❎ | We don’t celebrate Zohran Mamdani. Not only did he side with the Zionists to win this game, but he is also part of the same war & genocidal empire: nothing more. He belongs among those who praise American policymakers, and that’s where he will remain. It’s a joke that someone thinks he’s somehow “different” in America. Democrats are just as genocidal as Republicans. He may have won the mayor’s seat, but he can’t arrest the real all criminals or lead a revolution. He’s just another part of the soft Zionist machinery—and he’ll only grow more corrupt and complicit in the days ahead. Wait & Watch!

🔹@enemywatch

🏴 | 13 Jumada al-Awwal, 11 Hijri, is regarded by many scholars as the first possible date of the passing and martyrdom of Sayyidah Fatima Zahra (S), the beloved daughter of the Prophet Muhammad (S).

Regardless of sectarian debates, every sincere Muslim should at least reflect upon the narrations that exist regarding her suffering after the Prophet’s demise. Both Shia and Sunni sources acknowledge her deep grief, her isolation, and her confrontation with those in authority after the Prophet’s passing.

Historical records such as Sahih al-Bukhari (Book of Khumus, Hadith 3092) and Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal mention the dispute over Fadak, a property gifted to Fatima (S) by the Prophet (S). She was forced to defend her right publicly and to justify her claim before the ruling authority. Regardless of interpretations, the incident of Fadak itself is undeniable.

Multiple early historical and hadith works, including Tarikh al-Tabari, Al-Imama wa al-Siyasa (attributed to Ibn Qutayba), Sharh Nahj al-Balagha by Ibn Abi al-Hadid (a Sunni Mu‘tazili scholar), and Al-Milal wa al-Nihal by Al-Shahrastani, contain reports of the assault on her house and the confrontation that led to her injury. These wounds, according to numerous Shia and some Sunni historians, resulted in her martyrdom.

[and why is the case confined only to the shias, and why are the shias always made to prove it, even when many who claim to be shia themselves come with taunts, abuse, and lies? why don’t all muslims think about it seriously?]

Whether one accepts or rejects specific narrations, the historical outcome remains clear: Sayyida Fatima Zahra (S) left this world displeased with certain figures of her time, and this fact is directly stated in Sahih al-Bukhari (Book of Khumus, Hadith 3093): “Fatima remained angry with the first caliph and did not speak to him until she died.”

This single statement, preserved in the most authentic Sunni collection, confirms that her anger was real and unresolved. As the Prophet (S) said, “Allah is angered by Fatima’s anger and is pleased by her pleasure” (Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal, vol. 4, p. 328; Mustadrak al-Hakim, vol. 3, p. 154).

Thus, her suffering and displeasure are not sectarian myths but a shared moral reality. Instead of fearing or insulting one another, Muslims should think independently and sincerely about what truly happened to the daughter of the Prophet (S).

May Allah’s curse be upon those who wronged her, and may peace be upon Fatima Zahra (S), the leader of the women of Paradise.

🔹@enemywatch

+

🏴‍☠️ | Started:

We will fight antisemitism and Islamophobia in New York City.

—Zohran Mamdani, after being elected Mayor of New York City

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | IOF Expanding Attacks on Lebanon, Leading to Civilian Martyrdoms:

The Israeli occupation forces have intensified their attacks across Lebanon, resulting in multiple civilian casualties.

An Israeli strike targeted a car near Burj Rahal, at the entrance of Al-Abasieh town, yesterday. Earlier, an Israeli drone also targeted a car in Kafrdebian. The day before yesterday, IOF forces demolished a house—either in Khiyak or Mays al-Jabal.

Yesterday, Yousef Srour (seen in the black shirt in the photo) was killed. He was the brother of Mohammad Srour, who was martyred after the funeral of Hassan Srour. Both Yousef and Mohammad were brothers.

On November 3, Mohammad Ali Hadid was targeted and killed. He was reportedly injured (and left blind) from a previous pager attack and was with his wife at the time. Seven other civilians were injured (one seen in a white T-shirt), and several cars were burned as a result of the strikes.

🔹@enemywatch

+

✅ | Zohran Mamdani does not regard Hamas, its resistance fighters, and the roughly 200,000 martyred Gazans as victims and the oppressed; he considers them and their strikes to be terrorist attacks. Today a number of Shia supporters are celebrating that he won, having controlled a bogus opposition and stoked division between Republicans and Democrats. Imam Khamenei, the absolute Shia authority, considers and supports Hamas and has called their action a divine choice and a tactical strike. Choose your side and do not fool yourself all the time—until when will you be deceived? Zohran Mamdani has no worth; his entire existence is nothing compared to the martyrs of Gaza and Lebanon not even their shoes are comparable to this Mamdani and his treacherous & fraud wife.

🔹@enemywatch

+

✅ | Mamdani won your heart because he said he would arrest Netanyahu if he entered his territory. But your weak heart missed the fact that Mamdani belongs to the same party as Biden, the man who has funded the genocide in Gaza and killed almost as many as Trump did.

Mamdani never calls out the Democrats as destroyers or killers of Gaza because he joined one Palestine rally, and that was enough to make you happy. The same way people feel happy with Erdogan and MBS, who also deny and “protest” the genocide only in their statements.

Mamdani is fooling you, and he will keep fooling you until the day he calls the Lebanese resistance a terrorist organization, and when that happens, all your supposed common grounds with him, all your Muslim identity politics, will go straight to hell.

If he is supposedly fighting for Muslim identity, then update yourself, because the same so-called Muslim revolutions have been funded, made, and managed by Americans, the British, the EU, Arab regimes, and collectively by Mossad in Syria which his wife supports.

It does not always come openly written on paper; it comes hidden, intersectional, and filled with junk for your mind.

🔹@enemywatch

+

📕 | George W. Bush said in one of his speeches that ‘you’re either with us or against us!’ This sentence has been repeated several times. This is the evilest manifestation of the arrogant spirit of a power or a government. Who said you have the right to lead the fight against terrorism? If the prerequisite is the number of the victims of terrorism, then look at how many people [outside the U.S.] have been killed by terrorism? Even today, the people of Palestine are being palpably and openly terrorized and murdered in their own homes on a daily basis and at the hands of the usurpers of their homes. Was your attack on Vietnam not terrorism? Was your attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki terrorism? Were the victims of these attacks not killed deliberately, calculatedly and indiscriminately in the fire of your hatred? What right do you have to lead the fight on terrorism? And what right do you have to define terrorism? What arrogance do you have! This is why, when these words are broadcast across the world and the people of the world hear them, they realize why, since day one, the Islamic Revolution has considered “arrogance” and “the arrogant” as negative notions in its terminology and elaborates on them. The people of the world have an understanding of these terms in the terminology of the Islamic Republic.

— Imam Khamenei (H)

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 Breaking — Al-Mayadeen correspondent reports that an Israeli force has advanced in the Al-Kasayer area toward Lebanese territory, near the eastern outskirts of Meiss Al-Jabal in southern Lebanon.

🔹@enemywatch

🏴 | The young engineer Haider Anis Khairbek was killed, and his friend who was with him was injured, after a group of HTS terrorists driving a Hyundai Santa Fe opened fire on them while passing through the village of Ain Shaqaq, Jableh-Syria on the morning of November 4.

🔹@enemywatch

🇵🇸 | A strong explosion heard in occupied Jerusalem.

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | Zohran Mamdani’s mother, Mira Nair, was first married to Mitch Epstein, a well-known Jewish photographer and a Zionist propaganda artist whose work often reflects on holocaust propaganda. Epstein, who comes from a Jewish background, explored the propaganda for Holocaust through his Berlin series of photographs (c. 2008). In this series, he photographed sites such as the Sachsenhausen concentration camp and the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, juxtaposing these spaces of historical torment with the modern urban landscape of Berlin.

Meanwhile, Mira Nair herself has been outspoken on political issues. In 2013, she refused to attend the Haifa International Film Festival in Israel, declaring that she would visit Israel “when the walls come down” and “when the state does not privilege one religion over another.” — they promote two state agenda!

🔹@enemywatch

+

✅ | Don’t mix the variations of protests with each other. There are several distinct streams opposing Mamdani’s election, and each one arises from a very different ideological base, political agenda, and socioreligious orientation. Understanding these divisions is crucial to see how narratives are being shaped, manipulated, and redirected in the current political atmosphere.

1) The Republican–Israeli targeted opposition:

This stream is composed of Republican and Zionist circles that see Mamdani’s growing popularity as a political threat. His vocal stance in support of Palestine, his strong condemnation of Israeli aggression, and his presence at pro-Palestinian rallies have made him a convenient target for right-wing and pro-Israeli propaganda machines. They accuse him of being anti-Israel, anti-American, and sympathetic to so-called “terrorist narratives,” deliberately twisting his calls for justice into ideological extremism. Their attack lines are predictable — slogans about “illegal immigration,” “cultural collapse,” “Islamification,” and “identity politics.” These are not genuine concerns but rather calculated talking points to shape public perception and silence dissenting voices that challenge America’s foreign policy double standards.

However, beyond their loud rhetoric, there is no real ideological war between these Republican and Israeli lobbies and the broader Democratic structures. Both sides, in essence, operate under the same imperial consensus; supporting interventionism abroad and maintaining the global status quo. The apparent conflict between them is often a theater for domestic consumption, a managed opposition that hides the shared complicity in sustaining America’s imperial ambitions. Mamdani’s treatment in this narrative is less about his politics and more about how the establishment disciplines anyone stepping beyond the accepted boundaries of dissent.

2) The Salafi–Dawah centric cults:

Another front of opposition arises from within certain religious circles that function more like social media echo chambers than meaningful movements. These Salafi-oriented or Dawah-centered groups are theologically rigid, politically docile, and ideologically disconnected from the global Muslim struggle. They rarely criticize American militarism, Israeli occupation, or Western exploitation of Muslim lands. Instead, they focus their energy on policing individual morality and attacking Muslim figures who don’t conform to their narrow definition of piety.

Their criticism of Mamdani is not based on political analysis or justice but on surface-level optics; his attire, his tone, his use of secular platforms, or his interaction with non-Muslim circles. They accuse him of “modernism” or “compromise,” without realizing that their own detachment from real-world injustice makes them complicit in it. Their opposition is reactionary, not revolutionary; often confined to media debates, performative condemnations, and uncoordinated online campaigns. While a few among them may hold genuine concerns about religious authenticity, their inability to engage with power structures or challenge oppression renders them politically irrelevant. They exist as controlled bystanders within the larger imperial narrative.

3) The Resistance stance:

Then there is the third and most critical stream of opposition; the resistance stance. This perspective does not merely critique personalities; it exposes the deeper architecture of American political power, its imperial designs, and the networks of influence that sustain it. From this lens, Mamdani’s election is not an isolated local political event but part of a broader pattern of how certain figures are absorbed into the establishment to project a veneer of diversity and inclusion. The system allows limited “progressive” representation to appear tolerant, while ensuring that no genuine challenge to its foundations ever materializes.

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

The resistance position identifies soft Zionism, hybrid Zionism, and controlled opposition as the tools through which the establishment neutralizes authentic movements. Mamdani, while intelligent and articulate, operates within the framework of the Democratic Party, a party historically responsible for wars, sanctions, and political hypocrisy across the Muslim world. His progressive image does not erase the party’s complicity in Palestinian suffering, Syrian destruction, Massacre in Lebanon or Yemeni tragedy. Hence, while his words may resonate with moral outrage, the structures he aligns with remain part of the same machinery of oppression.

From this standpoint, we acknowledge Mamdani’s efforts in addressing local social issues, but we reject his glorification as an Islamic resistance figure. His activism may serve limited social justice goals, but it does not and cannot represent the ideological resistance against imperialism and Zionism. The real resistance must remain independent of party politics, rooted in consciousness, unity, and ideological clarity. We can find temporary convergence with Mamdani on certain issues, but not ideological alignment. Time will reveal whether his path leads to genuine transformation or gradual assimilation into the establishment he critiques.

At this stage, clarity is essential. Do not conflate these distinct forms of opposition. Each operates within its own world; the Republican-Israeli bloc with its imperial-genocidal politics, the Salafi-Dawah cults with their moral absolutism, and the resistance movement with its revolutionary critique of power. Understanding the differences prevents us from falling into false binaries or emotional confusion.

🔹@enemywatch