Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇵🇸 | Horrific scarring and hunger ravage the body of the child Mohammed Marouf, who is forced to scratch himself with sharp objects to relieve the intense pain he suffers after sustaining burns from an artillery shell that struck a school sheltering displaced persons in Jabalia, northern Gaza Strip.
Just a reminder: Abdullah II, Mohammed VI of Morocco, Sisi, Erdoğan, Aliyev, and Al Thani are all busy supplying Israel with whatever it needs.
🔹@enemywatch
Just a reminder: Abdullah II, Mohammed VI of Morocco, Sisi, Erdoğan, Aliyev, and Al Thani are all busy supplying Israel with whatever it needs.
🔹@enemywatch
🤬31😭14💔7😱1
🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah:
The Americans, who threaten the world, halted their aggression against Yemen out of fear that the aircraft carrier Truman would be hit.
According to the Hebrew newspaper Calcalist, a hit on the carrier would have struck at America’s prestige.
The paper confirms that Trump decided to halt the May 6 attacks on the day the Truman was forced to execute a rapid evasive maneuver to escape a hypersonic ballistic missile. The maneuver resulted in the crash of an F-18 fighter jet, which sank; marking the second such incident in a single week.
Remember: those who mocked the Yemeni strikes were simply spreading false propaganda, while the Americans themselves admitted the difficulty of this naval confrontation; one unlike any they had faced since World War II.
It can be said that Sanaa imposed a strategic equation, and the Americans based their decisions on hard realities.
It is also worth noting that two weeks earlier, when Yemenis sank two ships, stormed and rigged them with explosives, the Americans remained silent, claimed no involvement, and made no noise because they had lost the battle. Any further entanglement would have only brought more harm upon them.
🔹@enemywatch
The Americans, who threaten the world, halted their aggression against Yemen out of fear that the aircraft carrier Truman would be hit.
According to the Hebrew newspaper Calcalist, a hit on the carrier would have struck at America’s prestige.
The paper confirms that Trump decided to halt the May 6 attacks on the day the Truman was forced to execute a rapid evasive maneuver to escape a hypersonic ballistic missile. The maneuver resulted in the crash of an F-18 fighter jet, which sank; marking the second such incident in a single week.
Remember: those who mocked the Yemeni strikes were simply spreading false propaganda, while the Americans themselves admitted the difficulty of this naval confrontation; one unlike any they had faced since World War II.
It can be said that Sanaa imposed a strategic equation, and the Americans based their decisions on hard realities.
It is also worth noting that two weeks earlier, when Yemenis sank two ships, stormed and rigged them with explosives, the Americans remained silent, claimed no involvement, and made no noise because they had lost the battle. Any further entanglement would have only brought more harm upon them.
🔹@enemywatch
❤30🔥7💯5
❎ | Putin has spoken with Netanyahu twice in less than a month, once a few days ago, and again today. That level of direct communication, especially amid escalating regional tensions and Russia’s shifting posture on israel-Gaza, raises serious questions. At the same time, Putin just concluded a three-hour meeting at the Kremlin with Steven Witkoff. The length and nature of the meeting remain unclear, but its timing is far from coincidental.
What exactly is being discussed? The opacity is telling - negative.
🔹@enemywatch
What exactly is being discussed? The opacity is telling - negative.
🔹@enemywatch
💯20👍10🤬1
🗞️ | Khaleel Nasrallah:
Four key points in Hezbollah’s statement regarding the disastrous decision of the Nawaf Salam government:
• The decision undermines both the national pact and Lebanese sovereignty, and all those involved in issuing it bear responsibility for its consequences.
• The resistance will treat the decision as non-existent — meaning it will not cooperate with any proposed plans based on it, nor will it surrender its weapons.
• Hezbollah remains committed to dialogue in the interest of Lebanon and to establishing a national security strategy — but only after “Israel” fulfills its obligations.
• Hezbollah emphasizes its commitment to civil peace by reassuring all Lebanese — both the public and political forces — who support the path of resistance.
Accordingly, Hezbollah is acting with prudence to neutralize the effects of any external moves that could push Lebanon toward internal conflict.
🔹@enemywatch
+
Four key points in Hezbollah’s statement regarding the disastrous decision of the Nawaf Salam government:
• The decision undermines both the national pact and Lebanese sovereignty, and all those involved in issuing it bear responsibility for its consequences.
• The resistance will treat the decision as non-existent — meaning it will not cooperate with any proposed plans based on it, nor will it surrender its weapons.
• Hezbollah remains committed to dialogue in the interest of Lebanon and to establishing a national security strategy — but only after “Israel” fulfills its obligations.
• Hezbollah emphasizes its commitment to civil peace by reassuring all Lebanese — both the public and political forces — who support the path of resistance.
Accordingly, Hezbollah is acting with prudence to neutralize the effects of any external moves that could push Lebanon toward internal conflict.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤25
🟨 Breaking — Hezbollah condemned the Nawaf Salam government’s decision to disarm the resistance as a U.S.-imposed betrayal that undermines Lebanese sovereignty and serves israeli interests:
Statement issued by Hezbollah:
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
The government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has committed a grave sin by adopting a decision that strips Lebanon of the weapons of resistance against the Israeli enemy. This decision weakens Lebanon’s position and its ability to confront the ongoing Israeli-American aggression, and effectively grants Israel what it failed to achieve through its wars on Lebanon. In previous confrontations, we faced the enemy with valor and forced it into an agreement that obligated Israel to cease its aggression and withdraw from Lebanese territory.
This decision clearly violates the National Pact and also contradicts the government’s ministerial statement, specifically the fifth paragraph, which states:
“The government, in accordance with the National Accord Document adopted in Taif, is committed to taking all necessary measures to liberate all Lebanese territory from Israeli occupation and to extend the sovereignty of the state over all its lands exclusively through its own capabilities, and to deploy the Lebanese Army in the internationally recognized Lebanese border area.”
Preserving Lebanon’s strength, including the weapons of the resistance, is part of these necessary measures. Likewise, strengthening the Lebanese Army and arming it to enable the expulsion of the Israeli enemy and to protect and liberate national territory is also among these measures.
This decision was the result of pressure from U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein, as explicitly stated in the cabinet session’s justification. Prime Minister Salam announced that the cabinet “decided to continue discussions on the American paper next Thursday and tasked the Lebanese Army with developing an implementation plan to contain all arms by the end of this year.”
This decision serves Israel’s interests entirely and leaves Lebanon exposed and vulnerable to the Israeli enemy without any deterrent force.
The government has disregarded the constitutional commitment made by President Joseph Aoun in his inauguration speech, in which he pledged:
“My mandate will call for a discussion of a comprehensive defense policy as part of a national security strategy at the diplomatic, economic, and military levels, empowering the Lebanese state, I repeat, the Lebanese state, to remove Israeli occupation and repel its aggression from all Lebanese territory.”
What the government has decided is, in effect, a strategy of surrender and a blatant undermining of Lebanon’s sovereignty.
The withdrawal of Hezbollah and Amal ministers from the cabinet session was an expression of total rejection of this decision. This stance reflects the position of large and diverse segments of Lebanese society across regions, sects, and political affiliations. It also reflects the broad public opposition to subjecting Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli domination.
This decision undermines Lebanon’s sovereignty and grants Israel a free hand to tamper with Lebanon’s security, geography, politics, and very existence. Therefore, we will treat this decision as null and void.
At the same time, we remain open to dialogue, to ending Israeli aggression, liberating our land, releasing detainees, rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal attacks, and discussing a national security strategy, but not under the pressure of aggression.
The agreement must first be implemented by the Israeli side. The government’s top priority should be, as stated in its own ministerial declaration:
“To take all necessary measures to liberate all Lebanese lands from Israeli occupation.”
To our honorable people, we say: this is a passing summer cloud, in shaAllah.
We are accustomed to patience and to victory.
— Hezbollah Media Relations
Wednesday, 6 August 2025 / 12 Safar 1447 AH
🟡@enemywatch
Statement issued by Hezbollah:
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
The government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has committed a grave sin by adopting a decision that strips Lebanon of the weapons of resistance against the Israeli enemy. This decision weakens Lebanon’s position and its ability to confront the ongoing Israeli-American aggression, and effectively grants Israel what it failed to achieve through its wars on Lebanon. In previous confrontations, we faced the enemy with valor and forced it into an agreement that obligated Israel to cease its aggression and withdraw from Lebanese territory.
This decision clearly violates the National Pact and also contradicts the government’s ministerial statement, specifically the fifth paragraph, which states:
“The government, in accordance with the National Accord Document adopted in Taif, is committed to taking all necessary measures to liberate all Lebanese territory from Israeli occupation and to extend the sovereignty of the state over all its lands exclusively through its own capabilities, and to deploy the Lebanese Army in the internationally recognized Lebanese border area.”
Preserving Lebanon’s strength, including the weapons of the resistance, is part of these necessary measures. Likewise, strengthening the Lebanese Army and arming it to enable the expulsion of the Israeli enemy and to protect and liberate national territory is also among these measures.
This decision was the result of pressure from U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein, as explicitly stated in the cabinet session’s justification. Prime Minister Salam announced that the cabinet “decided to continue discussions on the American paper next Thursday and tasked the Lebanese Army with developing an implementation plan to contain all arms by the end of this year.”
This decision serves Israel’s interests entirely and leaves Lebanon exposed and vulnerable to the Israeli enemy without any deterrent force.
The government has disregarded the constitutional commitment made by President Joseph Aoun in his inauguration speech, in which he pledged:
“My mandate will call for a discussion of a comprehensive defense policy as part of a national security strategy at the diplomatic, economic, and military levels, empowering the Lebanese state, I repeat, the Lebanese state, to remove Israeli occupation and repel its aggression from all Lebanese territory.”
What the government has decided is, in effect, a strategy of surrender and a blatant undermining of Lebanon’s sovereignty.
The withdrawal of Hezbollah and Amal ministers from the cabinet session was an expression of total rejection of this decision. This stance reflects the position of large and diverse segments of Lebanese society across regions, sects, and political affiliations. It also reflects the broad public opposition to subjecting Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli domination.
This decision undermines Lebanon’s sovereignty and grants Israel a free hand to tamper with Lebanon’s security, geography, politics, and very existence. Therefore, we will treat this decision as null and void.
At the same time, we remain open to dialogue, to ending Israeli aggression, liberating our land, releasing detainees, rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal attacks, and discussing a national security strategy, but not under the pressure of aggression.
The agreement must first be implemented by the Israeli side. The government’s top priority should be, as stated in its own ministerial declaration:
“To take all necessary measures to liberate all Lebanese lands from Israeli occupation.”
To our honorable people, we say: this is a passing summer cloud, in shaAllah.
We are accustomed to patience and to victory.
— Hezbollah Media Relations
Wednesday, 6 August 2025 / 12 Safar 1447 AH
🟡@enemywatch
❤33👍3
Enemy Watch — Official
🇱🇧 | In an unusual development, the Lebanese Army has launched a sweeping operation in Baalbek, utilizing drones to strike targets. Targets are not exposed. 🔹@enemywatch
🇱🇧 | In the recent Lebanese Army operation, a notorious wanted individual was neutralized. The action was not directed against the resistance or any particular group. However, we must remain cautious at this critical juncture in Lebanese history, where any false or partially inaccurate news can spark serious problems for all parties involved.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
👍19💯1
🏴☠️ | The Guardian, citing sources from Israeli Unit 8200:
• Microsoft’s cloud platform Azure was used to build an intelligence repository on West Bank residents.
• Data from Azure helped coordinate raids in Gaza and the West Bank.
• The information was allegedly used to blackmail, detain, or assassinate individuals.
🔹@enemywatch
• Microsoft’s cloud platform Azure was used to build an intelligence repository on West Bank residents.
• Data from Azure helped coordinate raids in Gaza and the West Bank.
• The information was allegedly used to blackmail, detain, or assassinate individuals.
🔹@enemywatch
🤬40
☑️ | In an unexpected move, the Indian regime has not been fully shaken by Trump’s tariff lashes, which are now reaching 50%. Despite this, the regime announced it will continue its business ties with Russia, effectively ignoring American pressure.
In another official announcement made today, it is expected that Modi is planning to visit China by the end of this month; a development that will certainly irritate the United States.
It is still unclear how the pro-Israel Indian regime is managing this balancing act, but the current ground reality shows that India has, for now, officially rejected American bullying. What happens next, and how far things escalate or de-escalate, remains to be seen.
Aside from the fact that the ruling regime has long acted as a puppet of American and Israeli interests, India’s establishment remains powerful enough to manage such scenarios — time will tell.
🔹@enemywatch
In another official announcement made today, it is expected that Modi is planning to visit China by the end of this month; a development that will certainly irritate the United States.
It is still unclear how the pro-Israel Indian regime is managing this balancing act, but the current ground reality shows that India has, for now, officially rejected American bullying. What happens next, and how far things escalate or de-escalate, remains to be seen.
Aside from the fact that the ruling regime has long acted as a puppet of American and Israeli interests, India’s establishment remains powerful enough to manage such scenarios — time will tell.
🔹@enemywatch
❤11💯7👍2
🏴☠️ | Important: The Five Demands of the Zionist Regime from the MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq):
The 36th court session addressing the charges against 104 members of the MEK was held today.
According to Simyari, an expert on West Asian affairs, based on exchanges between the MEK and the Zionist regime, the group was tasked with five missions in return for two guarantees from Israel.
In their first meeting in Baghdad in 2003, the MEK was asked to carry out intelligence operations on the Fatah movement, Iran’s missile and nuclear programs, the Axis of Resistance, and internal sentiment monitoring (referred to as “domestic temperature checks”).
The “domestic temperature” project involved monitoring Iran’s internal affairs via phone surveillance and cyber activities.
Before the Iranian Revolution, the MEK had ties with Fatah, which israel was aware of. The Zionists wanted the MEK to gather information about Fatah, evaluate Iran’s relations with the group, and influence its decisions, thus betraying an ally, confirming the group’s traitorous nature.
In exchange, israel provided the MEK with financial support and helped establish a lobbying presence in the U.S., managed by a MEK operative named Jafarzadeh (alias: Behnam), which eventually resulted in the removal of the group from the U.S. terrorist list.
In 2008, Mossad’s Iran desk held a five-hour meeting with MEK representatives including Bijan Rahimi (alias: Khosro) and Hadi Roshanravan (code name: Mahmoud), solidifying cooperation.
After this meeting, internal MEK conversations which are now documented reveal the group mocking the israelis as delusional, quoting them saying: “With your help, we will finish Iran by 2009.” That very year, Iran faced the unrest of the 2009 sedition.
MEK operatives admitted they were unsure of israel’s exact goals, but it became clear the Zionist regime sought regime change in Iran through tools of internal subversion.
Notably, a week before Iranian nuclear scientist Martyr Fakhrizadeh was assassinated, a press conference was held in the U.S. where Jafarzadeh publicly accused him of building Iran’s atomic bomb. Fakhrizadeh was killed just one week later a chilling confirmation of coordinated espionage and targeting.
🔹@enemywatch
The 36th court session addressing the charges against 104 members of the MEK was held today.
According to Simyari, an expert on West Asian affairs, based on exchanges between the MEK and the Zionist regime, the group was tasked with five missions in return for two guarantees from Israel.
In their first meeting in Baghdad in 2003, the MEK was asked to carry out intelligence operations on the Fatah movement, Iran’s missile and nuclear programs, the Axis of Resistance, and internal sentiment monitoring (referred to as “domestic temperature checks”).
The “domestic temperature” project involved monitoring Iran’s internal affairs via phone surveillance and cyber activities.
Before the Iranian Revolution, the MEK had ties with Fatah, which israel was aware of. The Zionists wanted the MEK to gather information about Fatah, evaluate Iran’s relations with the group, and influence its decisions, thus betraying an ally, confirming the group’s traitorous nature.
In exchange, israel provided the MEK with financial support and helped establish a lobbying presence in the U.S., managed by a MEK operative named Jafarzadeh (alias: Behnam), which eventually resulted in the removal of the group from the U.S. terrorist list.
In 2008, Mossad’s Iran desk held a five-hour meeting with MEK representatives including Bijan Rahimi (alias: Khosro) and Hadi Roshanravan (code name: Mahmoud), solidifying cooperation.
After this meeting, internal MEK conversations which are now documented reveal the group mocking the israelis as delusional, quoting them saying: “With your help, we will finish Iran by 2009.” That very year, Iran faced the unrest of the 2009 sedition.
MEK operatives admitted they were unsure of israel’s exact goals, but it became clear the Zionist regime sought regime change in Iran through tools of internal subversion.
Notably, a week before Iranian nuclear scientist Martyr Fakhrizadeh was assassinated, a press conference was held in the U.S. where Jafarzadeh publicly accused him of building Iran’s atomic bomb. Fakhrizadeh was killed just one week later a chilling confirmation of coordinated espionage and targeting.
🔹@enemywatch
🤬8❤1
✅ | In a move that reflects serious preparation for high-stakes scenarios, Iran has formally established a new government body, the Supreme Defense Council, tasked with managing the country’s affairs during wartime. This development adds to Iran’s expanding institutional framework around national security.
The Council will reportedly include the heads of the three branches of government: President Masoud Pezeshkian, Chief Justice Mohsen Ejei, and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, along with two representatives personally appointed by Supreme Leader Imam Khamenei (yet to be named). It will also include Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Major General Abolrahim Mousavi, IRGC Commander-in-Chief Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour, Army Commander-in-Chief Major General Amir Hatami, Minister of Intelligence Ismael Khateeb, and the Commander of the Khatam al-Anbiyaa Joint Headquarters, whose identity has not yet been confirmed, possibly Brigadier General Ali Aliabadi.
In parallel, Ali Larijani was appointed Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC). Defense Minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh welcomed the appointment and stated that at this critical juncture, the presence of an experienced statesman with deep insight in this sensitive and strategic position will prove to be both impactful and instrumental. Additionally, Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian appointed Ali Akbar Ahmadian as the President’s Special Representative and Head of the Headquarters for the Advancement of National and Strategic Projects. In the decree, Pezeshkian emphasized the need to unite state and society, eliminate barriers to civic and diasporic participation, attract investment, and harness the country’s elite capacities. This restructuring comes after a notable public remark by Ali Akbar Velayati, senior advisor to the Supreme Leader, who tweeted that the people have faith and that there is consensus on the need for systemic reform. His words were widely interpreted as foreshadowing deeper structural shifts within the Islamic Republic.
Criticism lingers, however, over President Pezeshkian’s leadership, particularly regarding domestic issues. Close circles within the government reportedly lack confidence in his performance. Still, the appointment of trusted figures like Larijani and Ahmadian, both closely connected to the Supreme Leader, suggests a strategic power-balancing effort aimed at avoiding institutional collapse and public suffering. Although Larijani has been labeled a reformist and was previously disqualified from presidential bids, he remains a long-trusted figure within the Leader’s camp. He is a seasoned envoy who led sensitive missions in Russia, Syria, and Lebanon. During the recent 12-day israeli aggression on Iran, it was widely understood that strategic decision-making, including military appointments and coordination of drone and missile strikes (TP-3, BF-1), was directed by the Supreme Leader and his senior team. This suggests that the previous national security apparatus underperformed, and internal voices had long questioned its operational flaws. The new SNSC, under Larijani’s leadership, could represent a functional upgrade. Although Pezeshkian will formally chair it, the real distribution of power and decision-making authority remains unclear as of now but it is not like before.
The formation is now linked to the limited public presence of the Leader due to security protocols. Imam Khamenei’s appearances have been reduced as a result of heightened security measures. However, according to ground reports, he has actually increased his involvement in meetings and oversight of all levels of the security apparatus following the israeli aggression. He has been advised to appear and speak publicly only on critical occasions, a recommendation he has followed. This council will undoubtedly increase the frequency of direct commands from the Leader and also help address public and institutional expectations for his presence.
🔹@enemywatch
+
The Council will reportedly include the heads of the three branches of government: President Masoud Pezeshkian, Chief Justice Mohsen Ejei, and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, along with two representatives personally appointed by Supreme Leader Imam Khamenei (yet to be named). It will also include Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Major General Abolrahim Mousavi, IRGC Commander-in-Chief Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour, Army Commander-in-Chief Major General Amir Hatami, Minister of Intelligence Ismael Khateeb, and the Commander of the Khatam al-Anbiyaa Joint Headquarters, whose identity has not yet been confirmed, possibly Brigadier General Ali Aliabadi.
In parallel, Ali Larijani was appointed Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC). Defense Minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh welcomed the appointment and stated that at this critical juncture, the presence of an experienced statesman with deep insight in this sensitive and strategic position will prove to be both impactful and instrumental. Additionally, Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian appointed Ali Akbar Ahmadian as the President’s Special Representative and Head of the Headquarters for the Advancement of National and Strategic Projects. In the decree, Pezeshkian emphasized the need to unite state and society, eliminate barriers to civic and diasporic participation, attract investment, and harness the country’s elite capacities. This restructuring comes after a notable public remark by Ali Akbar Velayati, senior advisor to the Supreme Leader, who tweeted that the people have faith and that there is consensus on the need for systemic reform. His words were widely interpreted as foreshadowing deeper structural shifts within the Islamic Republic.
Criticism lingers, however, over President Pezeshkian’s leadership, particularly regarding domestic issues. Close circles within the government reportedly lack confidence in his performance. Still, the appointment of trusted figures like Larijani and Ahmadian, both closely connected to the Supreme Leader, suggests a strategic power-balancing effort aimed at avoiding institutional collapse and public suffering. Although Larijani has been labeled a reformist and was previously disqualified from presidential bids, he remains a long-trusted figure within the Leader’s camp. He is a seasoned envoy who led sensitive missions in Russia, Syria, and Lebanon. During the recent 12-day israeli aggression on Iran, it was widely understood that strategic decision-making, including military appointments and coordination of drone and missile strikes (TP-3, BF-1), was directed by the Supreme Leader and his senior team. This suggests that the previous national security apparatus underperformed, and internal voices had long questioned its operational flaws. The new SNSC, under Larijani’s leadership, could represent a functional upgrade. Although Pezeshkian will formally chair it, the real distribution of power and decision-making authority remains unclear as of now but it is not like before.
The formation is now linked to the limited public presence of the Leader due to security protocols. Imam Khamenei’s appearances have been reduced as a result of heightened security measures. However, according to ground reports, he has actually increased his involvement in meetings and oversight of all levels of the security apparatus following the israeli aggression. He has been advised to appear and speak publicly only on critical occasions, a recommendation he has followed. This council will undoubtedly increase the frequency of direct commands from the Leader and also help address public and institutional expectations for his presence.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤17🙏4👍2😱1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | In a move that reflects serious preparation for high-stakes scenarios, Iran has formally established a new government body, the Supreme Defense Council, tasked with managing the country’s affairs during wartime. This development adds to Iran’s expanding…
+
The formation of the Supreme Defense Council indicates that Iran is preparing for a broader, possibly imminent war scenario that may be far more expansive than previous skirmishes. The stated goal is to accelerate defense decision-making and to create a wartime governance structure capable of acting quickly and cohesively. What remains to be seen is how much authority Pezeshkian truly holds within this redesigned system and whether this restructuring signals strategic confidence or a reaction to deeper internal crises.
🔹@enemywatch | Details to follow...
The formation of the Supreme Defense Council indicates that Iran is preparing for a broader, possibly imminent war scenario that may be far more expansive than previous skirmishes. The stated goal is to accelerate defense decision-making and to create a wartime governance structure capable of acting quickly and cohesively. What remains to be seen is how much authority Pezeshkian truly holds within this redesigned system and whether this restructuring signals strategic confidence or a reaction to deeper internal crises.
🔹@enemywatch | Details to follow...
❤25🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷 | The Iranian Intelligence Ministry announced that its forces discovered and seized more than 210 firearms in three separate operations in August in Sistan and Baluchestan Province, noting that a significant number of these weapons were of American manufacture. The ministry says that the weapons were intended for use by 'elements affiliated with foreign intelligence services, particularly israel's Mossad, as well as armed groups'.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤38👍12🤝3🔥2
🇮🇷 | The Iranian Minister of Information and Communications Technology, Sattar Hashemi, has announced that a fiber-optic factory built recently in Venezuela has begun operations. This follows a November 2024 agreement between Iran and Venezuela to build the plant in the La Guaira region, backed by a $10 million investment from an Iranian knowledge-based company. The factory is intended to reduce Venezuela’s reliance on imported fiber-optic equipment and serve as a regional supplier, reflecting the deepening technological and industrial cooperation between the two countries amid broader efforts to strengthen their bilateral ties.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤35👍4
🟡 | The Islamic Resistance, Hezbollah in Lebanon, proudly and honorably announces the martyrdom of the mujahid Hosam Qassem Ghorab (r), known as “Sheikh Kazem.”
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤29🙏12💔4😭2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇱🇧 | israeli warplanes struck the outskirts of Ansar in Nabatieh District, as well as Al-Mahmoudiyah, Jbaa, and Tuffahata in southern Lebanon.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬39💔3❤1😭1
🇵🇸 | israel's Air Force is currently carrying out one of its most violent campaigns in the Gaza Strip, on the eve of the cabinet meeting to decide on the Gaza annexation plan.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
🤬39💔3
🇮🇷 | Foreign Minister Syed Abbas Araghchi:
The statement by the Secretary-General of Hezbollah shows that the party will stand firm against the disarmament plan. The position of the Secretary-General of Hezbollah was firm, and the Amal Movement along with Nabih Berri supported the party’s stance. Those seeking to disarm Hezbollah believe they can continue down this path after the blows the party has endured.
🔹@enemywatch
The statement by the Secretary-General of Hezbollah shows that the party will stand firm against the disarmament plan. The position of the Secretary-General of Hezbollah was firm, and the Amal Movement along with Nabih Berri supported the party’s stance. Those seeking to disarm Hezbollah believe they can continue down this path after the blows the party has endured.
🔹@enemywatch
👍25❤10🔥6
🇮🇶 | 🇮🇶 Secretary-General of Iraqi Resistance: Kataib Hezbollah, Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi:
• “Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani’s decisions have become unbalanced and contrary to foundational principles. I call on the leaders of the Coordination Framework to impose restraints on him.”
• “It is vital to confront these decisions and protect Iraq and its sacred sites until the end of Sudani’s term on November 11.”
• “I recommend the formation of a specialized committee within the Coordination Framework to investigate the incident involving the Ministry of Agriculture and uncover the full truth.”
• “Surveillance footage and testimonies from the officers responsible for securing the building must be utilized in this investigation.”
• “We reject any form of settlement. The law must take its full course, and all perpetrators regardless of who they are must face justice.”
• “We must investigate the reasons and motivations behind the arrest and severe torture of civilians at the al-Saqr military base.”
🔹@enemywatch
• “Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani’s decisions have become unbalanced and contrary to foundational principles. I call on the leaders of the Coordination Framework to impose restraints on him.”
• “It is vital to confront these decisions and protect Iraq and its sacred sites until the end of Sudani’s term on November 11.”
• “I recommend the formation of a specialized committee within the Coordination Framework to investigate the incident involving the Ministry of Agriculture and uncover the full truth.”
• “Surveillance footage and testimonies from the officers responsible for securing the building must be utilized in this investigation.”
• “We reject any form of settlement. The law must take its full course, and all perpetrators regardless of who they are must face justice.”
• “We must investigate the reasons and motivations behind the arrest and severe torture of civilians at the al-Saqr military base.”
🔹@enemywatch
💯20👍3
🇱🇧 | Key statements by Hezbollah MP Dr. Hussein al-Hajj Hassan:
• The Lebanese government has shown it is not a government for all Lebanese by deciding to task the army with developing a plan to confine weapons to state control.
• Since its formation, the government has not convened even once to discuss israeli attacks on Lebanon.
• Given the ongoing israeli occupation, the government should have focused on confronting the attacks instead of planning to confine weapons.
• Do officials ask themselves whether they are capable of defending Lebanon or simply responding to American and israeli demands?
• The government should resist external pressures, as national unity is the true way to confront them.
• By its decision, the government is shifting the conflict from israel-Lebanon to Lebanese against Lebanese.
• American envoy Tom Barrack explicitly stated “no guarantees.”
• The recent war caused significant damage, but the resistance has not and will not end.
• israel’s actions after the ceasefire, amidst international silence, have far exceeded what it achieved during the war.
• We are currently awaiting the army commander’s opinion on preparing an implementation plan for weapons confinement.
• Consultations are ongoing to decide our position on participating in the government’s next session.
• The government’s decision has led the country into a tunnel with unknown outcomes.
• This unprecedented, irresponsible decision has plunged Lebanon into an internal crisis without justification.
• Hezbollah does not wish to escalate tensions in Lebanon.
• How can sovereignty be discussed when a foreign envoy’s document sits on the cabinet table for deliberation?
• We do not seek guarantees for Hezbollah, but guarantees for Lebanon and its people.
• We requested from the Prime Minister $40 million to renovate some buildings in the southern suburbs; so far, there has been no response.
🔹@enemywatch
• The Lebanese government has shown it is not a government for all Lebanese by deciding to task the army with developing a plan to confine weapons to state control.
• Since its formation, the government has not convened even once to discuss israeli attacks on Lebanon.
• Given the ongoing israeli occupation, the government should have focused on confronting the attacks instead of planning to confine weapons.
• Do officials ask themselves whether they are capable of defending Lebanon or simply responding to American and israeli demands?
• The government should resist external pressures, as national unity is the true way to confront them.
• By its decision, the government is shifting the conflict from israel-Lebanon to Lebanese against Lebanese.
• American envoy Tom Barrack explicitly stated “no guarantees.”
• The recent war caused significant damage, but the resistance has not and will not end.
• israel’s actions after the ceasefire, amidst international silence, have far exceeded what it achieved during the war.
• We are currently awaiting the army commander’s opinion on preparing an implementation plan for weapons confinement.
• Consultations are ongoing to decide our position on participating in the government’s next session.
• The government’s decision has led the country into a tunnel with unknown outcomes.
• This unprecedented, irresponsible decision has plunged Lebanon into an internal crisis without justification.
• Hezbollah does not wish to escalate tensions in Lebanon.
• How can sovereignty be discussed when a foreign envoy’s document sits on the cabinet table for deliberation?
• We do not seek guarantees for Hezbollah, but guarantees for Lebanon and its people.
• We requested from the Prime Minister $40 million to renovate some buildings in the southern suburbs; so far, there has been no response.
🔹@enemywatch
💯21🤬3❤1
⚠️ | All news related to Hezbollah, or whenever you see “a source in Hezbollah told [the] informed [media], Asharq Al-Awsat, Jadeed, Al Jazeera, Al Hadath, Al Arabiya, Reuters should be considered waste products—Zionist psyops. Why would any channel claiming a pro-resistance identity share their content?
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯28👍5🤝1