Enemy Watch — Official
🇺🇸 Breaking — Donald Trump is reportedly meeting with HTS rebranded terrorist leader Julani, with Turkish President Erdogan present virtually to introduce his rebranded terrorist proxy to the former U.S. president. The meeting aims to legitimize Julani as…
❎ | In a stunning and deeply embarrassing development for those Muslims who have long championed Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Julani as so-called Islamic leaders, Trump is now meeting with the rebranded HTS terrorist leader Julani, with Erdogan reportedly introducing him virtually: a move that reeks of political theater and Western orchestration. For years, segments of the Muslim world, often blinded by populist rhetoric and superficial gestures, have exalted Erdogan as a defender of Islam and Julani as a mujahid resisting oppression. Yet here we see both figures colluding in an effort to whitewash the crimes of HTS, the same faction responsible for heinous massacres, sectarian executions, and collaboration with Zionist intelligence networks in Syria. That such a meeting would take place under the blessing of a U.S. president, whose record in the Muslim world is soaked in blood and duplicity, is the final nail in the coffin for the illusion that these men represent Islamic resistance or leadership. Instead, they stand exposed as pawns in a geopolitical circus, serving American and Israeli interests while Muslims are slaughtered in Gaza and Syria. The shame is not only on the traitors, but on those who knowingly or ignorantly raised them as heroes.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯27🕊5😡3
✅ | Local Analysts Divided on American Intervention in Indo-Pak War: (1/2):
Following the abrupt cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan, Many Indian and Pakistani analysts and establishment figures have been left stunned by what they now describe as direct and unauthorized American intervention. This involvement—telegraphed via a tweet from Trump just forty minutes before the official announcements of ceasefire from both capitals—has stirred fierce debate in New Delhi’s strategic circles. Many argue that it represents a blatant breach of India’s long-standing policy of keeping third parties out of its bilateral disputes, particularly those concerning Pakistan.
Recalling the rule of the 1972 Shimla Agreement, Indian foreign policy thinkers are questioning whether the current government has quietly abandoned its commitment to bilateralism under pressure. Trump’s tweet, cryptic and deliberately vague, has led to speculation about whether Washington manipulated backchannels to defuse the conflict for its own geopolitical calculus: possibly to retain leverage over both South Asian rivals amid the wider U.S. contest with China.
Indian diplomats have demanded clarity from the Modi government. Several veteran strategists have called for a full public disclosure of any backdoor negotiations involving the United States. There is increasing concern that American intelligence and pressure may have been exerted not to prevent war, but to control its pace, shape its optics, and dictate the terms of its resolution. Indian commentators are openly asking: did the U.S. allow Pakistan to escalate initially, only to later engineer a ceasefire when it served American interests?
Critics are also probing whether American surveillance data was shared with Pakistan, enabling its military to mount targeted operations under the pretense of “retaliation.” If so, this would represent a major diplomatic betrayal. A former Indian intelligence officer remarked that “Uncle Sam played the referee, but also handed one team the playbook.”
Marco Rubio’s subsequent tweet urging the NSAs of both nations to meet and discuss Kashmir added further fuel to the fire. India has long rejected any third-party involvement in the Kashmir dispute, seeing such moves as veiled attempts to dilute its sovereignty. Yet now, under American pressure, even the pretense of bilateralism appears to be eroding. New Delhi finds itself cornered, also forced to explain why foreign actors are increasingly dictating terms on matters it once claimed were entirely domestic.
Meanwhile, Pakistani analysts, too, have begun expressing concern. While some initially celebrated the ceasefire as a strategic victory, a growing segment of Pakistan’s academic and defense circles fear that American involvement came at the cost of long-term autonomy. As one Lahore-based scholar put it: “It’s not a win if your moves were being made from Langley.”
In both countries, a small but growing group of neutral analysts is calling out what they see as a broader American strategy: to manage South Asia’s conflicts not for peace, but for profit. U.S. defense contractors, intelligence operatives, and political brokers are seen as using crises like this to justify further military sales, cyber cooperation, and strategic dependency. A former Indian foreign affairs official bluntly stated, “This wasn’t mediation—it was manipulation.”
The Modi administration is now accused of allowing Washington to blur the lines between diplomacy and domination. At the same time, Islamabad faces criticism for falling into a trap where sovereignty is mortgaged in exchange for temporary diplomatic shielding.
The most disturbing aspect is that both nuclear-armed states appear to have ceded some of their decision-making autonomy to a third party that neither respects their regional goals nor shares their civilizational visions. The U.S., without any official request, inserted itself into a volatile theatre and exacerbated tensions under the guise of control.
🔹@enemywatch
+
Following the abrupt cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan, Many Indian and Pakistani analysts and establishment figures have been left stunned by what they now describe as direct and unauthorized American intervention. This involvement—telegraphed via a tweet from Trump just forty minutes before the official announcements of ceasefire from both capitals—has stirred fierce debate in New Delhi’s strategic circles. Many argue that it represents a blatant breach of India’s long-standing policy of keeping third parties out of its bilateral disputes, particularly those concerning Pakistan.
Recalling the rule of the 1972 Shimla Agreement, Indian foreign policy thinkers are questioning whether the current government has quietly abandoned its commitment to bilateralism under pressure. Trump’s tweet, cryptic and deliberately vague, has led to speculation about whether Washington manipulated backchannels to defuse the conflict for its own geopolitical calculus: possibly to retain leverage over both South Asian rivals amid the wider U.S. contest with China.
Indian diplomats have demanded clarity from the Modi government. Several veteran strategists have called for a full public disclosure of any backdoor negotiations involving the United States. There is increasing concern that American intelligence and pressure may have been exerted not to prevent war, but to control its pace, shape its optics, and dictate the terms of its resolution. Indian commentators are openly asking: did the U.S. allow Pakistan to escalate initially, only to later engineer a ceasefire when it served American interests?
Critics are also probing whether American surveillance data was shared with Pakistan, enabling its military to mount targeted operations under the pretense of “retaliation.” If so, this would represent a major diplomatic betrayal. A former Indian intelligence officer remarked that “Uncle Sam played the referee, but also handed one team the playbook.”
Marco Rubio’s subsequent tweet urging the NSAs of both nations to meet and discuss Kashmir added further fuel to the fire. India has long rejected any third-party involvement in the Kashmir dispute, seeing such moves as veiled attempts to dilute its sovereignty. Yet now, under American pressure, even the pretense of bilateralism appears to be eroding. New Delhi finds itself cornered, also forced to explain why foreign actors are increasingly dictating terms on matters it once claimed were entirely domestic.
Meanwhile, Pakistani analysts, too, have begun expressing concern. While some initially celebrated the ceasefire as a strategic victory, a growing segment of Pakistan’s academic and defense circles fear that American involvement came at the cost of long-term autonomy. As one Lahore-based scholar put it: “It’s not a win if your moves were being made from Langley.”
In both countries, a small but growing group of neutral analysts is calling out what they see as a broader American strategy: to manage South Asia’s conflicts not for peace, but for profit. U.S. defense contractors, intelligence operatives, and political brokers are seen as using crises like this to justify further military sales, cyber cooperation, and strategic dependency. A former Indian foreign affairs official bluntly stated, “This wasn’t mediation—it was manipulation.”
The Modi administration is now accused of allowing Washington to blur the lines between diplomacy and domination. At the same time, Islamabad faces criticism for falling into a trap where sovereignty is mortgaged in exchange for temporary diplomatic shielding.
The most disturbing aspect is that both nuclear-armed states appear to have ceded some of their decision-making autonomy to a third party that neither respects their regional goals nor shares their civilizational visions. The U.S., without any official request, inserted itself into a volatile theatre and exacerbated tensions under the guise of control.
🔹@enemywatch
+
😱5💯3
Enemy Watch — Official
✅ | Local Analysts Divided on American Intervention in Indo-Pak War: (1/2): Following the abrupt cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan, Many Indian and Pakistani analysts and establishment figures have been left stunned by what they now describe…
+
(2/2):
This uninvited intervention, done without explicitly acknowledging who was right or wrong, larger or smaller, only deepened strategic confusion.
Now, voices from both sides are warning that such interventions could lead to a war bigger and more catastrophic than anything previously imagined one where decisions are made not in New Delhi or Islamabad, but in Washington, D.C.
As the dust settles, new questions are emerging. Were the ceasefire conditions genuinely agreed upon by India and Pakistan, or were they imposed externally under the guise of diplomacy? Was this about conflict resolution—or a strategic rehearsal for future leverage in Asia?
If India claims it neutralized terror camps and Pakistan claims to have pushed back effectively, what will be the narrative moving forward? More importantly, who controls that narrative?
Rubio’s mention of Kashmir complicates matters further. If Washington insists on framing the Kashmir issue as a multilateral security concern, it risks stripping the region of any autonomous political voice. Kashmir, already suffocating under militarization and censorship, could become a pawn in a larger Cold War redux between the U.S., China, and regional powers.
Despite battlefield bravado and media victories, the core threat remains: a creeping loss of sovereignty to an empire that intervenes not for peace, but for control. Neutral voices across South Asia are sounding the alarm—if Delhi and Islamabad continue to allow this, the next war may not be theirs to start, but it will certainly be theirs to suffer.
🔹@enemywatch
(2/2):
This uninvited intervention, done without explicitly acknowledging who was right or wrong, larger or smaller, only deepened strategic confusion.
Now, voices from both sides are warning that such interventions could lead to a war bigger and more catastrophic than anything previously imagined one where decisions are made not in New Delhi or Islamabad, but in Washington, D.C.
As the dust settles, new questions are emerging. Were the ceasefire conditions genuinely agreed upon by India and Pakistan, or were they imposed externally under the guise of diplomacy? Was this about conflict resolution—or a strategic rehearsal for future leverage in Asia?
If India claims it neutralized terror camps and Pakistan claims to have pushed back effectively, what will be the narrative moving forward? More importantly, who controls that narrative?
Rubio’s mention of Kashmir complicates matters further. If Washington insists on framing the Kashmir issue as a multilateral security concern, it risks stripping the region of any autonomous political voice. Kashmir, already suffocating under militarization and censorship, could become a pawn in a larger Cold War redux between the U.S., China, and regional powers.
Despite battlefield bravado and media victories, the core threat remains: a creeping loss of sovereignty to an empire that intervenes not for peace, but for control. Neutral voices across South Asia are sounding the alarm—if Delhi and Islamabad continue to allow this, the next war may not be theirs to start, but it will certainly be theirs to suffer.
🔹@enemywatch
🙏11
🥀 | While the Saudis were dancing with Trump and Qatar’s emir was dining with him, Julani was kissing his hands and others were busy online — Gaza was bleeding, and carts were being loaded with the remains of entire households today. The already thin cover over these so-called Islamic nations has now been completely stripped away, exposing them for what they truly are: mere stars on the flag of the United States of America — the same America whose bombs are killing Gaza.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💔34😡7💯4😱1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🏴| After gaining immunity and support from Trump, ideological backing from Wahhabis, and endorsement from the treacherous "sect" from Muslims, Julani’s terrorists have resumed their massacres in Syria.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
😡31💔4
Enemy Watch — Official
☑️ | The value of the arms deal between the United States and Saudi Arabia stands at $142 billion—a staggering figure roughly equivalent to Israel’s defense budget for seven consecutive years. This isn’t just a transaction; it’s a strategic message. It signals…
☑️ | In this context, Indian propaganda machinery will likely try to spotlight the Balochistan issue in the media—highlighting some real and tragic stories of assaults on Baloch dissent, for which the Pakistani regime is indeed responsible. However, this doesn’t justify the chaos India creates by using this matter to empower its proxies and destabilize the region. It remains largely a political rant, not a genuine concern. This issue is just a balloon not the real one.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
💯13
😱14🔥3
❎ | It is choking, heart-crushing, and suffocating to witness how the Arab nations — their leaders, scholars, and even much of their public — are simply sitting, praying, eating, and sleeping, as Gaza bleeds and entire generations are wiped out. How can they allow this to happen in front of their eyes? Where is their sense of honor? Where are their ulama, their preachers, their so-called protectors of Islam? Have their sects and beliefs been so thoroughly hijacked, so brutally dismantled, that they no longer recognize the oppression and humiliation of their own ummah?
Trump — the Pharaoh of our time, the one with blood on his hands from every corner of the world — is being honored, escorted like royalty, signed into trillion-dollar deals. For what? For more weapons? For more silence? For more normalization with the enemies of Allah and His Messenger?
Do these Muslims no longer believe in the Day of Judgment? Have they forgotten that Allah says:
“And do not incline toward those who do wrong, lest you be touched by the Fire…” (Qur’an 11:113)
“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed — then it is they who are the disbelievers.” (Qur’an 5:44)
“Indeed, those who disbelieve spend their wealth to avert people from the way of Allah. So they will spend it; then it will be for them a [source of] regret; then they will be overcome.” (Qur’an 8:36)
Where are their muftis? Where are the Friday sermons that once used to tremble with the words of justice? What is the purpose of your madrasas if their graduates’ hearts are dead and their minds are filled with fear of tyrants instead of fear of Allah? How can you allow the Zionist regime to slaughter your brothers and sisters, while you compete over who will host the Pharaoh of this age first — giving him red carpets and oil deals, as if he were your savior and not your oppressor?
This is not neutrality. This is betrayal. This is silence soaked in blood.
The Qur’an warns us again and again — about siding with oppressors, about selling the religion for a small price, about being among the hypocrites:
“Indeed, the hypocrites will be in the lowest depths of the Fire — and never will you find for them a helper.” (Qur’an 4:145)
The question remains: how many more massacres will it take before your mosques wake up? Before your ulama speak? Before your people say — enough.
🔹@enemywatch
+
Trump — the Pharaoh of our time, the one with blood on his hands from every corner of the world — is being honored, escorted like royalty, signed into trillion-dollar deals. For what? For more weapons? For more silence? For more normalization with the enemies of Allah and His Messenger?
Do these Muslims no longer believe in the Day of Judgment? Have they forgotten that Allah says:
“And do not incline toward those who do wrong, lest you be touched by the Fire…” (Qur’an 11:113)
“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed — then it is they who are the disbelievers.” (Qur’an 5:44)
“Indeed, those who disbelieve spend their wealth to avert people from the way of Allah. So they will spend it; then it will be for them a [source of] regret; then they will be overcome.” (Qur’an 8:36)
Where are their muftis? Where are the Friday sermons that once used to tremble with the words of justice? What is the purpose of your madrasas if their graduates’ hearts are dead and their minds are filled with fear of tyrants instead of fear of Allah? How can you allow the Zionist regime to slaughter your brothers and sisters, while you compete over who will host the Pharaoh of this age first — giving him red carpets and oil deals, as if he were your savior and not your oppressor?
This is not neutrality. This is betrayal. This is silence soaked in blood.
The Qur’an warns us again and again — about siding with oppressors, about selling the religion for a small price, about being among the hypocrites:
“Indeed, the hypocrites will be in the lowest depths of the Fire — and never will you find for them a helper.” (Qur’an 4:145)
The question remains: how many more massacres will it take before your mosques wake up? Before your ulama speak? Before your people say — enough.
🔹@enemywatch
+
💯23😭4
Enemy Watch — Official
❎ | It is choking, heart-crushing, and suffocating to witness how the Arab nations — their leaders, scholars, and even much of their public — are simply sitting, praying, eating, and sleeping, as Gaza bleeds and entire generations are wiped out. How can they…
+
How far have we fallen…
While Gaza turns to ash, while the cries of orphaned children rise higher than your minarets, you dine, you shake hands, you sign papers soaked in blood.
The so-called Abraham Accords — what a mockery. What an abomination.
You dare invoke the name of Prophet Ibrahim (a), the father of monotheism, the breaker of idols, the challenger of tyrants — to bless your allegiance to murderers and occupiers?
Have you forgotten that Ibrahim (a) was the one who stood alone against the empire?
He said:
“Indeed, I have turned my face toward He who created the heavens and the earth, inclining toward truth, and I am not of those who associate others with Allah.” (Qur’an 6:79)
Would he have stood with Jews and imperialists? Would he have accepted Jerusalem under the boot of those who desecrate al-Aqsa?
And where is Sudais now?
The man whose voice once echoed through the Haram, now nothing but an echo of silence. He wept for leaders, not for the oppressed.
Where are the Wahhabi da’wah preachers? Where is their courage? They filled the airwaves with sermons on obedience to rulers, yet when those rulers kneel before Zion, they say nothing.
Where is Jamaat-e-Islami? Where are the Deobandis?
You built seminaries for decades — but for what? To breed silence in the face of genocide? To produce scholars who debate fiqh while bombs fall on hospitals?
This is the Ummah that once made tyrants tremble.
Now it trembles before microphones, fearful of visa bans, of being labeled.
But Allah is watching. And Allah does not forget.
“And do not think that Allah is unaware of what the wrongdoers do. He only delays them for a Day when eyes will stare in horror.” (Qur’an 14:42)
You feared the anger of kings, but not the wrath of the King of kings.
You feared economic sanctions more than divine punishment.
You feared losing your palaces more than losing your place in Paradise.
So listen closely — those who have sold the Ummah for a seat at the table of tyrants:
Your names may be written in newspapers today, but history will curse you.
And the oppressed of Gaza, of Yemen, of Syria, of Kashmir — they will stand on the Day of Judgment and point toward you.
And what will you say?
“And those who wronged themselves will say, ‘Our Lord, give us a way out.’ But they will not be given it.” (Qur’an 14:44)
Repent now — or fall with your masters.
Because every deal you make with Pharaoh, every alliance you forge with Haman, every word you silence for the sake of Dunya — is being written.
And the Reckoner never forgets.
🔹@enemywatch
How far have we fallen…
While Gaza turns to ash, while the cries of orphaned children rise higher than your minarets, you dine, you shake hands, you sign papers soaked in blood.
The so-called Abraham Accords — what a mockery. What an abomination.
You dare invoke the name of Prophet Ibrahim (a), the father of monotheism, the breaker of idols, the challenger of tyrants — to bless your allegiance to murderers and occupiers?
Have you forgotten that Ibrahim (a) was the one who stood alone against the empire?
He said:
“Indeed, I have turned my face toward He who created the heavens and the earth, inclining toward truth, and I am not of those who associate others with Allah.” (Qur’an 6:79)
Would he have stood with Jews and imperialists? Would he have accepted Jerusalem under the boot of those who desecrate al-Aqsa?
And where is Sudais now?
The man whose voice once echoed through the Haram, now nothing but an echo of silence. He wept for leaders, not for the oppressed.
Where are the Wahhabi da’wah preachers? Where is their courage? They filled the airwaves with sermons on obedience to rulers, yet when those rulers kneel before Zion, they say nothing.
Where is Jamaat-e-Islami? Where are the Deobandis?
You built seminaries for decades — but for what? To breed silence in the face of genocide? To produce scholars who debate fiqh while bombs fall on hospitals?
This is the Ummah that once made tyrants tremble.
Now it trembles before microphones, fearful of visa bans, of being labeled.
But Allah is watching. And Allah does not forget.
“And do not think that Allah is unaware of what the wrongdoers do. He only delays them for a Day when eyes will stare in horror.” (Qur’an 14:42)
You feared the anger of kings, but not the wrath of the King of kings.
You feared economic sanctions more than divine punishment.
You feared losing your palaces more than losing your place in Paradise.
So listen closely — those who have sold the Ummah for a seat at the table of tyrants:
Your names may be written in newspapers today, but history will curse you.
And the oppressed of Gaza, of Yemen, of Syria, of Kashmir — they will stand on the Day of Judgment and point toward you.
And what will you say?
“And those who wronged themselves will say, ‘Our Lord, give us a way out.’ But they will not be given it.” (Qur’an 14:44)
Repent now — or fall with your masters.
Because every deal you make with Pharaoh, every alliance you forge with Haman, every word you silence for the sake of Dunya — is being written.
And the Reckoner never forgets.
🔹@enemywatch
🙏17😭6❤3
Forwarded from Basira Press
❗️ Jackson Hinkle's close comrade calls Axis of Resistance "Axis of Cowards"!
These tweets are from "Ruslan," a member of RTSG, a research group closely related to the American Communist Party (ACP), which Hinkle serves on the steering committee. The head of RTSG, Noah "Rev Laskaris" Engesser (who used to use "he/him" pronouns), is also on the steering committee of ACP.
A shortened flowchart: RTSG member who insults the resistance —> RTSG's head —> ACP steering committee —> Jackson Hinkle
The people who invited Jackson to Lebanon and Yemen are most likely unaware of these things as they are not involved in English-language media circles to know these intricacies. Ruslan has said "Khamenei is a weak man" and has even insulted the religion of Islam itself. We hope organizers can look deeper into the arrogance of ACP's insults before considering inviting them into West Asia. This is why seeking western validation is a double-edged sword — we can build bridges with sincere and principled western activists/journalists, but we don't need them for validating our cause.
These guys all live in America and their activism is limited to posting memes and clickbait/engagement farming. By what arrogance do they think they have the right to insult the resistance axis? What would happen if 95% of the ACP leadership was taken out in targeted assassinations like what happened to Hezbollah? Their LARPer party would be so far gone off the internet they wouldn't even exist in the recycle bin of computers.
Who are these arrogant Americans to call cowards? Have they given even one martyr in the way of their own cause?
Notice how Imam Khamenei is insulted for striving through some of the most difficult challenges of literally the entire world being against him, all of which takes place in real life and not online, but he has a blind fanaticism for Hinkle, whom is infallible and cannot be criticized. Perhaps Imam Khamenei should sit on the computer and post Stalin memes and generic all caps "ISRAEL IS A WAR CRIMINAL" clickbait posts to be considered legit.
The Pakistani Army, a vassal of the United States, is considered legit for a short-lived skirmish defending against the Zionist-Hindutva aggression, but Iran is a "failed state" for withstanding decades of the most severe hybrid warfare.
Accusing Iran of collapsing Syria, when President Assad or some elements within the Syrian government/military ignored intel sent to them by the IRGC and leadership about the impending danger from Idlib. What is Iran supposed to do, be like America and illegally invade without the government's permission? To do what, save a dying, underpaid Syrian Arab Army that retreats from its posts without putting up a fight?
What about the Russian-led Astana process which contributed partially to Idlib being a takfiri stronghold? Or Assad's normalization with the Arab League, which caused him to distance himself from the resistance, before Gulf kingdoms backstabbed him?
Iran did not sell out Syria. At best, Pezeshkian's weakness emboldened the enemy, but it was not anything direct or intentional. And who elected Pezeshkian? The Iranian people! Maybe these "MAGA Communist" LARPers live in an internet fantasy of pretending to be Stalin all day, so perhaps they think that Iran should just Stalin all the people who voted Pezeshkian via massive, bloody purges of killings, exiles, jailings, poisonings, etc., which would not lead to long-lasting, organic change of the peoples' hearts so that they never beg for liberalism again.
During Jackson's trips to Lebanon and Yemen, we exposed his US intelligence ties. That should be enough of a red flag. Claiming to be pro-resistance while tolerating insults against Imam Khamenei is another red flag. What did Sayyed Nasrallah, whose funeral Jackson went to, think about the Leader? What about Ansarallah? Why hasn't ACP condemned this type of arrogant, overly-pessimistic language?
We hope that Jackson and his circle of entitled, arrogant Americans is never invited to another resistance bloc country again, God willing.
These tweets are from "Ruslan," a member of RTSG, a research group closely related to the American Communist Party (ACP), which Hinkle serves on the steering committee. The head of RTSG, Noah "Rev Laskaris" Engesser (who used to use "he/him" pronouns), is also on the steering committee of ACP.
A shortened flowchart: RTSG member who insults the resistance —> RTSG's head —> ACP steering committee —> Jackson Hinkle
The people who invited Jackson to Lebanon and Yemen are most likely unaware of these things as they are not involved in English-language media circles to know these intricacies. Ruslan has said "Khamenei is a weak man" and has even insulted the religion of Islam itself. We hope organizers can look deeper into the arrogance of ACP's insults before considering inviting them into West Asia. This is why seeking western validation is a double-edged sword — we can build bridges with sincere and principled western activists/journalists, but we don't need them for validating our cause.
These guys all live in America and their activism is limited to posting memes and clickbait/engagement farming. By what arrogance do they think they have the right to insult the resistance axis? What would happen if 95% of the ACP leadership was taken out in targeted assassinations like what happened to Hezbollah? Their LARPer party would be so far gone off the internet they wouldn't even exist in the recycle bin of computers.
Who are these arrogant Americans to call cowards? Have they given even one martyr in the way of their own cause?
Notice how Imam Khamenei is insulted for striving through some of the most difficult challenges of literally the entire world being against him, all of which takes place in real life and not online, but he has a blind fanaticism for Hinkle, whom is infallible and cannot be criticized. Perhaps Imam Khamenei should sit on the computer and post Stalin memes and generic all caps "ISRAEL IS A WAR CRIMINAL" clickbait posts to be considered legit.
The Pakistani Army, a vassal of the United States, is considered legit for a short-lived skirmish defending against the Zionist-Hindutva aggression, but Iran is a "failed state" for withstanding decades of the most severe hybrid warfare.
Accusing Iran of collapsing Syria, when President Assad or some elements within the Syrian government/military ignored intel sent to them by the IRGC and leadership about the impending danger from Idlib. What is Iran supposed to do, be like America and illegally invade without the government's permission? To do what, save a dying, underpaid Syrian Arab Army that retreats from its posts without putting up a fight?
What about the Russian-led Astana process which contributed partially to Idlib being a takfiri stronghold? Or Assad's normalization with the Arab League, which caused him to distance himself from the resistance, before Gulf kingdoms backstabbed him?
Iran did not sell out Syria. At best, Pezeshkian's weakness emboldened the enemy, but it was not anything direct or intentional. And who elected Pezeshkian? The Iranian people! Maybe these "MAGA Communist" LARPers live in an internet fantasy of pretending to be Stalin all day, so perhaps they think that Iran should just Stalin all the people who voted Pezeshkian via massive, bloody purges of killings, exiles, jailings, poisonings, etc., which would not lead to long-lasting, organic change of the peoples' hearts so that they never beg for liberalism again.
During Jackson's trips to Lebanon and Yemen, we exposed his US intelligence ties. That should be enough of a red flag. Claiming to be pro-resistance while tolerating insults against Imam Khamenei is another red flag. What did Sayyed Nasrallah, whose funeral Jackson went to, think about the Leader? What about Ansarallah? Why hasn't ACP condemned this type of arrogant, overly-pessimistic language?
We hope that Jackson and his circle of entitled, arrogant Americans is never invited to another resistance bloc country again, God willing.
🤝12💯6❤3
🇵🇸 Breaking: An Israeli settler was killed and two others injured in a shooting operation near Salfit. Abu Ubaydah (H) and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad congratulated the attack, calling it a natural act of revenge against the Zionist occupation.
🔹@enemywatch
🔹@enemywatch
❤24
Enemy Watch — Official
+ 🟩 Report: Recent Operations: (-13 May): 1. Operation in Shuja’iyya – Coordinated Ground Ambush A field commander in Saraya al-Quds confirmed that at exactly 12:45 AM on Saturday, their fighters launched a targeted operation east of the Shuja’iyya neighborhood…
+
🟩 Report: Recent Operations: (-15 May):
• Al-Qassam Brigades: Clashed with a Zionist engineering unit and captured a military vehicle driver east of Shuja’iyya, Gaza City (11-05-2025).
• Saraya al-Quds – Missile Force: Launched rocket barrages on Ashdod, Ashkelon, Sderot, and Gaza envelope settlements in response to Zionist massacres.
• Saraya al-Quds – Jenin Battalion (Silat al-Harithiya Company): Engaged invading forces on multiple fronts, targeting troops and military vehicles with heavy fire, causing confirmed casualties.
🔹@enemywatch
🟩 Report: Recent Operations: (-15 May):
• Al-Qassam Brigades: Clashed with a Zionist engineering unit and captured a military vehicle driver east of Shuja’iyya, Gaza City (11-05-2025).
• Saraya al-Quds – Missile Force: Launched rocket barrages on Ashdod, Ashkelon, Sderot, and Gaza envelope settlements in response to Zionist massacres.
• Saraya al-Quds – Jenin Battalion (Silat al-Harithiya Company): Engaged invading forces on multiple fronts, targeting troops and military vehicles with heavy fire, causing confirmed casualties.
🔹@enemywatch
❤15😱1🕊1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇵🇸 | Al-Quds Brigades:
Scenes from the Al-Quds Brigades' rocket force's bombardment of “Ashdod,” “Ashkelon,” “Sderot,” and the Gaza Envelope settlements with barrages of rockets, in response to the zionist enemy's crimes against our Palestinian people.
🔹@enemywatch
Scenes from the Al-Quds Brigades' rocket force's bombardment of “Ashdod,” “Ashkelon,” “Sderot,” and the Gaza Envelope settlements with barrages of rockets, in response to the zionist enemy's crimes against our Palestinian people.
🔹@enemywatch
❤28🔥6🙏1🕊1
Forwarded from NEW WORLD ORDYR 313 (0 EIE)
🇱🇧🏴☠️ ☄️ | A Lebanese Islamic singer charged with spying for israel
🔸 Lebanese authorities have charged Mohammad Hadi Saleh, an Islamic singer, with espionage for Israel. He has been accused of causing the deaths of Lebanese citizens, including Hezbollah members, in return for money
🔸 Judicial sources said Saleh was initially summoned for questioning over alleged financial fraud related to investments in stocks and the stock market. However, during the investigation, authorities discovered suspicious conversations on his phone with Israeli agents.
🔸 It was revealed that Saleh had been cooperating with Israel since the beginning of its latest aggression against Lebanon. He received $23,000 in total for his actions.
🔸 Saleh, known for his religious singing, would take photos with martyrs and post them online—information which Mossad used to identify targets. He would then perform elegies for them, disguising his betrayal.
🔸 He also provided the coordinates of Hezbollah security sites, which led to deadly attacks and the martyrdom of several Lebanese, including key Hezbollah figures.
🟡 @NEWWORLDORDYR
🔸 Lebanese authorities have charged Mohammad Hadi Saleh, an Islamic singer, with espionage for Israel. He has been accused of causing the deaths of Lebanese citizens, including Hezbollah members, in return for money
🔸 Judicial sources said Saleh was initially summoned for questioning over alleged financial fraud related to investments in stocks and the stock market. However, during the investigation, authorities discovered suspicious conversations on his phone with Israeli agents.
🔸 It was revealed that Saleh had been cooperating with Israel since the beginning of its latest aggression against Lebanon. He received $23,000 in total for his actions.
🔸 Saleh, known for his religious singing, would take photos with martyrs and post them online—information which Mossad used to identify targets. He would then perform elegies for them, disguising his betrayal.
🔸 He also provided the coordinates of Hezbollah security sites, which led to deadly attacks and the martyrdom of several Lebanese, including key Hezbollah figures.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡58