📕 | The Dangerous Glorification of Hitler (l):
There is a disturbing trend in some resistance channels glorifying Adolf Hitler for killing Jews and related issues. Let us be clear: this is entirely unjustified. Hitler was a brutal despot, and there is no moral, religious, or political basis to praise his atrocities. No cause rooted in justice can ever be built upon hate.
Worryingly, one cleric have also begun indulging in this rhetoric, gathering sizeable audiences (Gen Zs), who support them regardless of the content they promote. This signals a dangerous drift toward dehumanization, sadism, and ideological decay. It is a moral obligation upon all conscientious voices to reject this trend and remain grounded in truth.
Imam Khamenei (H) has addressed this issue multiple times with moral clarity. He condemned both the crimes of Hitler and the new forms of imperial aggression modeled after him. Below are two examples of his statements that remain deeply relevant today:
“It’s possible that the crematoria which the Jews claim existed are a lie; but the crimes of Hitler are not a lie.”
— 19 Ordibehesht 1384 / May 9, 2005
Similarity between America’s excuse for invading Iraq and Hitler’s justification for starting World War II
“This attack [America’s invasion of Iraq] has broader dimensions beyond Iraq. It’s not just about the invasion of one country. An attack on any country — whether Iraq or another — by a distant power using artificial and fabricated pretexts is wrong in any case. People and public opinion around the world have condemned this action. Even in the United States itself, you can see massive protests on television — gatherings of people in the East and West of the world.
But for the Islamic world, the matter is more dangerous and has wider implications. One should not look at it merely as a state or power attacking another country for various motives. Of course, the Americans try to portray the issue differently. They pretend that their goal is to overthrow Saddam. Their justification is that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction or that he promotes and supports terrorism. They ask the Iraqi people to support the Americans. This is how the Americans present it to the world — but it’s a deception. Many people in the world are aware of this now.
The real issue is that a new, extremely dangerous and shameless form of Hitlerism has emerged in history. They are acting just like Hitler did at the start of World War II. When Hitler began his attacks on neighboring European countries, he justified his actions to the public by saying that Germany needed ‘living space’ — meaning that the country was too small for the German people and regime, and they needed more room to breathe and survive. Hitler used this ridiculous and false reasoning to convince both his own people and global public opinion.”
— 1 Farvardin 1382 / March 21, 2003
🔹@enemywatch
There is a disturbing trend in some resistance channels glorifying Adolf Hitler for killing Jews and related issues. Let us be clear: this is entirely unjustified. Hitler was a brutal despot, and there is no moral, religious, or political basis to praise his atrocities. No cause rooted in justice can ever be built upon hate.
Worryingly, one cleric have also begun indulging in this rhetoric, gathering sizeable audiences (Gen Zs), who support them regardless of the content they promote. This signals a dangerous drift toward dehumanization, sadism, and ideological decay. It is a moral obligation upon all conscientious voices to reject this trend and remain grounded in truth.
Imam Khamenei (H) has addressed this issue multiple times with moral clarity. He condemned both the crimes of Hitler and the new forms of imperial aggression modeled after him. Below are two examples of his statements that remain deeply relevant today:
“It’s possible that the crematoria which the Jews claim existed are a lie; but the crimes of Hitler are not a lie.”
— 19 Ordibehesht 1384 / May 9, 2005
Similarity between America’s excuse for invading Iraq and Hitler’s justification for starting World War II
“This attack [America’s invasion of Iraq] has broader dimensions beyond Iraq. It’s not just about the invasion of one country. An attack on any country — whether Iraq or another — by a distant power using artificial and fabricated pretexts is wrong in any case. People and public opinion around the world have condemned this action. Even in the United States itself, you can see massive protests on television — gatherings of people in the East and West of the world.
But for the Islamic world, the matter is more dangerous and has wider implications. One should not look at it merely as a state or power attacking another country for various motives. Of course, the Americans try to portray the issue differently. They pretend that their goal is to overthrow Saddam. Their justification is that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction or that he promotes and supports terrorism. They ask the Iraqi people to support the Americans. This is how the Americans present it to the world — but it’s a deception. Many people in the world are aware of this now.
The real issue is that a new, extremely dangerous and shameless form of Hitlerism has emerged in history. They are acting just like Hitler did at the start of World War II. When Hitler began his attacks on neighboring European countries, he justified his actions to the public by saying that Germany needed ‘living space’ — meaning that the country was too small for the German people and regime, and they needed more room to breathe and survive. Hitler used this ridiculous and false reasoning to convince both his own people and global public opinion.”
— 1 Farvardin 1382 / March 21, 2003
🔹@enemywatch
10💯31❤3🫡2😡1
🇮🇷 | Iran Strengthens Regional Ties and Launches Trade Council to Expand Investment in Iraq:
In recent days, Iran has achieved notable diplomatic progress, successfully resuming and strengthening relations with Iraq, Egypt, and Lebanon. On 2 June, Iran officially launched a Trade Policy Council for Iraq, aiming to halve the current trade imbalance and significantly enhance private sector participation. The initiative reflects Iran’s broader strategy to expand its economic and political influence across 14 Iraqi provinces.
The council is tasked with facilitating joint ventures, improving transport and customs mechanisms, and resolving persistent investor concerns related to ownership rights, banking infrastructure, and financial guarantees. Iraq’s ambassador to Tehran underscored the scale of cooperation, pointing to $70 billion worth of potential projects in key sectors such as energy, housing, and industry.
🔹@enemywatch
In recent days, Iran has achieved notable diplomatic progress, successfully resuming and strengthening relations with Iraq, Egypt, and Lebanon. On 2 June, Iran officially launched a Trade Policy Council for Iraq, aiming to halve the current trade imbalance and significantly enhance private sector participation. The initiative reflects Iran’s broader strategy to expand its economic and political influence across 14 Iraqi provinces.
The council is tasked with facilitating joint ventures, improving transport and customs mechanisms, and resolving persistent investor concerns related to ownership rights, banking infrastructure, and financial guarantees. Iraq’s ambassador to Tehran underscored the scale of cooperation, pointing to $70 billion worth of potential projects in key sectors such as energy, housing, and industry.
🔹@enemywatch
❤15🔥1
Forwarded from Rydro (Abbas)
🔸 We have to understand that the Islamic revolution was not just a political mission, its vision goes way beyond that.
🔸 The Islamic revolution was an important step aimed to prepare the ground for the reappearance of Imam Mahdi (AJ). To reject the tyrants of our time and uphold the Islamic banner, as in the time of Imam Mahdi (AJ), it will be the same goal, to reject the tyrants and uphold the Islamic banner, to establish an Islamic government. The revolution reminded us that to wait for the Imam, is not done passively with mere slogans.
The reality is that it is not us who are waiting for the Imam, but rather the Imam is waiting for us. We must strive to reject tyrants and adhere to the religion of Allah, so that when the Imam appears, there will be those who support him, because when the Imam appears, the movement will begin, towards the formation and establishment of an Islamic state.
🔸 With that said, everybody under the Islamic government, the Islamic Republic for example as of today, from its courts, schools, hospitals, institutions, hawzas [seminaries] all the way to its military, is not just for national survival, but for the preparation of a global transformation.
When the Imam returns, his government, his state will not only require soldiers and commanders, but also judges to uphold justice, scholars to assist, teachers to shape minds and educate, engineers to build, doctors to heal, administrations to organize and carry their duties. The Imam’s mission is not limited to military only, but to establish an Islamic state, a complete Islamic state.
🔸 Therefore, every individual under the Islamic Republic or anywhere in the Islamic world, carries a responsibility, no role is ever small or irrelevant when it comes to safeguarding and strengthening the Islamic government. Every effort must be with the intention to serve Imam Mahdi (AJ), each role can have a contribution like a brick in the foundation of Imam Mahdi’s (AJ) future government, as the Imam’s government will be building and continuing on what’s already been laid down before his return.
#Resistance #Islamic #Analysis
👤 Rydro (Abbas)
✍️ 36th Anniversary of Ayatollah Khomeini’s Passing
🗓 6th of Dhul-Hijjah, 1446 - 3rd of June, 2025
@Rydro313
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤20💯3
🇮🇷 Breaking — On the occasion of the 36th anniversary of Imam Khomeini’s demise, Imam Khamenei will deliver a live televised speech at the Mausoleum of Imam Khomeini on tomorrow, June 4, 2025.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤24🙏2🤝1
🇮🇷 Report — Today evening, Imam Khamenei (H) addressed a mourning gathering of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) in his office: (1/2):
His speech is as follows:
When it is said that “the companions of Imam al-Sadiq (A) numbered four thousand,” where did they come from? Who formed them? As you say—who turned four hundred into four thousand? I have repeatedly quoted this narration from Imam al-Sadiq (peace be upon him) in these gatherings: “After Imam Husayn (A), the people turned back (on their faith), except for three.” In some narrations it says “except for three,” and in another, “except for five.”
That is, the tragedy of Karbala instilled such terror in the hearts of everyone across the Islamic world. They saw that this government was so brutal, so ruthless, that it didn’t even spare the grandson of the Prophet and treated the Prophet’s family in such a horrific manner. Hearts were struck with such fear that around Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A), only three, four, or five companions remained. And not all of them were even in Medina—one or two were in Kufa, for example. Imam Zayn al-Abidin gathered these few individuals and, over 35 years, gradually nurtured the groundwork.
Then came the time of Imam al-Baqir (A), and the number of followers began to increase. That same narration continues: “Then people began to join and became many.” Slowly, they began to connect and join. Who brought them together? It was Imam al-Baqir.
To remove fear from people’s hearts, merely discussing religious and jurisprudential topics is not enough—other things are needed. You can see this even today: in order to transform three or four individuals into hundreds and then thousands, one must act and speak in a different way. This is what Imam al-Baqir (A) did.
🔹@enemywatch
+
His speech is as follows:
When it is said that “the companions of Imam al-Sadiq (A) numbered four thousand,” where did they come from? Who formed them? As you say—who turned four hundred into four thousand? I have repeatedly quoted this narration from Imam al-Sadiq (peace be upon him) in these gatherings: “After Imam Husayn (A), the people turned back (on their faith), except for three.” In some narrations it says “except for three,” and in another, “except for five.”
That is, the tragedy of Karbala instilled such terror in the hearts of everyone across the Islamic world. They saw that this government was so brutal, so ruthless, that it didn’t even spare the grandson of the Prophet and treated the Prophet’s family in such a horrific manner. Hearts were struck with such fear that around Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A), only three, four, or five companions remained. And not all of them were even in Medina—one or two were in Kufa, for example. Imam Zayn al-Abidin gathered these few individuals and, over 35 years, gradually nurtured the groundwork.
Then came the time of Imam al-Baqir (A), and the number of followers began to increase. That same narration continues: “Then people began to join and became many.” Slowly, they began to connect and join. Who brought them together? It was Imam al-Baqir.
To remove fear from people’s hearts, merely discussing religious and jurisprudential topics is not enough—other things are needed. You can see this even today: in order to transform three or four individuals into hundreds and then thousands, one must act and speak in a different way. This is what Imam al-Baqir (A) did.
🔹@enemywatch
+
❤14😭2
Enemy Watch — Official
🇮🇷 Report — Today evening, Imam Khamenei (H) addressed a mourning gathering of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) in his office: (1/2): His speech is as follows: When it is said that “the companions of Imam al-Sadiq (A) numbered four thousand,” where did they come…
+
(2/2):
This idea that Imam al-Sadiq and Imam al-Baqir (A) took advantage of the conflict between the Umayyads and the Abbasids is incorrect—such conflict didn’t even exist during the time of Imam al-Baqir. There was absolutely no such dispute in that era. The Imam lived under extreme pressure from 95 AH to 114 AH—a span of nineteen years—and during that time, he was contemporaneous with Hisham and, before Hisham, with several other wicked, oppressive, and shameless rulers from the Umayyad and Marwanid dynasties.
Despite facing such brutal regimes, Imam al-Baqir (A) carried out his mission—the influence he had, the expansion of Shi‘i thought, and the growth in the number of committed followers in his circle were all due to his own efforts and spiritual leadership. We do not see a similar situation in the lives of the other Imams—not in this particular way. Of course, the later Imams—such as Imam al-Hadi, Imam al-Jawad, and Imam al-Askari—faced their own unique challenges and strategies, but what occurred during the time of Imam al-Baqir was distinct.
His situation was such that he was exiled—summoned to Damascus. In fact, Imam al-Baqir (A) is the only Imam who was taken to Damascus twice as a prisoner: once at the age of four during the reign of Yazid, and once during the reign of Hisham, when he and Imam al-Sadiq (A) were taken together. Important events took place during that second journey—events that must be studied carefully when understanding the life of Imam al-Baqir.
But even that wasn’t the end. The struggle had to continue. For that reason, the Imam gave specific instructions: “Mourn for me in Mina for ten days.” Not because the Imam needed mourning, but because of what it symbolized. In Mina, people from all corners of the Islamic world gather. When they come across a mourning gathering, they will ask: Who is this for? Why is there mourning here? What happened? In this way, the message of Imam al-Baqir reaches every corner of the Muslim world. This was a brilliant political strategy—one that combined spirituality with strategic communication
🔹@enemywatch
(2/2):
This idea that Imam al-Sadiq and Imam al-Baqir (A) took advantage of the conflict between the Umayyads and the Abbasids is incorrect—such conflict didn’t even exist during the time of Imam al-Baqir. There was absolutely no such dispute in that era. The Imam lived under extreme pressure from 95 AH to 114 AH—a span of nineteen years—and during that time, he was contemporaneous with Hisham and, before Hisham, with several other wicked, oppressive, and shameless rulers from the Umayyad and Marwanid dynasties.
Despite facing such brutal regimes, Imam al-Baqir (A) carried out his mission—the influence he had, the expansion of Shi‘i thought, and the growth in the number of committed followers in his circle were all due to his own efforts and spiritual leadership. We do not see a similar situation in the lives of the other Imams—not in this particular way. Of course, the later Imams—such as Imam al-Hadi, Imam al-Jawad, and Imam al-Askari—faced their own unique challenges and strategies, but what occurred during the time of Imam al-Baqir was distinct.
His situation was such that he was exiled—summoned to Damascus. In fact, Imam al-Baqir (A) is the only Imam who was taken to Damascus twice as a prisoner: once at the age of four during the reign of Yazid, and once during the reign of Hisham, when he and Imam al-Sadiq (A) were taken together. Important events took place during that second journey—events that must be studied carefully when understanding the life of Imam al-Baqir.
But even that wasn’t the end. The struggle had to continue. For that reason, the Imam gave specific instructions: “Mourn for me in Mina for ten days.” Not because the Imam needed mourning, but because of what it symbolized. In Mina, people from all corners of the Islamic world gather. When they come across a mourning gathering, they will ask: Who is this for? Why is there mourning here? What happened? In this way, the message of Imam al-Baqir reaches every corner of the Muslim world. This was a brilliant political strategy—one that combined spirituality with strategic communication
🔹@enemywatch
❤15
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷 Report — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi laid a wreath at the grave of Hezbollah leader Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah (r) in Beirut's Dahieh. He was accompanied by Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon Mojtaba Amani, members of Hezbollah’s parliamentary faction, and Shaheed Nasrallah’s son, Jawad.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤32🫡7
🇵🇸 Breaking — Ongoing Ground battle in Northern Gaza:
Heavy clashes have erupted in the Shuja’iyya neighborhood of northern Gaza, where Israeli forces are conducting intense shelling and airstrikes. Ground troops are reportedly engaged in direct confrontations with Al-Qassam fighters. Local sources confirm multiple fatalities and injuries amid the bombardment, though exact figures remain unclear as the situation continues to unfold.
🔹@enemywatch
Heavy clashes have erupted in the Shuja’iyya neighborhood of northern Gaza, where Israeli forces are conducting intense shelling and airstrikes. Ground troops are reportedly engaged in direct confrontations with Al-Qassam fighters. Local sources confirm multiple fatalities and injuries amid the bombardment, though exact figures remain unclear as the situation continues to unfold.
🔹@enemywatch
🔥19🫡4
📩 Breaking — Terrorist Attack on the Office of Ayatollah Sistani in Syria:
Al-Ahed, citing an informed source: Terrorists attacked the office of Ayatollah Sistani in Syria, vandalized the office property, and threatened to kill the staff.
🔹@enemywatch
Al-Ahed, citing an informed source: Terrorists attacked the office of Ayatollah Sistani in Syria, vandalized the office property, and threatened to kill the staff.
🔹@enemywatch
😡28🤯1
📕 | Report — The Struggle of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) Against Jewish Influence (1/2):
One of the groups that had a profoundly destructive influence on Islamic culture during the time of Imam al-Baqir (A) were the Jews. A number of Jewish rabbis, some of whom outwardly converted to Islam while others remained in their original faith, spread throughout the Islamic community and assumed positions of scholarly authority among the more naive and gullible segments of society.
These individuals left a lasting impact on Islamic culture through the fabrication and propagation of forged hadiths known as “Isra’iliyat.” These were mostly fabricated reports concerning the lives, ranks, and circumstances of previous prophets. One notable figure who included such narrations in his writings was the famous commentator al-Tabari, who drew extensively—either directly or indirectly—on Jewish sources in his Qur’anic interpretations.
The intellectual activity of Jewish elements within the Islamic scholarly milieu, particularly in jurisprudential and theological matters, became a serious concern. This issue is so well documented in Islamic history that there is no room for doubt or ambiguity regarding its significance.
Confronting Jewish influences and their corruptive insertions into Islamic culture was a major focus in the mission of the Imams of Ahl al-Bayt (A). One of the key cultural efforts of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) was to reject and disprove the fabricated hadiths produced by Jewish elements, especially those that distorted the image and sanctity of the divine prophets.
Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) actively sought to sever the corrupt relationship that had formed between some Muslims and Jewish elements, a relationship that had taken a dangerous and misguided path. He aimed to drain this swamp of deviation from within the Islamic society.
One clear example of his struggle against the spread of Isra’iliyat (fabricated Jewish traditions) is narrated by Muhammad ibn Muslim, who said:
“I said to Imam al-Baqir (A): Some of the Jews among us claim that when Allah Almighty says: ‘So ask the people of the reminder (Ahl al-Dhikr), if you do not know’ [Qur’an 16:43], it refers to the Jewish scholars.”
The Imam (A) pointed to his own chest with his blessed hand and replied:
“We are the Ahl al-Dhikr, and we are the ones meant to be asked.”
In another report, Zurarah ibn A’yun recounts:
“One day, while Imam al-Baqir (A) was sitting facing the Kaaba, he said:
‘Looking at the House of God is an act of worship.’
At that moment, a man from the tribe of Bajilah, named Asim ibn ‘Umar, approached the Imam and said:
‘Ka‘b al-Ahbar says that the Kaaba prostrates every morning toward Bayt al-Maqdis (Quds al-muqaddas).’
Imam al-Baqir (A) asked him: ‘What do you think of this statement?’
The man replied: ‘I believe Ka‘b was telling the truth.’
The Imam (A) responded firmly: ‘You and Ka‘b al-Ahbar are both lying.’
Then, in visible anger, he added:
‘Allah has not created any place on earth more beloved than the Kaaba.’”
This was part of a covert organizational strategy, a discreet but deliberate effort that had begun even before Imam al-Baqir (A), but reached a new intensity during his leadership. It was later perfected under Imams Ja‘far al-Sadiq (A) and Musa al-Kazim (A).
This explains why, in various narrations, some companions of Imam al-Baqir (A) are identified as “Ashab al-Sirr” (Keepers of the Secret)—figures like Jabir ibn Yazid al-Ju‘fi, who played a critical role in the underground dissemination of the Imam’s spiritual and political program.
#TheNoticing
#ImamBaqir
🔹@enemywatch
+
One of the groups that had a profoundly destructive influence on Islamic culture during the time of Imam al-Baqir (A) were the Jews. A number of Jewish rabbis, some of whom outwardly converted to Islam while others remained in their original faith, spread throughout the Islamic community and assumed positions of scholarly authority among the more naive and gullible segments of society.
These individuals left a lasting impact on Islamic culture through the fabrication and propagation of forged hadiths known as “Isra’iliyat.” These were mostly fabricated reports concerning the lives, ranks, and circumstances of previous prophets. One notable figure who included such narrations in his writings was the famous commentator al-Tabari, who drew extensively—either directly or indirectly—on Jewish sources in his Qur’anic interpretations.
The intellectual activity of Jewish elements within the Islamic scholarly milieu, particularly in jurisprudential and theological matters, became a serious concern. This issue is so well documented in Islamic history that there is no room for doubt or ambiguity regarding its significance.
Confronting Jewish influences and their corruptive insertions into Islamic culture was a major focus in the mission of the Imams of Ahl al-Bayt (A). One of the key cultural efforts of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) was to reject and disprove the fabricated hadiths produced by Jewish elements, especially those that distorted the image and sanctity of the divine prophets.
Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) actively sought to sever the corrupt relationship that had formed between some Muslims and Jewish elements, a relationship that had taken a dangerous and misguided path. He aimed to drain this swamp of deviation from within the Islamic society.
One clear example of his struggle against the spread of Isra’iliyat (fabricated Jewish traditions) is narrated by Muhammad ibn Muslim, who said:
“I said to Imam al-Baqir (A): Some of the Jews among us claim that when Allah Almighty says: ‘So ask the people of the reminder (Ahl al-Dhikr), if you do not know’ [Qur’an 16:43], it refers to the Jewish scholars.”
The Imam (A) pointed to his own chest with his blessed hand and replied:
“We are the Ahl al-Dhikr, and we are the ones meant to be asked.”
In another report, Zurarah ibn A’yun recounts:
“One day, while Imam al-Baqir (A) was sitting facing the Kaaba, he said:
‘Looking at the House of God is an act of worship.’
At that moment, a man from the tribe of Bajilah, named Asim ibn ‘Umar, approached the Imam and said:
‘Ka‘b al-Ahbar says that the Kaaba prostrates every morning toward Bayt al-Maqdis (Quds al-muqaddas).’
Imam al-Baqir (A) asked him: ‘What do you think of this statement?’
The man replied: ‘I believe Ka‘b was telling the truth.’
The Imam (A) responded firmly: ‘You and Ka‘b al-Ahbar are both lying.’
Then, in visible anger, he added:
‘Allah has not created any place on earth more beloved than the Kaaba.’”
This was part of a covert organizational strategy, a discreet but deliberate effort that had begun even before Imam al-Baqir (A), but reached a new intensity during his leadership. It was later perfected under Imams Ja‘far al-Sadiq (A) and Musa al-Kazim (A).
This explains why, in various narrations, some companions of Imam al-Baqir (A) are identified as “Ashab al-Sirr” (Keepers of the Secret)—figures like Jabir ibn Yazid al-Ju‘fi, who played a critical role in the underground dissemination of the Imam’s spiritual and political program.
#TheNoticing
#ImamBaqir
🔹@enemywatch
+
💯9❤5🤯1🙏1
Enemy Watch — Official
📕 | Report — The Struggle of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) Against Jewish Influence (1/2): One of the groups that had a profoundly destructive influence on Islamic culture during the time of Imam al-Baqir (A) were the Jews. A number of Jewish rabbis, some of…
+
The Role of the Jews in the Martyrdom of Imam al-Sajjad and Imam al-Baqir (A):
Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A) and Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) were also martyred by poison administered by the descendants of Marwan ibn al-Hakam, who had Jewish lineage. Regarding the martyrdom of Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A), it is mentioned in Muntaha al-Amal, Volume 2, page 62:
“Reliable reports, generally accepted, indicate that the Imam was martyred by poison. Ibn Babawayh and a group of scholars believe that it was al-Walid ibn Abd al-Malik who poisoned the Imam, while others say it was Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik. It is possible that Hisham ordered his brother al-Walid—who was the Caliph at the time—to poison the Imam. Therefore, both may be considered responsible, and attributing the martyrdom to either is correct.”
Regarding the martyrdom of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A), the same source states:
“It has been said that the Imam was martyred by poison given by Ibrahim ibn al-Walid ibn Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, and this may have been carried out under the order of Hisham.”
🔹@enemywatch
The Role of the Jews in the Martyrdom of Imam al-Sajjad and Imam al-Baqir (A):
Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A) and Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) were also martyred by poison administered by the descendants of Marwan ibn al-Hakam, who had Jewish lineage. Regarding the martyrdom of Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A), it is mentioned in Muntaha al-Amal, Volume 2, page 62:
“Reliable reports, generally accepted, indicate that the Imam was martyred by poison. Ibn Babawayh and a group of scholars believe that it was al-Walid ibn Abd al-Malik who poisoned the Imam, while others say it was Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik. It is possible that Hisham ordered his brother al-Walid—who was the Caliph at the time—to poison the Imam. Therefore, both may be considered responsible, and attributing the martyrdom to either is correct.”
Regarding the martyrdom of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A), the same source states:
“It has been said that the Imam was martyred by poison given by Ibrahim ibn al-Walid ibn Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, and this may have been carried out under the order of Hisham.”
🔹@enemywatch
😭9😡3❤2
🇾🇪 Breaking — A Yemeni ballistic missile has been launched targeting the occupied territories.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤20🫡4🔥3👍1🙏1🤝1
✅ | Two “Grad” rockets were launched from Daraa of Syria towards the occupied Syrian territories in the Golan. This is not an ordinary event given the current developments. We need to be cautious for a while to understand who is behind the operation and to analyze its implications.
It seems like a joint coordinated attack from Ansarullah Alhouthis in Yemen another unidentified party in Syria, considering they both launched it to arrive at exactly 22:00 PM Quds time.
🔹@enemywatch
It seems like a joint coordinated attack from Ansarullah Alhouthis in Yemen another unidentified party in Syria, considering they both launched it to arrive at exactly 22:00 PM Quds time.
🔹@enemywatch
🤯12❤9🔥1🫡1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | Two “Grad” rockets were launched from Daraa of Syria towards the occupied Syrian territories in the Golan. This is not an ordinary event given the current developments. We need to be cautious for a while to understand who is behind the operation and to…
☑️ | Missiles from the Syrian side are false alarms (high chances), similar to what happened earlier months from Lebanon. But we will wait.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯11🫡2
✅ | There are some suspicions surrounding the recent rocket launches from the Syrian side. A number of Israeli military vehicles stormed the Jazeera point near the village of Maaria in the Yarmouk Basin area, located in the western countryside of Daraa.
The group that claimed responsibility for the rockets is calling itself the “Mohammed Deif Brigades.” A review of its Telegram page shows that it was launched on April 31, 2025, just a few days ago. In their statement, they claimed to be operating from the heart of occupied Palestine, yet their first operation was carried out three days later from southern Syria.
There is something vague here, and something suspicious. We must take a moment to assess the consequences carefully. Perhaps the full picture will become clearer with time.
One possibility is that this was launched by Syrian resistance, and it is a substantive resistance response intended to fight against the annexation and land grabs by Israel in Syrian territory.
Other reports suggest it may actually be “Uli al-Bas,” an active Syrian resistance force aligned with the Axis of Islamic Resistance. Meanwhile, Israelis appear to be using this as a pretext to target their own Zionist proxy, Julani. They’ve also entered Daraa, which raises the possibility of a coordinated plan to target and massacre Shia communities in Daraa. This may have occurred with the cooperation of both HTS and Israeli forces.
Time will expose the reality.
🔹@enemywatch
The group that claimed responsibility for the rockets is calling itself the “Mohammed Deif Brigades.” A review of its Telegram page shows that it was launched on April 31, 2025, just a few days ago. In their statement, they claimed to be operating from the heart of occupied Palestine, yet their first operation was carried out three days later from southern Syria.
There is something vague here, and something suspicious. We must take a moment to assess the consequences carefully. Perhaps the full picture will become clearer with time.
One possibility is that this was launched by Syrian resistance, and it is a substantive resistance response intended to fight against the annexation and land grabs by Israel in Syrian territory.
Other reports suggest it may actually be “Uli al-Bas,” an active Syrian resistance force aligned with the Axis of Islamic Resistance. Meanwhile, Israelis appear to be using this as a pretext to target their own Zionist proxy, Julani. They’ve also entered Daraa, which raises the possibility of a coordinated plan to target and massacre Shia communities in Daraa. This may have occurred with the cooperation of both HTS and Israeli forces.
Time will expose the reality.
🔹@enemywatch
✍12👍4❤1
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | There are some suspicions surrounding the recent rocket launches from the Syrian side. A number of Israeli military vehicles stormed the Jazeera point near the village of Maaria in the Yarmouk Basin area, located in the western countryside of Daraa. The…
✅ | Hamas has no connection with this. The so-called “Muhammad Deif Battalion” appears increasingly to be part of a pre-planned setup intended to negatively influence broader regional negotiations and ceasefire developments.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
👍9🫡2
❎ | As of now, Israeli warplanes have been observed flying over Daraa Governorate, indicating ongoing surveillance or the potential for further strikes. Simultaneously, Israeli ground forces have reportedly advanced into the towns of Jazerit Ma’ariya (جزيرة معريه) and Hoth Al-Yarmouk (حوض اليرموك) in the western countryside of Daraa, near the Yarmouk Basin. Israeli jets were also seen above the T4 military airbase near Palmyra in central Syria. It appears that Israelis and Turkish forces are jointly carrying out coordinated attacks over Syrian territory.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😡6🫡1
🇾🇪 Breaking — The Yemeni Armed Forces:
• We targeted, in a qualitative military operation, Lod Airport in the occupied Jaffa area, using a Palestine-2 hypersonic ballistic missile.
• The operation successfully achieved its objective — causing millions of Zionist usurper herds to flee to shelters, halting airport activity, and preventing the landing of an American military cargo plane at Lod Airport for the second consecutive day.
• Yemen has chosen not to remain a spectator to the criminality, extermination, and siege occurring in Gaza.
• Yemen will continue to escalate and expand its military operations until the aggression on Gaza ends and the siege is lifted.
🔹@enemywatch
• We targeted, in a qualitative military operation, Lod Airport in the occupied Jaffa area, using a Palestine-2 hypersonic ballistic missile.
• The operation successfully achieved its objective — causing millions of Zionist usurper herds to flee to shelters, halting airport activity, and preventing the landing of an American military cargo plane at Lod Airport for the second consecutive day.
• Yemen has chosen not to remain a spectator to the criminality, extermination, and siege occurring in Gaza.
• Yemen will continue to escalate and expand its military operations until the aggression on Gaza ends and the siege is lifted.
🔹@enemywatch
❤21🤝2😡1
❎ | Violent Zionist raids are targeting Quneitra in occupied southern Syria. Occupation aircraft have carried out strikes on Tel al-Mal and Tel al-Shaham, located in the “Triangle of Death” area in the northern countryside of Daraa. Israeli warplanes are actively flying in the airspace of the Damascus countryside. Missiles have also struck the 175th Regiment near the city of Izra, as well as the vicinity of Tel al-Mal in northern Daraa. Israeli airstrikes have targeted Barqal Hill in Kanaker and the outskirts of Tel al-Shaham in the Damascus countryside.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😡11🤯1