📕 | George W. Bush said in one of his speeches that ‘you’re either with us or against us!’ This sentence has been repeated several times. This is the evilest manifestation of the arrogant spirit of a power or a government. Who said you have the right to lead the fight against terrorism? If the prerequisite is the number of the victims of terrorism, then look at how many people [outside the U.S.] have been killed by terrorism? Even today, the people of Palestine are being palpably and openly terrorized and murdered in their own homes on a daily basis and at the hands of the usurpers of their homes. Was your attack on Vietnam not terrorism? Was your attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki terrorism? Were the victims of these attacks not killed deliberately, calculatedly and indiscriminately in the fire of your hatred? What right do you have to lead the fight on terrorism? And what right do you have to define terrorism? What arrogance do you have! This is why, when these words are broadcast across the world and the people of the world hear them, they realize why, since day one, the Islamic Revolution has considered “arrogance” and “the arrogant” as negative notions in its terminology and elaborates on them. The people of the world have an understanding of these terms in the terminology of the Islamic Republic.
— Imam Khamenei (H)
🔹@enemywatch
— Imam Khamenei (H)
🔹@enemywatch
❤32💯16💔3
🇱🇧 Breaking — Al-Mayadeen correspondent reports that an Israeli force has advanced in the Al-Kasayer area toward Lebanese territory, near the eastern outskirts of Meiss Al-Jabal in southern Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬28💔6❤3👍1
🏴 | The young engineer Haider Anis Khairbek was killed, and his friend who was with him was injured, after a group of HTS terrorists driving a Hyundai Santa Fe opened fire on them while passing through the village of Ain Shaqaq, Jableh-Syria on the morning of November 4.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💔35🤬9❤4
❤29🙏4✍2🤬1
☑️ | Zohran Mamdani’s mother, Mira Nair, was first married to Mitch Epstein, a well-known Jewish photographer and a Zionist propaganda artist whose work often reflects on holocaust propaganda. Epstein, who comes from a Jewish background, explored the propaganda for Holocaust through his Berlin series of photographs (c. 2008). In this series, he photographed sites such as the Sachsenhausen concentration camp and the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, juxtaposing these spaces of historical torment with the modern urban landscape of Berlin.
Meanwhile, Mira Nair herself has been outspoken on political issues. In 2013, she refused to attend the Haifa International Film Festival in Israel, declaring that she would visit Israel “when the walls come down” and “when the state does not privilege one religion over another.” — they promote two state agenda!
🔹@enemywatch
+
Meanwhile, Mira Nair herself has been outspoken on political issues. In 2013, she refused to attend the Haifa International Film Festival in Israel, declaring that she would visit Israel “when the walls come down” and “when the state does not privilege one religion over another.” — they promote two state agenda!
🔹@enemywatch
+
🤯16👍5🤬3❤1
✅ | Don’t mix the variations of protests with each other. There are several distinct streams opposing Mamdani’s election, and each one arises from a very different ideological base, political agenda, and socioreligious orientation. Understanding these divisions is crucial to see how narratives are being shaped, manipulated, and redirected in the current political atmosphere.
1) The Republican–Israeli targeted opposition:
This stream is composed of Republican and Zionist circles that see Mamdani’s growing popularity as a political threat. His vocal stance in support of Palestine, his strong condemnation of Israeli aggression, and his presence at pro-Palestinian rallies have made him a convenient target for right-wing and pro-Israeli propaganda machines. They accuse him of being anti-Israel, anti-American, and sympathetic to so-called “terrorist narratives,” deliberately twisting his calls for justice into ideological extremism. Their attack lines are predictable — slogans about “illegal immigration,” “cultural collapse,” “Islamification,” and “identity politics.” These are not genuine concerns but rather calculated talking points to shape public perception and silence dissenting voices that challenge America’s foreign policy double standards.
However, beyond their loud rhetoric, there is no real ideological war between these Republican and Israeli lobbies and the broader Democratic structures. Both sides, in essence, operate under the same imperial consensus; supporting interventionism abroad and maintaining the global status quo. The apparent conflict between them is often a theater for domestic consumption, a managed opposition that hides the shared complicity in sustaining America’s imperial ambitions. Mamdani’s treatment in this narrative is less about his politics and more about how the establishment disciplines anyone stepping beyond the accepted boundaries of dissent.
2) The Salafi–Dawah centric cults:
Another front of opposition arises from within certain religious circles that function more like social media echo chambers than meaningful movements. These Salafi-oriented or Dawah-centered groups are theologically rigid, politically docile, and ideologically disconnected from the global Muslim struggle. They rarely criticize American militarism, Israeli occupation, or Western exploitation of Muslim lands. Instead, they focus their energy on policing individual morality and attacking Muslim figures who don’t conform to their narrow definition of piety.
Their criticism of Mamdani is not based on political analysis or justice but on surface-level optics; his attire, his tone, his use of secular platforms, or his interaction with non-Muslim circles. They accuse him of “modernism” or “compromise,” without realizing that their own detachment from real-world injustice makes them complicit in it. Their opposition is reactionary, not revolutionary; often confined to media debates, performative condemnations, and uncoordinated online campaigns. While a few among them may hold genuine concerns about religious authenticity, their inability to engage with power structures or challenge oppression renders them politically irrelevant. They exist as controlled bystanders within the larger imperial narrative.
3) The Resistance stance:
Then there is the third and most critical stream of opposition; the resistance stance. This perspective does not merely critique personalities; it exposes the deeper architecture of American political power, its imperial designs, and the networks of influence that sustain it. From this lens, Mamdani’s election is not an isolated local political event but part of a broader pattern of how certain figures are absorbed into the establishment to project a veneer of diversity and inclusion. The system allows limited “progressive” representation to appear tolerant, while ensuring that no genuine challenge to its foundations ever materializes.
🔹@enemywatch
+
1) The Republican–Israeli targeted opposition:
This stream is composed of Republican and Zionist circles that see Mamdani’s growing popularity as a political threat. His vocal stance in support of Palestine, his strong condemnation of Israeli aggression, and his presence at pro-Palestinian rallies have made him a convenient target for right-wing and pro-Israeli propaganda machines. They accuse him of being anti-Israel, anti-American, and sympathetic to so-called “terrorist narratives,” deliberately twisting his calls for justice into ideological extremism. Their attack lines are predictable — slogans about “illegal immigration,” “cultural collapse,” “Islamification,” and “identity politics.” These are not genuine concerns but rather calculated talking points to shape public perception and silence dissenting voices that challenge America’s foreign policy double standards.
However, beyond their loud rhetoric, there is no real ideological war between these Republican and Israeli lobbies and the broader Democratic structures. Both sides, in essence, operate under the same imperial consensus; supporting interventionism abroad and maintaining the global status quo. The apparent conflict between them is often a theater for domestic consumption, a managed opposition that hides the shared complicity in sustaining America’s imperial ambitions. Mamdani’s treatment in this narrative is less about his politics and more about how the establishment disciplines anyone stepping beyond the accepted boundaries of dissent.
2) The Salafi–Dawah centric cults:
Another front of opposition arises from within certain religious circles that function more like social media echo chambers than meaningful movements. These Salafi-oriented or Dawah-centered groups are theologically rigid, politically docile, and ideologically disconnected from the global Muslim struggle. They rarely criticize American militarism, Israeli occupation, or Western exploitation of Muslim lands. Instead, they focus their energy on policing individual morality and attacking Muslim figures who don’t conform to their narrow definition of piety.
Their criticism of Mamdani is not based on political analysis or justice but on surface-level optics; his attire, his tone, his use of secular platforms, or his interaction with non-Muslim circles. They accuse him of “modernism” or “compromise,” without realizing that their own detachment from real-world injustice makes them complicit in it. Their opposition is reactionary, not revolutionary; often confined to media debates, performative condemnations, and uncoordinated online campaigns. While a few among them may hold genuine concerns about religious authenticity, their inability to engage with power structures or challenge oppression renders them politically irrelevant. They exist as controlled bystanders within the larger imperial narrative.
3) The Resistance stance:
Then there is the third and most critical stream of opposition; the resistance stance. This perspective does not merely critique personalities; it exposes the deeper architecture of American political power, its imperial designs, and the networks of influence that sustain it. From this lens, Mamdani’s election is not an isolated local political event but part of a broader pattern of how certain figures are absorbed into the establishment to project a veneer of diversity and inclusion. The system allows limited “progressive” representation to appear tolerant, while ensuring that no genuine challenge to its foundations ever materializes.
🔹@enemywatch
+
💯28❤4👍1🤝1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | Don’t mix the variations of protests with each other. There are several distinct streams opposing Mamdani’s election, and each one arises from a very different ideological base, political agenda, and socioreligious orientation. Understanding these divisions…
+
The resistance position identifies soft Zionism, hybrid Zionism, and controlled opposition as the tools through which the establishment neutralizes authentic movements. Mamdani, while intelligent and articulate, operates within the framework of the Democratic Party, a party historically responsible for wars, sanctions, and political hypocrisy across the Muslim world. His progressive image does not erase the party’s complicity in Palestinian suffering, Syrian destruction, Massacre in Lebanon or Yemeni tragedy. Hence, while his words may resonate with moral outrage, the structures he aligns with remain part of the same machinery of oppression.
From this standpoint, we acknowledge Mamdani’s efforts in addressing local social issues, but we reject his glorification as an Islamic resistance figure. His activism may serve limited social justice goals, but it does not and cannot represent the ideological resistance against imperialism and Zionism. The real resistance must remain independent of party politics, rooted in consciousness, unity, and ideological clarity. We can find temporary convergence with Mamdani on certain issues, but not ideological alignment. Time will reveal whether his path leads to genuine transformation or gradual assimilation into the establishment he critiques.
At this stage, clarity is essential. Do not conflate these distinct forms of opposition. Each operates within its own world; the Republican-Israeli bloc with its imperial-genocidal politics, the Salafi-Dawah cults with their moral absolutism, and the resistance movement with its revolutionary critique of power. Understanding the differences prevents us from falling into false binaries or emotional confusion.
🔹@enemywatch
The resistance position identifies soft Zionism, hybrid Zionism, and controlled opposition as the tools through which the establishment neutralizes authentic movements. Mamdani, while intelligent and articulate, operates within the framework of the Democratic Party, a party historically responsible for wars, sanctions, and political hypocrisy across the Muslim world. His progressive image does not erase the party’s complicity in Palestinian suffering, Syrian destruction, Massacre in Lebanon or Yemeni tragedy. Hence, while his words may resonate with moral outrage, the structures he aligns with remain part of the same machinery of oppression.
From this standpoint, we acknowledge Mamdani’s efforts in addressing local social issues, but we reject his glorification as an Islamic resistance figure. His activism may serve limited social justice goals, but it does not and cannot represent the ideological resistance against imperialism and Zionism. The real resistance must remain independent of party politics, rooted in consciousness, unity, and ideological clarity. We can find temporary convergence with Mamdani on certain issues, but not ideological alignment. Time will reveal whether his path leads to genuine transformation or gradual assimilation into the establishment he critiques.
At this stage, clarity is essential. Do not conflate these distinct forms of opposition. Each operates within its own world; the Republican-Israeli bloc with its imperial-genocidal politics, the Salafi-Dawah cults with their moral absolutism, and the resistance movement with its revolutionary critique of power. Understanding the differences prevents us from falling into false binaries or emotional confusion.
🔹@enemywatch
❤24👍2
🇮🇷 | Iranian newspaper Farhikhtegan: “Don’t get excited about Mamdani’s victory; he is a product of Obama’s and the Democratic Party’s support.”
Mamdani’s victory in New York is not a sign of structural change in America. He rose to power with the backing of Obama and the Democratic Party, and this event should not be interpreted emotionally or seen as a political transformation.
🔹@enemywatch
Mamdani’s victory in New York is not a sign of structural change in America. He rose to power with the backing of Obama and the Democratic Party, and this event should not be interpreted emotionally or seen as a political transformation.
🔹@enemywatch
💯44👍4
🟡 Breaking — In a short while, an open letter from Hezbollah will be addressed to the three chairs and to the Lebanese people.
Stay tuned!
🔹@enemywatch
+
Stay tuned!
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤26👍2
Enemy Watch — Official
🟡 Breaking — In a short while, an open letter from Hezbollah will be addressed to the three chairs and to the Lebanese people. Stay tuned! 🔹@enemywatch +
🟨 | Hezbollah’s Open Letter to Lebanon’s President, Prime Minister, Parliament Speaker and its people: [1/2]
In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful
To His Excellency the President of the Lebanese Republic, General Michel Aoun, respected,
To the Speaker of the Lebanese Parliament, Mr. Nabih Berri, respected,
To the Prime Minister of Lebanon, Mr. Nawaf Salam, respected,
To the proud people of Lebanon,
Greetings,
Out of Hezbollah’s commitment to national understanding, the protection of sovereignty, and the preservation of security and stability in Lebanon, and in order to support and strengthen a unified Lebanese stance against Zionist aggression and its ongoing violations and breaches of the ceasefire declaration reached through the efforts of the US envoy Hanke Stein following indirect negotiations between the State of Lebanon and the Zionist entity, and in order to block attempts to drag the Lebanese state into new rounds of negotiations that serve only the goals and interests of the Zionist enemy and the forces hostile to justice and rights, we express to you, honorable presidents, and through you to our dear people in Lebanon, our vision regarding the situation and the national position we are committed to and regard as the effective means to safeguard Lebanon’s interests at this critical time for our region and the world.
The ceasefire declaration of 27/11/2024, which was agreed to halt the Zionist aggression against Lebanon, constituted, according to the parties to the agreement, an operational mechanism for United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 (2006). That resolution defined the area of operations exclusively south of the Litani River and stipulated the removal of weapons and fighters from that area and the withdrawal of the Israeli enemy behind the Blue Line.
While the preamble of the declaration noted that its provisions are steps toward implementing Resolution 1701, the first clause of this declaration stated:
• Israel and Lebanon will implement a cessation of hostilities starting at 04:00 on Wednesday 27/11/2024 in accordance with the obligations detailed below.
The second clause of the declaration stated:
• From 04:00 on Wednesday 27/11/2024 onward, the Lebanese government will prevent Hezbollah and all other armed groups in Lebanese territory from conducting any operations against Israel, and Israel will not carry out any offensive military operations against Lebanese territory, including civilian or military targets, or other state-related targets, by land, air, or sea.
The clauses continued up to clause number 13.
Although Lebanon and Hezbollah have strictly adhered to the content of the ceasefire declaration since its issuance, the Zionist enemy has continued its violations by land, sea, and air, ignoring all calls to cease those hostile practices. Instead, the enemy has blackmailed Lebanon, imposed conditions and demands, and insisted on completing its project aimed at subjugating Lebanon, humiliating its state, people, and army, and luring it into a political agreement that would extract Lebanese concessions to the enemy’s interests in our country and region, as well as recognition of its illegitimate occupation of Palestine.
Although the government’s hasty decision regarding the monopoly of arms was presented by some as a gesture of goodwill, the enemy exploited this governmental mistake to impose the disarmament of the resistance across Lebanon as a condition for halting hostilities: a condition not stipulated in the ceasefire declaration and one that cannot be accepted or imposed.
🟡 @enemywatch
+
In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful
To His Excellency the President of the Lebanese Republic, General Michel Aoun, respected,
To the Speaker of the Lebanese Parliament, Mr. Nabih Berri, respected,
To the Prime Minister of Lebanon, Mr. Nawaf Salam, respected,
To the proud people of Lebanon,
Greetings,
Out of Hezbollah’s commitment to national understanding, the protection of sovereignty, and the preservation of security and stability in Lebanon, and in order to support and strengthen a unified Lebanese stance against Zionist aggression and its ongoing violations and breaches of the ceasefire declaration reached through the efforts of the US envoy Hanke Stein following indirect negotiations between the State of Lebanon and the Zionist entity, and in order to block attempts to drag the Lebanese state into new rounds of negotiations that serve only the goals and interests of the Zionist enemy and the forces hostile to justice and rights, we express to you, honorable presidents, and through you to our dear people in Lebanon, our vision regarding the situation and the national position we are committed to and regard as the effective means to safeguard Lebanon’s interests at this critical time for our region and the world.
The ceasefire declaration of 27/11/2024, which was agreed to halt the Zionist aggression against Lebanon, constituted, according to the parties to the agreement, an operational mechanism for United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 (2006). That resolution defined the area of operations exclusively south of the Litani River and stipulated the removal of weapons and fighters from that area and the withdrawal of the Israeli enemy behind the Blue Line.
While the preamble of the declaration noted that its provisions are steps toward implementing Resolution 1701, the first clause of this declaration stated:
• Israel and Lebanon will implement a cessation of hostilities starting at 04:00 on Wednesday 27/11/2024 in accordance with the obligations detailed below.
The second clause of the declaration stated:
• From 04:00 on Wednesday 27/11/2024 onward, the Lebanese government will prevent Hezbollah and all other armed groups in Lebanese territory from conducting any operations against Israel, and Israel will not carry out any offensive military operations against Lebanese territory, including civilian or military targets, or other state-related targets, by land, air, or sea.
The clauses continued up to clause number 13.
Although Lebanon and Hezbollah have strictly adhered to the content of the ceasefire declaration since its issuance, the Zionist enemy has continued its violations by land, sea, and air, ignoring all calls to cease those hostile practices. Instead, the enemy has blackmailed Lebanon, imposed conditions and demands, and insisted on completing its project aimed at subjugating Lebanon, humiliating its state, people, and army, and luring it into a political agreement that would extract Lebanese concessions to the enemy’s interests in our country and region, as well as recognition of its illegitimate occupation of Palestine.
Although the government’s hasty decision regarding the monopoly of arms was presented by some as a gesture of goodwill, the enemy exploited this governmental mistake to impose the disarmament of the resistance across Lebanon as a condition for halting hostilities: a condition not stipulated in the ceasefire declaration and one that cannot be accepted or imposed.
🟡 @enemywatch
+
❤27👍3
Enemy Watch — Official
🟨 | Hezbollah’s Open Letter to Lebanon’s President, Prime Minister, Parliament Speaker and its people: [1/2] In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful To His Excellency the President of the Lebanese Republic, General Michel Aoun, respected…
+
[2/2]
The issue of monopoly of arms is not to be discussed in response to a foreign request or Israeli extortion but rather within a national framework in which a comprehensive strategy for security, defense, and protection of national sovereignty is agreed upon. Let all Lebanese know that the Israeli enemy does not target Hezbollah alone, but targets Lebanon with all its components, and seeks to remove Lebanon’s ability to refuse the blackmailing demands of the Zionist entity and to force submission to its policies and interests in Lebanon and the region. This requires a unified and dignified national stand that enforces respect for our country and people and protects Lebanon’s sovereignty and dignity.
As for falling into the traps of negotiations, that will yield further gains for the Israeli enemy, which always takes but never honors its commitments. With this brutal enemy supported by the American tyranny, maneuvers or compromises are not effective. Lebanon’s present concern must be to stop the aggression in accordance with the text of the ceasefire declaration and to pressure the Zionist enemy to implement it, and not to submit to aggressive extortion or to be lured into political negotiations with the Zionist enemy, for there is no national interest in that and it carries existential risks that threaten Lebanon’s entity and sovereignty.
In conclusion, as a founding component of Lebanon, to which we have pledged our full and final belonging as a homeland for all its sons and daughters, we affirm our legitimate right to resist occupation and aggression, and to stand alongside our army and our people in defending the sovereignty of our country. Legitimate defense does not fall under the category of a “decision of war or peace” — rather, it is the exercise of our right to defend ourselves against an enemy that imposes war on our nation, refuses to halt its aggressions, and seeks to subjugate our state.
Based on this vision, we approach current developments by reaffirming to all that the present moment calls for unity of efforts to stop the Zionist violations, aggression, and continued escalation against our country, and to repel the security and existential threats facing it. We hold in the highest esteem the patience and steadfastness of our proud and resistant people, who bear with us the burden of oppression and aggression in the hope of preserving national sovereignty and dignity. We pledge to them that we shall remain in the position of honor, dignity, and truth, defending our land and our people, and realizing the hopes and future of our generations.
Media Relations Department — Hezbollah
06/11/2025
🔹@enemywatch | End
[2/2]
The issue of monopoly of arms is not to be discussed in response to a foreign request or Israeli extortion but rather within a national framework in which a comprehensive strategy for security, defense, and protection of national sovereignty is agreed upon. Let all Lebanese know that the Israeli enemy does not target Hezbollah alone, but targets Lebanon with all its components, and seeks to remove Lebanon’s ability to refuse the blackmailing demands of the Zionist entity and to force submission to its policies and interests in Lebanon and the region. This requires a unified and dignified national stand that enforces respect for our country and people and protects Lebanon’s sovereignty and dignity.
As for falling into the traps of negotiations, that will yield further gains for the Israeli enemy, which always takes but never honors its commitments. With this brutal enemy supported by the American tyranny, maneuvers or compromises are not effective. Lebanon’s present concern must be to stop the aggression in accordance with the text of the ceasefire declaration and to pressure the Zionist enemy to implement it, and not to submit to aggressive extortion or to be lured into political negotiations with the Zionist enemy, for there is no national interest in that and it carries existential risks that threaten Lebanon’s entity and sovereignty.
In conclusion, as a founding component of Lebanon, to which we have pledged our full and final belonging as a homeland for all its sons and daughters, we affirm our legitimate right to resist occupation and aggression, and to stand alongside our army and our people in defending the sovereignty of our country. Legitimate defense does not fall under the category of a “decision of war or peace” — rather, it is the exercise of our right to defend ourselves against an enemy that imposes war on our nation, refuses to halt its aggressions, and seeks to subjugate our state.
Based on this vision, we approach current developments by reaffirming to all that the present moment calls for unity of efforts to stop the Zionist violations, aggression, and continued escalation against our country, and to repel the security and existential threats facing it. We hold in the highest esteem the patience and steadfastness of our proud and resistant people, who bear with us the burden of oppression and aggression in the hope of preserving national sovereignty and dignity. We pledge to them that we shall remain in the position of honor, dignity, and truth, defending our land and our people, and realizing the hopes and future of our generations.
Media Relations Department — Hezbollah
06/11/2025
🔹@enemywatch | End
❤32💯7🫡1
🇱🇧 | An Israeli airstrike targeted the outskirts of the Village of Toura, Southern Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬28💔3🤯1
✅ | Hezbollah, in its recent statements, has confirmed several points that must be understood and amplified. First and foremost, unlike the Palestinian resistance which, despite its resilience, suffers from many limitations and internal challenges, Hezbollah and its sister resistance factions in Lebanon possess a much wider and deeper influence across all facets of society. Along with religious masses, it enjoys support from various sectors and segments of Lebanese life, many of which remain deliberately undisclosed and rightly so, given the ongoing Israeli military aggression. The Israeli war machine, though momentarily restrained under the so-called ceasefire, continues its regular acts of oppression in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and the occupied Syrian territories. The atrocities have not ceased anywhere; perhaps they are not reported as frequently, but weekly assessments confirm that the violations are persistent and even increasing.
As of November 6, 2025, Israel, which has been boasting and fabricating stories of Hezbollah’s weakness and internal pressure while spreading false propaganda about its constant border presence and readiness to strike the IOF, only reveals its current state of desperation. Israel, alongside its American sponsors, is now reshaping its broader policy to reduce all forms of threats that endanger the Israeli entity’s existence, from rekindling violence in Sudan, a vital logistical hub for the resistance axis, to forming military bases in Eritrea aimed at countering Yemen, and now, with the cooperation of the Israeli-backed governor of Syria, Julani. The US military presence in the heart of Damascus, under the pretext of monitoring a security agreement between Syria and Israel, in reality serves two key objectives: direct control and influence over Syrian political decisions, and establishing a separating line between Turkish and Israeli influence. Beyond that, it is deeply connected to monitoring and restraining the movements of the resistance across the region.
Despite being aware of the catastrophic consequences of an open war, Israel appears hesitant to enter a direct confrontation, knowing Hezbollah’s proven capability for swift counterattacks and long-term endurance even without external support. There is a clear division within the IOF command: one faction advocates prolonging operations to maintain pressure, while another pushes for intensified aerial bombings aimed at dismantling Hezbollah’s military and communication structures. Israel seeks to use such pressure as leverage for new forms of fraudulent negotiation proposals recently floated toward Beirut under the guise of diplomatic dialogue.
At this juncture, if Hezbollah had been shaken, weakened, or fractured internally, it might have considered silence or even cooperation under the pretext of national interest. However, Hezbollah has firmly rejected all pressure, declaring that the American-led political framework in Beirut will not and cannot influence its course. It remains committed to the principles of sovereignty, a free Lebanon, and the preservation of national security and stability. Hezbollah today openly rejected any new form of deceptive negotiations, especially those linked to the submission of arms, and warned the Lebanese nation to recognize and resist the fraudulent traps of political negotiations designed to undermine Lebanon’s sovereignty.
This stance is of a legitimate body that forms a significant part of Lebanon, and it represents the position of the resistance with honesty and determination, standing firm on its ideological and legal foundations. It directly echoes and reinforces the content of Hezbollah’s Open Letter to Lebanon’s President, Prime Minister, Parliament Speaker, and its people, which emphasized that Lebanon and Hezbollah have strictly adhered to the ceasefire declaration since 27 November 2024, while the Zionist enemy has continued its violations by land, sea, and air.
🔹@enemywatch
+
As of November 6, 2025, Israel, which has been boasting and fabricating stories of Hezbollah’s weakness and internal pressure while spreading false propaganda about its constant border presence and readiness to strike the IOF, only reveals its current state of desperation. Israel, alongside its American sponsors, is now reshaping its broader policy to reduce all forms of threats that endanger the Israeli entity’s existence, from rekindling violence in Sudan, a vital logistical hub for the resistance axis, to forming military bases in Eritrea aimed at countering Yemen, and now, with the cooperation of the Israeli-backed governor of Syria, Julani. The US military presence in the heart of Damascus, under the pretext of monitoring a security agreement between Syria and Israel, in reality serves two key objectives: direct control and influence over Syrian political decisions, and establishing a separating line between Turkish and Israeli influence. Beyond that, it is deeply connected to monitoring and restraining the movements of the resistance across the region.
Despite being aware of the catastrophic consequences of an open war, Israel appears hesitant to enter a direct confrontation, knowing Hezbollah’s proven capability for swift counterattacks and long-term endurance even without external support. There is a clear division within the IOF command: one faction advocates prolonging operations to maintain pressure, while another pushes for intensified aerial bombings aimed at dismantling Hezbollah’s military and communication structures. Israel seeks to use such pressure as leverage for new forms of fraudulent negotiation proposals recently floated toward Beirut under the guise of diplomatic dialogue.
At this juncture, if Hezbollah had been shaken, weakened, or fractured internally, it might have considered silence or even cooperation under the pretext of national interest. However, Hezbollah has firmly rejected all pressure, declaring that the American-led political framework in Beirut will not and cannot influence its course. It remains committed to the principles of sovereignty, a free Lebanon, and the preservation of national security and stability. Hezbollah today openly rejected any new form of deceptive negotiations, especially those linked to the submission of arms, and warned the Lebanese nation to recognize and resist the fraudulent traps of political negotiations designed to undermine Lebanon’s sovereignty.
This stance is of a legitimate body that forms a significant part of Lebanon, and it represents the position of the resistance with honesty and determination, standing firm on its ideological and legal foundations. It directly echoes and reinforces the content of Hezbollah’s Open Letter to Lebanon’s President, Prime Minister, Parliament Speaker, and its people, which emphasized that Lebanon and Hezbollah have strictly adhered to the ceasefire declaration since 27 November 2024, while the Zionist enemy has continued its violations by land, sea, and air.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤29👍2🤝1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | Hezbollah, in its recent statements, has confirmed several points that must be understood and amplified. First and foremost, unlike the Palestinian resistance which, despite its resilience, suffers from many limitations and internal challenges, Hezbollah…
+
It also noted that the government’s hasty decision on the monopoly of arms was a grave error exploited by the enemy to demand resistance disarmament, a condition neither stated in the ceasefire nor acceptable under any circumstances.
Hezbollah’s message remains clear and resolute: Lebanon’s sovereignty is not a matter of negotiation, nor will its resistance bow to external pressures. The path forward is unity, steadfastness, and the protection of national dignity in the face of aggression and deceit.
At this moment, if the Americans and the IOF move to confront Lebanon and attack Hezbollah from all sides with the aim of annihilating it, such a campaign would trigger a major war, and the Americans are aware that such scenarios could prompt other resistance factions to respond, possibly including Iraqi groups. The real war scenario envisions Israeli attacks not only on Hezbollah’s positions but also on Lebanon’s civilian population, expanding destruction in the manner of Gaza. From the Julani-MBS-Trump nexus, Syria may try to strangle Lebanon along the border and open a wider theatre of operations against the country. The aggression would not be directed at Hezbollah alone but at all of Lebanon, with the intent of changing demographics and rendering the state weak. Such an attempt could provoke actors that the Americans do not want to engage directly. The Islamic Republic of Iran would not abandon Hezbollah, and Shia resistance's ideological and religious leadership is closely monitoring the scenarios. Imam Khamenei might order a preemptive response and broad resistance operations if necessary. These scenarios would be decisive battles, and what we foresee is the potential for a major setback for the American-Israeli camp.
Hezbollah is alive and will remain alive!
🔹@enemywatch
It also noted that the government’s hasty decision on the monopoly of arms was a grave error exploited by the enemy to demand resistance disarmament, a condition neither stated in the ceasefire nor acceptable under any circumstances.
Hezbollah’s message remains clear and resolute: Lebanon’s sovereignty is not a matter of negotiation, nor will its resistance bow to external pressures. The path forward is unity, steadfastness, and the protection of national dignity in the face of aggression and deceit.
At this moment, if the Americans and the IOF move to confront Lebanon and attack Hezbollah from all sides with the aim of annihilating it, such a campaign would trigger a major war, and the Americans are aware that such scenarios could prompt other resistance factions to respond, possibly including Iraqi groups. The real war scenario envisions Israeli attacks not only on Hezbollah’s positions but also on Lebanon’s civilian population, expanding destruction in the manner of Gaza. From the Julani-MBS-Trump nexus, Syria may try to strangle Lebanon along the border and open a wider theatre of operations against the country. The aggression would not be directed at Hezbollah alone but at all of Lebanon, with the intent of changing demographics and rendering the state weak. Such an attempt could provoke actors that the Americans do not want to engage directly. The Islamic Republic of Iran would not abandon Hezbollah, and Shia resistance's ideological and religious leadership is closely monitoring the scenarios. Imam Khamenei might order a preemptive response and broad resistance operations if necessary. These scenarios would be decisive battles, and what we foresee is the potential for a major setback for the American-Israeli camp.
Hezbollah is alive and will remain alive!
🔹@enemywatch
❤27🤝1
💔18😱7👍1🙏1
🇱🇧 Breaking — IOF Announces Bombing map in South Lebanon:
Urgent alert to residents of southern Lebanon, specifically the village of Aita Al-Jabal (Al-Zait).
According to the IOF, it will in the near future strike military infrastructure that it alleges belongs to the organization Hezbollah, in order to respond to what it describes as attempts by Hezbollah to rebuild its activities in the area.
The IOF warns residents of the buildings marked in red on the attached map and neighboring structures that they are located near sites used by Hezbollah. IOF stated: For your safety, you are required to evacuate those buildings immediately and move at least 500 meters away from them.
🔹@enemywatch
+
Urgent alert to residents of southern Lebanon, specifically the village of Aita Al-Jabal (Al-Zait).
According to the IOF, it will in the near future strike military infrastructure that it alleges belongs to the organization Hezbollah, in order to respond to what it describes as attempts by Hezbollah to rebuild its activities in the area.
The IOF warns residents of the buildings marked in red on the attached map and neighboring structures that they are located near sites used by Hezbollah. IOF stated: For your safety, you are required to evacuate those buildings immediately and move at least 500 meters away from them.
🔹@enemywatch
+
🤬29