🏴‍☠️ | Indian regime has launched a crackdown on bookstores in Kashmir, falsely labeling several books as “anti-national” and banning their sale:

In a sudden suppression and silencing of Kashmiris under Indian administration, the regime’s army and police have lashed out at the freedom of books by banning titles, barging into bookstores and stalls, inspecting them, and removing any materials they deem to carry “anti-national” narratives. But which anti-national content are they targeting? The ones that speak about the decades-long oppression of innocent Kashmiris, the cruelty imposed by the Indian army, and the systematic suppression of their voices?

Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts or the deep repository of lived memories carried by the people of Kashmir. Instead, it exposes the insecurities and intellectual limitations of those enforcing such authoritarian measures. It also lays bare the contradiction of proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival as a symbol of literary freedom, while simultaneously carrying out this cultural censorship. The Indian regime has been systematically distorting and erasing critical aspects of history, particularly those related to Muslim contributions and Kashmir’s contested past. In recent years, this effort has included the removal of chapters on Mughal emperors, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, and the 2002 Gujarat riots from national school curricula, as acknowledged in revised NCERT textbooks. These crackdowns have extended to banning books by Islamic thinkers such as Sheikh Hassan al-Banna (r) and Allama Abul A‘la Maududi (r), the renowned revolutionary scholar.

From the erasure of Muslim historical figures from official Indian school textbooks, to now extending this crackdown into Kashmiri spaces; this raises the central question: How will you erase the extended, detailed, and deeply rooted content that lives within the hearts and minds of Kashmiris? How long can this repression continue?

These provocations will only create new material for future books books born from resistance, not silence.

#Kashmir

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Hezbollah and Amal Movement ministers will withdraw from the [ongoing] Lebanese cabinet session if there is insistence on discussing the US proposal [which demands Hezbollah to disarm]. In protest, the ministers of Amal and Hezbollah, along with Minister Fadi Makki (the Shi’a ministers), withdrew from the Cabinet session in Baabda.

This is a clear sign that the President, Prime Minister, and ministers of the foreign-backed bloc are insisting on overturning the National Pact and the Taif Agreement, effectively handing over a sovereign concession to Washington and Riyadh.

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Breaking — Hezbollah and Amal ministers withdraw from the Lebanese cabinet session over the issue of weapons. Following this, any resolution passed will lack constitutional legitimacy. Minister Fadi Maki: “I withdrew because there is something significant in the American envoy’s paper, and this matter is beyond our ability to handle.”

Labor Minister Mohammad Haider: We withdrew from the government session after the refusal to postpone the discussion of Barack's paper until the army presents its plan on August 31st.

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Breaking — Preliminary reports indicate an israeli attack on a car on the Anjar-Masnaa road in the Bekaa region, eastern Lebanon, resulting in the assassination of an unarmed Hezbollah civilian.

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Ministers from the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, along with Minister Fadi Makki, have called for a reconsideration of priorities and a reversal of the previous government decision. They called for a re-evaluation of priorities and correction of the previous government decision.

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam insisted on discussing the American paper, which was rejected by the ministers from Amal and Hezbollah. The ministers refused to discuss the American paper before rectifying the course set in the prior session. With the withdrawal of the Shiite ministers, the government faces difficulty making any decisions due to loss of constitutional legitimacy. The preamble of the Lebanese Constitution states that the absence of any sectarian component invalidates the constitutional legitimacy of government sessions.

🔹@enemywatch

✅ | Out of Palestine, it is primarily the Shias who are standing firm—fighting on logical, religious, and humanitarian grounds. What about the rest? They need to seriously reflect on themselves. This is not a sectarian taunt but a sober reminder for those communities to return to their core ideologies and undertake real reform before they become prey to forces destined for eternal punishment, as warned in the Quran.

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | Ali Al-Khatib, Deputy Head of the Lebanese Supreme Islamic Shia Council:

"[US envoy] Barrack has achieved his objective of shifting the confrontation from Lebanese-Israeli to a political confrontation within the Lebanese government".

🔹@enemywatch

🇱🇧 | The Lebanese government has approved the objectives outlined in Tom Barrack's paper:

1. Lebanon shall implement the Taif Agreement, the Lebanese Constitution, and UN Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 1701 (2006), and take necessary measures to extend its sovereignty over all its territories, aiming to strengthen the role of legitimate institutions, establish the state’s exclusive authority in deciding matters of war and peace, and ensure that weapons are solely in the hands of the state across all Lebanese territories.

2. Ensure the sustainability of the cessation of all forms of hostilities (land, air, and sea) through organized steps leading to a permanent, comprehensive, and guaranteed solution.

3. End the armed presence of all non-governmental entities, including Hezbollah, across all Lebanese territories, both south and north of the Litani River, while providing necessary support to the Lebanese Army and Internal Security Forces.

4. Deploy Lebanese Army units in border areas and sensitive internal regions with appropriate support.

5. Israel’s withdrawal from the “five points,” and the resolution of border issues and prisoner matters through diplomatic means via indirect negotiations.

6. Return of civilians to their homes and properties in border villages and towns.

7. Ensure Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territories and the cessation of all hostilities, including land, air, and sea violations.

8. Permanent and visible demarcation of the international border between Lebanon and Israel.

9. Permanent demarcation and determination of the border between Lebanon and Syria.

10. Convene an economic conference with participation from the United States, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other friendly nations to support the Lebanese economy, reconstruction, and the implementation of President Trump’s vision for Lebanon’s return as a prosperous and viable state.

11. Provide additional international support to Lebanese security agencies, particularly the Lebanese Army, with appropriate military resources to implement the proposal’s provisions and ensure Lebanon’s protection.

🔹@enemywatch

🏴‍☠️ | The latest appearance of the former Grand Sunni Mufti of the Syrian Arab Republic, Ahmad Badr al-Din Hassoun, was in a video released by HTS. The footage shows interrogations of him and several detainees, including:

• Former Interior Minister Major General Mohammed al-Shaar
• Major General Ibrahim Huwaija
• Brigadier General Atef Najib

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | We are now witnessing sudden and major shifts in Lebanese politics. Aoun and Nawaf have announced the commands of Barak while wagging their tails—blep-ing to do it as soon as possible. The liberal Nawaf-Aoun duo has declared exactly what was dictated to them. But one thing is clearer than ever: both will eventually flee Lebanon. The situation may tremble, but it is evident that the Resistance has not even allowed them to start the talks and they left before it was announced. Lebanese Government merely announced what the terrorist Tom has brought upon them. Now, we are entering a phase of sudden changes in the political landscape: serious and critical changes. But one thing remains certain: no one will be able to take the weapons from Hezbollah. Now Protests are also erupting in the south of Lebanon, as well as the Bekaa region—two regions under Hezbollah-Amal influence.

🔹@enemywatch