirms that the current government views talks as a tactical tool to reduce pressure, not a strategic dependency.
The key question remains the stance of Imam Khamenei. No official statement confirms that the Leader has authorized or endorsed these negotiations. Since the post–12 June war environment, he has repeatedly stated that negotiations under pressure weaken deterrence and invite further aggression. His silence during this phase is therefore significant and strategic.
What is clear, however, is that the Leader is actively overseeing military readiness and preparedness. Unlike earlier negotiation phases, vulnerabilities exploited during past Oman talks no longer exist. Iran’s armed forces and security institutions have prepared multiple counter-scenarios for any betrayal or surprise attack during negotiations.
It is firmly established that negotiations are restricted strictly to the nuclear file. Israeli demands for zero enrichment, missile reductions, and abandonment of regional allies are not on the table and have been categorically rejected.
The possibility of returning to the 2015 framework appears credible. Ali Shamkhani publicly referenced this in a recent Al-Mayadeen interview, reinforcing internal consistency in Iran’s messaging.
Some reports suggest that Imam Khamenei demanded a reduction of American military presence in the region in exchange for limiting, not eliminating, nuclear activity. This reflects Iran’s insistence on reciprocal security guarantees.
Most importantly, Iran is not dependent on the outcome of these negotiations.
🔹@enemywatch
+
During this phase, the Iranian Foreign Minister traveled to Turkey to consult on the developing situation, meeting Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, followed by joint press conferences. Earlier speculation questioned whether Turkey itself or the United States initiated the negotiation push. It is now clear that the request originated from Washington, while regional states such as Oman, Qatar, and Turkey acted as facilitators urging Iran to engage in order to prevent escalation.
In this context, Qatar’s Foreign Minister made an overnight visit to Tehran and returned with a message from American officials addressed to Imam Khamenei. At the same time, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Secretary, Dr. Ali Larijani, traveled to Moscow carrying a letter from Imam Khamenei to President Vladimir Putin. According to informed sources, the message conveyed that Iran is prepared to return to its 2015 nuclear commitments if its demands are met and guarantees are secured.
As a parallel signal, the US aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln withdrew beyond a 1,400 km operational radius, indicating a calculated de-escalation meant to preserve leverage rather than initiate immediate confrontation.
Turkey was initially proposed as a negotiation venue largely at American insistence. Iran, recognizing Turkey’s NATO alignment and limitations, requested a change of venue toward Oman or Qatar, states traditionally viewed by Tehran as more neutral intermediaries. This confirms that the United States relied on multiple intermediaries to reach Iran indirectly.
Reports indicate that Qatar offered financial incentives, including the release of frozen Iranian assets, demonstrating that the maximum-pressure strategy has failed to deliver results.
President Masoud Pezeshkian later confirmed that he instructed the Foreign Minister to proceed with negotiations. This confirms that the current government views talks as a tactical tool to reduce pressure, not a strategic dependency.
The key question remains the stance of Imam Khamenei. No official statement confirms that the Leader has authorized or endorsed these negotiations. Since the post–12 June war environment, he has repeatedly stated that negotiations under pressure weaken deterrence and invite further aggression. His silence during this phase is therefore significant and strategic.
What is clear, however, is that the Leader is actively overseeing military readiness and preparedness. Unlike earlier negotiation phases, vulnerabilities exploited during past Oman talks no longer exist. Iran’s armed forces and security institutions have prepared multiple counter-scenarios for any betrayal or surprise attack during negotiations.
It is firmly established that negotiations are restricted strictly to the nuclear file. Israeli demands for zero enrichment, missile reductions, and abandonment of regional allies are not on the table and have been categorically rejected.
The possibility of returning to the 2015 framework appears credible. Ali Shamkhani publicly referenced this in a recent Al-Mayadeen interview, reinforcing internal consistency in Iran’s messaging.
Some reports suggest that Imam Khamenei demanded a reduction of American military presence in the region in exchange for limiting, not eliminating, nuclear activity. This reflects Iran’s insistence on reciprocal security guarantees.
Most importantly, Iran is not dependent on the outcome of these negotiations.
🔹@enemywatch
+
👍21✍6🤬1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | Regarding the ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran, there are multiple layers that must be understood beyond surface-level media narratives. What is currently being promoted in the media is a deliberate military buildup around Iran aimed…
+
Officials indicate a state of 200 percent preparedness, allowing Iran to deliver a decisive response in the first phase of any aggression.
Finally, it must be understood that much of the current discourse is part of an organized psychological and media campaign. Some reports are accurate, while others are exaggerated or speculative, designed to shape perceptions and influence negotiations. Time will determine the outcome, but it is already clear that portraying Iran as weakened, whether through diplomacy or war, contradicts the strategic posture set by the Leader.
So—
The current negotiation phase must also be viewed through the lens of past precedent and structural realities, particularly the 2018 US withdrawal from the JCPOA despite verified Iranian compliance, which explains Tehran’s insistence on guarantees and validates Imam Khamenei’s long-standing skepticism toward coercive diplomacy; legally, Iran continues to assert its rights under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the international system ignores Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal, exposing a persistent double standard that shapes Iranian threat perceptions; internally, decision-making in Iran follows a defined structure in which the elected government manages diplomatic engagement, the Supreme National Security Council coordinates security policy, and the Leader sets immutable red lines rather than day-to-day tactics, making his public silence analytically significant rather than ambiguous; militarily, Iran’s deterrence posture has evolved into a multi-domain framework encompassing land, sea, air, cyber, and asymmetric responses, designed not for first use but for immediate and overwhelming retaliation in the event of betrayal; regionally, Oman, Qatar, and Turkey are driven not only by mediation roles but by fears of escalation that could destabilize energy markets, shipping lanes, and internal security, which explains the urgency behind their involvement; simultaneously, an information-warfare environment surrounds the talks, where selective leaks, think-tank narratives, and anonymous briefings are used to shape perceptions and influence leverage, requiring careful separation of signal from noise; ultimately, the trajectory points toward three plausible outcomes, a limited nuclear understanding backed by guarantees, a negotiation collapse followed by controlled escalation, or a prolonged stalemate managed through indirect pressure, none of which imply Iranian strategic dependence on talks, but rather reinforce a posture where diplomacy operates alongside sustained deterrence rather than replacing it.
🔹@enemywatch
Officials indicate a state of 200 percent preparedness, allowing Iran to deliver a decisive response in the first phase of any aggression.
Finally, it must be understood that much of the current discourse is part of an organized psychological and media campaign. Some reports are accurate, while others are exaggerated or speculative, designed to shape perceptions and influence negotiations. Time will determine the outcome, but it is already clear that portraying Iran as weakened, whether through diplomacy or war, contradicts the strategic posture set by the Leader.
So—
The current negotiation phase must also be viewed through the lens of past precedent and structural realities, particularly the 2018 US withdrawal from the JCPOA despite verified Iranian compliance, which explains Tehran’s insistence on guarantees and validates Imam Khamenei’s long-standing skepticism toward coercive diplomacy; legally, Iran continues to assert its rights under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while the international system ignores Israel’s undeclared nuclear arsenal, exposing a persistent double standard that shapes Iranian threat perceptions; internally, decision-making in Iran follows a defined structure in which the elected government manages diplomatic engagement, the Supreme National Security Council coordinates security policy, and the Leader sets immutable red lines rather than day-to-day tactics, making his public silence analytically significant rather than ambiguous; militarily, Iran’s deterrence posture has evolved into a multi-domain framework encompassing land, sea, air, cyber, and asymmetric responses, designed not for first use but for immediate and overwhelming retaliation in the event of betrayal; regionally, Oman, Qatar, and Turkey are driven not only by mediation roles but by fears of escalation that could destabilize energy markets, shipping lanes, and internal security, which explains the urgency behind their involvement; simultaneously, an information-warfare environment surrounds the talks, where selective leaks, think-tank narratives, and anonymous briefings are used to shape perceptions and influence leverage, requiring careful separation of signal from noise; ultimately, the trajectory points toward three plausible outcomes, a limited nuclear understanding backed by guarantees, a negotiation collapse followed by controlled escalation, or a prolonged stalemate managed through indirect pressure, none of which imply Iranian strategic dependence on talks, but rather reinforce a posture where diplomacy operates alongside sustained deterrence rather than replacing it.
🔹@enemywatch
👍15❤6🔥2
🇮🇷 | The Iranian "Nour News" website, which has close ties with Ali Shamkhani advisor to Imam Khamenei reports that special structural and administrative decisions have been adopted within the Iranian defense sector, and will be announced soon. This comes in response to recent threats.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🫡29❤6😱1🤝1
🏴☠️ | The video clips, which document acts of torture and humiliation, were found on the mobile phone of an HTS terrorist who directly participated in these inhumane crimes against unarmed and innocent Alawites. The individual was later captured by Asayish forces while fighting Kurdish forces in Aleppo.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬42❤4😭2😡2
Forwarded from Geopolitics Prime | Epstein files updates
Check out more Epstein revelations HERE
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤6👍5✍2🤯1
Middle East Spectator — MES
—❗️🇸🇦/🇮🇷/🇺🇸 NEW: Saudi Arabia has informed Iran that the Kingdom will 'stay neutral' and not respond in case of an Iranian attack on U.S. bases in the Gulf or Saudi Arabia, as long as no Saudis are killed @Middle_East_Spectator
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣40💯3🤬1
✅ | When you know, all know the solution is only battle. There is no escape in stretching the elastic and putting tables and chairs over it to talk this and that. We expect the ongoing talks are pre-war discussions instead of submission.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯42✍2🤬2
✅ | Iran wants to talk only about nuclear files and may offer to return to previous commitments of the nuclear deal in return for the removal of sanctions, and then first reduce, then remove its military presence from the neighboring countries of Iran, with guarantees from Qatar, Oman, Turkey, and possibly Pakistan. However, this is only in the case when the two parties dispute these files. But America wants to destroy Iran. So all these things are just time-earning and time-wasting until or unless America understands that a battle with Iran will be very huge and even irreparable for it. Any military action against Iran would not be limited to conventional war. Any miscalculation could provoke responses far beyond what America anticipates, involving resistance axes' response and disruption of maritime trade routes in the Persian Gulf. Al-Mayadeen confirms that, according to informed sources, indirect talks between Tehran and Washington on the nuclear file will be held on Friday in Muscat, Oman. The report added that while Iran appreciates the efforts of regional mediators, it wishes to reduce the number of countries participating in the talks to facilitate a more focused and productive negotiation process.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯32😡2❤1🤬1
❎ | Some foreign Pahlavi brainrots posted a picture of the martyr, defender of the holy shrine of Sayyidah Zaynab (S), Martyr Babak Nouri (r), claiming he was killed by Iranian security forces in recent riots. Yeah, poor things—they think all these mullah supporters look like medieval men… so they found his picture and posted it.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤣34👍2🤬2
🇾🇪 | Yemeni Leader Abdulmalik Badreddin Al-Houthi offers condolences on the death of Mr. Abdul-Karim Nasrallah (r), the father of the martyr of Islam and humanity Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah (r):
The departure of Mr. Abdul-Karim came after a life filled with piety and righteousness, and after building a family that gave rise to the martyr of Islam and humanity, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, with what Allah achieved through his hands for Islam in terms of goodness, victories, and achievements. We extend our sincerest condolences and most heartfelt sympathy to the family of Sayyid Nasrallah, his dear relatives, to the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qassim, and to all members of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement.
🔹@enemywatch
The departure of Mr. Abdul-Karim came after a life filled with piety and righteousness, and after building a family that gave rise to the martyr of Islam and humanity, Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, with what Allah achieved through his hands for Islam in terms of goodness, victories, and achievements. We extend our sincerest condolences and most heartfelt sympathy to the family of Sayyid Nasrallah, his dear relatives, to the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qassim, and to all members of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement.
🔹@enemywatch
❤37😭4