❎ | Keep an eye on Putin’s phone calls and meetings with Netanyahu, Trump, the Emir of the UAE, one Southeast Asian country, and the upcoming expected visit to India.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯25👍3
✅ | Iraq is currently heading into national and local elections, with dozens of political parties registered to compete. At the same time, the country is witnessing the arrival of an unprecedented number of Arbaeen pilgrims; the 40th day of the martyrdom anniversary of Imam Husayn (A) with estimates possibly exceeding 30 to 31 million.
In line with local traditions, many political parties display images of Ayatullah Sistani (may he live long) and their own leaders to signal their allegiance and ideological alignment. However, a recent statement from His Eminence’s office has advised against the use of his image for such political purposes, especially during Arbaeen. This directive has stirred confusion among the masses.
The statement is clearly aimed at the political campaigning during the election period and the Arbaeen pilgrimage. It does not prohibit the display of Ayatullah Sistani’s image in Husayni ceremonies, public gatherings, or Hussainiyahs. These displays remain permissible and have traditionally been done as acts of devotion and love by followers. In fact, none of the righteous marāji‘ including top leader Imam Khamenei and then Ayatullah Sistani, Ayatullah Makarim and Ayatullah Fayyaz himself have objected to the respectful display of such images during Arbaeen.
Indeed, the marja‘iyyah has consistently encouraged the people to unify the global Ummah under a single Husayni banner. This is also why the use of national flags or their display in the sacred area between the shrines (Bayn al-Haramayn) is discouraged. If such flags are used, it should be during designated programs or for media purposes not as a public spectacle, so that the focus remains on Imam Husayn (A) and not national identities.
The Arbaeen walk is fundamentally about honoring the legacy and path of Imam Husayn (A), as well as the martyrs, resistance leaders, and righteous believers who sacrificed for truth and justice. No general prohibition has been issued on image displays within this context.
However, the deviant Shirazi current has a known history of exploiting this sacred occasion by promoting the image of their cult leader, Sadiq Shirazi which is a practice that has faced widespread and rightful criticism.
🔹@enemywatch
In line with local traditions, many political parties display images of Ayatullah Sistani (may he live long) and their own leaders to signal their allegiance and ideological alignment. However, a recent statement from His Eminence’s office has advised against the use of his image for such political purposes, especially during Arbaeen. This directive has stirred confusion among the masses.
The statement is clearly aimed at the political campaigning during the election period and the Arbaeen pilgrimage. It does not prohibit the display of Ayatullah Sistani’s image in Husayni ceremonies, public gatherings, or Hussainiyahs. These displays remain permissible and have traditionally been done as acts of devotion and love by followers. In fact, none of the righteous marāji‘ including top leader Imam Khamenei and then Ayatullah Sistani, Ayatullah Makarim and Ayatullah Fayyaz himself have objected to the respectful display of such images during Arbaeen.
Indeed, the marja‘iyyah has consistently encouraged the people to unify the global Ummah under a single Husayni banner. This is also why the use of national flags or their display in the sacred area between the shrines (Bayn al-Haramayn) is discouraged. If such flags are used, it should be during designated programs or for media purposes not as a public spectacle, so that the focus remains on Imam Husayn (A) and not national identities.
The Arbaeen walk is fundamentally about honoring the legacy and path of Imam Husayn (A), as well as the martyrs, resistance leaders, and righteous believers who sacrificed for truth and justice. No general prohibition has been issued on image displays within this context.
However, the deviant Shirazi current has a known history of exploiting this sacred occasion by promoting the image of their cult leader, Sadiq Shirazi which is a practice that has faced widespread and rightful criticism.
🔹@enemywatch
🙏12❤1
🇾🇪 Breaking — A speech by Yemen’s leader, Sayyid Abdul Malik al-Houthi (H), is currently ongoing. It will be shared once it concludes.
🔹 @enemywatch
🔹 @enemywatch
❤19🤝2
✅ | One must say: Western democracy is not merely a political system; it is a dagger of evil, a carefully constructed illusion designed to fracture societies from within. It masquerades as freedom and justice but in reality functions as a tool of imperial domination and cultural subjugation. The demons who champion this so-called “realism” those institutions that legitimize oppression under the guise of pragmatism are nothing but agents sharpening the deadliest daggers in the hearts of nations.
What we see in Lebanon today is not a mere political crisis; it is the tragic consequence of a deeper epistemological betrayal; the abdication of historical memory, collective dignity, and sovereignty itself. The Lebanese government’s attempt to disarm its own resistance is a surrender to forces that have already stained the region’s soil with the blood of over 270,000 Palestinians, 10,000 Lebanese, and thousands of Syrians. These are not abstract numbers but wounds that scream the story of imperial aggression and settler-colonial violence witnessed with open eyes.
When a person begin to internalize the narratives of their oppressors, when they turn their weapons against their own defenders, they invite self-destruction. Sovereignty is not simply control over borders or military capacity: it is the lived reality of collective will and resistance against erasure. The failure to recognize this is a failure of political consciousness.
Democracy as imposed by Western hegemony, in this context, is a false promise; an ideological trap that seeks to disarm not only weapons but the spirit of nationality, nativity, resistance, social justice, and the possibility of liberation from the claws of aggressord. Lebanon’s descent into chaos is not incidental but the predictable outcome of embracing a system designed to weaken, divide, and ultimately consume.
The dagger of Western democracy is sharpened on the stone of division and betrayal, and unless Lebanon rejects it, it will continue to bleed not just physically but culturally and spiritually.
This is a lesson not only for Lebanon but also for the peoples of Iraq, Pakistan, India, Turkey, the trapped masses of Azerbaijan, and even for European countries: Western democracy itself is like an atomic bomb without inspections or limits. It presents itself as a guarantor of freedom and rights, yet it operates without accountability, detonating societal cohesion, eroding sovereignty, genderlessing their people, and turning traitors as zombies for their fellow country-men.
🔹@enemywatch
What we see in Lebanon today is not a mere political crisis; it is the tragic consequence of a deeper epistemological betrayal; the abdication of historical memory, collective dignity, and sovereignty itself. The Lebanese government’s attempt to disarm its own resistance is a surrender to forces that have already stained the region’s soil with the blood of over 270,000 Palestinians, 10,000 Lebanese, and thousands of Syrians. These are not abstract numbers but wounds that scream the story of imperial aggression and settler-colonial violence witnessed with open eyes.
When a person begin to internalize the narratives of their oppressors, when they turn their weapons against their own defenders, they invite self-destruction. Sovereignty is not simply control over borders or military capacity: it is the lived reality of collective will and resistance against erasure. The failure to recognize this is a failure of political consciousness.
Democracy as imposed by Western hegemony, in this context, is a false promise; an ideological trap that seeks to disarm not only weapons but the spirit of nationality, nativity, resistance, social justice, and the possibility of liberation from the claws of aggressord. Lebanon’s descent into chaos is not incidental but the predictable outcome of embracing a system designed to weaken, divide, and ultimately consume.
The dagger of Western democracy is sharpened on the stone of division and betrayal, and unless Lebanon rejects it, it will continue to bleed not just physically but culturally and spiritually.
This is a lesson not only for Lebanon but also for the peoples of Iraq, Pakistan, India, Turkey, the trapped masses of Azerbaijan, and even for European countries: Western democracy itself is like an atomic bomb without inspections or limits. It presents itself as a guarantor of freedom and rights, yet it operates without accountability, detonating societal cohesion, eroding sovereignty, genderlessing their people, and turning traitors as zombies for their fellow country-men.
🔹@enemywatch
💯24❤2
🏴☠️ | Indian regime has launched a crackdown on bookstores in Kashmir, falsely labeling several books as “anti-national” and banning their sale:
In a sudden suppression and silencing of Kashmiris under Indian administration, the regime’s army and police have lashed out at the freedom of books by banning titles, barging into bookstores and stalls, inspecting them, and removing any materials they deem to carry “anti-national” narratives. But which anti-national content are they targeting? The ones that speak about the decades-long oppression of innocent Kashmiris, the cruelty imposed by the Indian army, and the systematic suppression of their voices?
Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts or the deep repository of lived memories carried by the people of Kashmir. Instead, it exposes the insecurities and intellectual limitations of those enforcing such authoritarian measures. It also lays bare the contradiction of proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival as a symbol of literary freedom, while simultaneously carrying out this cultural censorship. The Indian regime has been systematically distorting and erasing critical aspects of history, particularly those related to Muslim contributions and Kashmir’s contested past. In recent years, this effort has included the removal of chapters on Mughal emperors, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, and the 2002 Gujarat riots from national school curricula, as acknowledged in revised NCERT textbooks. These crackdowns have extended to banning books by Islamic thinkers such as Sheikh Hassan al-Banna (r) and Allama Abul A‘la Maududi (r), the renowned revolutionary scholar.
From the erasure of Muslim historical figures from official Indian school textbooks, to now extending this crackdown into Kashmiri spaces; this raises the central question: How will you erase the extended, detailed, and deeply rooted content that lives within the hearts and minds of Kashmiris? How long can this repression continue?
These provocations will only create new material for future books books born from resistance, not silence.
#Kashmir
🔹@enemywatch
In a sudden suppression and silencing of Kashmiris under Indian administration, the regime’s army and police have lashed out at the freedom of books by banning titles, barging into bookstores and stalls, inspecting them, and removing any materials they deem to carry “anti-national” narratives. But which anti-national content are they targeting? The ones that speak about the decades-long oppression of innocent Kashmiris, the cruelty imposed by the Indian army, and the systematic suppression of their voices?
Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts or the deep repository of lived memories carried by the people of Kashmir. Instead, it exposes the insecurities and intellectual limitations of those enforcing such authoritarian measures. It also lays bare the contradiction of proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival as a symbol of literary freedom, while simultaneously carrying out this cultural censorship. The Indian regime has been systematically distorting and erasing critical aspects of history, particularly those related to Muslim contributions and Kashmir’s contested past. In recent years, this effort has included the removal of chapters on Mughal emperors, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, and the 2002 Gujarat riots from national school curricula, as acknowledged in revised NCERT textbooks. These crackdowns have extended to banning books by Islamic thinkers such as Sheikh Hassan al-Banna (r) and Allama Abul A‘la Maududi (r), the renowned revolutionary scholar.
From the erasure of Muslim historical figures from official Indian school textbooks, to now extending this crackdown into Kashmiri spaces; this raises the central question: How will you erase the extended, detailed, and deeply rooted content that lives within the hearts and minds of Kashmiris? How long can this repression continue?
These provocations will only create new material for future books books born from resistance, not silence.
#Kashmir
🔹@enemywatch
🤬11😱4❤1
🇱🇧 | Hezbollah and Amal Movement ministers will withdraw from the [ongoing] Lebanese cabinet session if there is insistence on discussing the US proposal [which demands Hezbollah to disarm]. In protest, the ministers of Amal and Hezbollah, along with Minister Fadi Makki (the Shi’a ministers), withdrew from the Cabinet session in Baabda.
This is a clear sign that the President, Prime Minister, and ministers of the foreign-backed bloc are insisting on overturning the National Pact and the Taif Agreement, effectively handing over a sovereign concession to Washington and Riyadh.
🔹@enemywatch
This is a clear sign that the President, Prime Minister, and ministers of the foreign-backed bloc are insisting on overturning the National Pact and the Taif Agreement, effectively handing over a sovereign concession to Washington and Riyadh.
🔹@enemywatch
❤30👍5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇱🇧 | Breaking — Hezbollah and Amal ministers withdraw from the Lebanese cabinet session over the issue of weapons. Following this, any resolution passed will lack constitutional legitimacy. Minister Fadi Maki: “I withdrew because there is something significant in the American envoy’s paper, and this matter is beyond our ability to handle.”
Labor Minister Mohammad Haider: We withdrew from the government session after the refusal to postpone the discussion of Barack's paper until the army presents its plan on August 31st.
🔹@enemywatch
Labor Minister Mohammad Haider: We withdrew from the government session after the refusal to postpone the discussion of Barack's paper until the army presents its plan on August 31st.
🔹@enemywatch
👍26❤6
🇱🇧 | Breaking — Preliminary reports indicate an israeli attack on a car on the Anjar-Masnaa road in the Bekaa region, eastern Lebanon, resulting in the assassination of an unarmed Hezbollah civilian.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬21😭13💔1
🇱🇧 | Ministers from the Amal Movement and Hezbollah, along with Minister Fadi Makki, have called for a reconsideration of priorities and a reversal of the previous government decision. They called for a re-evaluation of priorities and correction of the previous government decision.
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam insisted on discussing the American paper, which was rejected by the ministers from Amal and Hezbollah. The ministers refused to discuss the American paper before rectifying the course set in the prior session. With the withdrawal of the Shiite ministers, the government faces difficulty making any decisions due to loss of constitutional legitimacy. The preamble of the Lebanese Constitution states that the absence of any sectarian component invalidates the constitutional legitimacy of government sessions.
🔹@enemywatch
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam insisted on discussing the American paper, which was rejected by the ministers from Amal and Hezbollah. The ministers refused to discuss the American paper before rectifying the course set in the prior session. With the withdrawal of the Shiite ministers, the government faces difficulty making any decisions due to loss of constitutional legitimacy. The preamble of the Lebanese Constitution states that the absence of any sectarian component invalidates the constitutional legitimacy of government sessions.
🔹@enemywatch
🔥17💯9🙏2
✅ | Out of Palestine, it is primarily the Shias who are standing firm—fighting on logical, religious, and humanitarian grounds. What about the rest? They need to seriously reflect on themselves. This is not a sectarian taunt but a sober reminder for those communities to return to their core ideologies and undertake real reform before they become prey to forces destined for eternal punishment, as warned in the Quran.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯42❤2🔥1🤬1
🇱🇧 | Ali Al-Khatib, Deputy Head of the Lebanese Supreme Islamic Shia Council:
"[US envoy] Barrack has achieved his objective of shifting the confrontation from Lebanese-Israeli to a political confrontation within the Lebanese government".
🔹@enemywatch
"[US envoy] Barrack has achieved his objective of shifting the confrontation from Lebanese-Israeli to a political confrontation within the Lebanese government".
🔹@enemywatch
🤬27
🇱🇧 | The Lebanese government has approved the objectives outlined in Tom Barrack's paper:
1. Lebanon shall implement the Taif Agreement, the Lebanese Constitution, and UN Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 1701 (2006), and take necessary measures to extend its sovereignty over all its territories, aiming to strengthen the role of legitimate institutions, establish the state’s exclusive authority in deciding matters of war and peace, and ensure that weapons are solely in the hands of the state across all Lebanese territories.
2. Ensure the sustainability of the cessation of all forms of hostilities (land, air, and sea) through organized steps leading to a permanent, comprehensive, and guaranteed solution.
3. End the armed presence of all non-governmental entities, including Hezbollah, across all Lebanese territories, both south and north of the Litani River, while providing necessary support to the Lebanese Army and Internal Security Forces.
4. Deploy Lebanese Army units in border areas and sensitive internal regions with appropriate support.
5. Israel’s withdrawal from the “five points,” and the resolution of border issues and prisoner matters through diplomatic means via indirect negotiations.
6. Return of civilians to their homes and properties in border villages and towns.
7. Ensure Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territories and the cessation of all hostilities, including land, air, and sea violations.
8. Permanent and visible demarcation of the international border between Lebanon and Israel.
9. Permanent demarcation and determination of the border between Lebanon and Syria.
10. Convene an economic conference with participation from the United States, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other friendly nations to support the Lebanese economy, reconstruction, and the implementation of President Trump’s vision for Lebanon’s return as a prosperous and viable state.
11. Provide additional international support to Lebanese security agencies, particularly the Lebanese Army, with appropriate military resources to implement the proposal’s provisions and ensure Lebanon’s protection.
🔹@enemywatch
1. Lebanon shall implement the Taif Agreement, the Lebanese Constitution, and UN Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 1701 (2006), and take necessary measures to extend its sovereignty over all its territories, aiming to strengthen the role of legitimate institutions, establish the state’s exclusive authority in deciding matters of war and peace, and ensure that weapons are solely in the hands of the state across all Lebanese territories.
2. Ensure the sustainability of the cessation of all forms of hostilities (land, air, and sea) through organized steps leading to a permanent, comprehensive, and guaranteed solution.
3. End the armed presence of all non-governmental entities, including Hezbollah, across all Lebanese territories, both south and north of the Litani River, while providing necessary support to the Lebanese Army and Internal Security Forces.
4. Deploy Lebanese Army units in border areas and sensitive internal regions with appropriate support.
5. Israel’s withdrawal from the “five points,” and the resolution of border issues and prisoner matters through diplomatic means via indirect negotiations.
6. Return of civilians to their homes and properties in border villages and towns.
7. Ensure Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territories and the cessation of all hostilities, including land, air, and sea violations.
8. Permanent and visible demarcation of the international border between Lebanon and Israel.
9. Permanent demarcation and determination of the border between Lebanon and Syria.
10. Convene an economic conference with participation from the United States, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other friendly nations to support the Lebanese economy, reconstruction, and the implementation of President Trump’s vision for Lebanon’s return as a prosperous and viable state.
11. Provide additional international support to Lebanese security agencies, particularly the Lebanese Army, with appropriate military resources to implement the proposal’s provisions and ensure Lebanon’s protection.
🔹@enemywatch
🤬32❤4
🏴☠️ | The latest appearance of the former Grand Sunni Mufti of the Syrian Arab Republic, Ahmad Badr al-Din Hassoun, was in a video released by HTS. The footage shows interrogations of him and several detainees, including:
• Former Interior Minister Major General Mohammed al-Shaar
• Major General Ibrahim Huwaija
• Brigadier General Atef Najib
🔹@enemywatch
• Former Interior Minister Major General Mohammed al-Shaar
• Major General Ibrahim Huwaija
• Brigadier General Atef Najib
🔹@enemywatch
🤬23😭4