📩 Report — Global Observance of the 36th Death Anniversary of Imam Ruhullah Moosavi Khomeini (r):

June 1-2, 2025 — The 36th anniversary of the passing of Imam Ruhullah Moosavi Khomeini (r), the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, was solemnly observed across various parts of the world through organized commemorative events and public gatherings.

In India, a major event titled Yaad-e-Imam-e-Rahil was held at Kesar Baug Hall in Mumbai. The program witnessed the participation of a large number of people from diverse backgrounds, including religious scholars, students, and members of the wider community. Special arrangements were made to facilitate the attendance of women. The gathering served as a platform to reflect upon the intellectual, spiritual, and political legacy of Imam Khomeini (r), and his enduring influence on global resistance movements and Islamic revivalism.

The Hussaini Movement concurrently launched the eighth year of its annual digital campaign #KhomeiniForAll, which reached audiences across multiple regions and remained active in trending discussions on social media platforms.

In Pakistan, the Tehreek-e-Bidari movement organized a mass commemoration ceremony in Karachi, where thousands gathered to pay tribute to Imam Khomeini (r). The program featured speeches on his theological contributions, leadership during the Iranian Revolution, and his pivotal role in shaping modern Islamic political thought.

🔹@enemywatch

🇵🇸 | Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades released footage showing their fighters targeting a gathering of Zionist military vehicles that had advanced into the vicinity of the Customs Authority area, located in southeastern Khan Younis. The attack was carried out using 60mm standard mortar shells, striking directly at the occupying forces as part of continued resistance operations in the southern sector of the Gaza Strip.

🔹@enemywatch

🇵🇸 | Screams of a young man who was shot by occupation forces while attempting to obtain American humanitarian aid west of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip.

🔹@enemywatch

🇵🇸 | Media has aired footage of Saraya Al-Quds seizing about 170 kilograms of explosives dropped by Israeli drones, repurposing them for ambushes against the IDF.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 | Iran’s Mahfil program, known globally for its emphasis on Qur’an recitation and Qur’anic teachings, is steadily expanding its reach across the world. In a recent program organized by its coordinators, large-scale events were held in various African countries, where participation from local Qāris (Qur’an reciters) exceeded expectations. While many Arab countries are focused on bringing satanic rituals and haram in their nation, the Islamic Republic of Iran is making serious and sincere efforts to contribute to the cause of Islam offering the best of its capabilities in religious, educational, and cultural outreach.

🔹@enemywatch

🇵🇸 | An Israeli drone strike targeted the Rafei School in Jabalia, northern Gaza, on Tuesday morning, killing a Palestinian man and leaving his young children orphaned.

🔹@enemywatch

☑️ | Yes, Osama bin Laden and all those affiliated with Al-Qaeda, HTS, ISIS, and Saddam, Arab regimes' rulers are terrorists and will remain terrorists. There is no Islam to be found among them. If you stand with them, leave the channel.

🔹@enemywatch

📕 | The Dangerous Glorification of Hitler (l):

There is a disturbing trend in some resistance channels glorifying Adolf Hitler for killing Jews and related issues. Let us be clear: this is entirely unjustified. Hitler was a brutal despot, and there is no moral, religious, or political basis to praise his atrocities. No cause rooted in justice can ever be built upon hate.

Worryingly, one cleric have also begun indulging in this rhetoric, gathering sizeable audiences (Gen Zs), who support them regardless of the content they promote. This signals a dangerous drift toward dehumanization, sadism, and ideological decay. It is a moral obligation upon all conscientious voices to reject this trend and remain grounded in truth.

Imam Khamenei (H) has addressed this issue multiple times with moral clarity. He condemned both the crimes of Hitler and the new forms of imperial aggression modeled after him. Below are two examples of his statements that remain deeply relevant today:

“It’s possible that the crematoria which the Jews claim existed are a lie; but the crimes of Hitler are not a lie.”

— 19 Ordibehesht 1384 / May 9, 2005

Similarity between America’s excuse for invading Iraq and Hitler’s justification for starting World War II

“This attack [America’s invasion of Iraq] has broader dimensions beyond Iraq. It’s not just about the invasion of one country. An attack on any country — whether Iraq or another — by a distant power using artificial and fabricated pretexts is wrong in any case. People and public opinion around the world have condemned this action. Even in the United States itself, you can see massive protests on television — gatherings of people in the East and West of the world.

But for the Islamic world, the matter is more dangerous and has wider implications. One should not look at it merely as a state or power attacking another country for various motives. Of course, the Americans try to portray the issue differently. They pretend that their goal is to overthrow Saddam. Their justification is that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction or that he promotes and supports terrorism. They ask the Iraqi people to support the Americans. This is how the Americans present it to the world — but it’s a deception. Many people in the world are aware of this now.

The real issue is that a new, extremely dangerous and shameless form of Hitlerism has emerged in history. They are acting just like Hitler did at the start of World War II. When Hitler began his attacks on neighboring European countries, he justified his actions to the public by saying that Germany needed ‘living space’ — meaning that the country was too small for the German people and regime, and they needed more room to breathe and survive. Hitler used this ridiculous and false reasoning to convince both his own people and global public opinion.”

— 1 Farvardin 1382 / March 21, 2003

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 | Iran Strengthens Regional Ties and Launches Trade Council to Expand Investment in Iraq:

In recent days, Iran has achieved notable diplomatic progress, successfully resuming and strengthening relations with Iraq, Egypt, and Lebanon. On 2 June, Iran officially launched a Trade Policy Council for Iraq, aiming to halve the current trade imbalance and significantly enhance private sector participation. The initiative reflects Iran’s broader strategy to expand its economic and political influence across 14 Iraqi provinces.

The council is tasked with facilitating joint ventures, improving transport and customs mechanisms, and resolving persistent investor concerns related to ownership rights, banking infrastructure, and financial guarantees. Iraq’s ambassador to Tehran underscored the scale of cooperation, pointing to $70 billion worth of potential projects in key sectors such as energy, housing, and industry.

🔹@enemywatch

🇮🇷 Report — Today evening, Imam Khamenei (H) addressed a mourning gathering of Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (A) in his office: (1/2):

His speech is as follows:

When it is said that “the companions of Imam al-Sadiq (A) numbered four thousand,” where did they come from? Who formed them? As you say—who turned four hundred into four thousand? I have repeatedly quoted this narration from Imam al-Sadiq (peace be upon him) in these gatherings: “After Imam Husayn (A), the people turned back (on their faith), except for three.” In some narrations it says “except for three,” and in another, “except for five.”

That is, the tragedy of Karbala instilled such terror in the hearts of everyone across the Islamic world. They saw that this government was so brutal, so ruthless, that it didn’t even spare the grandson of the Prophet and treated the Prophet’s family in such a horrific manner. Hearts were struck with such fear that around Imam Zayn al-Abidin (A), only three, four, or five companions remained. And not all of them were even in Medina—one or two were in Kufa, for example. Imam Zayn al-Abidin gathered these few individuals and, over 35 years, gradually nurtured the groundwork.

Then came the time of Imam al-Baqir (A), and the number of followers began to increase. That same narration continues: “Then people began to join and became many.” Slowly, they began to connect and join. Who brought them together? It was Imam al-Baqir.

To remove fear from people’s hearts, merely discussing religious and jurisprudential topics is not enough—other things are needed. You can see this even today: in order to transform three or four individuals into hundreds and then thousands, one must act and speak in a different way. This is what Imam al-Baqir (A) did.

🔹@enemywatch

+

+

(2/2):

This idea that Imam al-Sadiq and Imam al-Baqir (A) took advantage of the conflict between the Umayyads and the Abbasids is incorrect—such conflict didn’t even exist during the time of Imam al-Baqir. There was absolutely no such dispute in that era. The Imam lived under extreme pressure from 95 AH to 114 AH—a span of nineteen years—and during that time, he was contemporaneous with Hisham and, before Hisham, with several other wicked, oppressive, and shameless rulers from the Umayyad and Marwanid dynasties.

Despite facing such brutal regimes, Imam al-Baqir (A) carried out his mission—the influence he had, the expansion of Shi‘i thought, and the growth in the number of committed followers in his circle were all due to his own efforts and spiritual leadership. We do not see a similar situation in the lives of the other Imams—not in this particular way. Of course, the later Imams—such as Imam al-Hadi, Imam al-Jawad, and Imam al-Askari—faced their own unique challenges and strategies, but what occurred during the time of Imam al-Baqir was distinct.

His situation was such that he was exiled—summoned to Damascus. In fact, Imam al-Baqir (A) is the only Imam who was taken to Damascus twice as a prisoner: once at the age of four during the reign of Yazid, and once during the reign of Hisham, when he and Imam al-Sadiq (A) were taken together. Important events took place during that second journey—events that must be studied carefully when understanding the life of Imam al-Baqir.

But even that wasn’t the end. The struggle had to continue. For that reason, the Imam gave specific instructions: “Mourn for me in Mina for ten days.” Not because the Imam needed mourning, but because of what it symbolized. In Mina, people from all corners of the Islamic world gather. When they come across a mourning gathering, they will ask: Who is this for? Why is there mourning here? What happened? In this way, the message of Imam al-Baqir reaches every corner of the Muslim world. This was a brilliant political strategy—one that combined spirituality with strategic communication

🔹@enemywatch